User talk:Hardscarf/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive 1

Please copy all information from original image (author, uploader (if not the same), description) when you move it to Commons from other Wiki. I could guess that this image is work of Morwen :-) --EugeneZelenko 14:09, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please be accurate with license tags when you move images from other wikis. Original image was marked as {{GFDL}}. And you can't apply {{PD-self}} to works of other people. --EugeneZelenko 16:44, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Erekle_II_of_Georgia_coat_of_arms.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 05:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oops... yea, youre right. i wasn't very clear about the location and forgot to put up the licensing! well... its changed now thanks for catching my mistake!

--Hno3 20:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Urartu Maps[edit]

Could you provide some detail on the origin for the Urartu maps which you have uploaded?. (Recently I drew similar maps for Urartu article in Russian, and I based them on Piotrovski book. My maps seem to be quite different -- I'd like to find out whose source is more recent and reliable) Thanks. EvgenyGenkin 12:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You better discuss this with User:Jolle (ca), as he was the one who originally uploaded them on the Catalan wikipedia. --Hardscarf 01:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hulpmiddel voor vertalen...[edit]

Hoi Hardscarf, ik heb geprobeerd (in eerste instantie voor mezelf) een hulpmiddeltje te maken voor de vertalingen van Afbeelding vd dag. Het is een pagina geworden die de nog niet vertaalde afbeeldingen toont en daarbij een knop om de pagina voor de vertaling te openen. Als de Engelse vertaling aanwezig is dan opent de nieuwe pagina (om te editten) met daarin al de Engelse vertaling die je dan kan vervangen door de Nederlandse (leek me zelf gemakkelijk voor het vertalen als de tekst in het edit-veld staat). Zie maar of je er ook wat mee kunt. Ik dacht ik meld het je even. De pagina staat op User:Freestyle nl/POTD vertalen. Groetjes, Freestyle nl 12:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erg handig, bedankt! Wat mij betreft mag je hem hier ook op de hoofdpagina van de POTD zetten als tool. Dat scheelt inderdaad werk. --Hardscarf 13:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:1533-1896.jpg.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Rtc 11:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Urartu743.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Cat chi? 16:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello there and thank you for your message,

I find it hard to believe that these are really free image, they almost look as if taken from a website. Do you speak Dutch? Could you maybe get in touch with that original uploader and ask him maybe where he took those images to make it plausible so that information can be added? Gryffindor 17:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sjablonen updaten[edit]

Hoi Hardscarf, Ik wilde even zeggen dat hoewel ik weg ben bij de Nederlandse Wikipedia ik nog de POTD vertaler hier zal blijven updaten zodat die gebruikt kan blijven worden (ik ga denk ik zelf ook nog vertalen), wat ik niet meer doe is het updaten van het POTD sjabloon op Wikipedia, dus misschien kan jij of iem. dat doen. Ik ben op Commons nog gewoon actief en op de Engelse Wikipedia. Groetjes,  Emil·76  10:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jammer dat je (voorlopig hoop ik) bent geswitched van wikipedia :(, maar ik ben blij dat je op de achtergrond nog wilt blijven helpen met de vertaling. Kun je me misschien vertellen hoe het updaten van het POTD-sjabloon in zijn werk gaat? Dan wil ik het wel overnemen of ergens beschrijven hoe iemand anders dat eventueel kan doen. --Hardscarf 11:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dat is niet zo ingewikkeld gelukkig (denk ik). Je moet sjabloon:POTD updaten, er staat een link op die pagina naar de genereerde lijst met afbeeldingen, die kun je simpelweg copy-pasten in de broncode van het sjabloon. Voor Sjabloon:POTD onderschrift geldt eigenlijk het zelfde, alleen moet je nog de wiki-links opnieuw aanbrengen voor de nl.wikipedia (als je die wilt hebben tenminste). De onderschriften in het sjabloon zijn nu up-to-date t/m 30 juni, en sjabloon:POTD t/m 20 juni. Als je nog vragen hebt hoor ik het wel.  Emil·76  14:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bedankt. Wat ik me nog afvroeg: is het ook mogelijk om een lijst van de onderschriften als 'raw data' op een pagina te zetten, dus met de links naar de betreffende commonspagina's, commonscategorieën en Nederlandse wikipagina's er nog in (tussen nowiki-tags). Dat scheelt zoekwerk bij het invoegen van de links. Als het niet kan is het ook prima, maar ik houd me wel aanbevolen ;) --Hardscarf 14:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ik ben bang dat dat niet gaat (ik zou niet weten hoe...). Wat ik zelf altijd doe bij het overzetten is de links (van een onderschrift) allemaal openen met CTRL ingedrukt (bij Firefox of IE 7) zodat ze in de andere tabs worden geopend. Op die manier kan ik gemakkelijker de namen van de links copy-pasten. Daarna kies ik weer voor 'De andere tabbladen sluiten' en herhaal ik het voor het volgende onderschrift.  Emil·76  22:21, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, dan weet ik in elk geval genoeg. Op die manier wil het inderdaad ook prima. --Hardscarf 12:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SVG maps of Russia[edit]

I don't know about others, but the reason why I didn't use the svg maps was because I was not aware you made the whole set :) Of course, feel free to replace existing pngs with the svgs. As for the colors, I, honestly, don't care either way. Pink was the color used by Morwen on her very first map of Russia, so I guess it just carried over to other maps. I really don't see a good reason to change the colors of your svgs to pink just so they match the old versions; it'd be a waste of time, in my opinion. I trust if someone has a problem with new colors, they'll let you know :)

All in all, thanks for the nice set of svgs! It's about time someone cared to convert these maps. I also hope you are going to stick around to update them in future, because I have no experience with vector graphics whatsoever :) Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:32, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day translation[edit]

Hello, Thank you for changing the dutch text for December 8, my text was probably not any good at all since I don't really know that language. I noticed that you changed the links so they link away from Commons. The reason I used links to Commons is that Pictures of the day are used on commons Main page, and I think it is good to use the links to lead visitors to more examples of the content we have here. Linking away from Commons is not wrong (lots of POTD translations do that), but I am interested to know what the reasons are to do so. /Ö 23:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like the Italian wikipedia we on the Dutch wikipedia also use the POTD on the mainpage (scroll a bit down to see). That is why we try to link directly to the articles on the Dutch language wikipedia so we only have to link once. The captions are then imported from User:Freestyle nl/POTD onderschrift to nl:Sjabloon:POTD onderschrift. Unfortunately there are users that resist the idea to directly link to the commons (for instance with the latin names of flora and fauna species), as we used to do that too. I hope you don't oppose this way of using the POTD. --Hardscarf 15:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't oppose that. I just wanted to now why it was done that way. /Ö 09:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:RM2006_010.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:RM2006_010.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ~ putnik 13:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see if w:User:Ram2006 is the same as the user who uploaded it at the website. Perhaps better ask him yourself. --Hardscarf 16:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dynamo E-burg metro.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. DENKernel 13:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Description copied from en wiki with commonshelper. --Hardscarf 22:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am not sure this is the inflow of the Chuya into Katun. Visited the very place myself and it does look different. Pls see Image:Katun Chuya.jpg. Also checked what other pictures there are on Google Earth and these do appear to confirm the doubts. Chuya does not have cloudy-white waters but rather cloudy-brown waters at the confluence. Pls doublecheck if possible. Thanks!--Ondřej Žváček 13:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I asked the uploader on flickr, and he confirmed that it was [1], but if it is not, then feel free to change the description, as I haven't been there ;). Thanks for clearing up this matter. --Hardscarf 15:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks! It appears that the uploader on flickr is also not sure the confluence of which rivers this is. At any event, Chuya is a right side tributary of Katun and the river on the picture seems to be a left side tributary. Unfortunately, I do not know what river it could be so cannot change the description. I thought it is Argut for a while but that is also a right side tributary.--Ondřej Žváček 22:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to explore; here are some Russian topographic maps of the area ;). --Hardscarf 23:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Warsaw_Ghetto_map.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

howcheng {chat} 03:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User ! This image is absolutely incorrect. Indeed it's not a photo but a reproduction of the picture Russian painter Grigory Gagarin's named "Cherkessy" (Cirkassians). Please change it. --Turzh 20:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for changes & sorry for my mistake in paintor's name (Gavrilov instead of Gagarin). If you had a wish see plz this book with other Gagarin's pictures. Good luck ! --Turzh 17:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure that is the title? The pdf says 'Совещание черкесских князей в 1839—40-х гг.'; "Conference of Circassian princes in 1839-40" --Hardscarf 06:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Amurbridge.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Amurbridge.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ahonc (talk) 10:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Chechens19.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Chechens19.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ahonc (talk) 10:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted - the author (and so the source)information is explicitly stated. --Hardscarf (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Chechens19.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Ahonc (talk) 18:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dudaev&family.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 05:41, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:W W Chusovaya Kama crossing.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Art-top (talk) 12:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Majdanek-1944.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

russavia (talk) 12:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Hardscarf!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:53, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]