User talk:Jesper7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jesper7!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:58, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

categories[edit]

Thank you so much for your work on wikiafrica pictures! Keep it going! Elitre (talk) 20:29, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:57, 13 April 2013 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:57, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Incorrect categorization[edit]

Please don't add images to the Popular Science Monthly Illustrations Galleries if they are not part of the Wikisource:Popular Science Monthly Proofreading Project. If they are, then they must be identified by their volume and .djvu page numbers in a manner explained out on this page. Kindly remove the PSM categories from the images which don't belong there. — Ineuw 05:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Steatopygia[edit]

I don't think this includes artificial bustles, but if it does, then you need to add the category to categories such as Category:Bustles, not to individual images in the categories. Churchh (talk) 17:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note to your revert of categorization[edit]

Hello, the Category:Anchi-piri is now a sub-category of Category:Women with face tattoos and thus there is no need to categorize a file in both categories. Just as a note.Torsch (talk) 21:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


"Anchi-piri" is a no English word. --Jesper7 (talk) 09:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

En Rejse I Rødkarenernes Land[edit]

Hi there. I had placed Category:En Rejse I Rødkarenernes Land into Category:Red Karen. Is there a specific need to put individual images from that category, such as you did with File:Roedkaren19tattoo.png, into Category:Red Karen, thus actually creating a COM:OVERCAT for just this one image? - Takeaway (talk) 19:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"En Rejse I Rødkarenernes Land" is a book about a missionary in Red Karen (Karen-ni) State. The book has some important illustrations of the local culture. Illustrations As will be away among all the book's pages in Danish. Jesper7 (talk) 14:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The book had before not been categorised at all under "Category:Red Karen" as it is now. When one opens the category for the book, one can immediately see which images are text, and which are photos and graphics. There is no need to categorise the images separately in both the actual category as well as in its parent category. COM:OVERCAT is very clear in this. - Takeaway (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Adolescent girl's clothing has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


BethNaught (talk) 07:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lalla Fatma N'Soumer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sami At Ferḥat (talk) 18:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Lotus feet has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Tibet Nation (talk) 02:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]