User talk:GRuban/Archive 6

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


File:Charity Kase before makeup.jpg

File:Charity Kase before makeup.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 09:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Charity Kase after makeup.jpg

File:Charity Kase after makeup.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 09:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Bobby Brown on Sister Circle Live.jpg

File:Bobby Brown on Sister Circle Live.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2607:FB91:1589:8277:8055:5EEB:9B7D:3DAA 21:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Xia Li posing with fan.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Xia Li posing with fan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : None.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 22:57, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Desiree Ross on Random TV Reviews.jpg

File:Desiree Ross on Random TV Reviews.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

––FormalDude (talk) 01:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Category title may be a typo?

"Yevgeny Prigozhin" is Russian; his first name Евгений is also sometimes spelled "Yevgeniy." The Wikimedia category about him, however, is Category:Yegveny Prigozhin. I think that's a mistake but I would like your opinion before I try to change it. Thanks! HouseOfChange (talk) 16:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Meh. I am also originally Russian and was originally named Георгий: Georgiy. In English my name is George. The city I was born is named Moskva. In English it is Moscow. (How? Why? There isn't even a "w" sound in Russian ... don't get me started.) There are many ways to translate/transliterate Евгений: Evgeniy, Yevgeniy, Evgeny, Evgenii, Yevgeny, or even Eugene; it's hard to say which is more correct. In general, we go by what reliable sources say. I see:
Looks like a majority for Yevgeny to me. --GRuban (talk) 17:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Ah, here, this is especially beautiful, the Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/02/16/the-rise-of-putins-chef-yevgeniy-prigozhin-the-russian-accused-of-manipulating-the-u-s-election/ Yevgeniy Prigozhin in the article text (and the URL), Yevgeny Prigozhin in the image caption. On the same page! --GRuban (talk) 17:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Oh, Yegveny in the category! Yeah, I've been reading that wrong all this time. That's clearly an error. --GRuban (talk) 20:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks so much! I should have been clearer explaining the problem -- I missed the letter switch myself when I first added an image. HouseOfChange (talk) 19:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Macy Rodman on CompUSA Live.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Macy Rodman on CompUSA Live.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Peaceray.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Alanna Ubach on Dulce Osuna.jpg

File:Alanna Ubach on Dulce Osuna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Newsfittoprint22 (talk) 17:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Wolfram Menschick (cropped).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wolfram Menschick (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wolfram Menschick (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely, -M.nelson (talk) 23:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

@Fitindia: - the original image this was cropped from, File:Wolfram Menschick.jpg has not been deleted and is under VRTS pending. It doesn't make sense to keep that one, and delete this one, their conditions should be exactly the same, they should be kept or deleted simultaneously. Please restore this one unless and until the original is also deleted. --GRuban (talk) 15:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
@GRuban Have restored. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you! --GRuban (talk) 15:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Licence review request (April-June 2022)

I know you are a licence reviewer. Can you let pending licence reviews pass for those videos I uploaded? Thanks.

HarvettFox96 (talk) 08:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC); edited: 11:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done First one, done.
Second one, a bit more work. You got it from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64tpUeEnnLM which is an aggregator of other people's work, and says it originally came from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1o0UlhfBR2s&t=0s ... which is not the same video! The good news is that I found it also at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jiX2BrnQxc where it is also marked Creative Commons Attribution, so should be OK. But it could have been bad. --GRuban (talk) 13:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Third and fourth also done. The fourth one is marked that way because YouTube doesn't have a CC0 license, only a BY 3.0 license. But we can go by the text in the description. Thank you! --GRuban (talk) 14:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome. However, a few more I have below:

HarvettFox96 (talk) 04:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. However, just curious, are you planning to upload all the free license student made short animations on YouTube or Vimeo? Because there are a lot of them, and per Commons:Project scope we are supposed to serve an educational purpose rather than just be an archive. The first 10 or even 100 are useful to serve as examples of student work in general, but after that we really should only have the ones that have something special, a famous author, an unusual style, something else notable about the work itself, etc. --GRuban (talk) 14:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Sorry for not commenting a month ago because of time constraints. Most of them are generally in-scope and notable by recognizing data I just made on Wikidata.

A few more I have below. Every time I try finding different keywords with strict parameters, but it's harder due to the terrible algorithm and quality control on YouTube nowadays.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 08:45, 5 June 2022 (UTC); edited: 12:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --GRuban (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Here's more.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 13:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC); edited: 02:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Hopefully, you can pass those files anytime, and this won't take a long time. Thanks.
The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 21:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done --GRuban (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

More during the final month.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 08:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC); edited: 08:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

  • ✓ Done - If we got the version from Vimeo and it's been released, then it's been released. He's under no obligation to only put it under that license wherever he publishes it, he's the owner, he can do what he likes with it. --GRuban (talk)

Trainiac

Hi GRuban. About your question...well, I'm not pretty sure. Looking at his images on Flickr, I get the impression that he is a railway photographer who was active during the 1960s and 1970s. There are images of Spanish locomotives that I haven't seen anywhere else, and they seem to come from the same type of camera.

Other images I think are postcards. On the one hand, I'm pretty sure he didn't take those pictures, but on the other hand, I think he owns the postcards. CFA1877 (talk) 15:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Owning the postcards isn't the same thing as owning the images on the postcards. I own a number of DVDs, but I can't post the movies to Wikimedia Commons and say I release them under a free license! You had one postcard image in your list of 20-odd, but that one was published circa 1900, so is public domain. (I think the current "almost definitely PD" line is Jan 1, 1927 or so.)
Note I'm not nominating the images for deletion, since if he really is a railway photographer and personally took the images that would be great; I'm just not willing to vouch for it. That's pretty much what Commons:License review is about - an experienced user (in this case me) - is willing to basically stake that reputation and say, yes, these images were licensed like this. If it's important to either have the images officially stamped or officially deleted, we would email the Flickr user to ask where he got the images, search the Internet for the exact same or similar images, research more about the Flickr user, etc. I've done that at times when I've been interested enough, it's possible. But that's just more effort than I'm personally willing to put in to these half dozen images of trains! I'm not a train specialist! If they were images of roleplaying game authors, now ... If you are willing to do the research, then please do then tell me, and I may be convinced enough to stamp them. --GRuban (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Yes, you're right. I'll keep looking into this issue and, in case I have any news, I'll let you know. Greetings! CFA1877 (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Licence review request

1, 2. Thanks in advance! CFA1877 (talk) 00:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --GRuban (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Brit Morgan at Comic-Con.jpg

File:Brit Morgan at Comic-Con.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Maineartists (talk) 13:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Fikry Ibrahim for "Go Eat".jpg

File:Fikry Ibrahim for "Go Eat".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

220.246.171.244 05:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Licence review request

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. Thanks in advance! CFA1877 (talk) 01:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

@CFA1877: Mostly ✓ Done, two notes:
  1. 1 is not done yet. What is it a picture of - is it supposed to be art? It looks like just pigs feet hanging on a wall, which would be fine... but it is titled "Museu do Presunto". If it is actually a museum exhibit, then it's not fine, freedom of panorama in Spain does not extend to the insides of museums, we'd need the museum or the artist or both to release it, not just a museum visitor.
  2. Most of these files are just titled things like File:AGuichot110511071911_0150.jpg and File:AGuichot110511071913 0282b.jpg, which doesn't really help explain their contents. Can you retitle them to something more intelligible, such as, "A. Guichot, Excmo. Sr. D. Cayetano Luca de Tena" and "A. Guichot, Vestibulo del Centro Obrero" for these cases? At least for future files you upload. Thank you. --GRuban (talk) 21:54, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
About the first image...well, I didn't uploaded. But I suppose it is not actually a museum exhibit, but real food. If they were exhibit pieces, they wouldn't "bleed" oil. The museum exhition area looks like this. CFA1877 (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Category:Zums-Lam

Привет! Проверьте пожалуйста лицензию на все 6 фоток из категории. Разрешение на странице автора в Фейсбуке. --Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 07:19, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Оригиналы были в формате ".heic" пришлось конвертировать в jpeg. из-за чего не показывает время съемки, по этому только год указал. Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 07:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Прекрасные фото - спасибо! ✓ Done - Почти. Всего 5 фото на https://www.facebook.com/100000741199681/posts/5555750821126236/?d=n, но 6 в Category:Zums-Lam. Я думаю, что File:Зумс-Лам (2).jpg тот, который был исключен — очень похож на File:Зумс-Лам (3).jpg, но имеет желтый цветок в центре справа и светло-зеленый лист внизу справа.
Beautiful photos - thank you! ✓ Done - Almost. There are only 5 photos on https://www.facebook.com/100000741199681/posts/5555750821126236/?d=n but there are 6 in Category:Zums-Lam. I think File:Зумс-Лам (2).jpg is the one that was left out - it's very similar to File:Зумс-Лам (3).jpg but has a yellow flower at the center right and a light green leaf at the bottom right. --GRuban (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Вам спасибо за проверку, иногда бывает долго не проверяют и страница автора становится недоступной (было бы жалко потерять такие фото). Фото я нашел тут на странице нашего общего друга по ФБ где и уточнил кто автор. Я не против если удалите дубликат, обычно commons предупреждает при загрузке. --Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 17:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Lilli Cooper for Make it Fair.jpg

File:Lilli Cooper for Make it Fair.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2601:204:C500:A5C0:8947:AB58:585:412C 04:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Licence review request (July-December 2022)

More incoming media here this second half of the year.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 09:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC); edited: 16:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Reviewed the videos, the first three are sound only, which I'm not great at, so I'd prefer someone else look at. Er, listen to. --GRuban (talk) 14:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Three more I have.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 14:44, 8 July 2022 (UTC); edited: 14:51, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

At least most of them have been done by passing licence reviews.
The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 09:30, 9 July 2022 (UTC); edited: 07:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Again, I have five more of them:

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 07:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC); edited: 12:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. You mistyped the link to the Magician's Cat, but I was able to find it.[1]. --GRuban (talk) 00:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks for handling my minor mistake when I almost forgot. But a few more here:

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 01:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC); edited: 00:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --GRuban (talk) 13:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
At last, the month will be almost over. Here's the last one that is currently processing: File:Leszek Mozga - Roadkill (2018).webm
The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 11:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done, but I have to say ... yuck! --GRuban (talk) 15:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

A new month has arrived. I got a few videos and audio while trying to find something else.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 13:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC); edited: 16:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

I found that artwork by a barely-not-so-obscure furry artist Epicfacepowwaa on DeviantArt through Google Images (not SearxNG) after searching for different keywords by excluding restrictive clauses using advanced operators. Even with that, she recently released her most artworks (depending on each one-off character) under CC-BY licenses. What do y'think before passing them?

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 03:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC); edited: 11:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

They look fine, and I'll probably approve them, but are they within scope? Again, is the artist notable, or is the work historical, or the art style distinctive, or something else? We don't want to just copy every Creative Commons Attribution or Attribution Share-Alike image on DeviantArt, just the ones that are educationally useful. Whatever that means. --GRuban (talk) 21:04, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Well said before, all of them created by her are mainly legitimate, in-scope because of quality, and notable thru the data. However, you missed the last one I already linked above there or right here: File:Epicfacepowwaa - Bloop (2020).png.
The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 06:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC); edited: 06:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done --GRuban (talk) 17:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

More artwork and videos have to come.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 02:48, 18 August 2022 (UTC); edited: 09:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --GRuban (talk) 13:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Three images I recently uploaded; sadly, no videos at almost the end of the month.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 13:52, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Three weeks after the hiatus, here are six images I uploaded; I'll keep finding even further.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 12:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Will y'pass all of 'em for a moment?
The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 13:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done Again, I worry about collecting the works of a barely-not-so-obscure artist. --GRuban (talk) 13:09, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Here they go wild again!

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 05:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done--GRuban (talk) 14:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Sorry for causing myself stress because of a headache, thanks to multiple times of brownouts yesterday. Now here are a few of them I already have.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 04:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done--GRuban (talk) 13:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

The same goes again.

13:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Done, but I saw your user page. From reading it, it looks like you're using Commons as a web host for images you like. That's not strictly a License Review issue, but still bothersome. Are you sure all 46 images in Category:Epicfacepowwaa are needed? --GRuban (talk) 20:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
That's a fair question. While I just keep browsing in the DA gallery to find something interesting within the quality standards. It depends on the other ones I haven't selectively archived and uploaded.
The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 13:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Go ahead so that you can pass those pending ones.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 10:18, 14 November 2022 (UTC); edited: edited: 06:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 09:42, 24 November 2022 (UTC); edited: 12:27, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 10:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Well, there you go. I guess I've had enough before the year hopefully ends when I'll be on hiatus until the first day of April from now. Besides, happy new year to you.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 13:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC); edited: 23:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done. Happy New Year. --GRuban (talk) 14:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
I have to get away from three months off now because the SIM Registration Act is implemented and will likely happen before late April. I'll keep finding harder and uploading something interesting from sources that will be archived and make another section.
The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 23:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC); edited: 01:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Chaz Stevens with Pole cap.jpg

File:Chaz Stevens with Pole cap.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 12:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Image

Hol GRuban, I know you were a member of V.RT. So I want to ask you please if you can request permission through V.R.T. to this page https://m.facebook.com/pinkypromisetv/ if you could give your permission to publish the image of the second 00:11 of this video https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TEqxcU2BWQo please.--Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please)

Sorry, I'm not a member of Commons:Volunteer Response Team (was for a short while a long time ago). I am a Commons:License reviewer, which is not really the same thing. I don't think the VRT actually asks third parties for permission as such, they answer emails that third parties send in. You want to ask that Facebook user to fill out the form at Commons:Wikimedia VRT release generator, then send the resulting email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, and then the VRT will write back and say whether they accept the release. Or they could just modify the license for their YouTube video, that might be easier. --GRuban (talk) 22:52, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Sure, I send requests like that occasionally. Fair warning, my success rate is somewhere around 20% - maybe 60% don't answer, and 20% answer and say "no". Anyway, here is one I sent to the press office of a politician a few months ago:
I'm a volunteer editor for Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia you may have heard of.
We have an article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Cisneros that doesn't have an image.
Would you be able to release an image of Jessica Cisneros for reuse and modification? One of those on https://jessicacisnerosforcongress.com/media-center/ would do fine, but you need to do one of two things:
  1. Write on that page next to that image, "Image released under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/" or
  2. Send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (CCing me would be nice) that has one or more images attached and says:
I hereby affirm that I represent Jessica Cisneros, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the following media work:
content attached to this email
I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.
I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.
I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.
I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
Jane Doe
Press relations person for Jessica Cisneros for Congress
2022-05-10
The volunteers at that email address may respond with more questions, so the first method may be more straightforward.
Thank you!
George Ruban
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:GRuban
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GRuban
I think you're writing a Spanish speaker, so if you can write it Spanish, it may be more effective. For PinkyPromiseTV, they'll have another option, #0, to change the license on the YouTube video. Or if you think they'll be more likely to release a single screenshot than the whole video, you could take a screenshot, and email it to them, then they could put it on their Facebook with the "released under under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/" text as #1, or email it in as per option #2. --GRuban (talk) 17:16, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Sometimes it gets more complicated: you can read about one that succeeded here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GRuban/Archive_9#To_whom_it_may_concern --GRuban (talk) 17:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
@GRuban Thank you. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 22:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Unauthorized publication: Image that should not be published on commons should be deleted

this is unauthorized publish, this captured image should not be published here, because the license is not even a free common use.

@GRuban please deleted this non-free common picture. Thank you. --Thalialioo (talk) 01:51, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm not actually an administrator, so can't delete it myself; I'm a Commons:License reviewer, so can mark it as failing license review, so an admin will likely delete it eventually. (I did that.) If there is special urgency you can find your favorite active administrator and ask them directly, or post on the Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. (I didn't do that, as I don't see it standing out among the other non-free images we likely have marked for deletion; if it doesn't get deleted in a few days, I'll follow up.) --GRuban (talk) 13:38, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Review

Please, can you review these images?

.--Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 21:16, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Woo. This is a tougher question than you think. See the change I just made to Template:PD-MexicoGov-2013. I'll need to consult with other license reviewers and/or administrators. Hang on. --GRuban (talk) 14:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Consultation re Template:PD-MexicoGov-2013

@Yann, Fitindia, Leoboudv, and Jeff G.: Respected fellow license reviewers and/or administrators, I need to ask your educated opinion. I'm a rather experienced Commons:License reviewer, but this is a complicated question. As you can see, immediately above, User:Aurelio de Sandoval asked me to review some files, and I'm doing that. However, the license that he is citing, Template:PD-MexicoGov-2013, is based on https://www.gob.mx/terminos, which has apparently changed recently. It changed some time between March 16, 2022, and April 6, 2022 to say

"Se autoriza al Usuario a visualizar y descargar los materiales contenidos en el sitio solamente para su uso personal y no para un uso comercial... El Usuario no deberá modificar, reproducir o mostrar pública o comercialmente los materiales, ni podrá distribuir o utilizarlos con algún propósito público o comercial;"
(Google translation:) "The User is authorized to view and download the materials contained in the site only for their personal use and not for commercial use... The User shall not modify, reproduce or publicly or commercially display the materials, nor may he distribute or use them for any public or commercial purpose"

which is not a license we can accept on Wikimedia Commons. However, most of the pages these files came from have a "Fecha de publicación"/"Publication date" on them, so we can tell whether they were put on that site before or after that March 16, 2022 date. So I think, we can accept those files that were put up before that date, and reject those files that were published after that date. We have other license templates that work like that, Template:Pixabay, for example, which we have thousands of files under. Do you agree? --GRuban (talk) 14:58, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Files and publication dates

Give it a moment, we're discussing. Un momento por favor. The issue is that the license changed as described above. --GRuban (talk) 21:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done - per discussion above, I reviewed all the National Guard files that Jeff G. hadn't, added a Fecha de publicación date to one that he had, which shows it was published before the March 2022 date, and nominated the one with Fecha de publicación after March 2022 for deletion. As above, I believe that the Susana Distancia cartoon was probably on that site before that date, so I'm not nominating that file for deletion, but I can't find it there now so can't vouch for it by reviewing it. Thank you folks. --GRuban (talk) 13:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

PD-USA

@GRuban: I have a question, is this image in the public domain?

  • Second question: Is the license correct?

.--Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 21:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

  • Yes, the Smithsonian Institution is one of the most respected museums (or groups of museums) in the world, if they say it's in the public domain we generally believe them. They don't specify why it's PD, so it might be for a different reason than publication without a copyright statement but that is less important than the fact that it is. --GRuban (talk) 21:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

And this other

.--Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 21:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

This one troubles me. It's from CNN, which says it's "circa 1940, from his personnel file". So according to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Austria#Photographs it would be public domain if it were either published before 1946, or never published before 1990. CNN doesn't really say that, and they're not really interested in the provenance of the photo. I won't nominate it for deletion, because it quite possibly does fit into one of those categories, but I don't really see positive evidence that it does. Let me look a bit more. --GRuban (talk) 22:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Aha! This picture was all over the news in April 2018, because of this article: https://molecularautism.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13229-018-0208-6 That's where that CNN article is almost certainly getting it. That article is "Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)." At least one website specifically cites that paper, https://www.livescience.com/62374-hans-asperger-nazi-cooperation.html, " (Image credit: Hans Asperger, National Socialsm, and "race hygiene" in Nazi-era Vienna/BioMed Central/under CC BY 4.0)". I would actually do that, credit it to that paper which is marked CC-BY 4.0, possibly in addition to the PD-Austria tag. Some people may decide it makes a difference, but for me, whether CC-BY or PD Austria applies is splitting hairs, as either is good enough for our purposes. --GRuban (talk) 23:11, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

PD

Hello GRuban, I have doubts about these images, I don't know if they are in the public domain in Mexico, in the USA and in Commons, please, could you help me?

--Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 13:20, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Eh. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico seems complex, since these are pre-1996 works and that seems to have changed several times before then. We have one template, Template:PD-Mexico that is simpler but I don't see than any of these qualify, for example, File:Ramón Valdés circa 1950s photograph.jpg - if that was circa 1950s, then it's not likely the author died before 1952. If you want to be sure, I'd ask someone who knows more about Mexican copyright. I won't be able to decide one way or the other, and we have this rule of thumb called Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle that puts them at risk. --GRuban (talk) 22:46, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Licence review

File:CarryMinati.jpg File:AjeyNagar2022.jpg File:CarryMinati2019.jpg Ramahare (talk) 06:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Will do, but please don't post them full size on my talk page. You can put a : before the File: and get the name, or you can add a size specifier to get a thumbnail, look elsewhere on this very page for examples. --GRuban (talk) 13:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done - I needed to change the http://youtu.com shortcut to the full link in two of those, as it wasn't working for me, you want http://youtube.com/watch?v= whatever. --GRuban (talk) 14:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Licence Review Request

Hello @GRuban: can you please review my images uploaded from YouTube. Even before the review is completed...I am getting copyright strikes from other user...please review them and send for deletion if they are not lisenced. My intention is not to upload unlicensed files. Thank you 456legend (talk) 10:24, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Can you be a little more specific? It's a bit much to ask me to go through https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/456legend&ilshowall=1 and guess which ones came from YouTube, at least the last 10 didn't, and I'm not going to just keep clicking. --GRuban (talk) 14:34, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

I sincerely apologize for the mixup--Trade (talk) 21:35, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Today's Mass Extinction and Holocene etc.

Hello, I found this thread of yours while searching for past discussions of the issue. Last time I encountered this it was about a slightly different filename pattern, which I can't find now, but presumably all from the same Flickr user who thought their message was important enough to use it as a filename for their high-quality nature photography, and whose Flickr account seems to have disappeared now.

I've tentatively tried a VisualFileChange regexp to start mass renaming these to just "unidentified insect (flickrid)", which isn't great, but it's better than nothing. (The regexp that I'm using is /{{(FlickreviewR[^}]+photos\/\d+@N03\/)(\d+)([^}]+)}}/g to {{$1|$2|$3}}{{Rename|1=Unidentified insect ($2).jpg|2=2|3=|user=Belbury}} if that's any use to you, I'll have to work on that if they weren't all Flickrreviewed.)

But if that goes through without any admin objections, I'll get onto the rest. Belbury (talk) 20:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Licence Review Request

Hello GRuban. Can you please review these two images File:Justin Chatwin in 2022.png File:Chatwin in 2022.png

Thank You ! Happycook28 (talk) 08:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately the YouTube video they come from is not actually Creative Commons Attribution licensed. COM:WHERE#YouTube explains how to check - it doesn't have the "License Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)" under the "Show more" link. Sorry. Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Happycook28. --GRuban (talk) 11:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Ok. Thank you for this information. Now i understand where to look at on Youtube, Vimeo etc. You can delete the images. Happycook28 (talk) 07:00, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Daudov vruchaet shtandart.webm

Добрый день! Я связался с Пресс-Службой Парламента Чеченской Республики и они дали разрешение на публикацию данного материала. Прошу провести проверку Alterbulat (talk) 09:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done - and well done! Браво! --GRuban (talk) 13:10, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Спасибо большое! Alterbulat (talk) 14:40, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Licence Review Request

Hello GRuban. Can you please check if this photo is alright File:Justin Chatwin in 2022.jpg

Thank you again. Happycook28 (talk) 07:21, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

To be honest, this bothers me more the more I look at it.
  • The Flickr user https://www.flickr.com/people/196908211@N04/ just created his account this month.
  • They only have 5 photos on that account, and the other 4 have nothing to do with that red carpet event.
  • Those other 4 images are from 2017, 2018, were taken by different cameras, have EXIF, and are noticeably larger.
  • This image has no EXIF, was taken in 2022 and is noticeably smaller.
  • Possibly most important, that image looks an awful lot like a crop of the image at the Justin Chatwin Online fan page, https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=443008357827536&set=pb.100063551257793.-2207520000.&type=3 - though I will admit, those first 4 reasons were what made me go search for another copy of this image somewhere public on the internet.
For all these reasons, I strongly suspect that Flickr user does not own this image. In fact, if I were a suspicious person, I might even suspect that Flickr user account was created specifically to be able to upload this image to Wikimedia Commons and/or Wikipedia. Commons:License laundering is our page on that. I think I need to add this to the deletion nomination. --GRuban (talk) 13:28, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Licence review request

Hello GRuban. The following images: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. Thanks in advance. CFA1877 (talk) 21:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done, sorry it took a while. --GRuban (talk) 22:27, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Nelydia Senrose interviewed by MeleTOP.jpg

File:Nelydia Senrose interviewed by MeleTOP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2001:D08:D8:E46F:8CA0:8212:C286:3EBF 12:52, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Neelofa and Nabil Ahmad on MeleTOP episode 100.jpg

File:Neelofa and Nabil Ahmad on MeleTOP episode 100.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

SteenNote (talk) 09:19, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Nelydia Senrose on MeleTOP.jpg

File:Nelydia Senrose on MeleTOP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

SteenNote (talk) 09:24, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Neelofa on SCMP Style.jpg

File:Neelofa on SCMP Style.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2001:D08:D8:CE7B:D5E6:EBE7:FCEC:1125 13:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Neelofa and Nabil Ahmad on MeleTOP episode 200.jpg

File:Neelofa and Nabil Ahmad on MeleTOP episode 200.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2001:D08:D8:CE7B:D5E6:EBE7:FCEC:1125 13:19, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Neelofa on MeleTOP 207.jpg

File:Neelofa on MeleTOP 207.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2001:D08:D8:CE7B:D5E6:EBE7:FCEC:1125 13:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GRuban/Archive_6&oldid=762125537"