User talk:Ghosnk3

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ghosnk3!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

The quality of the chemical structure Image:Development of MK869.jpg is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure Image:Development of MK869.jpg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --NEUROtiker ⇌ 10:53, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure Image:GR-205171.jpg is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure Image:GR-205171.jpg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --NEUROtiker ⇌ 22:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure Image:LY-303870.jpg is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure Image:LY-303870.jpg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --NEUROtiker ⇌ 22:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure Image:T-2328.jpg is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure Image:T-2328.jpg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --NEUROtiker ⇌ 22:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure Image:TAK-637.jpg is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure Image:TAK-637.jpg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --NEUROtiker ⇌ 22:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure Image:Development of aprepitant.jpg is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure Image:Development of aprepitant.jpg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --NEUROtiker ⇌ 22:31, 4 December 2008 (UTC)