User talk:George Miquilena

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bienvenidos a mi discusión -- George Miquilena · talk 16:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Saludos[edit]

Hola George,

Me preguntaba si eres de Maracaibo. Yo ahorita me encuentro viviendo muy cerca de URBE, he estado viendo que has subido muchas fotos y videos de Maracaibo. Te doy la bienvenida a wikimedia commons, espero que pases buenos momentos aqui, cualquier cosa que necesites no dudes en escribirme, aprovecho la ocasion para invitarte a la comunidad de wikimedia Venezuela --The Photographer (talk) 03:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola George Miquilena, te quería decir que la próxima vez que quieras que te borren alguna imagen solo tenés que poner en la página del archivo: {{Speedy delete|Uploader request}}. Además sería conveniente que enlaces en tu firma a tu página de usuario, así te pueden escribir mensajes más facilmente. En tu firma sería conveniente que pongas: [[File:Flag of Venezuela.svg|15px]] [[User talk:George Miquilena|<span class="signature-talk">George Miquilena</span>]]. Saludos, --Metrónomo (talk) 05:40, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Funciona. -- George Miquilena 20:24, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Aparece como wikitexto, y así tampoco funciona: -- [[File:Flag of Venezuela.svg|15px]] George Miquilena (talk) 20:29, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
¿Estás tildando la opción Tratar firma como wikitexto (sin un enlace automático)? --Metrónomo (talk) 05:06, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reconstrucción del rostro de Simón Bolívar vista periférica.jpg[edit]

I think it is a bad idea to abuse templates for content, that they clearly not cover. The same as for the other upload applies here: You must provide written permission from the copyright holder. --Martin H. (talk) 22:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only (!!!) "Los textos de las leyes, decretos, reglamentos oficiales, tratados públicos, decisiones judiciales y demás actos oficiales" no serán protegidos por ley. All other content IS copyrighted. Stop adding the template to contet that is not "textos de las leyes", not "decretos", not "reglamentos oficiales", not "tratados publicos", not "decisiones judicales" and not "actos officiales". --Martin H. (talk) 23:30, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

speedy requests for GRAIL MoonKAM images[edit]

Hi George, could you please give a rationale for and in your speedy-deletion requests for your GRAIL MoonKAM uploads. "Upload request" is not a valid speedy rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 05:52, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As you didn't reply, I've reverted your speedy-requests due to missing rationale. Feel free to open a regular DR with a proper rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Changing license[edit]

Hi. The licenses for published photos cannot be revoked. I mean, the author can change the license on the site where the photos were published, but Wikimedia can still use them under the original license, because the Creative Commons text says that it's a "perpetual" license, so you can't revoke it. Bogdan Giuşcă (talk) 08:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok :)-- George Miquilena · talk 01:55, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mensaje de The Photographer[edit]

Muy necesaria, para crear consciencia. --The Photographer (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reyzamurochorrosdemilla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 05:28, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reyzamuromerida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 05:28, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sobre imágenes[edit]

Hola maracucho que es lo que necesita sobre estas imágenes, eso si por favor en cristiano esta condenadas plantilla las odio, no entiendo la cosa que pretenden pedir, las fotos las tome yo y allí dice que un trabajo propio es decir la hizo la Veronidae, las agrupe así por que es menos tedioso para subirlas y ilustran mejor el artículo en la cual las coloque, si es por lincencia se la regale a Wiki en su cuento creo que las llaman creative 3. no me acuerdo y no se porque no salio reflejado porque estoy seguro que parque planilla de interrogatorio policial que hacen al comienzo la imágenes de las que me preguntas son estas:

  • File:Aves del Parque Generalisimo Francisco de Miranda Caracas - Venezuela.jpg
  • File:Ambientes y fauna de Zoologico de Caricuao Caracas - Venezuela 1.jpg
  • File:Ambientes y fauna de Zoologico de Caricuao Caracas - Venezuela 2.jpg
  • File:Felinos Zoologico de Caricuao Caracas - Venezuela.jpg
  • File:Historicas años 60 del Parque Generalisimo Francisco de Miranda Caracas - Venezuela.jpg
  • File:Historicas años 80 del Parque Generalisimo Francisco de Miranda Caracas - Venezuela.jpg

De nuevo dime que necesita para colocarlo, deberían simplificar las cosa en esta cosas si engorroso subir imágenes, espero tu respuesta si no la borraran no subo dos veces la cosa de verdad que sin pretender ofender se pasan de fastidiosos, y ya estoy bastante decepcionada de este sitio. Saludos. --Veronidae (talk) 02:03, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Me perdonas pero en este momento estoy molesta, de verdad que la intención es la molestar y fastidiar claro que todas las fotos son mías pero que gracias tiene que me digas las cosas después de que las borraron y mutilaron todos artículos en las cuales las había colocado además es información estaba en platilla esa que le hacen llenar a uno donde decía que el trabajo era propio es decir que eran mías, pero ni modo supongo que ahora estarán contentos por que mutilaron los artículos, por estos saboteos es que esto decepcionada del proyecto Wikipedia cuando no es una cosa es la otra los administradores en ves de ayudar lo único hacer dificultar las cosas, de todas formas gracias tuviste la decencia de contestar no como la mayoría que unos le pregunta y no repoden, lo que lamento es la mutilada de los artículos pero ahora se quedaran así, no pierdo mas mi tiempo. En gracias al menos respondiste tarde pero respondiste. --Veronidae (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Por Dios santo que le ocurre a todos ustedes, claro que son mías si no las subo porque será que siempre hay que esperar buena fe de parte todos ustedes pero ustedes no la pueden tener hacia uno, como gustaría restregarles los negativo. Pero ni modo ya se acabo esa cosa, ya no estoy interesada, no es posible que uno pierda tiempo y esfuerzo en hacer algo bien y ustedes lleguen lo vuelva añico en segundos por su falta de buena. Bueno les deseo mejor suerte a los que venga después de mi por que o no sigo acá para que vean la cara de bolsa o crean que me chupo el dedo, que la pases bien, eso si les recuerdo piden buena fe entonces ténganla hacia los demás. Que la pases bien y que Dios y Chinita te ilumine. Bye. --Veronidae (talk) 02:12, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hola me puede explicar como le anexo el negativo a la imagen para que no me sigas dañando mis artículos. Porque de verdad que no entiendo todo el mundo sube sus tos alegando como fuente trabajo propio y valen pero para mi no. --Veronidae (talk) 23:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ya aquí[edit]

Saludos George, ya me encuentro de nuevo en Maracaibo, acabo de regresar del viaje, he tomado algunas buenas fotografías. He visto que ya obtienes tus primeras imagenes de calidad, felicitaciones y espero que puedas conseguir muchas mas!!. Con respecto a las fotos que me muestras, recuerdo hace algunos años haber hecho cosas similares. Gracias por la mandoca, me la voy a comer con mantequilla --The Photographer (talk) 17:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Una hermosa para ti[edit]

Una hermosa copyvio para ti --The Photographer (talk) 19:48, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Si vale, es un problema con la gente que sube fotografías robadas de algún sitio, yo mismo lo hice hace varios años por desconocimiento de las licencias, estamos hablando de cuando estaba comenzando en commons. Esa foto la tomé este Jueves, me lance un viaje al Centro y tome algunas cosas por ahi, con los nervios de que no me fueran a quitar la cámara. Estaba pensando ir a la Laguna de Sinamaica pronto. --The Photographer (talk) 20:11, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 01:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No source tagging[edit]

Hello George, please be more careful when tagging files as "no source". If the file is marked as own work, then it has a source. If you suspect it is a copyvio, then you should nominate it for deletion and explain why. You should not go around marking everything you suspect with "no source", that's not what that tag is for. Also, you should be more careful when tagging old files. I found a bunch of files of dinosaurs marked as copyvio, when it seems quite obvious that they were uploaded by the same guy who published them in that forum in 2007. Another file was marked by you as no source, when it was a pretty obvious case of "own work" if you have looked at the user other contributions. It was uploaded in 2006, when there was not a requirement to fill all the data. we should be extra careful when tagging those old uploads. Cheers,-- Darwin Ahoy! 18:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No existía un formulario, pero ahora sí y se tiene que informar como es debido para que quede evidencia que pruebe que el archivo realmente está en la licencia.-- George Miquilena · talk 18:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You can't go over files uploaded when there were no such forms, and start tagging them all with "no source". In this case, you tagged a pretty obvious case of own work, lots of other uploads by same user were taken with that camera model, and on that region. What's the point of tagging that content? If you detect it, you should fix it, not tag for deletion. That does not help anybody. Quite the contrary, you are giving others lot of unnecessary work to cleanup your wrong tagging, which could be better applied on something else. -- Darwin Ahoy! 18:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
¿Entonces para ti todo lo que tenga una licencia es un caso obvio de trabajo propio?, en Commons hay que fijarse hasta en el último detalle.-- George Miquilena · talk 18:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Where did I say that? I said that this looked like an obvious case of an old upload of own work with somewhat incomplete information (the license said it was own work, so the info was there). The other files you tagged had different situations, but none of them was a case for deletion. You must be very careful when you go around tagging, especially in those old uploads. This is not Wikipedia, where maintenance tags are mostly harmless. In this case, for instance, a perfectly legitimate upload of a good file donated to us, and in use at at least 12 other projects, could have been lost, and it could pass years until someone detected the mistake and restored it, if ever.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, pero por supuesto, ya el usuario que subió el archivo agrego la información que faltaba gracias a la notificación que le llego porque yo marque el archivo como Sin fuentes. ¿Ves? -- George Miquilena · talk 14:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please, try to understand that the few users that respond to tagging and correct those bureaucratic little problems are not worth the damage done to the project by reckless tagging. You should only tag files when you are sure that a source is missing, not because you do not see it at first sight. As I said, tagging here is not like tagging in Wikipedia. By the way,congratulations for your quality image, keep up the good work. Cheers, -- Darwin Ahoy! 20:19, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

¡Una barnstar para ti![edit]

El barnstar de buen humor
Hola George eres a la primera persona a la que le escribo, soy de Cuba.Espero que me esccibas para saber si lo recibes. Adriel Fernández (talk) 19:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Un bote en la playa de San Carlos, Estado Zulia, Venezuela.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Colours a bit on the red side, pic tilted to the right (see horizon), considerable CA on the left side of the boat. QI for me as soon as the first two are fixed. --Kreuzschnabel 06:27, 3 September 2012 (UTC)::Done --The Photographer 00:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola[edit]

El barnstar fue lo primero que encontre que sirviera para conversar, creo que es para dar una gratitud o algo por el estilo

Sobre el umbral de originalidad[edit]

Hola George Miquilena, he visto que añadiste en algunas imagen como esta un aviso sobre que el archivo podría no estar en Dominio Público en los EEUU. Imágenes con sólo texto no son elegibles para estar sujetas a derecho de autor, por lo que sí que están en Dominio Público y por tanto la plantilla estuvo mal puesta. Tenlo en cuenta, un saludo. Lobo (howl?) 01:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No sabía que el texto no tiene derechos de autor.-- George Miquilena in Maracaibo · talk 16:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

your uploads and deletion requests[edit]

Hi George Miquilena,
I really wonder why you upload images only to request their deletion a few weeks or sometimes even a few days later? If this would be about 2 or 3 images, I wouldn't even think or speak about that. But over the last weeks, this have been scores of images. What is going on here? Apart from producing additional work-load for the deleting admin, you should be aware that none of these images is really removed from the Wikimedia servers. They will stay there for eternity or at least until the next big harddisk crash.
Besides, you should not write "unused file", as for example File:Maracaibo culture 2012.JPG, when the file is still used on Commons. This use should be removed first. --Túrelio (talk) 18:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Skyline/buildings/malls[edit]

Saludos George, quería comunicarme contigo para que por favor limpiaras la sección Skyline/buildings/malls de Maracaibo, debido a que contempla una cantidad de imágenes de mas o menos lo mismo. Recuerda que allí debemos colocar las imágenes más representativas, mientras sean menos pero las de mejor calidad mejor. Gracias. --The Photographer (talk) 15:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quedo muy bien, otra cosa que te iba a decir era que debemos conseguir la mayor cantidad de imágenes de calidad y destacadas para ponerlas en esas secciones. --The Photographer (talk) 17:26, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Que vaina contigo George, acuerdate que ese filtro tiende a sobreexponer el color de las fotos. Lo que se desea en commons es tener fotos lo más parecido a la realidad. --The Photographer (talk) 17:37, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jajaja, quita ese filtro chimbo vale --The Photographer (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Metro de Caracas[edit]

Saludos George, pues respondiendo a tu pregunta, no soy el Autor de esa foto, sin embargo, en el meta de la foto dice "Karlos Corbella", lo cual he especificado ahora en la foto, al parecer pudo haber cedido los derechos al metro de Caracas, quien las publico en licencia libre, ahora bien, habria que colocar la licencia exacta. Te invito a investigar eso. Hay un nuevo usuario de Maracaibo llamado User:Rjcastillo. Un abrazo --The Photographer (talk) 17:31, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Borrado de imágenes[edit]

Saludos George, Quisiera saber el porque tu dices que el he violado los derechos de autor si esas imagenes son propias, es decir las tome con mi camara. Como soy nuevo en commons por favor podrias explicarmelo ? Gracias.

--Rjcastillo (talk) 00:47, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

George, con respecto a este asunto, te sugiero conversar antes el problema con el usuario antes de marcarlas para eliminación, especificando la violación del derecho exactamente con su respectivo enlace. Lo mismo te paso con Veronidae, pregunta antes de disparar, a pesar de que tienes poco tiempo en commons el usuario Rjcastillo es aun mas nuevo, seria mejor explicarle todo el asunto, o al menos saludar ;) --The Photographer (talk) 01:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Borrado de imagenes[edit]

  Saludos nuevamente George,
     Estuve revisando y las imagenes de los juguetes quizas si deban ser borradas, pero en cuanto a los carros de madera no. Debido a que ese carro lo construyo un amigo de mi padre.

--Rjcastillo (talk) 01:56, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Informacion en imagenes y comentarios sin sentido[edit]

Saludos George,

He notado con gran preocupación que has estado retirando información en alguna de tus imágenes, categorías e incluso agregando información sin sentido, por favor, te invito a detenerte, no sigas haciendo eso. Cualquier duda por favor --The Photographer (talk) 19:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked soon[edit]

বাংলা  čeština  словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  עברית  magyar  日本語  македонски  norsk bokmål  Nederlands  norsk  português  русский  slovenščina  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


float
   This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Commons.

Ezarateesteban 16:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ezarateesteban 21:33, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template talk:PD-VE-Photo has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template ⧼pageinfo-talkpage⧽, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Photographer (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arauca auto venezolano.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Miquilena · talk 17:28, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perro andino, Mérida, Venezuela.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Miquilena · talk 17:30, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laguna a gran altura, Estado Mérida, Venezuela.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Miquilena · talk 17:31, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buses de un país subdesarrollado (Venezuela).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Miquilena · talk 17:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Papilas gustativas de un Pez gato.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Miquilena · talk 17:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Un gato en San Carlos, Estado Zulia, Venezuela.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Miquilena · talk 17:35, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lancha en la playa de San Carlos, Estado Zulia, Venezuela.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Miquilena · talk 17:35, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campinas, Brasil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Capmo (talk) 15:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saludos de tu amigo Marco Antonio Medina Molina Marco Antonio Medina Molina 03:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[edit]

Hola Jorge. Sé que no quieres colocar tu nombre en español pero sé que eres tú y veo que tenías anteriormente una página de Wikimedia Commons. Me saludas a tu abuela, a Verónica y a tu mamá. Saludos. Marco Antonio Medina Molina 03:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC) Marco Antonio Medina Molina 03:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Costa Rica. San José Taxis.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Allan Aguilar (talk) 05:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JarektBot (talk) 15:11, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atlanta,Georgia,downtown skyline,dusk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2604:2000:C688:EA00:E0B3:AE7E:2D80:BC75 19:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atlanta,Georgia,downtown skyline,dusk,traffic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2604:2000:C688:EA00:E0B3:AE7E:2D80:BC75 19:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atlanta,Georgia,downtown skyline,dusk,traffic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2604:2000:C688:EA00:E0B3:AE7E:2D80:BC75 19:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sao paulo brazil e la noche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ankry (talk) 14:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Thank you very much for your kind help, really appreciated. Moyanbrenn (talk) 18:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Thanks again for your support of yesterday Moyanbrenn (talk) 09:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Una plaza en Maracaibo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 17:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maracaibo calles 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

62.216.210.8 19:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austin street, Texas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nv8200p (talk) 13:01, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]