User talk:Halavar/Archive7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Oriflame Fashion Night (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ----Шухрат Саъдиев 18:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Seminarium duchowne (03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Seminarium duchowne (02).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Namiot weselny (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1576 khatchkar from Julfa in Vagharshapat, Armavir Province, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1602 khatchkar from Julfa in Vagharshapat, Armavir Province, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK. --C messier 14:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:17, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Chaczkar z 1602 roku ze zniszczonego cmentarza w Dżulfie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DKrieger 09:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Chaczkary (z 1602 i 1603 roku) ze zniszczonego cmentarza w Dżulfie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DKrieger 20:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality--6AND5 21:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Trzy chaczkary na dziedzińcu przed seminarium duchownym.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DKrieger 20:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Żołnierze na Placu Wolności.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --6AND5 21:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Autobus PAZ-672.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Zwartnoc, Ruiny katedry Zwartnoc 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Either a little bit oversharpened or not processed from a RAW: The sky shows jpeg artefacts. Can be fixed by reprocessing. --Cccefalon 20:12, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 11:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, artefacts are gone now. --Cccefalon 20:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Three Khachkars in the courtyard in front of the Theological Seminary. Vagharshapat, Armavir Province, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Akademik seminarium duchownego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 18:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Tomaszów Lubelski, Cerkiew św. Mikołaja (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:55, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Tomaszów Lubelski, Fontanna (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Tomaszów Lubelski, Pomnik ku czci Sybiraków (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Tomaszów Lubelski, Budynek Państwowej Szkoły Muzycznej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yeni Mosque in Bitola, Republic of Macedonia. View from S..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Wieża zegarowa (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Question: You can reduce the noise?--Famberhorst 15:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Problem fixed. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 16:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Picture is less clear, but okay for me.--Famberhorst 04:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Pomnik Józefa Szwejka na rynku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:27, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015, Przemyśl, Zamek Kazimierzowski (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Kamienica, Ulica Grodzka 1 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Kamienica, Ulica Grodzka 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Tomaszów Lubelski, Pomnik ku czci Sybiraków (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Tomaszów Lubelski, Cerkiew św. Mikołaja (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Brama Pile (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Kościół Karmelitów pw. św. Teresy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015, Przemyśl, Zamek Kazimierzowski (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Bazylika archikatedralna Wniebowzięcia Najświętszej Maryi Panny i św. Jana Chrzciciela (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:23, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Kamienice, ulica Grodzka 1 i ulica Grodzka 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:20, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Grodzka Street in Przemyśl, Subcarpathian Voivodeship, Poland. View from N..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011 Gjirokastra, Twierdza 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011 Gjirokastra, Twierdza 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Wieża zegarowa (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:11, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Baptysterium św. Wardana Mamikoniana i pomnik ludobójstwa Ormian (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Pomnik ludobójstwa Ormian (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Josef Švejk monument on the Market Square in Przemyśl, Subcarpathian Voivodeship, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Baptysterium św. Wardana Mamikoniana i pomnik ludobójstwa Ormian (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:45, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Dziewczyna i ksiądz Apostolskiego Kościoła Ormiańskiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:45, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Ludzie przed katedrą w Eczmiadzynie (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, --Cayambe 16:12, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Dwa chaczkary na dziedzińcu przed seminarium duchownym.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:45, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Katedra w Eczmiadzynie (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Kościół Karmelitów pw. św. Teresy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me, difficult position to capture this church. --Hubertl 09:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The northern wing of the Przemyśl Castle. Przemyśl, Subcarpathian Voivodeship, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Chaczkar z 996 roku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Katedra w Eczmiadzynie (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Chaczkar z XIII wieku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Armenian Genocide memorial in Vagharshapat, Armavir Province, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Khachkar from 996 in Vagharshapat, Armavir Province, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13th-century khachkar from Geghard in Vagharshapat, Armavir Province, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Ludzie przed katedrą w Eczmiadzynie (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Pomnik ludobójstwa Ormian (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:11, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Budynek Rządowy (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me now. --Cayambe 12:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Narodowa Galeria Armenii i Muzeum Historii Armenii (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 06:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Chrześcijańskie Centrum Edukacyjne, Pomnik przed budynkiem (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christian Education Center of Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin in Vagharshapat, Armavir Province, Armenia. View from S..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Chrześcijańskie Centrum Edukacyjne, Pomnik przed budynkiem (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:08, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Baptysterium św. Wardana Mamikoniana (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:18, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Chrześcijańskie Centrum Edukacyjne (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok.--ArildV 14:12, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Widok na miasto z baszty wschodniej zamku (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 05:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank), Widok na klasztor Norawank (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Baptysterium św. Wardana Mamikoniana (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:33, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Chaczkar na dziedzińcu przed seminarium duchownym.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 23:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank), Widok na klasztor Norawank (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support--Jebulon 09:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 10:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)--[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please increase the contrast a little bit. --Code 06:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, you were right, looks better. New version uploaded. --Halavar 10:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Code 06:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank), Widok na klasztor Norawank (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Budynek Rządowy (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slightly tilted ccw --Cccefalon 06:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Fixed. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 10:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Widok na miasto z baszty wschodniej zamku (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI, IMO --Hubertl 10:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Widok na miasto z baszty wschodniej zamku (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI, IMO --Hubertl 10:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Przemyśl, Widok na miasto z baszty północnej zamku (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI, IMO --Hubertl 10:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 12:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Trzy chaczkary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Chaczkar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 13:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Budynek Rządowy (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 11:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 11:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok now. --Cayambe 10:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice composition, QI. --Palauenc05 16:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

QI[edit]

Cześć. Poprawiłem to zdjęcie. Pzdr. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:31, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Budynek muzeum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 11:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Chaczkary (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 11:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Chaczkary (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The crop is not perfect, but the dome is centered. QI for me. --Hubertl 16:30, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bas-relief of the Madonna and Child on the St. John the Baptist Church (Surb Karapet). Noravank monastery, Vayots Dzor Province, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 05:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Chaczkary (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, widoki okolic Jeghegnadzor (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, widoki okolic Jeghegnadzor (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, widoki okolic Jeghegnadzor (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wernaszen, Kościół św. Hakoba (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, Widoki okolic Arpi (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, wjazd do miasta Jeghegnadzor (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Kościół Matki Boskiej (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:14, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Chaczkar (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 13:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The museum building. Noravank monastery. Gnishik gorge (Noravank Gorge), Vayots Dzor Province, Armenia. View from West..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wernaszen, Kościół św. Hakoba, chaczkary (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:22, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Norawank, Chaczkary (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 18:03, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Hakob church in Vernashen, Vayots Dzor Province, Armenia. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wernaszen, Turystyczna tablica pokazująca kierunek do klasztoru Spitakawor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wernaszen, Droga przez wioskę w stronę klasztoru Spitakawor (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, widoki okolic Jeghegnadzor (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 03:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, widoki okolic Jeghegnadzor (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 03:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, Widoki okolic Arpi (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Very nice landscape photography! --Michael Barera 03:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wąwóz Gnishik (Wąwóz Norawank) (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Wernaszen, Droga przez wioskę w stronę klasztoru Spitakawor (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, widoki okolic Jeghegnadzor (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:07, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, widoki okolic Jeghegnadzor (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice colors --Daniel Case 03:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (46).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, Widoki okolic Arpi (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, widoki okolic Jeghegnadzor (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, widoki okolic Jeghegnadzor (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, widoki okolic Jeghegnadzor (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:55, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 13:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 13:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (36).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Gladzor, Widok wsi z drogi H47 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 02:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fajne, choć przydałoby się ciut kontrastu --Pudelek 16:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Krajobrazy widziane z drogi M2, widoki okolic Jeghegnadzor (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, and great colors! --Michael Barera 01:35, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (63).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can be a bit sharper, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (67).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (70).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (57).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (61).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (127).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 11:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Spitakawor (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Spitakawor (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Spitakawor (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Klasztor Spitakawor (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (135).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (48).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (52).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spitakavor monastery. Vayots Dzor Province, Armenia. View from N-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Mkhitar Gosh. Matenadaran. Yerevan, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Goris, Pociąg i karuzela dla dzieci.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (55).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (59).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:51, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:14, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:51, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (71).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 01:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (58).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 22:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (56).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 06:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (75).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 00:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (67).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Jeghegnadzor, Wjazd do centrum miasta od strony drogi M2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Благодарность[edit]

Уважаемый Marcin Konsek, спасибо вам за бесценные фото Армении я всегда слежу за вами и восхищаюсь вашими фотографиями. Сегодня увидел скульптуры наших героев в Джермуке (скульптора Ованеса Мурадяна ) Ахпюр Сероба и Грайр Джохка, надеюсь фото признают качественными. Удачи вам и еще раз спасибо за ваши фото. --Armenak Margarian (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Widok z mostu nad rzeką Arpa (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Plakat reklamowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Statua w parku (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:15, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Pijalnia wód mineralnych (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:08, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (64).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:08, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Имена герове[edit]

Здравствуй Halavar, я не знаю как тебе легче будет тебе сказать имена героев но я могу только так

1. File:2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Rzeźba w skale (06).jpg Aghbiur Serob was a famed Armenian military commander

2. File:2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Rzeźba w skale (07).jpg Aghbiur Serob

3. File:2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Rzeźba w skale (04).jpg Hrayr Dzhoghk was an Armenian military leader and strategist

4. 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Rzeźba w skale (05).jpg (fichier) Sose Mayrig the wife of famous hajduk leader Serob Aghpur

5. 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Rzeźba w skale (02).jpg Makhluto also known as General Smbat, was an Armenian fedayee commander

6. 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Rzeźba w skale (01).jpg Makhluto

7. 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Rzeźba w skale (03).jpg Andranik Ozanian was an Armenian military commander and statesman, the best known fedayi and a key figure of the Armenian national liberation movement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armenak Margarian (talk • contribs) 18:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Opuszczony Pałac Sportu (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Rzeźba w skale (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 12:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Rzeźba w skale (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 12:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Pijalnia wód mineralnych (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 12:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Rzeźba w skale (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Pomnik z mini wodospadem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 20:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Pijalnia wód mineralnych (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 20:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (74).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (78).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Opuszczony Pałac Sportu (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 17:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Rzeźba w skale (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Pijalnia wód mineralnych (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (56).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:27, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:27, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (76).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 10:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful holidays[edit]

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 16:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***[edit]

* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 18:17, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Wodospad (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Most nad kanionem rzeki Arpa (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Pijalnia wód mineralnych (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Plac z przystankiem autobusowym (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:04, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (65).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:30, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (70).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 16:39, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (45).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:52, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal. Spitakavor monastery. Vayots Dzor Province, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (60).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Jeghegnadzor, Rzeźba na ścianie budynku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 15:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Jeghegnadzor, Nieczynny diabelski młyn (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 15:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Rzeźba w skale (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (71).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK for me. --C messier 17:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Plac z przystankiem autobusowym (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:25, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (68).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Hubertl 18:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Jeghegnadzor, Nieczynny diabelski młyn (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Most przy wodospadzie na rzece Arpa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:39, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (69).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:17, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 16:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (51).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:08, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Chyndzoresk (010).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Domdomegg 19:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

QI Tunisia training[edit]

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Chyndzoresk (005).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Although the polarizing filter is preferred with an average long focal (and 50mm equivalent), the result seems correct for IQ.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Chyndzoresk (018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Chyndzoresk (020).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Latarnia uliczna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Jeghegnadzor, Nieczynny diabelski młyn (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Sharp enough for me. --Michael Barera 04:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Chyndzoresk (028).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit would be nice sharper, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:55, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (006).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 02:00, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Chyndzoresk (040).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Widoki z trasy Chyndzoresk - Goris (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Chyndzoresk (034).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Krajobraz widziany z drogi M2 pomiędzy Goris a Szaki (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Krajobraz widziany z drogi M2 pomiędzy Goris a Szaki (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me, not really sharp, but due because out of the car. --Hubertl 20:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (002).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Krajobraz widziany z drogi M2 pomiędzy Goris a Szaki (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp photo, perspective is good --Michielverbeek 06:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Dżermuk, Statua w parku (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (047).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (042).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (034).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (028).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (029).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Krajobraz widziany z drogi M2 pomiędzy Goris a Szaki (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Chyndzoresk (038).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 18:13, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (016).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Widok na okoliczne wzgórza i góry (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 20:16, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Chyndzoresk (046).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments That seems good quality .--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (051).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (026).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (024).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:54, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Widok na okoliczne wzgórza i góry (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Widok na okoliczne wzgórza i góry (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Widok na okoliczne wzgórza i góry (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (050).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (049).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Widok na okoliczne wzgórza i góry (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Widok na okoliczne wzgórza i góry (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (052).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (054).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (057).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (081).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (080).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (070).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (082).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (077).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (061).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (075).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (084).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (074).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Formacje skalne widziane na drodze do wodospadu Szaki (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support I suppose that the tiny white spots in the sky are clouds. Good quality. But please add a meaningful category. --Code 07:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Categories added. Thanks for the hint! --Halavar 16:19, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Formacje skalne widziane na drodze do wodospadu Szaki (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality, but please add a meaningful category. --Code 07:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Categories added. Thanks for the hint! --~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (079).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Although it's a little noisy in the sky and the sharpness could be better. Still a QI IMO. --Code 07:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (72).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality although the lens sharpness is very weak at the corners. Your pictures are so nice compositionally, I hope you'll get a better lens soon! --Code 07:13, 17 January 2016 (UTC)~[reply]
You're right, this lens has a problem with sharpness. Now I've got better one: Canon EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS USM --Halavar 16:19, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Widok na okoliczne wzgórza i góry (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Sharp enough for a landscape, in my opinion. --Michael Barera 02:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (072).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (35).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:52, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (058).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:52, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (059).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:38, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (36).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not 100% sure about the tilt, but fine --Poco a poco 20:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (37).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:38, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (40).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:47, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (44).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (064).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (62).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 05:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (56).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 05:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (078).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 05:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Krajobraz widziany z drogi pomiędzy Zorac Karer a Szaki (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (65).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMO tilted CCW and/or perspective correction necessary. --XRay 14:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New, fixed version uploaded, please take a look again. --Halavar 17:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support IMO OK now. Thank you. --XRay 10:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Widok na okoliczne wzgórza i góry (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --A.Savin 00:15, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (46).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (073).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Goris, Kościół św. Grzegorza Oświeciciela (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:45, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Goris, Pomnik poległych za Ojczyznę.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Goris, Widok na Stary Goris (Kores) (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 21:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:11, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Goris, Kościół św. Grzegorza Oświeciciela (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Widok z klasztoru Tatew na okoliczny krajobraz (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 13:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMO perspective correction necessary. --XRay 07:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New, fixed version uploaded, please take a look again. --Halavar 20:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support IMO OK now. --XRay 16:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]