User talk:Kadellar/2008-2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2008-2011

PuigMayorAvión.jpg

Hecho: Image:PuigMayorAvión2-edit.jpg. ¡Saludos! --Xavigivax (talk) 08:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:Borrado

Hola Kadellar, en cuanto la imagen haya sido sustituida por la nueva en todas las wikis donde pudiera haber sido usada la borro, gracias por avisar. Los nombres de archivo no se pueden modificar una vez subidos, hay que borrar y subir de nuevo, es una lata pero no se puede hacer nada :) Un saludo. Anna (talk) 01:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Hecho. Anna (talk) 18:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

suspect vote

Hi. The vote on FPC is valid. It is suspect as this person went straight to FPC after registering and started voting. This is allowed but could indicate meat/sock puppetting. It is meant as a warning to the voter in case he/she had vote rigging mind. The vote was not cancelled. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 19:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Featured Picture promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:02.Trinidad (59).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:02.Trinidad (59).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

File:CoupéTuning.jpg

I just know a thing or two about both the Civic and the Tiburon - their dashboards, as well as the shape of the back window, are their characteristic features. I'm completely positive that the car on the photo is a 1992-1995 Honda Civic. What's more, I'm about 80% sure it's not even a coupe, but a hatchback. --Zahn (talk) 12:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Perfil alar-1.jpg

"Un poco sucio", lo tuyo es de ser optimista... La verdad, es que para el tipo de gráfico, jpg no es el formato adecuado. Yo de tí, lo volvería a crear, pero con Inkscape y en formato vectorial. El resultado sería el óptimo. Realiza tu petición de vectorización aquí: [1]. ¡Saludos! --Xavigivax (talk) 22:20, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Ya está borrada. Un saludo. Anna (talk) 00:42, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Hola Kadellar, a los escaneos de partituras o gráficos que subas o hayas subido les debes poner el origen (libro, folleto, etc.) de donde los hayas sacado y el año de publicación, porque si son recientes lo más probable es que tengan copyright. Anna (talk) 00:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Featured picture promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Eden Project geodesic domes panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eden Project geodesic domes panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Karel (talk) 20:34, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Knin (grb).gif

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


File:Knin Wappen.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:58, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Morus bassanus adu.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Morus bassanus adu.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Karel (talk) 21:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


File:Madrid_2016-cristal.jpg

File:Madrid_2016-cristal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eusebius (talk) 20:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Guadalajara-aire.jpg

Hola, Kadellar. Me he permitido modificar la imagen File:Guadalajara-aire.jpg para darle más brillo y sea más visible. Si no te importa, y con tu permiso, podría subir esta modificación que substituyese a la que actualmente hay. Espero tu respuesta. Saludos. Sonsaz (talk) 15:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Si, es que en un principio me aparecía como la original, con poco brillo y color, y la volví a subir otra vez por ver si finalmente se quedaba como pretendía. Gracias por la atención. Saludos. Sonsaz (talk) 17:22, 6 November 2009 (UTC)


Category:Euro coins (Malta)

Category:Euro coins (Malta) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:10, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Your Flickr uploads

Hello Kadellar/2008-2011!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! Two hints ahead:

  • Always upload the highest resolution of a photograph that is available on flickr
  • You can use this tool for your flickr uploads. It makes the hole procedure much easier and faster for you!

Thank you for your support! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 17:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Kadellar!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --ZooFari 05:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ebony Bones-01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ebony Bones-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Deletion request

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miguel de Cervantes - Monumento a Miguel de Cervantes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 18:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre Sacyr Vallehermoso & Torre Caja Madrid de noche - at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment To me it is not a good image: Distortion, and the building of left is disturbing, but I'm not sure--Lmbuga 01:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Imo QI --Mbdortmund 17:49, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Triosphere - Ida Haukland - 01.jpg

Hi! Just to let you know that I have reduced the noise in the image using another software. If you dont like the new version feel free to revert! --Jovian Eye talk 02:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triosphere - Ida Haukland - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good after noise reduction. --Jovianeye 02:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Madrid - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment at least a little perspective distortion correction is needed --Carschten 20:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Is it better right now? Kadellar 13:17, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 Support I'm surprised that this small distortion correction looks much better now. QI imo --Carschten 08:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A340-642 - Iberia - EC-JLE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Schlaier 15:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boeing 747-475 - Aerolíneas Argentinas - LV-ALJ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 16:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

what a great photo!

Kudos to you for that Ebony bones photo! I stink here in Commons, but have uploaded over 1,500 photos (you can see a tiny rotating gallery on my en.wikipedia userpage, and above them a link to the list of others uploaded here. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 02:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Lanzarote 5 Luc Viatour.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lanzarote 5 Luc Viatour.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de la Soledad (Fuente el Saz de Jarama) - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but you can use some proportion next time --Someone35 13:03, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carlos III - Jardines de Sabatini - Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for meJean-Pol GRANDMONT 19:13, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de la Soledad (Fuente el Saz de Jarama) - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Airwolf 22:32, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Manuel Machado.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Manuel Machado.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Manuel Machado.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 14:07, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Foto borrada

Hola Kadellar, el problema es que la legislación española aplicable a la época habla de 80, no de 70 años :-(

Lo siento. Un cordial saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 14:48, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de la Soledad (Fuente el Saz de Jarama) - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. nice composition --Ralf Roletschek 19:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 Comment I think that it can be QI, but the cross is unsharp. Vigneting to me. chromatic aberrations (see note)--Lmbuga 20:33, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 Oppose, but I'm not sure: See above--Lmbuga 20:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
The composition is not good: The image is too tight and the cross is too tight--Lmbuga 21:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Sorry: I don't like the image--Lmbuga 21:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
9,2 megapixels--Lmbuga 02:05, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 Comment I think I've checked the little CA. The cross is intentionally unsharp, it's a complementary object in the picture, here I wanted to focus just on the hermitage. Kadellar 19:18, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 Support aaahhhh, composition... --Carschten 19:23, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 Support I understand (intentionality) and good now. Thanks--Lmbuga 21:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre Sacyr Vallehermoso & Torre Caja Madrid reflejadas en Torre de Cristal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting and good quality. --Cayambe 07:34, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de la Soledad (Fuente el Saz de Jarama) - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:59, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Sigrid_Undset-Lillehammer.jpg

File:Sigrid_Undset-Lillehammer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

176.11.170.226 21:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Sigrid_Undset-Lillehammer.jpg

File:Sigrid_Undset-Lillehammer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

176.11.170.226 21:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Kadellar,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:38, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: Traslado de categoría

Acabo de poner el comando correspondiente para el bot que ejecuta cambios de categorías en [2]. Ahora hay que esperar que lo procese. Saludos, Alpertron (talk) 13:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: QIC mezquita

Hola, gracias por tu mensaje, acabo de retocarla, mira a ver si ahora cumple los requisitos de QIC. Oye, impresionante lo que has subido, yo he subido muchas imágenes pero no de tanta calidad...te mando un saludo, --Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Gracias por estar atento. Si te gustar revisar me pregunto si podría consultarte antes de colocar un par más para su revisión. La cantidad de imágenes que reciben el visto bueno es bajo en relación con la cantidad de imágenes que propongo. De hecho, tango unas 10 más ahora mismo como candidatas y tengo unas cuantas más en la recámara. Saludos, --Poco a poco (talk) 20:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Aparte de las que están esperando respuesta en QIC serían nada menos que todas estas:
Imagino que te he abrumado, ni que decir que me puedes responder cuando quieras o también mandarme a la mierda :) --Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 10 December 2011 (UTC) PD: Hay 3 que están pendientes de que el bot las rote 90 grados.
Muchas gracias por tu tiempo y consejos! Claro que puedes mejorar lo que quieras, faltaba más! Coincido con tus apreciaciones, las que no pasarían tu corte son aquellas que no me convencían del todo (especialmente la foto de Ronda). No aprecio la CA de la foto del Taj Mahal en el arco, ¿puedes abrirme los ojos? :) A todo esto, no había visto la mancha de la mezquita de Abu Dhabi hasta que lo comentaste, ¿cóme te libraste de ella? ¿qué software utilizas? ¿NX2? ¿GIMP? ¿SW para tu PowerShot?. Saludos y gracias por tu paciencia, --Poco a poco (talk) 20:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Con la simetría del Taj Mahal con los jardines tengo problemas, el edificio debo girarlo en sentido contrario a las agujas del reloj, pero los motivos en las fuentes en sentido contrario, vamos, que creo que va a ser complicado porque busco una simetría que no existe... --Poco a poco (talk) 20:43, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Hola, el Taj Majal en el arco ha quedado muy bien, muchas gracias! la he nominado a QI y no han tardado nada en aprobarla. Respecto a la otra imagen del Taj Mahal con perspective deformation, agradezco tus esfuerzos, pero finalmente me he decantado por la versión del 10 de diciembre (File:El Taj Mahal-Agra India0022.JPG) que creé con NShift. Además, de esta herramienta utilizo NX2 y Gimp, las 3 herramientas las tengo instaladas desde hace poco, pero poco a poco voy aprendiendo. Especialmente la última es recomendable, gracias por tu paciencia y hasta pronto, --Poco a poco (talk) 19:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Finalmente me he decido por proponer un puñado de las fotos de arriba. Creo que las críticas han sido, por lo general, certeras y eso me ayuda a evaluar por mí mismo la calidad de las imágenes. También me he fijado en muchas otras (especialmente las que no pasan el corte). Ya puestos, estoy leyendo un libro de fotografía que me regalaron hace un año y estoy recabando información de Internet (especialmente de las wikis inglesa y alemana) sobre diferentes tácticas. También me he bajado un puñado de aplicaciones para mejorar las imágenes y veo cosechando los primeros resultados, aunque sigue habiando desviaciones y problemas que aún no sea solventar. Resumiendo, no hace falta que me responda sobre las imágenes de arriba, algunas están algo verdes y otras las he propuesto así o tras alguna mejora. También he decidido comprarme un objetivo macro para fotos en tamaño real (1:1), ese tipo de instantáneas siempre me interesaron. Abrazos y feliz Navidad! Poco a poco (talk) 13:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30 St Mary Axe (Swiss Re Building) and St Andrew Undershaft church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, shows project scope. --Katarighe 20:31, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Re:Propuestas QI + Feliz Navidad

Hola Kadellar, no te preocupes, yo voy a mi ritmo y creo que le voy cogiendo el tranquillo. Gracias por todo y feliz Navidad para ti y los tuyos, hasta pronto, --Poco a poco (talk) 16:24, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

ISO

Hola Kadellar, muchas gracias por el consejo. Lo del ISO ya lo tengo claro, pero hasta hace poco no, y las fotos que he venido nominando tienen un par de años. Son cosas que he aprendido en los últimos meses o casi mejor semanas. De todas formas, la culpa la solía tener la cámara porque antes hacía casi todo en modo automático. Pronto subiré fotos más recientes donde, espero, se verá mejora. Gracias por estar ahí y un abrazo, Poco a poco (talk) 18:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Big Ben - 01.jpg

Hi Kadellar. Because I think your image File:Big Ben - 01.jpg is not bad and can be a QI, I uploaded a retouched version in the file history. I corrected the distortions and cropped (approached to the rule of thirds - I think it's not too tight, but I like it as it is at the moment, too...). Maybe it's better? Grüße aus Deutschland --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Re: QI posibles

Hola Kadellar, gracias dedicar de nuevo tu tiempo a mis menesteres. El caso es que no nominé esas dos imágenes por la falta de simetría del Taj Mahal y porque en el detalle de la columna pensé que criticarían el corte inferior, pero siguiendo tu consejo las voy a nominar. Eso sí, preferiría que fueran otros los que juzquen si son QIs o no, valoro mucho tu opinión, pero me gustaría que fuera una tercera opinión la que nos de la razón a los 2 :) Espero que entiendas mi postura, aunque quizás peque de excelo de celo. No sé, puede que sea mi labor de biblio de estos años que me hace ser extremadamente precavido. Gracias por todo y feliz 2012!! --Poco a poco (talk) 22:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trafalgar Square, fountain and National Gallery - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough, some ghosts are unavoidable. And very interesting view.--PereslavlFoto 00:05, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Ben - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit soft, but nice light and composition --Carschten 16:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio España - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentA bit of perspective distortion. (es) Repara en las líneas verticales laterales. Me gustaría que las pudieses enderezar un poco, aunque no sea totalmente. Gracias--Lmbuga 04:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
✓ Done He arreglado eso y algo de CA que no vi en su día. I've fixed that and some CA I hadn't seen before. Kadellar 12:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
QI. Mejor, buena--Lmbuga 23:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Ben - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 21:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kadellar/2008-2011&oldid=65738768"