User talk:Harke/Archiv2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papiermühle Markgröningen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:16, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hagmühle Schwieberdingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 09:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antistatic wrist strap (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --MattiPaavola 17:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Multimeter Gossen Metra Hit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. You can even see some dust on your meter! :-) --MattiPaavola 17:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baumstativ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. ZooFari 00:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golfanlage Schloss Nippenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --MattiPaavola 11:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwieberdingen Schulhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --MattiPaavola 11:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwieberdingen Georgskirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --MattiPaavola 11:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwieberdingen Widumhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Cayambe 18:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwieberdingen Scheune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markgröningen Untere Mühle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Yarl 19:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markgröningen Untere Mühle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for me. ZooFari 22:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forstamt Solitude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for me. ZooFari 22:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glemstal Markgröningen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Cayambe --Cayambe 15:28, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glemstal Markgröningen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also good. --Cayambe 15:28, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glems im Winter (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 19:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glems im Winter (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 19:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glems im Winter (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --George Chernilevsky 06:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bärenschlössle im Schnee (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 08:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glems in Winter (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Tilt CCW, correction need --George Chernilevsky 06:31, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Also here, there is a hill right-hand side on the horizon and the trees are in reality not vertical. What element are tilt i your opinion? --Harke 19:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Compare trees and their reflexions in water. It is visible even in thumbnail. --George Chernilevsky 14:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Rotated 3° cw to get the central trees and their reflexions vertical. Better now? --Harke 20:48, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Good now --George Chernilevsky 06:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glems in Winter (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Strong tilt CCW, correction need --George Chernilevsky 06:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I cannot see it. What elements are tilt? If you mean the horizon: there is in reality a hill right-hand side in the background. --Harke 19:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Compare trees and their reflexions in water. It is visible even in thumbnail. --George Chernilevsky 14:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Rotated 3.5° cw. It's difficult for me to see, if this is correct. --Harke 20:54, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
6.2° CW IMO need for original --George Chernilevsky 06:05, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Done. Thanks for your detailed review, its really difficult to see. --Harke 17:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Es ist das gute Ergebnis. Es hat mir gefallen. --George Chernilevsky 13:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfaffensee im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöckingen Hofanlage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, taken at the right season --Berthold Werner 08:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lienzingen Knittlinger Straße (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Smial 20:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lienzingen Knittlinger Straße (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Smial 20:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lienzingen Peterskirche (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Smial 20:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lienzingen Peterskirche (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Smial 20:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Maria Kirche (Ditzingen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Smial 20:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöckingen Gaisberghaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment cw tilted? --Berthold Werner 08:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC).
I don't see any tilt at house edges or windows. Lantern in the foreground is tilted cw: maybe really inclined? I don't know. --Harke 10:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Ok. --Berthold Werner 12:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lienzingen Knittlinger Straße (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me, useful. Please, try to nominate different pics with different names and descriptions! Thanks! ----Jebulon 09:51, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lienzingen Knittlinger Straße (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. (Some luminance noise in the shadow visible at full resolution but very minor.) --Johannes Robalotoff 17:32, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berg Hohenstaufen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice place and subject, very good image. --Cayambe 21:14, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rusenschloss Felsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments With just acceptble CA in the tree branches at the upper left (those branches could/Should be clone away IMO). --Cayambe 11:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
The branches are disturbing, I know. I tried already to remove it, the result was not satisfying. The sky color is very uneven in this area. Maybe someone with more experience may do it? --Harke 18:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rusenschloss Burgruine (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Barrel distortion is a bit disturbing on the wall at the left. Can you correct it? Otherwise good. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC) It seems distorted, but it is real. Look here. It is the archway taken just from the oposite direction. Maybe rotation 0.5° acw may help a little. Should I?--Harke 18:46, 21 May 2010 (UTC)  Support Looking at the other picture, I believe you that the wall is not straight in reality. Please do not rotate, because then the wall on the right would be leaning. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:13, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwieberdingen Georgskirche Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- MJJR 20:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwieberdingen Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gut --George Chernilevsky 11:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vöhingen Gedenkstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:06, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vöhingen Gedenktafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also good. --Cayambe 08:06, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konstanzer Kirche (Ditzingen) Emporentreppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Berthold Werner 13:59, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konstanzer Kirche (Ditzingen) Emprorentreppen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Berthold Werner 13:59, 12 June 2010 (UTC))

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hirschlanden Altes Pfarrhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Berthold Werner 13:59, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauenkirche Unterriexingen (Westansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 18:02, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fachwerkhaus Korntal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 18:02, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelisches Bildungszentrum Hesselberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Mbdortmund 20:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sendeturm auf Hesselberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sendeturm Hesselberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christuskirche Korntal Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --kallerna 17:08, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wappen Bruckmühle Schwieberdingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Berthold Werner 18:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nippenburg Ruine Mauerreste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI! -- MJJR 20:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nippenburg Herrenhaus 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Mbdortmund 18:49, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reflecta CS Diarahmen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Neutral I think the white part is blown out. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 Support QI for me --George Chernilevsky 07:00, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Standardmagazin Kodachrome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perhaps DOF a bit short but ok for QI. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nippenburg Ruine Turmreste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nippenburg Ruine Ostansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nippenburg Ruine Keller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nippenburg Herrenhaus Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp and good. --Cayambe 19:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ditzingen Schlossmühle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --kallerna 15:43, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CS Diamagazin 4x40 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments seems to be magnetic for dust... --Mbdortmund 13:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
...ich habe es wirklich geputzt!--Harke 09:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münchingen Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 14:06, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwieberdingen Schlössle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Mbdortmund 12:39, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münchingen Hengelhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sorgfältig gewählter Standpunkt, scharf, korrekt belichtet und gut beschrieben. Das Tüpfchen auf dem I wäre eine Quellenangabe für die Bildbeschreibung. Weiter so! --Ikiwaner 16:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Danke für das Lob! --Harke 18:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CS Diamagazin 4x40 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 16:53, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deutschordenschloss Mainau 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and useful. --Nevit 23:35, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CS Diamagazin 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 CommentNice "historical" image :) I had one of these. Can you desaturate to remove purple tint in shadow? --Nevit 23:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 Comment Done. --Harke 15:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 Support --Nevit 21:25, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frühlingsallee Tulpenblüte 2010 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice colours, good composition. Without the people in the background it could be FP. --Ikiwaner 12:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosskirche Mainau 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 09:01, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spiegelskala Multimeter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI. Yann 11:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blumenpfau Mainau 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Quartl 14:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münchingen Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice. Meets the QI criteria. --High Contrast 10:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GPIB Kabel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Mbdortmund 18:38, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Object on white surface

Will you please explain how do you take photo of small objects on white surface? When I try to take such picture, I use white sheet as a background, but it looks gray (example1, example2). I can't make background lighter because other areas will be overexposed. On your picture (example3) background is white. How do you reach this whiteness? --Kae (talk) 11:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi,
for this small object I used a white balance card as a background and adjusted then the white reference with the image processing software. For large object I use a white paper - but this is not always satisfying. Perfect white can be achieved in this case IMO only separating the background from the object by an image processing software. --Harke (talk) 18:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paralaxenfehler Spiegelskala.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments gute Doku --Mbdortmund 23:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paralaxfrei Spiegelskala.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments gute Doku --Mbdortmund 23:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münchingen Altes Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments illustrative, perfect exposure --Ikiwaner 17:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosskirche Mainau 2010 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gute Perspektivkorrektur und ich schätze, dass du ein Normalobjektiv verwendet hast statt das Weitwinkel zu zücken. Die Beine sind der beste Zoom (wo möglich). --Ikiwaner 17:49, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frühlingsallee Tulpenblüte 2010 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments wunderbare Frühlingsstimmung, hohe Auflösung, wenig CA. --Ikiwaner 17:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thermocouple Connector.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good. --Kae 10:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Narrenkopf Johanneskirche Münchingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice w:Grotesque IMO.QI--Jebulon 21:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Münchingen Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, I like it. But I think this pic needs a correction with better scaling of the height, as visible at high res on the pic of the castle. Thoughts ?--Jebulon 15:45, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
I tried a cautious improvement- better now? --Harke 17:01, 29 August 2010 (UTC) I've tried something, and reverted to your version. Please have a look on the file page, and compare with the detail on the castle. IMO the scale is better.--Jebulon 17:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Please consider, that the perspective on the castle wall is distorted- the horizontals are shortened because of the inclined view. IMO you overstretch the verticals in your version 17:35, 29. Aug. 2010. I would prefer not to modify the original too much. But, I don't know. --Harke 17:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand Jebulons problem but the quality of the image is very good --Carschten 12:31, 5 September 2010 (UTC) I don't have any "problem", thanks, I just say that the report between width and height is not good, due to perspective from below, and need a correction IMO. For example the helms over the schilds look very unnatural to me.--Jebulon 14:43, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glockenstuhl Rathaus Münchingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gut gemachtes Architekturdetail. Detailliert, gute Perspektive. --Ikiwaner 17:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münchingen Rathaus Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gut gemachtes Architekturdetail, könnte etwas mehr Nachschärfen vertragen. --Ikiwaner 17:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC) Erledigt --Harke 16:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johann Friedrich Flattich Gedenkstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --Carschten 12:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwieberdingen Hirsch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good technical quality and well presented main subject.--MrPanyGoff 12:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stuttgart Hauptbahnhof 2010-09-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good photo --Pudelek 11:51, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bauzaun Nordflügel 2010-09-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically ok... and historical photo :-) --Cayambe 09:36, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turm Stuttgart Hauptbahnhof 2010-06-28 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also good. --Cayambe 09:36, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Annenkirche Annaberg 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- Smial 00:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pöhlberg Aussichtsturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- Smial 00:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annaberg-Buchholz Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Super, Ansicht, super Wetter, super Komposition, super Qualität → QI für mich und auch das beste dieser fünf. -- Felix Koenig 16:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhof Korntal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Cayambe 19:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhof Weissach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also good. --Cayambe 19:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhof Cranzahl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 13:22, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cranzahl Fichtelbergbahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:50, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frohnauer Hammer 2010 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 12:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fichtelberghaus Juli 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gefällt mir sehr gut. --Berthold Werner 11:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fichtelberg 0.2km.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Lmbuga 20:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frohnauer Hammer 2010 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, with acceptable chromatic aberration in the trees at the top left. --Cayambe 07:02, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Petri Augustusburg vom Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good composition, OK for me --Vomirencostard 17:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwarzenberg Obere Schloßstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice place, good image. --Cayambe 08:28, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fichtelbergbahn 2010 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can't see anything wrong. Mattbuck 00:33, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Augustusburg Südtor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also good. --Cayambe 11:54, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Augustusburg Südseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Cayambe 11:54, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gusseinserne Kolonnade Marianske Lazne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK--Mbz1 17:47, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienberg Zschopauer Straße und St. Marien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good--Mbz1 17:47, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seiffen Kirche und Friedhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I wish crop at the bottom were different,but OK.--Mbz1 17:47, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ort Augustusburg vom Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 12:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erzgebirgische Aussichtsbahn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Please geocode. --Cayambe 15:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC) done --Harke 17:32, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frohnauer Hammer Herrenhaus (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also good. --Cayambe 15:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Singende Fontäne Marianske Lazne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sehr gut --George Chernilevsky 08:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karolinenquelle Marianske Lazne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me.--Vizu 19:02, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienberg Kirche St. Marien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please have a look to the annotation...--Jebulon 00:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC) done--Harke 17:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC)  Support Good and useful. --MrPanyGoff 21:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gusseiserne Kolonnade Eingang Marianske Lazne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC) With a little improvement of the sky, you may try an attempt in FPC, IMO.--Jebulon 17:56, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Augustusburg Stadtkirche St. Petri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gut. But could support a better categorization to be more useful IMO.--Jebulon 16:58, 12 November 2010 (UTC)✓ Done Funny, isn't it ?--Jebulon 17:33, 12 November 2010 (UTC) Thanks --Harke 16:17, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Harke!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johanneskirche Münchingen Weihnachtsbeleuchtung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame of the trash bin, and some parts noisy, but otherwise good and in season--Jebulon 10:34, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fichtelberg Wald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Better with a geolocation, but QI.--Jebulon 22:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwieberdingen Kirche St Peter und Paul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Der Himmel am oberen Bildrand und schattige Bereiche im Bild weisen (trotz ISO 100....) ein starkes Rauschen auf. Könntest Du diese Bereiche bitte entrauschen? Dann gibt's Pro von mir. --Carschten 18:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC) done --Harke 19:32, 18 December 2010 (UTC) Good for me. New categories added.--Jebulon 10:52, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nippenburg Burgscheuer 2010 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC)