User talk:Judgefloro/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TagaSanPedroAko's reply

I know you may be planning to photograph those places, and you may also appreciate me as one of your helpers, along with P199 and Briarfallen, in contributing in Wikimedia Commons. Also, I hope that you will follow up my request after solving your large backlog of photos of Pampanga and Bulacan. Also, I will plan to request you to photographs places in Laguna (especially the cities of San Pedro, Biñan, Santa Rosa, Cabuyao, and Calamba, and some towns), Batangas (all towns and cities), and Cavite (most cities and towns also) soon.

If you appreciate me as your helper here in Wikimedia Commons, let me know at my talk page. I will continue to send requests to photograph places in the Philippines, especially Luzon. I appreciate any response from you, Honorable Judge Florentino Floro. Thank you.--TagaSanPedroAko 08:15, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Answering TagaSanPedroAko's request on photographs of San Pedro, Laguna

I posted a request on photographs of San Pedro, Laguna with the signature of TagaSanPedroAko, and I am still waiting for any image for my request. If you have any photograph related to my requests, please reply back in my talk page. I am still waiting for completion of my listed requests, Judge Florentino V. Floro. Thank you.--TagaSanPedroAko 09:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Reply

The other areas not covered by your cousin's photos are the National Highway/Manila South Road over San Vicente, Nueva, and Landayan.

Leave a message back at my talk page. Thank you.--TagaSanPedroAko 10:28, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Request for additional photographs of places in the City of San Pedro, Laguna

This is TagaSanPedroAko again. I have a revised lists of places of the City of San Pedro, Laguna to be photographed. I removed items already covered by your cousin. You may follow it up after my request on photos of Muntinlupa, Parañaque, and Las Piñas.

Here is a list of places to photograph:

  • San Pedro Town Center (there is only one photo, so take more)
  • Pan-Philippine Highway/Manila South Road (along San Vicente, Nueva, and Landayan)
  • PNR South Main Line (along San Pedro)
  • Suki Market (on San Vicente)
  • San Pedro railway station (new)
  • San Pedro railway station (old)
  • Dambana Island (on the junction near Barangay Nueva)
  • Santo Sepulcro Arch (along Pan-Philippine Highway/Manila South Road in Landayan)
  • Pacita Complex
  • Centro Pacita
  • Pacita Astrodome
  • Pacita MG railway station
  • Santo Sepulcro Parish Church (along Landayan Street)
  • A. Mabini Street (near San Antonio)
  • streets on Poblacion
  • San Vicente River
  • United San Pedro Subdivision (open access village in Barangay San Antonio)
  • South Luzon Expressway (from Magsaysay Road overpass)
  • Barangay San Antonio
  • Magsaysay Road
  • La Marea (taken from Magsaysay Road)
  • Victoria Avenue
  • Southridge (along Victoria Avenue, Barangay San Antonio)
  • Narra Road
  • Southville 3A (relocation area on the end of Narra Road in Western San Pedro)
  • Filinvest South Peak (taken from Father Masi Street)
  • Sisters of Mary the Immaculate School (on South Peak)
  • San Pedro skyline from South Peak
  • Adelina Village
  • Calendola Village
  • Sampaguita Village
  • Langgam
  • Old Carmona railway station
  • PNR Carmona branch line
  • Olympia Village
  • Pacita Avenue
  • Laguna de Bay

If you know they are the places not visited by Ramon FVelasquez, please reply at my talk page.--TagaSanPedroAko 10:58, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Please notify me again if those places I listed still has no photos in Category:San Pedro, Laguna. Thank you.--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 08:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Photographs of western San Pedro, Laguna and other barangays in the lowland San Pedro not reached by Ramon FVelasquez

To Judgefloro

This is TagaSanPedroAko again. I could see that western San Pedro, Laguna is not reached by your cousin. There are photos of Barangay San Antonio, but it is only limited to the eastern lowlands area. Also, San Vicente, Nueva, Landayan, Cuyab (note:Your cousin reached that barangay, but still has limited photographs), and other barangays in the foothills of western San Pedro are still lacking photographs. I want you to photograph those areas for data that could be used as information on the San Pedro, Laguna article.

If you think that those areas of San Pedro, Laguna, that I mentioned, are still out of reach of photographs here at Wikimedia Commons, and still needs photographs to be placed at the San Pedro, Laguna category, let me know through a message at my talk page. Also,notify me when you scheduled to go into those areas. I appreciate any answer from you, Honorable Judge Florentino V. Floro. Thanks for consideration.--TagaSanPedroAko 12:45, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Please stop CYCLING or LOOPING categories

Please realize what you are doing wrong. This is not the first time I told about this mistake you keep repeating. When you created the category Category:Altars of the baptism of Jesus Christ in the Philippines with pictures from Category:Parish Church of the Lord's Baptism (Pasig, Candaba, Pampanga). Just because added pictures from this church, you DO NOT add it as one of the categories of Category:Altars of the baptism of Jesus Christ in the Philippines. You do not LOOP the pictures or categories. Because the category is about "Altars of the baptism of Jesus Christ in the PHILIPPINES". What if somebody added "altars of Baptism" pictures from a church in Cavite or from other places Then those picture has nothing to do with the Category:Parish Church of the Lord's Baptism (Pasig, Candaba, Pampanga), and making the category a mistake as not all pictures are not from PASIG, CANDABA, PAMPANGA.

Same goes with the Category:Ornamental plants in Bulacan, which you added pictures of ornamental plants from Guiguinto. You do not add Category:Guiguinto, Bulacan as a category of Category:Ornamental plants in Bulacan. What if somebody added a picture of "ornamental plants from San Miguel, Bulacan", then Category:Guiguinto, Bulacan is no longer TRUE. You should have made a Category:Ornamental plants in Guiguinto, Bulacan and then add the Category:Ornamental plants in Bulacan into that category. Please read Commons:Categories#Principles and read "Hierarchic principle" follow it. You are telling the guy above that you are Judge Floro, how come you, yourself, do not want to follow Commons rules. -- Briarfallen (talk) 21:52, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Reply to "Another category you made that needs fixing"

If you you are unsure with what you are doing then STOP, as you are always bound to do something wrong. Placing it in the 'by country' category is WORSE! If you are not sure of something, then don't do anything. If the category title says "by country," then only country categories should be there. Is LOLOMBOY a COUNTRY? No, then don't put it there. Follow what the category title says, and please don't make any guesses.

Also, the Category:Chapels in the Philippines is under Category:Philippine Heritage as part of the Category:Churches in the Philippines. Category:Chapels in the Philippines is INSIDE the Category:Churches in the Philippines. All categories inside the Category:Churches in the Philippines is part of the Philippine Heritage. Unlike you, I follow rules of OVER-CATEGORIZATION. I don't have to put Category:Chapels in the Philippines as Philippine Heritage because it is all covered by Category:Churches in the Philippines. That is the Hierarchy principle. Philippine Heritage is the higher category, anything inside that folder should be related to Philippine heritage. -- Briarfallen (talk) 23:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Replies to Briarfallen's messages

Please note that I only add the photos to the Category of Category:Altars of the baptism of Jesus Christ in the Philippines and since the same is part of the Parish Church photos, I need to add in the specific photos the Church itself, not putting Candaba, Pampanga; as a Catholic, there is some gray areas in the Sanctuary and Altar; Sanctuary covers an altar; it is my view as editor, not as Catholic and not even due to my beliefs, but as I judge, when the camera is at the farthest part of the church interior, when the altar and sanctuary are there, I deem it proper to put the photos in the Category:Altars of the baptism of Jesus Christ in the Philippines;

The Category:Parish Church of the Lord's Baptism (Pasig, Candaba, Pampanga) is about the Church is Pampanga, a major premise if you are in logic, so to speak; then the minor part or premise is an altar or sanctuary, specifically, Category:Altars of the baptism of Jesus Christ in the Philippines; I do not any mistake in putting the smaller category of altar upon the higher and more encompassing category of Category:Parish Church of the Lord's Baptism (Pasig, Candaba, Pampanga); my reason is simple - if one searches or looks for the altar, then, he looks for it in Candaba, nowhere there, he goes to the Church, but there in none, should he go and open Churches in Pampanga, Bulacan? hence, I adjudge it proper to put it there, since the category is so rare, we, having very few in the Philippines, there would be no confusion upon the world viewer of the photos;
Regarding Category:Ornamental plants in Bulacan instead of Category:Ornamental plants in Guiguinto, Bulacan - then adding Category:Guiguinto, Bulacan to the former, it was a decision I opted, for I desire that in the future, if plants are added to the former category, it would be more simple rather than just creating plants in a town in Bulacan, even if later another editor would put plants in Bulacan or Rizal; putting Category:Guiguinto, Bulacan thereat or inside the bigger Bulacan category would not confuse the researcher, it would not compromise the veracity of the category, nonetheless, the facility of finding the plants would be easier than limit it to just a barangay or even a town, instead of Province, Bulacan; I am not countering or contradicting your view as editor, it is just that I deem it proper to put these photos in the categories, which I deem are proper, but, respecting the others, including you as editor or even administrators, who would deem proper to amend or correct and change my edits, to prevent edit wars;
I as editor User:Judgefloro have repeatedly underscored that I am here to upload and edit the Donated inter Vivos meaning the 116,000 photos of Judge Florentino Floro that I uploaded; and for privacy reasons, like this guy in San Pedro, you and others, who never wanted to divulge their blogs to identify themselves, for security reasons due to the new law of Cyber and Internet libel, defamation, torts and damages laws that were recently passed in Philippine Congress, we as editors would not want to tell anybody that I am this person or that person aside from the fact that we do not want to advertise here our names and persons, but just, for me, to follow the Philosphy and belief of Judge Floro and myself, and this guy from San Pedro that we love the Philippines and we desire to share our photos for educational values that any other sites in the internet would not be of such integrity as Commons, no ads.
Regarding Churches and Chapels in the Philippines, these 2 Categories are not so simple vis-a-vis the various sub and over hierarchy Categories; I and Judge Floro appreciate so much your devotion to make his photos better to reach Filipinos; rest assured that I am following Judge Floro's desire as part of the Donation and your fervent devotion to make Commons better for Filipinos like this Guy from San Pedro; please continue with your good work and feel free to message us, and rest assured that I am doing my best, but please, specify the edits that you want me to make; I submit that it is the technical language difficulty that prevents us from doing better; sincerely--Judgefloro (talk) 01:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

TagaSanPedroAko is in good faith.

To Judgefloro and Briarfallen:

This is TagaSanPedroAko again. I still in good faith with all of you, Judgefloro and Briarfallen. Also, I also follow your philosophy, and therefore, follow Philippine cyber law. So, I still maintain good faith here in Commons. Also, give me a reply in TagaSanPedroAko's talk page.

Sincerely --TagaSanPedroAko 02:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Still waiting for reply

To Judgefloro:

This is TagaSanPedroAko again. Yesterday, I sent a message to your talk page, but, I still have no reply since I posted it. If you have a reply, send it in my talk page.

Thanks,
--TagaSanPedroAko 02:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Reply on your message on your plan to go to San Pedro, Laguna on January

This is TagaSanPedroAko again. This user studies somewhere in the eastern part of Tunasan, Muntinlupa and lives on western San Pedro, on the hills. However, I am in my Christmas vacation in Batangas City from December 23. So, I could have any reply on you, but, I suppose you will have those photos taken and uploaded by yourself, while I am busy also in uploading my own photographs with these system of file names: Ts(area)(4 digit number)(place)(series number), as in the case of this file:File:TsAlabang8621FestivalSupermall 01.JPG, in Wikimedia Commons. Notify me when you finished the backlog of photographs of Pampanga and Bulacan. Thanks for consideration.--TagaSanPedroAko 03:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments on TagaSanPedroAko's file naming of latest uploaded files

To Judgefloro and Briarfallen:

I am uploading files with these file name format: Ts(location)(4 to 5-digit number)(place)(series number), as in the case of this files:

If you have any comments, place an message on my talk page.

It would be desirable to have not so many pictures on the interior but sufficient number of photos also at the rear and front facade of the Mall in full sun. Thanks.--Judgefloro (talk) 04:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Notification: Pampanga and Bulacan photographs backlog

To Judgefloro:

This is TagaSanPedroAko, one of your helpers along with Briarfallen.

I saw your reply in my talk page. If you will leave on January to take photographs of locations and places in South Metro Manila, Laguna, Batangas, and Cavite that your cousin never reached or has limited number of photos, leave a message about the remaining files on your backlog of Pampanga and Bulacan photos on my talk page, so, you may proceed on the time you specified.

Thanks.
--TagaSanPedroAko 04:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Apologies for name-calling

I apologize for the names I wrote in your talk page messages. Also, I will remove those names soon, and I will replace them with "your cousin" to prevent legal issues regarding cyber libel. I will edit my messages here and send a reply again soon. TagaSanPedroAko is still not familiar with some Commons policies, however, I will never lose my trust to you, Judgefloro.

Regrets
--TagaSanPedroAko 04:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

I sent a message at your talk page, and you have not done anything wrong, since, I am just explaining to you the Photography philosophy of educational and higher values that Commons has been keeping and which the Donor of these photos Judge Floro has full Faith in, as We have faith in you and your photos of San Pedro. Cheers.--Judgefloro (talk) 05:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

TagaSanPedroAko,along with Briarfallen, is still in good faith.

Thanks for my response. I keep my trust with you, and I will continue to help you in your talk page. In addition, I will also help you in your contributions and also post requests as part of my loyalty to you.

Also, place a message of gratitude on my talk page in return.

Thanks\ --TagaSanPedroAko 05:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Update: Uploads of Pampanga and Bulacan photos

To Judgefloro

This is TagaSanPedroAko again. As you said, you will go to Southern Metro Manila (especially:Paranaque, Muntinlupa, and Las Pinas) and San Pedro, Laguna for photographing of areas not reached or partially covered by your cousin, Ramon FVelasquez. I am still waiting for updates on your large backlog of 2,000 photos of Pampanga and Bulacan. How many photos of those places are uploaded using UploadWizard?--TagaSanPedroAko 06:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

As preparation for going to southern Metro Manila and several areas in south Luzon, you said you will finish uploading the backlog of 2,000 photos of the provinces of Pampanga and Bulacan. So, I am waiting whether you finished uploading those photos before proceeding to South Metro Manila and parts of South Luzon (details will be posted soon after reviews of categories of the locations I request for photographs). Are you almost finished uploading that large backlog of photos from your Nikon Coolpix AW100?

Review:Category:Muntinlupa City

To Judgefloro

The Category:Muntinlupa City lacks photographs, and most of your photos is on the the Muntinlupa-San Pedro boundary. So, after going to Paranaque and Las Pinas and before covering the remainder of San Pedro, Laguna, you must photograph Muntinlupa City, that covers all barangays and points of interest.

Here is a revised list for Muntinlupa City:

  • Alabang
  • South Station (especially the transportation terminals)
  • Starmall Alabang
  • Alabang Station
  • Liana's Alabang (along Montillano)
  • Alabang Pedestrian Overpass
  • Alabang Public Market
  • Alabang-Zapote Road
  • Festival Supermall
  • Filinvest City (Note: some buildings in this area may be copyrighted)
  • Sucat
  • Sucat Station
  • Cupang
  • Buli
  • Bayanan
  • Bayanan Baywalk (near Laguna de Bay)
  • Putatan
  • Muntinlupa City Hall (along Pan-Philippine Highway)
  • Poblacion
  • Our Lady of the Abandoned Parish Church (on Pan-Philippine Highway cor. Rizal Street)
  • Tunasan (including
  • SM Center Muntinlupa (along Pan-Philippine Highway)
  • Muntinlupa Sports Complex (near Laguna de Bay)
  • Saint Peregrine Laziosi Parish (along Pan-Philippine Highway and beside Lyceum of Alabang (new campus))

(Note: There may be places that requires permission for photography, as there is no FOP exception according to Commons:Freedom of panorama#Philippines.)

Thanks --TagaSanPedroAko 10:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Noted.--Judgefloro (talk) 11:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Judgefloro. --TagaSanPedroAko 14:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Judgefloro

This is TagaSanPedroAko again, back in San Pedro, Laguna. I greet you a happy new year, and I know you will proceed in the places I specified on time, 1st week of January, after being busy uploading 2,000 photos of the provinces of Pampanga and Bulacan. Also, I will help you if I have time, especially on the weekends and vacations.

"Masaganang Bagong Taon!" Have a prosperous new year, Judgefloro. --TagaSanPedroAko 17:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Update: Photographs of Paranaque, Las Pinas, Muntinlupa, and San Pedro, Laguna

This is TagaSanPedroAko again. I am still waiting for new uploads of the locations I requested for photographs. Are you still uploading more photos of Pampanga and Bulacan or already photographing the locations I requested?--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 13:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Review of TagaSanPedroAko's first quality image nomination

This is TagaSanPedroAko again. Already, I nominated this file:

on the Quality Image nominations. I want you to participate in reviewing that image as another file in this category:

, and I appreciate any reply from you.

Thanks.
--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 06:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Arayat3322.JPG

File:Arayat3322.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

McZusatz (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your message; while I was reviewing this beautiful town and its new Municipal Hall, I came across this bugged or broken file; hence, I looked for the latest or renovated Town Hall Image of New Town Hall, which I re-sized and uploaded; all these pictures I am uploading, since February, 2014, thus now, about 121,000̟ are my own by way of gratuitous Donation to me as User editor here, in Commons by Judge Florentino Floro, the photographer who does not happen to know how to upload or edit here and has no time, at age 61; also, the bugged photo was also Donated by the same Judge Florentino Floro to another editor UserːRamon FVelasquez who was on Wiki-break since February, 2014, when I agreed to receive the Donated 121,000 photos; this may be the exception to the Commons rule; however, I have no objection to the deletion since the uploaded version is just a re-sized one or smaller of the original photo [1]; I just want readers or researchers to have a better view of the bugged or broken filed, sincerely, no objection to the deletion, thanks.--Judgefloro (talk) 05:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Please delete, no objection since I uploaded yesterday's photos of Judge Florentino Floro, the photographer of all my donated by him photos here in Commons, and this Newly renovated park makes the old ones just part of history of this to be made Heritage Park: Category:Mount Arayat National Park --Judgefloro (talk) 01:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)


File:JfRed flowers in the PhilippinesBulakfvf 09.JPG

Hi Judgefloro, this is an Euphorbia milii cultivar. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 06:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Ies, done, I amended the category; actually, I could have asked the natives the names of the flowers then type them for translation to scientific names, but more often I lack time since I race with the sun to shoot more landmarks; I love these simply amazing nature, for which reason, I spent my precious time in these small barangays but so enchanting rather than photograph Pope Francis who is just an hour from Bulacan; best regards and thanks.--Judgefloro (talk) 06:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Requests for photographs: Manila and Batangas City

This is TagaSanPedroAko again. Some landmarks and some districts in Manila lacks photographs or has limited coverage according to my review. You may plan it to be done in the last week of January or anytime, after finishing photographing Parañaque, Las Piñas, Muntinlupa, and San Pedro, Laguna, shown above.

The areas (all along the LRT-1) and their landmarks are:

Manila

Santa Cruz

  • Capitan Luis Gonzaga Building
  • Capitan Pepe Building
  • Chinese General Hospital
  • Dr. Jose Fabella Memorial Hospital
  • Forum Theater
  • Lacson Avenue
  • Lords and Jennet Theaters
  • LRT-1 Bambang Station
  • LRT-1 Blumentritt Station
  • LRT-1 Carriedo Station
  • LRT-1 Doroteo Jose Station
  • LRT-1 Tayuman Station
  • Manila Chinese Cemetery
  • Manila North Cemetery
  • Manuel F. Tiaoqui Building
  • Manila City Jail (Old Bilibid Prison)
  • PNR Blumentritt Station
  • Recto Avenue
  • Roben Theater
  • San Lazaro Hospital (Department of Health)
  • Scala Theater
  • SM City San Lazaro
  • Tayuman Street

Binondo

  • Calvo Building
  • Capitol Theater
  • Commercial Bank and Trust Company Building
  • Don Roman Santos Building
  • Jones Bridge
  • Mariano Uy-Chaco Building
  • Natividad Building

Ermita

  • Arroceros Forest Park
  • Casino Español de Manila
  • Gaiety Theater (dilapidated building)
  • LRT-1 United Nations Station
  • Manila Hotel
  • Manila Ocean Park
  • Philippine General Hospital
  • Quirino Grandstand
  • Santa Isabel College
  • YMCA Building

Malate

  • Aurora A. Quezon Elementary School
  • De la Salle University
  • De la Salle University - College of Saint Benilde
  • Jesus Reigns Christian Academy
  • LRT-1 Quirino Avenue Station
  • LRT-1 Vito Cruz Station
  • Manila Yacht Club
  • Manila Zoological and Botanical Garden
  • Ospital ng Maynila
  • Philippine Christian University
  • Philippine Women's University
  • Quirino Avenue
  • Ramon Magsaysay Building
  • Saint Scholastica's College

Paco

  • Concordia College
  • Khalsa Diwan Sikh Temple
  • LRT Quirino Station
  • Mahatma Gandhi Street (Calle Perez)
  • Old Paco Train Station
  • Paco Catholic School
  • Paco Park
  • Pedro Gil Avenue
  • PNR Paco Station

Pandacan

  • Bagong Barangay Elementary School
  • Bagong Diwa Elementary School
  • Beata Elementary School
  • Carlos P. Garcia High School
  • Iglesia Filipina Independiente - Pandacan
  • Iglesia ni Cristo - Lokal ng Pandacan (along Quirino Avenue)
  • Jacinto Zamora Elementary School
  • Mabini Residence
  • Marcos Residence
  • Malacanan Park
  • Malayan High School of Science
  • Nagtahan Bridge
  • Pandacan Linear Park
  • Pandacan Railway Bridge
  • Pandacan United Methodist Church (along Quirino Avenue)
  • Plaza Balagtas
  • PNR Pandacan Station

Quiapo

  • Don Jose Sulpicios Orpilla Mansion
  • Enriquez Ancestral House
  • Felix Resurreccion-Hidalgo Street (R. Hidalgo Street)
  • Globe Electronics Building (former Globe Theater)
  • Golden Mosque
  • Manuel L. Quezon University - Manila
  • Minor Basilica of the Black Nazarene (Quiapo Church)
  • Nakpil-Bautista Ancestral House
  • Nazarene Catholic School (former Quiapo Parochial School)
  • Ocampo Ancestral House
  • Ocampo Pagoda
  • Padilla Ancestral House
  • Paterno Ancestral House
  • Plaza Miranda

Pasay City

San Isidro

  • DLTBCo Buendia Bus Terminal (under LRT Gil Puyat Station)
  • Gil Puyat Avenue
  • LRT-1 Gil Puyat Station

Please note that there are some places not listed here. Also, some places require permission from their owners. Some areas may be havens of criminals.

The way of transportation to Manila from Bulacan is by bus. There are some buses bound for Manila. Jeepneys, pedicabs, tricycles, and the LRT-1 are the main ways of transportation in Manila.

---


Also, there are some places in Batangas City lacking coverage, according to my last review. It will form the second part of this plan.

The places (all are in the urbanized areas) and their landmarks are:

Balagtas

  • Balagtas Barangay Hall
  • Balagtas Elementary School
  • Balagtas Rotunda
  • Batangas Grand Terminal
  • Diversion Road
  • President Jose P. Laurel Highway

Poblacion

  • A. Evangelista Street
  • Acosta Pastor House
  • Basilica of the Immaculate Conception
  • Batangas City Coliseum
  • Batangas City East Elementary School
  • Batangas City Hall
  • Batangas National High School
  • Batangas Old Market
  • Batangas State University
  • Bay City Mall
  • Calumpang Bridge (damaged by typhoon)
  • Calumpang River
  • Calumpang Temporary Pontoon Bridge
  • D. Silang Street
  • Jose Rizal Monument
  • M. H. Del Pilar Street
  • P. Burgos Street
  • P. Zamora Street
  • Plaza Mabini
  • Rizal Avenue
  • Saint Bridget College
  • University of Batangas-Elementary Department

Pallocan West

  • Days Hotel
  • Pallocan West Barangay Hall
  • Pallocan West Elementary School
  • Parish of the Most Holy Trinity
  • SM City Batangas

Kumintang Ibaba

  • Batangas Provincial Community Park
  • Batangas Regional Hospital
  • Bridge of Promise
  • Governor Antonio Carpio Road
  • Lyceum Philippines University-Batangas

Hilltop Area

  • Batangas Catholic Cemetery (including the skyline of Batangas City)
  • Batangas Provincial Capitol
  • Insular Life Building

Cuta

  • Batangas New Market
  • Calumpang River
  • Malitam Island
  • Sitio Duluhan

Please note that there are some places not listed here. Also, some places require permission from their owners.

The way of transportation to Batangas City from Manila are buses running the Buendia-Batangas City route. The main ways of transportation in Batangas City are jeepneys and tricycles. However, the Batangas-Libjo-San Isidro route is temporarily moved to the Bridge of Promise while repairs on the Calumpang Bridge is continuing. But, you can use the Calumpang Temporary Pontoon Bridge to Pallocan West.

You may take pictures of the locations while traveling between destinations, especially when travelling by bus.

Please reply back if you will plan that trip.

Thanks,
--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 06:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Reply on your message

Thank you. However, most barangays of the cities of Paranaque, Las Pinas, Muntinlupa and San Pedro, Laguna lacks images for use in Wikipedia and other purposes, since Wikimedia Commons is used to supply free media for Wikimedia projects and also to third parties through free licenses. You may proceed on those two trips once you finish the large backlogs of images and category cleaning, with the first trip (Paranaque, Las Pinas, Muntinlupa, and San Pedro, Laguna) first, then the second trip (Manila and Batangas City). Details of the plan for the trip to Manila and Batangas is posted on the top, and send me a message even the user is on wikibreak if you accepted my plans. I will be patient on waiting for your response that you will promise to photograph the places on my posted requests on your talk page. I am still a new user active since November 2014, and I contribute my own work of places, so, you will upload your own photos of the places I posted by yourself. Thanks.--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 14:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Rejoinder:Your Request is still being considered: Faster Uploading but Slow Download

Thanks for your concern about Judge Florentino Floro's photography; as editor of His donated photos, I am still beginning to Upgrade the Uploading mechanism thusly: Desktop, Computer, using Globe Lte 4G, with Internet service Globe Telecom in the Philippines using Huawei Lte CPE B593 Tatoo at HOME, Digital Video Disc, POWERLOgiC - 39 Ping, 1.04 Download speed Mbps 12:40 Mbps Upload Speed maximum 3.19 Mbps Download Speed maximum, Transmitter, antenna Upload speed, used by User:Judgefloro for Commons Uploading since today and about a week ago using rented computers - with this new devices, I fervently hope, that I will be able to Clean-up the Categories, bad editing, and faithful following of best editing of Commons, since I have a head-start with faster Uploading and fast memory of this computer I now use, but, but, slow opening or Download speed. Your request is still Noted by Judge Floro, Sincerely yours,--Judgefloro (talk) 16:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Discarding of request for trips in order to continue coverage of Metro Manila, then to CALABARZON

Even you considered my requests for trips to some areas, I discarded my plans for trips above, so, you will disregard them and then continue with covering Metro Manila. I hope that you will be accepting this message fairly, so, you can proceed in Metro Manila first, without interruption, before covering CALABARZON, starting with either Cavite or Laguna, and following the rest.--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 14:18, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vantey (talk) 14:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your message and concern: actually, here in SM City Baliwag, before I took picture, I asked permission from the management, the owners and the Officers of the Exhibit; in addition, for tourism purposes of Bulacan, Philippines, the SM management encouraged the photography of these works; many took pictures thereof; hence, I have no objection to the deletion, respectfully yours, regards.--Judgefloro (talk) 14:22, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:JfTobias0431Bishopfvf 03.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JfTobias0431Bishopfvf 03.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

McZusatz (talk) 08:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

The license was lost in a server error. Would you mind adding it again? --McZusatz (talk) 08:04, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your help in this photo; Done; it is a photo taken after some other landmark photos of the Bishop Bishop TObias, sincerely--Judgefloro (talk) 13:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Update on your coverage of Metro Manila

Accordingly, I found that you started your photographing of Metro Manila last time in Northern Metro Manila (3rd District), with Navotas and Malabon covered. I hope that you will continue your coverage of Metro Manila into Manila (1st District), Eastern Metro Manila (2nd District) and South Metro Manila (4th District). Will you cover each district one by one? I will discard my requests for trips in areas I listed, so, you will continue soon.

Thanks, --TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 14:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

When you will be covering Metro Manila and CALABARZON?

I see that you are still documenting cities and towns in Central Luzon, and you started covering Metro Manila fully soon. When you will be going to document Metro Manila and CALABARZON? Give me updates of areas you will cover and you have covered when I am not logged in or logged in here in Wikimedia Commons. Also, notify me when you are ready to cover Metro Manila and CALABARZON fully.

I informed your requests and noted discusssions to Judge Floro, who stated that it takes about 5 hours to reach Calabarzon particularly the Towns after Mauban, Quezon which he stopped covering after the prophesied Dolores, Quezon mystic fire; the reason is, sunny weather compels only 2 hours or less to reach the nearby Nueva Ecija and Pampanga Barangays which are so Notable like Bacolor and Betis Churches, sincerely--Judgefloro (talk) 14:15, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
I moved you answer to your talk page, so, you will see it. It seems to be difficult to go to CALABARZON because of traffic in Metro Manila. But, the point is that I still want to find what are the places to cover for the next time. What are the areas in Central Luzon that is yet to be covered? When you will be covering Metro Manila fully? And when you will proceed to CALABARZON? I am asking for the places to cover in Central Luzon. Also, I ask you when you will proceed to the remainder of Metro Manila and then to CALABARZON (with the priority on cities and municipalities Cavite, Laguna, Batangas and Rizal).
Please view my talk page about my reply on the message you posted. My point is that you are meant to take responsibility on the areas you will cover soon. So, if I am logged out, please notify me of the places to be covered, since you hold the responsibility on the itineraries, Judgefloro. I hope that you will be covering Metro Manila and CALABARZON as your responsibility as editor. I am a teenage Commoner from the City of San Pedro, Laguna, and I am 3 months here in Wikimedia Commons as a user uploading photos of places in the Philippines, just like you. I hope that you will cover my city also as your responsibility as a Commoner. Now, you must be taking responsibility on the places to cover. I will be keep in good faith with you as an Commons user cooperating with you, Judgefloro. --TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 15:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
I am back again. I saw newer uploads of areas in Pampanga. How about your photographs in Pampanga? Do you have plans to take photos of more areas in Metro Manila? Will you be in Metro Manila soon?

File:FvfCasaRoces9264 25.JPG

File:FvfCasaRoces9264 25.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 15:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I have no objection to the deletion; I had dinner in this heritage restaurant, and the owner granted the public express permission for the photography; sincerely.--Judgefloro (talk) 16:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyrighted buildings and art

Copyrighted works on public in the Philippines cannot be photographed freely, unless they are already in the public domain. The Philippines has no Freedom of Panorama, however, it may come to the point that FOP will be added to the present Philippine copyright law at an indefinite time. So, do not photograph any painting or sculpture (even copies or replicas) which is still under copyright, unless the copyright owner granted permission. For buildings, you may photograph them if the owner granted permission. --TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 09:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

IPO Letter FoP - I am quoting to you the Legal Query filed by Judge Florentino Floro with his classmate's Spouse Director Blancaflor on the Matter: "IPO Letter and Petition filed [2] IPO Letter FoP filed with the IPO Bureau of Copyright newly created by amendment law of 2013; the IPO promised to render and issue a legal opinion after arrival of the Director from abroad::Category:Intellectual Property Center IP PHL, in this building which I photographed including the 16th floor office of Director Blancaflor, I discussed the matter of my Petition on FoP with Atty. Limbo who said that the newly created on 2013 Bureau of Copyright will be the one under Director Blancaflor who is abroad but will be back soon to render and release a legal opinion on my Petition, Letter. --02:35, 8 March 2014" If you find any of my uploaded photos in violation of the Copyright laws, please notify any Administrator or put the proper template on the matter: Note again that I am User:Judgefloro who was bestowed these photos of photographer Judge Florentino Floro; it is he who took the photos and it is my responsibility to follow the rules of Commons as Judge Floro instructed me to faithful to the letter, spirit and rules of Commons --Judgefloro (talk) 13:12, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

RE: Hi

Thanks, and sorry if I didn't answer you. Let's see how the Philipppines look, knowing that it's in the same latitude of my country. Do you have photos of the city of San Fernando, La Unión and Vigan and their churches?? A greeting for you. --Byralaal (talk) 02:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Byralaal; as editor and Uploader of Judge Florentino Floro's photos of about 181,000+ I uploaded all of which he donated to me for Commons Public Domain, here are some of them as you are asking - Category:San Fernando City, La Union, Churches in the Roman Catholic Diocese of San Fernando de La Union‎, Category:La Union, Cultural heritage monuments in La Union‎ Category:Cities and municipalities in La Union here the 21 Churches and Town halls Judge Florentino Floro photographed and I uploaded; not yet in Vigan, just some in Ilocos Sur Churches up to Candon City. Sincerely.--Judgefloro (talk) 04:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Photos of the Quezon Memorial Circle

Long time no see, Judgefloro.

I have noticed the category for the Quezon Memorial Circle having no photos uploaded by you. I want to have a photo taken by you. Do you have any photo of that memorial? If no, take photos of that place and upload them. Thanks.--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 08:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Judgefloro.

Regarding the photos about the Quezon Memorial Circle, do you have any photo to upload or none? If none, you may proceed. Also, notify me about any disturbance that may affect your trip to that monument.--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 15:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks again for your interest in Judge Floro's photos; He has read your requests, and we Noted them; rest assured that in due time in due course he would try his best to pass by these places, but due to headaches of the destruction of both Apalit-Calumpit and Bustos-Baliwag Bridges, the trucks and other big vehicles clog the road dockets still, sincerely--Judgefloro (talk) 16:41, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Do you have any photo?--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 11:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Are there more areas to cover before going toward Metro Manila?--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 11:24, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Quezon Memorial Circle

Your request has been granted as Judge Floro took photos of - Category:Quezon Memorial Circle - Joy of Urban Farming (Quezon Memorial Circle)‎ (41 F) Quezon Memorial‎ (230 F) Rotary Club Peace Monument (Quezon Memorial Circle)‎ (36 F) The Quezon Heritage House (Quezon Memorial Circle)‎ (6 F) World Peace Bell (Quezon Memorial Circle)‎ (33 F) - Despite the torrential rains and bad clouds, it is terribly difficult to photograph these categories you requested; in additions, Quezon City hall is utterly beautiful but the crab mentality atmosphere makes the photo taking more painful, sincerely done, yet 2 Museums are under renovation and the Quezon is open only to those who ...--Judgefloro (talk) 18:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Request

Hey, just requesting that if you happen to come across road signs such as these: [triangular ones],, and speed limit signs like this: , could you photograph them and categorize them at Category:Road signs in the Philippines. Thank you very much. :) --Photo07 (talk) 16:31, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your messages; I uploaded Judge Floro's photos of these road signs and the like, and I am aware of this category, Road signs in the Philippines; but since I am not more experienced on this I usually do not put them in these categories; rest assured that I will try my best to put my Uploaded photos since today and onwards on the Category:Road signs in the Philippines, sincerely and best regards--Judgefloro (talk) 16:41, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


Copyright status: File:0434jfIba Ibayo Hagonoy Hall Bulacanfvf 07.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:0434jfIba Ibayo Hagonoy Hall Bulacanfvf 07.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:0434jfIba Ibayo Hagonoy Hall Bulacanfvf 08.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:0434jfIba Ibayo Hagonoy Hall Bulacanfvf 08.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:0434jfIba Ibayo Hagonoy Hall Bulacanfvf 09.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:0434jfIba Ibayo Hagonoy Hall Bulacanfvf 09.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your having noticed my error or oversight in not having checked the empty description; I corrected this, as done, sincerely--Judgefloro (talk) 13:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Request: Other areas around Quezon City

Thanks for updates to my request for photos of the Quezon Memorial Circle.

Now, there are other areas around which I request. More places around Quezon City seemed to lack some of your contributions. I request for new photos of Cubao, the East Triangle, North Triangle and South Triangle, Diliman, Balintawak, and Fairview. Also, these roads, Aurora Boulevard, Katipunan Avenue, Quezon Avenue, EDSA, East Avenue, West Avenue, South Avenue, Roosevelt Avenue, Congressional Avenue, Mindanao Avenue, Quirino Highway, E. Rodriguez Avenue, and G. Araneta Avenue needs more coverage.

Also, I have my best hopes that you will proceed with the rest of Metro Manila, and then to Calabarzon.--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 04:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Duly Noted, sincerely--Judgefloro (talk) 19:01, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
I do expect for the best to come. I know that you will be going with the rest of Metro Manila and then to CALABARZON, but, you may still need to go with other locations on Central Luzon, so, there will be a backlog on my requests here. Possibly, those backlogs will take several weeks or even months, but, I'll be polite with you. Thanks.--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 14:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
If only Judge Floro could possible inform about press freedom, freedom of expression, particularly press photography freedom, photographers will comprehend the pains in photo taking because of the crab mentality illnesses of onlookers and those who have nothing to do that disturb the race against time to take best photos; as soon as I receive any photos about your requests from Judge Floro, I will upload them after editing, Noted sincerely--Judgefloro (talk) 17:58, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:9953jfVergara Bypass Cabanatuan City Nueva Ecijafvf 38.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:9953jfVergara Bypass Cabanatuan City Nueva Ecijafvf 38.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your notice and message; I already put the descriptions and details, sincerely yours--Judgefloro (talk) 14:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 18:54, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your message; when I took these pictures including other pictures of Town Halls interior and exterior, I would ask the express permission of those officials and officers of the Town hall; tersely, it is impossible to photo the inside of Vice or Mayor's offices even the session halls, without any assistance from the offices concerned; hence, under Philippine Copyright laws, express permission place them outside the prohibition; but I would take extra precaution, by taking farther or more meters or feet off the portraits, and the like; at any rate, I have no objection to the deletion for I understand that USA laws apply also, sincerely and regards--Judgefloro (talk) 19:15, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:9081jfSM Megacenter Cabanatuanfvf 18.JPG

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:9081jfSM Megacenter Cabanatuanfvf 18.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:9081jfSM Megacenter Cabanatuanfvf 18.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 15:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:9081jfSM Megacenter Cabanatuanfvf 18.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:9081jfSM Megacenter Cabanatuanfvf 18.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:0009jfFreedom Park Cabanatuan Cityfvf 08.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:0009jfFreedom Park Cabanatuan Cityfvf 08.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 15:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:0009jfFreedom Park Cabanatuan Cityfvf 08.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:0009jfFreedom Park Cabanatuan Cityfvf 08.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Done and Thanks for your help, notice in my oversight or having overlooked the empty description, best regards and sincerely--Judgefloro (talk) 15:37, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Photos of other areas of Ilocos Sur

Hello

I have been on a long vacation in Ilocos Sur, but, I saw that other areas of that province have not been covered by your photos, a it seems that you photos of Ilocos Sur is up to Candon City only. You have not been the other areas of Ilocos Sur, especially Vigan City. Do you have any photo of Vigan City and other towns in Ilocos Sur to be uploaded? If no, you can go to Ilocos Sur if you have time, take photos of those areas, and upload them. Thanks--TagaSanPedroAko(Let's talk/Usap tayo) 08:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

File:0520jfFort Stotsenburg Parkfvf 02.JPG

Dear Judgefloro,

I was just looking at your uploads about Fort Stotsenburg, nice pictures. They are on a list https://tools.wmflabs.org/mrmetadata/commons/commons/index.html of files with a small blemish, making them machine-unreadable it seems. I repaired the first by adding }} to close the first description template {{en|1=....}}. Kind regards, Hansmuller (talk) 09:32, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Done and Thanks for your help, notice in my oversight or having overlooked the empty description; actually I deviated from my usual links and instead tried to wikify the english articles of Wikipedia, but I often overlook the templates and other mechanics, but they only happen in the description, therefore, I make sure the the reader of the pictures go to my description in the Category and they will see the full description; I admit that often my description is long unlike other editors; this is because most of my photos are valued, rare and heritage, most are not yet photographed due to security reasons in troubled Philippines; best regards and sincerely--Judgefloro (talk) 12:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

--Judgefloro (talk) 15:37, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Hansmuller, it took me so long to fix these photos, Fort Stotsenburg; sorry for the delay, and they are now all well described, for what happened is I overlooked the preview of the files, hence the error in the reading of the description, best wishes and regards, sincerely, --Judgefloro (talk) August 21, 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Kelly (talk) 14:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your message and concern, I have no objection to the deletion, I note however, that I and many students take pictures of this very public place, best regards.Judgefloro (talk) 12:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Kelly (talk) 15:56, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Kelly, actually, it was a repeated request on my talk page to take photos of this Landmark in Quezon city, Request by TagaSanPedroAko (Let's talk/Usap tayo); before I took photos, I asked express permission from the Quezon Circle and since the public was invited to the opening after Renovation of this Museum of the Memorial, we paid required minimal fees for entrance due to their educational and tourism values; all these are theirs, and almost all visitors take pictures; and it is respectfully submitted that under Philippine Laws, this falls under the exception to the rule on copyright law; but since, USA laws may be over and above this matter, I respectfully state that I have no objection to the deletion, sincerely and best wishes, Judgefloro (talk) 15:60 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Judgefloro/Archive_3&oldid=198361896"