User talk:Hanneke Heinemann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hanneke Heinemann!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Neubau Leica Camera - Innen.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Hallo, dies ist ein Foto eines Innenraumes, hier greift also die Panoramafreiheit nicht. Wir brauchen also die Genehmigung des Urhebers, hier: des Architekten, für diese Abbildung. Er muss dabei schriftlich einer freien Lizenz zustimmen, wie das geht, steht unter COM:OTRS. --Emha (talk) 13:33, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neubau Leica Camera Fassade.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective correction necessary. And please remove the chromatic aberrations. Possibly, a tweak for the whites should be done, too (look at the histo). --Cccefalon 11:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Cccefalon thanks to the photography workshop in de.WP we have a IMHO better version. --Emha 12:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It is indeed much better. However, I think the workshop guys can polish it a little bit more: The histo is still scratching at the RGB255 corner and reducing the whites a little bit will probably enhance the bright parts of the cloud structure. But no worries, this image is on the way to QI! --Cccefalon 14:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Cccefalon: Thanks for your suggestions - and thanks to User:Hic et nunc it is even more improved now. ✓ Done --Emha 19:48, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Some minor issues left, but overall good and also nice example of collabourative work. Can pass as QI imo. --Cccefalon 04:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

File:Martine Andernach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]