User talk:Junafani

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search



File tagging File:Hlt as.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hlt as.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hlt as.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Apalsola tc 09:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --junafani (?) 22:33, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the Spa-Francorchamps track map you uploaded has an error (Pouhon, not Poulhon). Could you fix it? --junafani (?) 18:41, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks. I got the name from a JPG on the official site which wasn't all that readable. Will (Talk - contribs) 22:04, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Helsinki Thunder maps[edit]

Hi, I noticed that your track maps of Helsinki Thunder have couple spelling errors (Hämeentic -> Hämeentie and Sörnaisten -> Sörnäisten). Could you fix those? --junafani (?) 13:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I got the names I used by attempting to copy the names from Google Earth. But it can be difficult to read them there sometimes even with the largest font. It doesn't help that I don't know Finnish. Those errors are now fixed in all three images. If you see any other errors, please let me know.
BTW: I have more on my site: wlps-ge-stuff.ucoz.com. I am about to publish there a matching KMZ set for Google Earth of the same circuit. The site also has PNG versions of all my maps. Will (Talk - contribs) 02:29, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Silverstone GP Circuit Map[edit]

Hi Junafani. The map you produced for the new Silverstone GP circuit is great (Silverstone_Circuit_2010_version.png), but the orientation is different to the other maps in the article. It would improve the look of the article (IMO) if you could find time to rotate it 90 degrees counter-clockwise.... Rat Splat (talk) 11:15, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd obviously just do this myself but the text would screw up :) Rat Splat (talk) 11:18, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 00:14, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suinulan rautatieasema 2014-09-20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

88.112.137.45 09:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suinulan rautatieasema 2014-09-20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

88.112.137.45 10:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hennan rautatieasema pohjoiseen 2017-12-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 16:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

.[edit]

Stations
You have very nice pictures of railway stations! 👍 Edvardbeijar (talk) 16:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]