User talk:Gabi Hernandez

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome[edit]

Meet My Cat ;)[edit]


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gabi Hernandez!

Please categorise images correctly[edit]

To categorise images, please put them in the most specific category possible. Most of the images which you recently uploaded to Wikimedia had been categorised in "Washington D.C." whereas they should have been categorised for their specific subject. - Takeaway (talk) 10:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Macaques in Ubud

Hi, Gabi. Takeaway's right about proper categorisation; it helps everyone find images. Images here may be used by any of the WMF projects, so you might find a picture you took used on a wiki in a language you've never heard of. This is another reason to go slowly. Before you upload an image, you should have a fair idea of where it should be categorised and take more than a bit of care about giving it a really helpful name. And Spelling counts, too: File:Layingwearth.jpg is missing an 'r'. It's also missing saying anything about the tomb of the unknown soldier in Washington DC. We have a template that can be used to request an image be renamed: {{Rename}}. Before we can use it, we need to determine just what better name we should use... thoughts? Cheers, Jack Merridew 03:59, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just uploaded an old picture of mine. Category:Macaca fascicularis for moar; at least three of the others are by me, although not with this account ( I'm a sock ;). I have a lot of pictures that I should upload; I need to sort through them, find the really good one, and crop some of them. It's tedious. Here's one of mine from a while ago. It's from a cremation ceremony. I have about 150 pics from a much larger ceremony that occurred a few years later. Guess I just committed to doing it. Cheers, Jack Merridew 04:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Washingtonmon1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Torsch (talk) 22:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Suzanne1.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Suzanne1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Suzanne1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 20:41, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whitehouse121.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 06:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Binksternet (talk) 23:18, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]