User talk:Hawky.diddiz

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hawky.diddiz!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:27, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion of the author[edit]

Welcome Commons. Changes you made on 4 of my images are inoportunes. Before editing images, it is customary to take the opinion of the author. Thank you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for that, will remember that. But what was exactly wrong with the images if I may ask? Hawky.diddiz (talk) 01:41, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's fun, because I wanted the other day, ask yourself the same question. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:20, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
They all are pretty large so I compressed them with jpegtran, lossless mode and keeping exif data. As I got compression rates up to 66% I thought it would be a good way to save bandwidth. Hawky.diddiz (talk) 13:38, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I understand. In fact, as you saw, archiving is done in several formats. For a very small icons, small (for afichage in Wikis) a means big. They are automatically made ​​from the largest file. Those who consult encyclopaedias have the file smaller and the bandwidth is not altered. Those who want to print images (we solisité by many newspapers) can load the picture high resolution. the image in high resolution must remain very high resolution. You're full of good intentions, continuous and do not hesitate to ask questions, the "elders" are there for that. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Of course the images need to keep their quality and resolution. That's what lossless compression means. I know, the smaller preview/embedded images are generated and optimizing the original image doesn't affect these, this works better for smaller images that are used in full size. But I'm still not sure what was wrong with the optimized images. Hawky.diddiz (talk) 23:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely,   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Parma-Stemma.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Parma-Stemma.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Parma-Stemma.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]