User talk:Haneburger

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Haneburger!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Haneburger!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Hinterhorn Alm.JPG is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
• Image:Stanser Joch.JPG is uncategorized since 9 August 2009.

Checklist anonymous edits (COM:CVU)

Hi Haneburger,

As a you've probebly noticed, since this week the patrolling functionality has been enabled for all edits, no longer just for page creations (hence the Sitenotice). This enables us to track, for example, anonymous edits on Commons. I'd like to invite you to check out the Anonymous edits list and maybe patrol part of a day. See also the updated Commons:Patrol.
If you have any questions please leave message on the CVU talkpage, my talkpage or on IRC. --Krinkle^talk 12:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Krinkle,

Thanks for the invitation. A systematic patrolling of a day-part I can make only from time to time, because it needs more time than I normally have. Mainly I want to focus on the fields of my interests (i.e. mountains, geography). --Haneburger (talk) 07:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Königspitze Sunrise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments great arrangement of areas, very light, yet very distinct distribution of colours, fantastic.--Rupert Pupkin 19:36, 5 July 2010 (UTC)]] 17:43, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fitz Roy group - Laguna Capri - 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Thanks for the nomination of this picture! I even never have thought that it would be selected as quality image. Sincerely, --Gagea (talk) 17:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochnissl from Walder Alm.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Atemberaubend! --Cosmicdancer 11:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle auf der Walder Alm.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question It's tilted? --Pudelek 13:56, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Circa 2 degrees turned right. Better? --Haneburger 17:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Comment ok now --Pudelek 16:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbstlicher Buchenwald bei Gaflenz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments not perfect, but nice atmosphere --Carschten 15:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Erklärungstafel im Freilichtmuseum Himmelreich.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:Gedenktafel Karl Stainer und Alfons Kasseroler.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

TUSC token 585df7d7ec45f08d119e0708621998dc

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Haneburger, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:07, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Summersberg 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice view and atmosphere --Mbdortmund 16:55, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegkreuz bei Rum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:17, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

File:ÖBB 4024 Innsbruck Hauptbahnhof.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:54, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obernberg am Brenner gegen Olperer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --JLPC 09:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burning tractor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaflenz2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:20, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karren am Dürrenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Gzzz 20:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuhmöser von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Moroder 09:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canisianum Innsbruck from NNW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Iifar 14:27, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Folded serpentinite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lizumer Sonnenspitze from S.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:36, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junsjoch und Pluderling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turm der Karlskirche Volders.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice atmosphere. -- Felix Koenig 15:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gebetsfahnen bei der Kellerjochhütte.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:51, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hall in Tirol, Medienturm auf dem Salinenareal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Skibild mit Berghintergrund

Hallo, bei File:Carving.jpg ist sowohl das Bild selbst als auch deine Beschreibung, die das Bild wesentlich nützlicher gemacht hat, geändert worden. Wie früher der unidentifizierte Berg ist auch jetzt wieder etwas zu sehen, das wesentlich interessanter wäre, wenn im Text stünde, was es ist. Die Person, die die Änderung vorgenommen hat, scheint weder auf Commons noch auf der en-Wikipedia auf Anschreiben zu reagieren. Vielleicht magst du ja Bild und Text zurücksetzen und findest vielleicht sogar ein Zuhause für das aktuelle Bild? --Dustsucker (talk) 02:13, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Danke für das Hinweis, habe die Sache repariert. --Haneburger (talk) 09:57, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Haneburger, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OE-LIR at Innsbruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 09:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Karlskirche

bitte unterlass solche schnappsideen fürderhin, das macht nur arbeit W!B: (talk) 12:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Stimmt, hätte nicht passieren dürfen aber wenn man fast neben der wohnt kann es schon passieren, dass man plötzlich nur mehr die eine sieht. Viele Grüße, --Haneburger (talk) 12:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

danke, sorry für den ruppigen anpfiff, wenn das mit deutschen passiert, sag ich mir, na ja, dass die zu bornioert oder beschrankt sind, über den tellerrand zu gucken, kennt man, putz man ein bisserl den hintern ab, den rest sollen sie selber machen: bei einem österreicher geht mir mein argument abhanden, wir wären umsichtiger: Dein nettes wiedergutmachen zeigt, dass Du aber eh aus derselben schule kommst: danke, und ich hab BKS gemacht statt speedy - lg W!B: (talk) 12:28, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Danke auch, BKS ist wohl das Bessere. LG --Haneburger (talk) 12:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bärenbach (Urschenbach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Tschanüff in Ramosch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 11:36, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Decrease of quality in the corners

Hallo Haneburger! Thanks for promoting my image and for your comment which I find interesting. How can you tell that the quality decreases in the corners? Couldn't it be the lens? Regards, Wolfgang --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:06, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Wolfgang Moroder, ich antworte auf Deutsch, auf Englisch muss ich mich herumplagen, den richtigen Ausdruck zu finden. Natürlich habe ich das Objektiv gemeint, dessen Leistung etwa in der rechten oberen Ecke sichtlich abfällt. Aber was meine D200 mit ihren 10 MP oft noch verbirgt, offenbart die D800 mit ihren 36 MP schonungslos. Ich halte die D800 für eine gigantisch gute Kamera, nur offenbart sie einfach gnadenlos alles, seien es Unschärfen, Verwackler oder die Qualität der Objektive. Ich schätze deine Bilder, die du mit der D800 machst sehr und bewundere auch ihren Detailreichtum. Viele Grüße, --Haneburger (talk) 10:52, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, vielleicht war das Objectiv (ich hab mir etwas Geld dafür geleistet) nur schmutzig. Sonst muss ich es zurückgeben? Liebe Grüsse und Dank --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Bin da kein Experte, Schmutz will ich nicht ausschließen, glaube ich aber irgendwie nicht ganz. Daher nur Mutmaßungen: Es gibt bei Objektiven und bei der Ausrichtung der Sensorebene bekanntlich Toleranzen und wenn sich die beiden in negativer Weise addieren...? Daher ist nicht jedes Objektiv auf jedem Apparat gleich gut. Bevor du es zurückgibst vielleicht den Backstein-Test machen? Kamera aufs Stativ und eine gleichmäßige Ziegelwand mit verschiedenen Einstellungen aufnehmen. Habe ich selber noch nie gemacht, soll aber gut funktionieren.

Habe übrigens gerade gesehen, dass du ein Bild von mir für die QI kandidieren hast lassen. Danke! Ich halte das Bild für nicht schlecht - aber auch nicht für perfekt, mal sehen. Liebe Grüße --Haneburger (talk) 13:16, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piz dal Ras und Zug der Rhätischen Bahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. - A.Savin 20:39, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Passhöhe am Ofenpass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think you should cut a bit the street on the bottom --Moroder 20:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC) Very nice place and good photo! --Ximeg 20:21, 11 November 2012 (UTC)  CommentThanks for the reviews, croped a little bit at the bottom --Haneburger 14:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Himmelsrichtungen …

Hallo Haneburger, 3 von 4 Himmelsrichtungen hätten wir durch :-) Danke für deine Aufmerksamkeit. Aber was will man auch bei einem Berg der Kellerjoch heißt, da ist ja oben und unten auch fraglich? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Stimmt, bei dem Berg ist alles verkehrt. Das mit Norden ist übrigens davon gekommen, weil ich den Berg so gefühlsmäßig mehr von Norden her fotografiert habe und erst dann auf der Karte gesehen habe, wie weit westlich ich gestanden bin. Danke übrigens auch, dass du immer wieder mal bei Bildern von mir die Kategorien nachbesserst. Die Beobachtungsliste offenbart immer wieder, wo ich schlampig war. Liebe Grüße --Haneburger (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opere di scarico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiostro di San Zeno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Indeed --Poco a poco 18:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzgang barmherzige Schwestern Innsbruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to go --Poco a poco 21:53, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftsalm-Kapelle aussen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Frage

Hi, Was stimmt da mit den Hintergrund nicht? Stört dich etwa das unschärfe Buqet? ... ist so beabsichtigt und soll auch so sein. Interessanterweise hat ein solches anderes Bild von mir ein positive Bewertung erhalten. LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 06:47, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Steinsplitter, das ist sicher auch eine Geschmacksfrage. Mich persönlich haben bei dem Bild mit den Anemonen die extrem hellen Lichter im Hintergrund gestört, die in starke Konkurrenz zu dem Weiß der Blüten treten. Bei mir haben sie den Blick automatisch von den Blüten weggelenkt. Dass der Hintergrund unscharf ist, stört überhaupt nicht, im Gegenteil - aber die extremen Kontraste machen das Bouquet unruhig. Beim Trollblumenbild stören mich die hellen Lichter im Hintergrund schon etwas weniger, nur wirkt das Weiß irgendwie wie ein Halo rund um die Bäume. Was mich bei dem Bild aber vor allem stört ist die rechte Blume, die direkt aus dem Bild hinauszeigt und die rechts meines Erachtens mehr Raum bräuchte. Trotzdem, den Ansatz Blumen mit kurzen Brennweiten zu fotografieren, kann man sicher etwas abgewinnen, bildgestalterisch ist das aber recht anspruchsvoll...Aber das alles sind mehr so meine persönlichen Eindrücke, ich bin am Lernen und vielleicht sieht das ein anderer wieder ganz anders. LG --Haneburger (talk) 07:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nel chiostro di San Zeno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Indeed --Poco a poco 19:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sendeanlage am Dach des ORF Tirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:01, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martinswand from SE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice! --Moroder 11:00, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balduinstein, center from west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and good IMO--Lmbuga 19:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gipfelkreuz Haneburger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel on the Walder Alm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voldertal from Walder Alm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Haneburger⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potsdamer Hütte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --P e z i 12:55, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Haneburger,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ÖBB 4020 in Wien Speising.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:45, 09 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! G-EZUS at Innsbruck Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:55, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airbus A319 G-EZIK at Innsbruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality but needs perspective correction (e.g. the concrete funnel is not rectilinear). --Cccefalon 08:46, 9 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Very good image for me. I see no reason for any perspective correction. -- Spurzem 20:50, 9 March 2015 (UTC)  Support I agree with Spurzem. --El Grafo 09:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich

... für Dein Engagement

Danke für Deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich. Du hast damit einen wertvollen Beitrag geleistet, Bildmaterial für die Wikipedia und für eine Weiternutzung im Sinne freien Wissens bereitzustellen. Die Jury sichtet nun in einem mehrstufigen Verfahren die Einreichungen. Die Gewinner geben wir am 30. September 2015 unter anderem auf wikilovesearth.at bekannt. Die öffentliche Preisverleihung, zu der wir Dich schon jetzt herzlich einladen, findet im November 2015 in Wien statt. Bei Fragen zum Wettbewerb schreibe bitte an infowikilovesearth.at. Der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich wird Wiki Loves Monuments im September 2015 sein.

Danke ebenso für Deine Beiträge, die Du unabhängig von Wiki Loves Earth leistest. Solltest Du bei Deinen Fotounternehmungen Unterstützung benötigen, kannst Du Dich jederzeit an den österreichischen Förderverein Wikimedia Österreich wenden (eine Vereinsmitgliedschaft ist keine Voraussetzung). Zu den Serviceangeboten für ehrenamtliche Fotografinnen und Fotografen gehören ein Pool an Fotoequipment, die Organisation von Fotoakkreditierungen, Reisekostenerstattungen sowie E-Mail-Adressen und Visitenkarten. Wikimedia Österreich kannst Du über vereinwikimedia.at kontaktieren.

--Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk)  14:49, 3 Jul 2015 (UTC)  > für das Team von Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich

Die Preisträger stehen fest

Die Jury hat entschieden - die zehn Preisträger von Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich findest Du hier: http://wikilovesearth.at/gewinner-wle-2015/. In dieser Endauswahl ist leider kein Bild von Dir vertreten. Unter den 500 Fotos, die von der Vorjury für die engere Auswahl vorgesehen wurden, sind zwei Deiner Bilder: http://wikilovesearth.at/tools/vorjury/index_2015.html. Noch bis 30. September gibt es die Möglichkeit am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments rund um denkmalgeschützte Bauwerke teilzunehmen. --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 08:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarzhorn und Höhe Schöne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Gruß aus Wien! --Hubertl 09:58, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White Tower in Thessaloniki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gregory Palamas Thessaloniki from NW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Gruß aus Wien! --Hubertl 08:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich

... fürs Mitmachen!

Vielen Dank für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich. Die Jury hat entschieden und die diesjährigen Preisträger wurden veröffentlicht: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/.

In etwa einem halben Jahr findet mit Wiki Loves Earth (http://wikilovesearth.at/) der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich statt, bei dem es um Naturdenkmäler geht. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn du auch an diesem Wettbewerb wieder teilnimmst.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 18:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotmoos in Absam.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:48, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Servus Haneburger,

Am Sonntag, den 1. Mai 2016 startete zum dritten Mal der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich.
Wir laden dich herzlich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mit Fotos von Naturdenkmälern und weiteren unter Naturschutz stehenden Objekten aus Österreich teilzunehmen. Der Zeitraum, in dem die Bilder auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen werden sollen, läuft bis 31. Mai 2016.
Alle Informationen findest du hier: https://wikilovesearth.at/.

Zusätzlich wollen wir dich dazu einladen, als Mitglied der Vorjury die diesjährigen Beiträge zu begutachten: Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Earth 2016/Österreich/Jury. Du kannst bei der Vorjury auch mitmachen, wenn du selbst am Fotowettbewerb teilnimmst. Deine eigenen Fotos werden dir dann nicht zur Bewertung vorgelegt.
Bitte melde dich zur Vorjury an. Der Bewertungszeitraum liegt zwischen 15. Mai und 15. Juni 2016. Jede Stimme ist willkommen. Liebe Grüße im Namen des Organisationsteams,
--Agruwie  ^Disk    15:07, 5 May 2016 (CET)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago della Val d'Inferno.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:01, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Category:Hans Psenner Steg

Servus, Haneburger,

du hast mal die Kategorie Hans Psenner Steg angelegt und sie dabei in die Oberkategorie Files by User:Thisisbossi gestellt. Nun sind erstens nur drei der neun Bilder von Thisisbossi, und zweitens scheint es mir eine starke Einschränkung zu sein, eine Sachkategorie einem einzelnen Benutzer zuzuordnen. Du hast ja selbst Bilder in diese Kategorie gestellt.

Was meinst du? Grüße -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 07:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe es ausgebessert. Wahrscheinlich habe ich das bei einem Paste - Copy übersehen. --Haneburger (talk) 08:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Fresko Krönung Mariens in der Seekapelle.jpg

File:Fresko Krönung Mariens in der Seekapelle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Fotorechte

Hallo Hermann! Ich habe eine Frage zu den Verwendungsrechten von Fotos, die du am Donauturm aufgenommen hast. Ich würde die für eine Gegenüberstellung zum alten Wien verwenden (www.zeitenspruenge.at), kannst du mich dafür per Mail auf zeitenspruenge@gmail.com kontaktieren? Danke Lg Alex 62.240.134.124 12:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)