User talk:Halavar/Archive10

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Międzynarodowa siłownia Gan Boon Leonga - pomnik Gan Boon Leonga (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kolorowa riksza rowerowa (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very special! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Jalan Tokong (ulica świątyni).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice slice of life. Hazy, but good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:59, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum Malajów i Świata Islamskiego (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:51, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Stary zdobiony dom na ulicy Jonker (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I wish the top of the building were more focused, but overall, a solid QI of a nice motif. -- Ikan Kekek 06:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
UMNO Museum in Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. View from West.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope. Nikhil (talk) 03:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Stary zdobiony dom na ulicy Jonker (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:08, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Międzynarodowa siłownia Gan Boon Leonga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Świątynia Kwan Im (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kolorowy budynek na Jalan Tukang Besi (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Fontanna na centralnym placu (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 16:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Budynek, Ulica Sioni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (03).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:50, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Stary zdobiony dom na ulicy Jonker (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too shallow DoF, statue on the top is out of focus. --Lucasbosch 09:05, 5 November 2016 (UTC)  Question - Lucasbosch, those look like Decline arguments. Did you mean to decline? -- Ikan Kekek 09:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, A Famosa (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 14:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynek-memoriał Proklamacji Niepodległości (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:43, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kolorowa riksza rowerowa (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:10, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kościół św. Pawła (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 14:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Petronas Towers (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You could try de-noising the sky a bit more, but this is good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 01:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Menara Maxis (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 01:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Ulica Jonker (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:02, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Świątynia Cheng Hoon Teng (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Petronas Towers (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Menara Public Bank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok for me Good Quality --Bijay chaurasia 15:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Suria KLCC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur City Centre (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Główna siedziba Bank Simpanan Nasional.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Post

Hi, we thanked you officially ;). Also happy Polish National Independence Day!--g. balaxaZe★ 19:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Siedziba główna Keretapi Tanah Melayu (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:53, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Stacja kolejowa Kuala Lumpur (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:53, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Muzeum Narodowe, Tablica informacyjna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur City Centre (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little soft, but the composition is good. -- Ikan Kekek 11:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, A Famosa (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sufficiently good for QI, I believe. -- Ikan Kekek 11:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kolorowa riksza rowerowa (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:45, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Most Pasar nad rzeką Malakka (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Plac Holenderski (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 11:43, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Meczet Narodowy Malezji (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus is a little soft but acceptable; good composition. -- Ikan Kekek 07:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Petronas Towers (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Petronas Towers (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:01, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Запрошення на церемонію нагородження переможців фотоконкурсів ВЛП та ВЛЗ 3 грудня 2016

Доброї пори доби! Дякуємо за участь у фотоконкурсі/ах, що проходили за підтримки «Вікімедіа Україна», та запрошуємо на церемонію нагородження переможців «Вікі любить пам'ятки» та «Вікі любить Землю» 2016 року, що відбудеться 3 грудня (субота) у Національному музеї історії України (м. Київ, вул. Володимирська, 2), початок об 11:00. Подія у Facebook.

З повагою, оргкомітети конкурсів.--20:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Menara Maxis (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:05, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Park KLCC, Fontanna na jeziorze Symphony (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Petronas Towers (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Still, I'd reduce the height/width ratio. I know the spot and it looks a bit stretched out to me --Poco a poco 15:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Petronas Towers (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 22:42, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Siedziba główna Keretapi Tanah Melayu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be sharper, but okay for QI. --Haeferl 03:40, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Park KLCC i Suria KLCC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (The crop is inevitable this way, I guess) --A.Savin 16:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Stary zdobiony dom na ulicy Jonker (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:39, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Park KLCC, Fontanna na jeziorze Symphony (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is OK. -- Ikan Kekek 00:41, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Petronas Towers (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Stary zdobiony dom na ulicy Jonker (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Świątynia Cheng Hoon Teng (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 00:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Petronas Towers (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Meczet Narodowy Malezji (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:48, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Petronas Towers (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very small aura top of the sphere, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 17:07, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Petronas Towers (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Aspect ratio could maybe been improved, not sure, but QI --Poco a poco 18:07, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Park KLCC, Fontanna na jeziorze Symphony (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Stacja kolejowa Kuala Lumpur (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Meczet Jamek (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks a bit flat, could need some more contrast or sharpness. Acceptable, though. --Basotxerri 16:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Muzeum Muzyki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Budynek Sułtana Abdula Samada (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Budynek Sułtana Abdula Samada (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Narodowe Muzeum Włókiennictwa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gray, rainy day but good overall quality in the representation of the subject. However, the Arab-influenced Modernist building to its right is also depicted almost in full, so if you know its name, (a) I'd be interested; (b) please include it in your categories. -- Ikan Kekek 12:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC)  Done --Halavar 12:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek 13:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Meczet Jamek (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Budynek Sułtana Abdula Samada (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Budynek Sułtana Abdula Samada (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall, it's probably a bit over the line, considering the atmospheric conditions of the day. However, I'm not all that happy with the sharpness of the further reaches of the building, so if you can do at least a subtle sharpening, I think you could improve the photo. -- Ikan Kekek 12:05, 24 December 2016 (UTC)  Done --Halavar 12:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Świątynia San Duo (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:33, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Meczet Jamek (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)  Comment - Really interesting picture, especially for someone like me who used to live in Malaysia and hasn't been to KL since 2003, but also in general, both for the lines and planes and the contrast between old and new. If you could have gotten really good focus, I might have been tempted to nominate this for FP. -- Ikan Kekek 12:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Budynek Sułtana Abdula Samada (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Meczet Jamek (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Budynek Sułtana Abdula Samada (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Petronas Towers (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Sharpness at the top could be better. --XRay 06:40, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Ulica Tun Tan Cheng Lock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia taoistyczna Guan Di (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia Chan She Shu Yuen (36).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia Chan She Shu Yuen (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Domy-sklepy na ulicy Tun H S Lee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Dataran Merdeka (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia Chan She Shu Yuen (35).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia Chan She Shu Yuen (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 18:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Budynek Sułtana Abdula Samada (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A good composition, nice to see the contrast with the modern buildings in the background, sharp enough for Q1. Only the right part of the main object might have been a bit deformed --Michielverbeek 11:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Międzynarodowa siłownia Gan Boon Leonga - pomnik Gan Boon Leonga (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The top crop appears a bit short to me, but QI nevertheless. --Cayambe 15:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Sklep z pamiątkami (02).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Sklep z pamiątkami (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia Chan She Shu Yuen (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia Chan She Shu Yuen (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Had probably been a little sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Menara Maxis (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Meczet Jamek (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 21:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Dekoracje z okazji Chińskiego Nowego Roku (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 23:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Domy-sklepy (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:02, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Wejście do ulicy Smitha - Chinatown Food Street (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 23:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia Chan She Shu Yuen (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Dekoracje z okazji Chińskiego Nowego Roku (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Domy-sklepy (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Domy-sklepy (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Smitha - Chinatown Food Street (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Autobus wycieczkowy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:39, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Świątynia Sri Mariamman (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Domy-sklepy (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 13:53, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Like the others, this is of iffy quality to me and should be sharpened. -- Ikan Kekek 15:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Domy-sklepy (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please sharpen this one, too. Right now, I think it's at best a weak QI. -- Ikan Kekek 14:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Yor request is done. --Halavar 15:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Clear improvement and now OK for me. -- Ikan Kekek 15:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Dach nad Chinatown Food Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is OK. -- Ikan Kekek 14:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Świątynia i Muzeum Relikwi Zęba Buddy (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Erskine, Domy-sklepy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Domy-sklepy (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Domy-sklepy (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia Chan She Shu Yuen (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Ann Siang, Domy-sklepy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please up the sharpness on this one, too. -- Ikan Kekek 15:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Yor request is done. --Halavar 15:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Sorry, still iffy to me. -- Ikan Kekek 15:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment That is all I can do, without destroying my image. Adding more sharpness means more noise. Sharpness level now is OK for a QI --Halavar 16:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC) I understand that there are limits to what can be done in post-processing. I'll let someone else pass judgment on this photo. -- Ikan Kekek 17:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC) SupportSharp enough for QI and not iffy at all to me. Some noise recuction in the shadows would be fine but is not necessary. --Ermell 08:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Świątynia i Muzeum Relikwi Zęba Buddy (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Świątynia i Muzeum Relikwi Zęba Buddy (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Świątynia i Muzeum Relikwi Zęba Buddy (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Świątynia i Muzeum Relikwi Zęba Buddy (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 18:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia taoistyczna Guan Di (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Smitha - Chinatown Food Street (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Pagody, Dekoracje z okazji Chińskiego Nowego Roku (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments F11 might have been a better option, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Świątynia Sri Mariamman (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 16:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Pagody (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Domy-sklepy (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Świątynia Sri Mariamman (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Meczet Jamae (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Domy-sklepy (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty good quality and nice picture. -- Ikan Kekek 18:38, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Meczet Jamae (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but good enough for me. You found out about all the interesting places of worship in Singapore and Malaysian cities you visited. -- Ikan Kekek 00:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Pagody, Dekoracje z okazji Chińskiego Nowego Roku (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition, very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 18:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Klubowa, Domy-sklepy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Question: Time says 02:37?? Not the local time is it? --Slaunger 20:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Yes, I didn't change the time in my camera. It should be 09:37 --Halavar 22:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia taoistyczna Guan Di (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition. -- Ikan Kekek 00:16, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Dekoracje z okazji Chińskiego Nowego Roku (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I especially like looking down the road and at the background viewed through the decorations. -- Ikan Kekek 19:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Świątynia i Muzeum Relikwi Zęba Buddy (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly grainy at full size, but good quality overall and a great motif. Very good to look at all full-page size. -- Ikan Kekek 19:45, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Smitha - Chinatown Food Street (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good use of off-center approach --Daniel Case 05:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Dekoracje z okazji Chińskiego Nowego Roku (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI and a nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 03:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Thian Hock Keng (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Domy-sklepy (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I wish the skyscraper in the (near) background were sharper, but the jewellery shop itself is good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 15:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Meczet Jamae (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:08, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Klubowa, Domy-sklepy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Maxwell, Red Dot Design Museum (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Thian Hock Keng (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Thian Hock Keng (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Thian Hock Keng (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Domy-sklepy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Domy-sklepy (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Nagore Durgha (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Park Telok Ayer, Znak "Zakaz palenia".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Park Telok Ayer, Pomnik "Procesja chińska" (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
National Textile Museum in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. View from N-W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and clearly the best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sultan Abdul Samad Building in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. View from S-W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I agree that this is the most encyclopedically useful photo of this building on Commons, since the other photos either don't show the entire building or have more distant views, with skyscrapers behind the building and/or stuff in front of it on the Lapangan Merdeka competing for the viewer's interest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica Bussorah, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica Arabska, Domy-sklepy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:04, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Meczet Sułtana (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica North Bridge, Domy-sklepy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:04, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Red Dot Design Museum in Singapore, View from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica Kandahar, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica Kandahar, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Restauracja na ulicy Muscat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:19, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Meczet Sułtana (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Meczet Sułtana (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Thian Hock Keng (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nobody dares? To me its good enough. -- DerFussi 21:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica Kandahar, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica Kandahar, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The perspective I do not like, but the quality is good for me.--Famberhorst 16:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Meczet Sułtana (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica North Bridge, Domy-sklepy (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Thian Hock Keng (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Meczet Malabar (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Centrum Dziedzictwa Malajskiego, Dawny Pałac Kampong Glam (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica Bussorah, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica North Bridge, Domy-sklepy (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Most Pasar nad rzeką Malakka (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality but It's a little little bit oversatured --Christian Ferrer 12:16, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Meczet Al-Abrar (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you remove the CAs, please? --Basotxerri 15:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 19:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC) The CAs were quite strong, it's much better now, but some of them can still be seen. Could you try if you can remove them entirely? --Basotxerri 10:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Ok, hope it's good now. --Halavar 13:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC) OK for me now. --Basotxerri 17:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Świątynia Sri Veeramakaliamman (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 11:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Świątynia Sri Veeramakaliamman (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Serangoon, Domy-sklepy (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Budynek na ulicy Syed Alwi (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Centrum Dziedzictwa Malajskiego, Dawny Pałac Kampong Glam (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Świątynia Sri Veeramakaliamman (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Świątynia Sri Veeramakaliamman (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy but still ok --Poco a poco 20:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Meczet Angullia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica Kandahar, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI, and a really good, pretty composition. If you decide to play with the upper part of the photo to produce a sharper-looking effect, ping me, because if it looked sharper, I would seriously consider nominating the photo for FP. -- Ikan Kekek 20:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Thian Hock Keng (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! There's very, very slight halo on the dragon's head, BTW. --Basotxerri 19:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masjid Sultan in Singapore. Main prayer hall..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Gardens by the Bay, Wewnątrz Kwiatowej Kopuły (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Gardens by the Bay, Wewnątrz Kwiatowej Kopuły (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Gardens by the Bay, Wewnątrz Kwiatowej Kopuły (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Gardens by the Bay, Wewnątrz Kwiatowej Kopuły (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the more precise categorizations

Hi Halavar,

I noticed today in my watchlist that you have made several precisions in the QI classification of QIs of buildings I have created.

I have not been aware of the country-specific categories before for buildings, but I will keep them in mind for the future, such that you do not have to clean up after me. Thanks for undertaking such maintenance tasks. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

When you make edits like this one, you apparently oversee that the files are overcategorized after that (here "Chile" and "Buildings in Chile"). You should stop doing such edits in masses. --A.Savin 13:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your recent changes of my user categories

Dear Halavar, you changed the user categories of one (or more?) of my photos. Please don't do this, because the name and choice of user categories is the sole right of the user. I do not claim, that this image is an image who passed the QIC contest. However, what is a quality image is not a trademark of Commons and it is upon each photographer to decide, if he considers one of his images as a quality image. Of course, he cannot use the QIC label then an also he cannot tag it with Category:Quality images. The user category Category:Quality images by Cccefalon is just my own cup of tea. A discussion about this was already conducted by end of last year, see here. It is unfortunately in German language, but perhaps you can get an idea with google translate. Greetings, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Gardens by the Bay, Wewnątrz Kwiatowej Kopuły (73).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Gardens by the Bay, Wewnątrz Kwiatowej Kopuły (70).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Gardens by the Bay, Wewnątrz Kwiatowej Kopuły (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Centrum Dziedzictwa Malajskiego, Fontanna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Murray, Murray Terrace (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, A Famosa (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Bastion Middleburg (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum Malajów i Świata Islamskiego (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum Ludowe, Stary samolot "Lang Rajawali" (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kościół św. Pawła (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Stary dom obok parku na ulicy 9 kwietnia (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uplisciche, Rezerwat historyczno-architektoniczny (075).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uplisciche, Rezerwat historyczno-architektoniczny (011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:53, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:56, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Nowoczesny most na rzece Bordżomula (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Mocameta, Klasztor Mocameta (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Considering the file size, I think the door is sharp enough although the top of the door in particular is a bit unsharp. I wouldn't mind a second opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 06:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Górna stacja kolejki linowej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 09:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Al-Abrar Mosque in Singapore. View from East.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Kampong Glam Palace, now Malay Heritage Centre in Singapore. Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Malabar Mosque in Singapore. View from East.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Budynek na ulicy Syed Alwi (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:54, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Meczet Malabar (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Ulica Kandahar, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. However, I think it would be better to include some "window"-related category. --Basotxerri 19:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Pagody, Dekoracje z okazji Chińskiego Nowego Roku (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:06, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Świątynia i Muzeum Relikwi Zęba Buddy (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Park Centralny (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 12:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Ckaltubo, Łada Niva 1600 na dworcu autobusowym.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:56, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica South Bridge, Kierunkowe tabliczki turystyczne (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 15:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 15:29, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (012).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:20, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:52, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (39).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sharpness doesn't quite reach the tower and it is also a bit grainy. Do you think you could apply some noise reduction to it and sharpen just the tower a littel more? W.carter 17:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)  Done New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 17:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC) Better. Good quality. --W.carter 16:25, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Budynek Sułtana Abdula Samada (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Fasada domu-sklepu na ulicy Tun H S Lee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (025).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 20:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (013).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 20:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (032).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 20:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (116).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Byki leżące na trawie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gori, Park Stalina (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (133).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The main goal is good and sharp. The tree left behind is a bit disturbing.--Famberhorst 16:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (140).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (167).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Scotch Mist 19:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Cerkiew Metechi (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (016).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK Charlesjsharp 12:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia taoistyczna Guan Di (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (222).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (222).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 17:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Sklep z koszulkami.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Rzeźby na placu Fullertona (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Marina Bay Financial Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, ArtScience Museum (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 19:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Wieżowce i The Float at Marina Bay (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (240).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (240).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 13:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Rzeźby Hehe i Xiexie (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Marina Bay Sands (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 13:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, OUE Bayfront i Change Alley Aerial Plaza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Fullerton Heritage Promenade, The Fullerton Pavilion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Merlion (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (169).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (149).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (149).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 11:25, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (131).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Rzeźby Hehe i Xiexie (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Merlion (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 12:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (137).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I might have cropped in tighter, but it works --Daniel Case 20:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Hotel Fullerton (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Lustrzane Kule naprzeciwko Muzeum Cywilizacji Azjatyckich (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfortunately no clear sky, but good quality nonetheless. --Tsui 03:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Most Andersona (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Hotel Fullerton (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Teatr Wiktorii i Hala Koncertowa (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Esplanade – Theatres on the Bay (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, ArtScience Museum (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (241).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (241).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Marina Bay Sands (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There must be a template to show that it is covered by FoP. Please add it. --A.Savin 03:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)  Done I didn't know that I need to add this template, but ok:) Template added. --Halavar 19:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC) Good quality --A.Savin 04:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Fullerton Hotel Singapore. View from N-W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Most Cavenagha (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (195).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (195).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (256).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This crop is very unfortunate. If you haven't got any space left to include on the left border, the only thing I can think of is to crop more of the curve on the left, so that the viewer won't see the footpath as partially cut-off. --Basotxerri 13:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)  Done You're right, thanks for the hint. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 19:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC) That's much better! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (255).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (183).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Lustrzane Kule naprzeciwko Muzeum Cywilizacji Azjatyckich (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Most Cavenagha (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I believe that a bit of sharpening would help, but ok --Poco a poco 18:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Fullerton Heritage Promenade (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (210).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (210).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Marina Bay Sands i ArtScience Museum (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Several dust spots at the left. --A.Savin 04:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 12:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 11:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anderson Bridge in Singapore. View from S-W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 07:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Muzeum Cywilizacji Azjatyckich, Ekspozycja (006).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Muzeum Cywilizacji Azjatyckich, Ekspozycja (026).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Sokal, Gimnazjum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 00:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Sokal, Wieża 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Cmentarz Noratus (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Victoria Theatre and Concert Hall in Singapore. View from S-E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Muzeum Cywilizacji Azjatyckich, Ekspozycja (072).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy but still ok --Poco a poco 13:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Park KLCC, Fontanna na jeziorze Symphony (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 15:16, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia taoistyczna Guan Di (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frederic Chopin statue, Singapore Botanic Gardens.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:55, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Park Besika Gabaszwili, Karuzela dla dzieci (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Miejsca odpoczynkowe nad rzeką Bordżomula (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 21:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (261).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (269).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (395).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Fullerton Heritage Promenade (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Szkoła arabska Alsagoff (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (394).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (393).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (393).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (378).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

FoP

Hello Halavar, at the moment I realized that many of your works from Abkhazia are also under FoP restriction since there is no change in Georgian law sad bad we will have to remove those photos. I will try to find information about buildings to keep as much buildings as possible.--g. balaxaZe★ 16:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

I thought that you did that 2 years ago. We all remember that mass deletion of my images... If you want to make massive deletion of images from Georgia, please do that not only with my images, but others too. Also, please add proper tags to the categories of copyrighted buildings, sculptures and other work of arts. I don't have a time to do that because I need to upload thousands of my images and I'm involved in the Quality images section. --Halavar (talk) 16:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Halavar no, of course, that is not only about your photos but I know you and that's why I told you that. We want to change that law but at the time no improvements. Be sure I prefer to keep but since there are non-stop removes better to place those tags in every category and I hope this will be bigger reason for lawmakers to change that.--g. balaxaZe★ 16:25, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Hotel Fullerton (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Dalhousie Obelisk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Teatr Wiktorii i Hala Koncertowa (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (368).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (381).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 08:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Wieczorny widok na Central Business District od strony promenady Esplanade (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice composition--Lmbuga 12:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Hotel Fullerton (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, River Hongbao 2016 (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Skrzyżowanie ulic- Arab Street i North Bridge Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Nowoczesna fontanna w pobliżu Mostu Esplanade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Most Andersona (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just about OK --A.Savin 16:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, River Hongbao 2016 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very tight cut, but okay for me.--Famberhorst 06:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, River Hongbao 2016 (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Ann Siang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (003).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (013).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, River Hongbao 2016 (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (014).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (027).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, River Hongbao 2016 (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice picture. -- Ikan Kekek 12:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Domy-sklepy (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, River Hongbao 2016 (43).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (365).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (065).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (071).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (127).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (121).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (104).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (097).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (092).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 14:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Esplanade – Theatres on the Bay (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

File:20161001 Kurtkowiec i Czerwone Stawy Gąsienicowe 1730.jpg

Cześć. Przyciąłem zdjęcie zgodnie z Twoją sugestią. Proszę sprawdź i oceń czy aktualna wersja nadaje się na QI. -- Jakubhal 11:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --Peulle 17:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A bit noisy, can you reduce it?--Peulle 17:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 17:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC) OK now.--Peulle 18:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Informacja turystyczna (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum UMNO (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (175).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (148).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (210).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (192).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 12:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (176).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (091).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Ann Siang, Domy-sklepy (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Left side is leaning out. --A.Savin 16:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks. New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 16:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC) OK. Better. --A.Savin 15:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (088).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Should be identified for QI --A.Savin 15:36, 24 February 2017 (UTC)  Done Please take a look again. --Halavar 11:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 15:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 March 2017 (UTC)