User talk:Jonund/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Deleted content
File:Robert Johnson World's Greatest Bluesman.jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- See my comment in the preceding section. --Jonund (talk) 08:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Karl Herman Knoke
Dear Jonund i see you have more information about Karl Herman Knoke i found a pic of Karl from during World War two do you have more information about Karl during the war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.30.136.189 (talk • contribs)
- I don't remember having said anything about Karl Herman Knoke. Maybe you mistake me for somebody else? --Jonund (talk) 18:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello Jonund,
it isn't clear to me which one of the called category names you would prefer. I'd like to close that cfd. --Achim (talk) 19:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe we should call the category Paul Allan Yule, consistent with enwp and distinct from the photographer and filmmaker. --Jonund (talk) 07:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
For you
The Photographer (talk) 19:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Cute! Thank you! --Jonund (talk) 08:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
John Smith
This is from awhile ago, but you changed the attribution of File:118th Battle of Pegram's Farm.png to John Smith, the 18th century British engraver? The book was published in 1888, some 145 years after the death of Smith. The image itself is of a battle from September 30, 1864. Wanted to check with you before I changed it back. Mkdw (talk) 03:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your inquiry. I added Category:John Smith (engraver) and then removed it, as I realized that it was a mistake. The publisher of the book from which the image was taken is John L. Smith, a corporal in the regiment described in the book, but he is not identical with the engraver - and perhaps not the author of the images, which he may have aquired from somebody else. The category was readded by User:Hsarrazin, in good faith, I presume. --Jonund (talk) 12:46, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- yes, totally good faith... sorry if I mistook 2 homonyms. Please feel free to remove any error from me. John Smith is not exactly a rare name, and there are probably more than 1 John Smith engravers :) --Hsarrazin (talk) 21:21, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
File:Avoautossa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
90.191.109.9 15:09, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Request to use The Magi in flagrante delicto for commercial use
Hello! I was wondering if it was possible to use your image of The Magi in Flagrante delicto. I'm writing a book based around Medieval images and doodles, and was hoping this image could contribute. Drop me an email at Cathal@socialchain.co if you'd like any more information!
Thanks, and have a nice day!
Cathal
- All images on Commons are free to use for any purpose. So just go ahead! --Jonund (talk) 17:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
File:Giant Gavel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
106.68.115.191 11:46, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Category:Viktor_O._Ledenyov has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
BrightRaven (talk) 08:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, how do you know this image is from the early 19th century ? — Racconish ☎ 15:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- I assumed that it was a contemporary portrait. But maybe it was a premature conclusion? At least it doesn't look modern. --Jonund (talk) 16:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Vilna gaon.jpg
- File:Tzvi Ashkenazi.jpg
- File:Shlomo Yitzchaki.jpg
- File:Rav David ben Shmuel HaLevi.jpg
- File:Rav Moshe Isserles.jpg
- File:R' Akiva Eiger.jpg
- File:Rav Moshe Sofer.jpg
- File:Moshe ben Maimon.jpg
- File:Moshe ben Nachman.jpg
- File:Don Yitzchak Abarbanel.jpg
- File:Avraham Gombiner.jpg
- File:Besht London.jpg
- File:Asher ben Yechiel.jpg
Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 16:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Συνάντηση ΥΠΕΞ Σ. Λαμπρινίδη με ΥΠΕΞ Τουρκίας A. Davutoglu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dfvsdjfndsfjkhdsvjklnjk (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Syrian women refugees.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:26, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Staatliche Kunstgewer Beschule Hamburg.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
De728631 (talk) 18:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Please do not edit war
★ Poké95 00:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, Jonund. You removed category:2013 in New Zealand from file:Cracked-earth(byKundanRamisetti).jpg, because cracked earth looks the same every year. This is a weak argument, please do not do that. You can look category:2007 in Tanzania (and other years of Tanzania). There are a lot of animals, although they look the same every year. They are categorized not only by year, but also by month. Taivo (talk) 07:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, if you look at the EXIF data, you will see it was taken at 2013. ★ Poké95 09:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- In my opinion, it's a strong argument. The fact that somebody has categorized animals according to date, although they look the same every year, doesn't mean that they are well-categorized.
- Actually, if you look at the EXIF data, you will see it was taken at 2013. ★ Poké95 09:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- I contributed to the discussion in my edit summary, and thought that might settle the issue. The next step would be discussing on the talk page. Starting to warn people who make bona fide-edits is not the most constructive way to reach agreement. --Jonund (talk) 18:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Artistic-surreal-photomanipulation-by-sarolta-ban-14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
46.139.245.182 21:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- I seem to have been misled by a false license. Copyvio should be deleted. --Jonund (talk) 18:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Public benefit-related attitudes in Sweden.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
دونالد ترامب (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 05:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Thank you very much for your kind help, really appreciated. Moyanbrenn (talk) 18:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Thanks again for your support of yesterday Moyanbrenn (talk) 09:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Communist Party of the Philippines has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Pitpisit (talk) 00:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Mini Submarines at Pipa Got Naval Base, North Korea.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Finnusertop (talk) 16:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Rape in Sweden after background.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Liftarn (talk) 11:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Valdtakter efter bakgrund.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Liftarn (talk) 11:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Reb noygershel1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ביקורת (talk) 08:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Konekivaariasema.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guanaco (talk) 19:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Category:Acoustic jars
Hi, Jonund, I noticed you creating the category and was wondering if there is a reason for not interwikilinking in the text. Thank you for your time. :) Lotje (talk) 13:42, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- No, there is no reason for interwikilinking. Please, fell free to do it. --Jonund (talk) 13:54, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Mucha_20.jpg
It's not Mucha. It's computer drawing after Mucha, pictured playboy style girl with giant tits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ya unikum (talk • contribs) 05:45, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks! I was not attentive enough when I uploaded a number of images attributed to Mucha. Now I have nominated it for deletion. --Jonund (talk) 17:16, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
File:917hildegarde23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2601:282:B80:622E:0:0:0:F326 09:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Noms de dieu.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
BevinKacon (talk) 19:40, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Prophecies Hildegard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
——Chalk19 (talk) 08:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 14:12, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't know about the FoP issue. --Jonund (talk) 16:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
File copyright status
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your recent file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 19:53, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Iranian Ghadir Mini Submarine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hanooz 17:45, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Bidragsblankett.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:53, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Alberto Frigo has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Alberto Frigo (talk) 03:10, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Muslim military chaplains has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 21:52, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Jonund/Archive 3,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,