User talk:Frankemann

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Frankemann!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mountains[edit]

Hei! Jeg ser du har lastet opp mange fine bilder av fjell. Her på Commons er det en hovedkategori for norske fjell; Mountains of Norway. Her kan du klikke deg inn på f.eks.fylker og legge bildene i riktig kategori. Lykke til! Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hei! Det var jo ergelig at jeg brukte preposisjonen "in" og ikke "of". Betyr dette at de er vanskelige for andre å finne bildene nå? Må jeg legge alle bildene inn på nytt igjen? Jeg ønsker jo at det jeg gjør skal bli ryddig og ordentlig! Ser ikke at det er noen enkel måte å endre kategorien på...?

Frankemann (talk) 22:40, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nei, du må ikke legge inn bildene på nytt, bare endre kategorien. Akkurat som på Wikipedia er det slik at du kan legge til forskjellige verktøy i dine personlige innstillinger. Du kan gå til innstillingene, klikke under språk og avmerke for norsk og lagre. Når det gjelder kategorier er det en enkel måte å endre dem på ved å bruke Hot cat; under innstillinger er det en fane som (hos meg) heter tilleggsfunksjoner. Langt ned er det et avsnitt som heter Tools for categories og det står Hot Cat som nummer to. Kryss av for det og lagre. Når du har lagt til Hot Cat kommer et kryss ved siden av kategorinavnet og du kan lete deg frem til riktig kategori med den. Jeg kan ta en titt på bildene senere og se hva jeg kan gjøre med dem. Er ikke så kjent med fjell, men klarer sikkert å legge dem i riktig fylke osv. Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hei igjen, tusen takk for omfattende instruks! Nå har jeg gått gjennom alle bildene og lagt dem inn på passende kategori. --Frankemann (talk) 17:06, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Finneidstrømmen bro med kissilo.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Finneidstrømmen bro med kissilo.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:Hjemgamstrømmen.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 20:35, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Fyljesdalsånå.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fyljesdalsånå.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Godfarfossen.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Godfarfossen.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Innset kraftverk portal.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Innset kraftverk portal.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 02:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the Flickr license and tagged it for Flickr review. The license tag was accidentially deleted in this edit. - 4ing (talk) 07:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Aarlifoss kraftstasjon generatorer og turbiner.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Aarlifoss kraftstasjon generatorer og turbiner.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:12, 3 September 2014 (UTC) Stefan4 (talk) 14:12, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please put a direct link to the photograph at Flickr? The photo is not by an unknown photographer as you have written; if you look at the down right there is a number and a signature saying Eneret Wilse. The photo is taken by Anders Beer Wilse, and we have hundreds of his photographs here at Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Photographs_by_Anders_Beer_Wilse Regards --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 14:53, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about some of the pictures have links that make it difficult to find the source, but I have tried to fix this up at all the pictures. Common to all is that they come from NVE's Flickr page. If you enter NVE page on Flickr you will not find Anders Beer Wils name anywhere. However, it says explicitly that the photographer is unknown.--Frankemann (talk) 14:45, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I found the photo here https://www.flickr.com/photos/nve/4077162217/ and have added the link to the description. I also approved the upload as I`m a Flickr reviewer. --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 18:18, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nice ![edit]

Så mange flotte bilder du har lastet opp fra NVE blant annet! Jeg legger til noen flere kategorier på en del av dem og så har jeg opprettet en kategori som heter Files from NVE Flickr stream. Ha en fin dag! --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 09:44, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Borring av akselkasse for båt på Rognan.tif[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Borring av akselkasse for båt på Rognan.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, Frankemann. You have new messages at Jarekt#License_File:Borring_av_akselkasse_for_b.C3.A5t_p.C3.A5_Rognan.tif's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

--Jarekt (talk) 17:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, Frankemann. You have new messages at Jarekt#License_File:Borring_av_akselkasse_for_b.C3.A5t_p.C3.A5_Rognan.tif's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

--Jarekt (talk) 20:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Storjord, Tysfjord in North Norway.jpg[edit]

File:Storjord, Tysfjord in North Norway.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Krdbot 21:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Skibotndalen Storfjord kommune.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Skibotndalen Storfjord kommune.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 06:59, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arkiv i Nordland[edit]

Hei! Hva med Category:Arkiv i Nordland slik som det er gjort for Category:Fylkesarkivet i Sogn og Fjordane og Category:Oslo byarkiv. Jeg har laget en slik institusjonsmal som det er gjort på disse. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Institution:Arkiv_i_Nordland Bildene fra arkivet kan da hete Files from, eller Images from, eller Files from Arkiv i Nordland Flickr stream. Når det gjelder Dag Skogheims arkiv kan det legges til f. eks. Private collection of Dag Solheim el.lign. Jeg kan lage en egen kategori på han hvor dette blir en underkategori. Om du sier ok starter jeg med å kategorisere i dag. Regards --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 09:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hei! Det ser bra ut, både for Arkiv i Nordland og for Dag Skogheim (Altså ikke Solheim!). Begge institusjonene trenger denne kategorien slik at bildene kan holdes sammen.

Så en annen ting: Med alle de bildene jeg lastet opp måtte jo noe gå galt. Disse bildene håper jeg du kan ta en kikk på:

File:Tankefulle soldater før de skal reise ut.jpg Her glemte jeg av engelsk tekst. Enten må du oversette og sette inn nytt engelsk navn, eller så får du slette bildet slik at jeg kan laste opp på nytt.
File:German war graves summer 1940 Hemnesberget or Elsfjord..jpg Her stemmer verken tekst eller bilde. Denne må du være snill og slette helt. Bilde viser ikke noen gravplasser, men utstyr som engelske soldater forlot da de tyske bergjegerne nærmet seg.
File:English soldiers captured after the battle of Pothus, Saltdalen..jpg Dette kan du slette fordi et annet bilde av samme motiv også er lastet opp. Ikke bry deg om at det er bruk i en artikkel på Wikipedia, jeg skal selv fikse dette.

Beste hilsner --Frankemann (talk) 16:24, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hei! Jeg er ikke admin her på Commons og kan derfor ikke slette noe. Men jeg har følgende spørsmål vedrørende bildene de tre bildene:

Det gjør ikke noe om bildet har norsk tekst
På bilde nummer 2 står denne teksten på Flickr: Engelske etterlatenskaper etter kampene ved Stien 17. mai 1940, det samme som du har skrevet under bildet her på Commons. Er det riktig at dette er hva bildet viser? I såfall kan jeg be om at bildet endres til riktig navn, såkalt rename som det kalles her.
Hva er lenken til det andre bildet som viser det samme? I slike tilfeller kan vi sette på merke om duplicate så blir det ordnet her uten sletting. Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 19:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hei igjen Anne-Sophie Ofrim. Da finnes det gjerne andre løsninger. Svar på spørsmålene:

Humm, i svaret under sier du at rename er mulig. Jeg skulle i alle fall likt engelsk tittel siden alle de andre bildene har engelske tekster.
Ja, det er helt riktig at bildet viser engelske soldaters utstyr etter evakuering. Renameing er altså relevant.
Bilde #2 er dette: File:Two British soldiers captured by Rognan.jpg og dette vil jeg altså beholde fordi underteksten er mest utfyllende.

Hilsen --Frankemann (talk) 20:24, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nå har jeg lagt inn merke på filen som er duplikat. Jeg er ikke helt stø på bildene det er snakk om og hva motivene egentlig viser. Det beste er derfor om du kan be om renaming av de to filene selv. Det er ganske strengt når det gjelder renaming av filer her på Commons, du kan lese om det her https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:File_renaming Man må altså ha en grunn som kommer inn under punkt 2 til 7. Siden det at en fil har norsk navn ikke er en grunn, vil det antagelig være best å bruke grunn nummer 3 her; Correct misleading names into accurate ones Det er to måter å be om renaming på; enten

sette inn {{rename|Det nye navnet på filen.jpg|3|}} under filen. I det ledige feltet til høyre kan du sette inn en tilleggsforklaring om du ønsker det.
Du som laster opp så mange bilder kan ha behov for å be om rename på et senere tidspunkt også. Da vil jeg i såfall anbefale deg å legge til renamefunksjonen i innstillingene dine. Under tilleggsfunksjoner er det et avsnitt som heter Interface: Files and categories Hvis du haker av for RenameLink som står som nummer tre, vil du få en egen liten boks øverst til høyre på alle bilder hvor det står move. Når du klikker på den er det bare til å fylle ut og krysse av for det som er aktuelt og lagre. Mye enklere enn slik jeg har forklart over. Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 19:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Constitution day parade in Sulitjelma with slogans for continued mining.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Constitution day parade in Sulitjelma with slogans for continued mining.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:A compressor station in Sulitjelma.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A compressor station in Sulitjelma.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Anhydrite from Sulitjelma.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Anhydrite from Sulitjelma.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kerosene delivery Scleppegrells road in Oslo.jpg[edit]

File:Kerosene delivery Scleppegrells road in Oslo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Krdbot 06:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turbines in open basin for Christiania sailcloth factory.jpg[edit]

File:Turbines in open basin for Christiania sailcloth factory.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Krdbot 06:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andkjelvatnet seen from Durmålstinden summit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:24, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyholmsundet in the entrance to Bodø from north.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagvassdalen Nature Reserve seen from Kråkmotinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beiarfjorden ytre deler seen from the air.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evening sun over Balvatnet in Sulitjelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 23:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evening light into Kobbskaret in Sørfold.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vesldalstinden seen from Lundadalsvatnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:08, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balvaten seen from Skajddebukta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 18:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kråkmotinden seen from Sandnesvatnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Wow! BUT, it would be even better if you linked all the places in the file description instead of here at the nomination page. This entry will be archived in a week or so, but the file page will still be there hopefully for years so that is where the real information should be. On this page the links just mess up the search function. Think about this in the future. It would also be nice if you added the country (Norway) in the descriptions so that readers don't have to search for where "Nordland" is. --W.carter 14:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Sorry, I shall remember this the next time.--~~~~[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midtre Hestbreapiggen seen from Nørdre Hestbreapiggen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The lower half could do with some more brigthness IMO. --Ermell 19:08, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Tried to adjust up the dark foreground slightly. --Frankemann 17:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rognan with seaside seen from Vikveien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The pic looks a bit too heavy with the blue saturation. If it'd been an evening photo that would have been understandable, but this is almost mid day. Think you could do something about that? --W.carter 09:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Tried to reduce the blue saturation slightly. --Frankemann 20:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough. QI. --W.carter 09:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The lighthouse on the promontory of Nyholmen by Bodø harbor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 18:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seinesodden nature reserve seen from the air.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK - not bad for an aerial photo --A.Savin 11:11, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blåmannsisen with the mountain Blåmannen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:21, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Kråkmo Mountain against Veggfjellan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be cropped a bit more at the top, but otherwise very nice light and detail --Daniel Case 19:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Kråkmotinden Mountain against Tennvatnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments More Arctic beauty --Daniel Case 19:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvænfloget and Saltdalsfjorden seen from the air.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit softer in the distance but still OK --Daniel Case 19:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fembøring at the port of Bodø.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good color ... wish you could have gotten the top of that mast though --Daniel Case 19:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stream intake for a river south of Storelvvatnan in Sulitjelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice deep landscape --Daniel Case 19:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vardetoppen in Sulitjelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:08, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mørsvikfjorden seen from Kobbskaret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elvefjorden seen from the air.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done I have made a somewhat wider framing. The resolution is in any case better. --Frankemann 17:05, 11 October 2016 (UTC) OK, a weak Support vote; it is a little better. Still, you should try to upload images as close as possible to full resolution in the future, especially nice nature shots like this.--Peulle 07:10, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saltfjorden seen from Bodøsjøen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holåbreen eastern part of the glacier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Låven summit seen from east.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandnesvatnet in Hamarøy seen from Kråkmotinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sjønstå seen from the region of Kvanntotinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saltdalsfjorden seen from E6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bjørntoppen and Tausafjell seen from Rykkjedalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Store Langvastinden med Åmotdalsvatnet i forgrunnen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 18:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glen down on to Langvann lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Åmotdalshytta tourist cabin under Snøhetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Missing coordinates, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snøhetta with Large-, Central and West Summit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storskrymten Litlskrymten and Grytkollen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larstind seen from the ascent to Store Langvasstinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Geocode would have been nice, though. --Peulle 17:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langvatnet with low morning light.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The is where LOTR whould have been filmed. --Peulle 17:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langvatnet with low afternoon light.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, lovely sky. --Peulle 17:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drugshøi illuminated by low morning sun in October.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaldvella river with autumn's first ice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It might be not the most obvious panorama with f-value13, but I like the composition and the sphere --Michielverbeek 22:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drugshøi seen from Larseggen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 22:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ice water in Kaldvella river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Unusual light for me, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:02, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Håmmårbukinn at Stroppeltjønna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I wouldn't mind a second opinion on those low-light blues, but with the exception of what looks to me like just a bit of a blown highlight in the upper right, this looks like a good-quality photo, and it's certainly an arresting motif. -- Ikan Kekek 10:06, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flurries of snow above Nevervatnet, Røyrvatnet and Straumvatnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Geocoordinates would be useful. --Ermell 20:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trigonometric point mark on Rismålstuva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skiers following the marks against Fortundalsbreen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The skiers following the marks with Tverrådalskyrkja in the background.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:40, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Many tracks upward and inward Leirbrean.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I´m afraid, that the WB isn´t ok here and on the other images nominated on the same day. They are all to bluish. --Milseburg 13:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Insufficient quality per first reviewer. --W.carter 08:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK Corrected brightness. Can the others also be improved? --Frankemann 20:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, still too dark and white balance is off. --W.carter 08:50, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK ? Better now? --Frankemann 20:15, 28 April 2017 (UTC)?[reply]
Looks good now and in the nick of time. --W.carter 22:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slopes down to Gravdalen from Smørstabbreen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Underexposed and WB too blue. None of the photos have been fixed within a week. --W.carter 08:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK Corrected brightness. --Frankemann 20:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, still too dark and white balance is off. --W.carter 08:50, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK ? Better now? --Frankemann 07:57, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, good enough for QI. In the future, could you please do corrections as soon as issues are raised and not at the last possible minute when you photos are about to be declined. --W.carter 08:48, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the Storebjørn against Simledalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the Storebjørn against Hurrungane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the Storebjørn against Gravdalstinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This looks too blueish, could you check the WB, please? --Basotxerri 20:05, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK ? New attempt. --Frankemann 20:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Better now, OK for me, thank you! --Basotxerri 17:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skogadalsbøen mountain lodge in Jotunheimen National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too dark with very little detail visible. Think you can brighten it so the quality can be assesed properly? --W.carter 13:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK ? New attempt. --Frankemann 20:49, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A bit soft in the details but ok for QI. --W.carter 08:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Offpiste skiers getting ready for descent from Storebjørn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 22:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Up the last steep piece at the summit of Storebjørn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storebjørn seen from Gravdalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice photo but could you please remove that small black shadow up in the top right corner? --W.carter 22:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK Cropped pictrue. --Frankemann 16:08, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I would have gone with cloning, but cropping is another way to fix it. Good quality. --W.carter 09:49, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the Storebjørn against Gravdalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice but a bit too dark and too blue. Think you could fix that? --W.carter 22:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK Adjusted the brightness and blue. --Frankemann 16:08, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --W.carter 09:49, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sårjåstjåhkkå peak in Sulitjelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 19:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steindalen and Lønstinden in Saltfjellet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very pretty, and sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 21:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beiarelva lower part at Arstadberget.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Helldalsisen and the peak from Blåfjell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit grainy but fog does that to a photo. Good quality. --W.carter 20:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mørsvikbotn seen from Blåfjell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good...sure FP --Livioandronico2013 20:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Extraordinary tame reindeer at Saltfjellet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View towards Blåfjellet and inner parts of Sørfold.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 13:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Blåfjell with Grovatnet in the center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Styrkesvik village at the fjord crossing Sørfolda and Leirfjorden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow --Livioandronico2013 19:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sørfolda and Leirfjorden fjords seen from european route E6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Husbyviktinden viewed from the lower parts of the Rørstad valley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 19:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Åndsvikfjellet seen from Mjønestindan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 19:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heggmovatnet seen from Blombakkfjellet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 19:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulitjelmaisen seen from Nuortta Sávllo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. Please add geocode--ArildV 09:33, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Årjep Sávllo seen from Nuortta Sávllo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:39, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gjerdalen with the mountain Kautulus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 10:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skjerstad church organ and gallery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Jsamwrites 12:52, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linnajávrre and Gårttjejávrre seen from Gasskatjåhkkå.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:51, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sørfolda seen from Styrkesvik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin layer of ice over Åmotsvatnet lake in Dovrefjell National Park, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 21:57, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frozen ground in Stroplsjødalen valley in Dovrefjell National Park, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good with striking light and arguably close to FP level. -- Ikan Kekek 20:26, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ice cold morning at Langvatnet lake in Dovrefjell National Park, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! --Pudelek 20:51, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Kråkmotinden Mountain against Sjuenetvatnet lake in Sagvassdalen Nature Reserve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dark, perhaps a bit foreboding and good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from north towards Snøhetta mountain peak in Dovrefjell National Park, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Åmotflyin plains in the end of Åmotsdalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Phantastic panorama without fear of a lot of sky --PtrQs 20:54, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argaladhytta cabin in Junkerdal nasjonal park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! October morning in Stroplsjødalen valley in Dovrefjell National Park, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kokedaltinden in Sulitjelma seen from ascent against Vardtoppen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Leirfjord towards Sjunkhatten National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 20:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View at Satertind and Sjurfjellet peaks in Junkerdal nasjonalpark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 20:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kokedaltinden in Sulitjelma seen from ascent against Vardtoppen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 20:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seglfjellet in Beiarn with Leirvika nature reserve (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gasskatjåhkkå the highest point in Hamarøy municipality.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Mørsvikbotn seen from Blåfjell.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mørsvikbotn seen from Blåfjell.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Multindan seen from southeast with Sagfjord below.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 10:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Off-piste skiers ready for takeoff from Storebjørn peak in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Why dont you use the full contrast up to real white? Even those areas, which should fully reflect the sun, look just grey. --PtrQs 21:08, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK ? New and better version now I hope. --Frankemann 18:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd suggest not to file different images under the same filename; - and I rather liked the cut of the original image, 'cos here we have that disturbing blue shadow in the foreground. --PtrQs 19:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK ? Sorry for silly mistake. Now I have corrected the right picture! --Frankemann 19:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect! And now if you can tell me where to book this tour .. --PtrQs 23:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blåsjø perennial storage reservoir.jpg[edit]

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses

File:Blåsjø perennial storage reservoir.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ italiano ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ українська ∙ svenska ∙ sicilianu ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 13:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smørstabtindan mountains and Smørstabbreen glacier in Jotunheimen Nasjonal Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 19:10, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Store Smørstabbtinden and Kniven mountains in Jotunheimen Nasjonal Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:56, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View over Linndalsvatna lake in Linndalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Andkjelvatnet seen from Durmålstinden summit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Andkjelvatnet seen from Durmålstinden summit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Svarthamaren from Flya up to Merraskaret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Merraskaret towards Merraskartjønna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grøvu river i Grøvudalen i Sunndalsfjella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, darkness because time of the year --Michielverbeek 18:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Veggasætra over Storvatnet lake in Lindalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 11:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Seterfjellet from Storglupåa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support All pictures in this series are of good quality. Nice! --George Chernilevsky 18:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Litlskarhøa in Sunndalsfjella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Storskarhøa mountain from Bollåthøa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View towards Langranden from Bollåthøa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Nice! --George Chernilevsky 18:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Geitådalen from Bollåthøa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midtre Gjevillvasskamben at Gjevillvatnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perhaps something more contrast would have been nicer. But for me a good quality.--Famberhorst 04:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snota peek seen from Bossvasshøgda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the bridge over Rappa river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Too purple? -- Ikan Kekek 05:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK? Thanks Ikan Kekek, I have adjusted the colors slightly. Kind regards Frankemann 19:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It looks more realistic to my eyes. If that's how you remember it looking, that's alright with me. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 09:47, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned mountain farms in Grøvudalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too bluish purple? -- Ikan Kekek 05:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK? Thanks Ikan Kekek, I have adjusted the colors slightly. Kind regards Frankemann 19:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Now it's a lot less purple, but it's still pretty blue. Is that how you remember it looking? You'll notice, I put question marks at the ends of my questions, because you were there and I wasn't, so I don't know for sure. -- Ikan Kekek 09:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Info In autumn in the mountains in Norway a red warm light arises at sunset, afterwards bluish light. --Frankemann 20:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, in that case, I will vote to promote. -- Ikan Kekek 02:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just to let you know that the motive in this picture is anything but an abandoned mountain farm. This is Gammelsetra, which is still in operation as a seter, including milkmaid training :) ( http://www.sunndal.com/no/item/seterlandet-sunndal ) T 85.166.160.249 14:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storebjørn mountain in Jotunheimen Nasjonal Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veslebjørn mountain seen from Bjørnungen in Jotunheimen National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middle Hestbreapiggen western peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old and new log houses at Dindalsvegen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:52, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loftet mountain in Jotunheimen National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please fix the undefined categories. --Basotxerri 13:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:41, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Blekbuvatnet and Romsdalsfjella in the distance from Bollåthøa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Like the quality and the subject -- Simisa 12:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Grødalen from Svøulia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Could perhaps be processed less, but OK --Daniel Case 00:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larstind seen from the ridge of Larseggen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Photo could have been sharper. Tripod used? Good enough for me.--Famberhorst 05:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Signs warning tourists about the risk associated with going out to Trolltunga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Michielverbeek 20:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middle part of Vassliheia quarry field near Saksenvika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 19:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osatinden summit seen from Sørskarfjellet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 19:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sjunkfjorden seen from Sørskarfjellet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 19:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midtiskartinden summit seen from Midtiskaret gorge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks OK, if a bit soft ... but why ISO 400 here? --Peulle 18:21, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sjunkhatten and the mountain ridge of Osatinden seen from Sørskarfjellet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 19:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faulvatnet lake seen from the northeast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 17:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinfjellvatnet lake seen from Steinfjellet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strange stones with lichen below Steinfjellvatnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langvatnet lake seen from Steinfjellet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:31, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stream inlet below Steinfjellvatnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Hattvatnan towards Småtindan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 15:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Sokumfjellet towards Sokumvatnet and the mountains in the southwest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --TheRunnerUp 18:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the cairn at Memaurtinden towards the inner part of the Beiarfjord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Hattvatnan towards the upper part of Breivik valley and Memaurtinden summit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Hattvatnan towards Småtindan and Memaurtinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --TheRunnerUp 17:28, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Memaurtinden towards Beiarn and Høgtinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Outer part of the harbor in Inndyr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The beach in the inner part of the harbor of Inndyr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Sokumfjellet towards Småtindan and Memaurtinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A lot of shadows, but quality for me high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Overview of Litle Sokumvatnet and Namnlausvatnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --TheRunnerUp 20:20, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snow bridge near Småtindisen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cove in inner parts of the harbor in Inndyr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enclosed pew at the gallery for the governor of Nordland in Gildeskål old church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:39, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Sokumfjellet towards Morsdalsfjorden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Double rainbow over Storelvvatnet i Sulitjelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 22:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the south end of Storelvvatnet towards Vardetoppen and Otertinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Double rainbow over Tverrfjellet in Sulitjelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - Good quality, IMO, considering that of course it was misty. -- Ikan Kekek 09:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagfjorden seen from Kuvasstinden in the south.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Yann 12:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruosvágtjåhkkå peak rows seen from Kuvasstinden in the west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Yann 12:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rønna and Kvannliaksa seen from the mountain ridge Tjårro with evening light.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Yann 12:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Sokumfjellet towards Memaurtinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Yann 13:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Krukkiladnja towards Bjøllådalen with Raudfjellet mountain in the distance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Small waterfall at Bjøllåelva and some rain showers in north of Bjøllådalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:57, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inndyr seen from the outer parts of the port area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the south end of Storelvvatnet towards Vardetoppen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:40, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Storvassheia towards Kråkmotinden with evening light.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Kind of soft but, maybe this is the best you can do in the circumstances. --Daniel Case 05:20, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View beyond Bjøllådalen and Krukkimyra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Better than the other one --Daniel Case 19:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utsyn fra Krukkiladnja mot Semskfjellet Fetterbakk og Kjempåelva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support I guess this is as good as you could get under the circumstances --Daniel Case 19:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the southern part of Bjøllådalen where Raudfjellelva flows into Bjøllåga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 10:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Small rapids in Bjøllåelva and a pale rainbow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Very nice. I think f/16 makes the image too soft but there is enough detail in the foreground and I'm a sucker for rainbows and pretty nature stuff --Trougnouf 11:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Riarskaret towards Fossådalsvatnet and Snota mountain in the distance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Riarskaret towards Fossådalsvatnet lake and Trollhøtta mountain in the distance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:27, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Kamtjønnin and height 1497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Look down towards Tverrbekken stream and Hemre rock wall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 07:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Fossådalsvatnet lake with the autumn's first snow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 18:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow evening light over the west Mellomfjelltjønnin lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 15:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the Skull to Snota peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 15:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View over Mellomfjellet with Trollhøtta peak in the distance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 20:46, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Skallen towards Trollhøtta peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Amazing. Similar light and nature to here in Scotland --Podzemnik 22:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A place where Svartå river in Svartådalen is at its widest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:03, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svartå river in Svartådalen valley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Riarskaret towards Kamtjønnin lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Beutiful composition and landscape, quality ok. --ArildV 12:05, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The view from the glacier at Reinoksfjellet towards the southeastern parts of Reinoksvatnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. It seems ok for me. --Tournasol7 00:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View towards Reinoksfjellet mountain from west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, geotagging would be fine --Isiwal 08:37, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blucher heading for Norway.jpg[edit]

File:Blucher heading for Norway.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snøholstinden seen from the path in the Rauddalen in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Store Rauddalseggje seen from the path in the Rauddalen in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mjølkedalstind and Olavsbunuten seen from the path in the Rauddalen valley in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olavsbu tourist cabin in Rauddalen in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice setting! --PantheraLeo1359531 21:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snøholstinden seen from Olavsbu in violet evening light in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, the sun light makes this image special --PantheraLeo1359531 21:05, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raudalstindane ridge seen from the Rauddalsbandet in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olavsbunuten and Mjølkedalstinden in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Tverråbrean and Styggehøe in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:51, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The view from Veslådalen towards Gjende in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:18, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View towards southwestern parts of Russvatnet and Austre Surtningssue in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View towards southwestern parts of Russvatnet and Bessfjellet in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Hestbekken towards the Steinbudalen and Glittertinden in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View up Veodalen and Veobrean in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kyrkja and Tverrbytthornet seen from Visdalen in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:57, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View inward in the Steinbudalen in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 13:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View inwards Steinbudalen and Ryggjehøe in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 13:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Store Rauddalseggje seen from Olavsbu in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:07, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olavbunuten seen from Olavsbu in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Should be a bit brighter IMO --Ermell 07:06, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Have made the picture brighter. --Frankemann 16:54, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:43, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skiers on their way towards Glittertind in Jotunheimen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bjøllånes in Dunderlandsdalen seen from Berglia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 21:37, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Border point Rr 240 A between Norway and Sweden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, subject is focused. --PantheraLeo1359531 21:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View over Sulitjelmaisen and Stortoppen from Sårjåstjåhkkå.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Kokedaltinden from Sårjåstjåhkkå.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swamp with prepared path in Ånderdalen National.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:46, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Efjorden from Vårset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The beach at Titterbakken in the Ersfjord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roaldsvatnet seen from Roaldsryggen on Senja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy, but the quality is good --Michielverbeek 07:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergsbotn seen from lookout point at Moltebærhagen by Norwegian County Road 862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Could do with some more contrast. --Ermell 07:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC) Info Done --Frankemann 16:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The industrial area of the former Senjens Nickelworks and Bergsfjorden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artistic decoration with two boys at the harbor in Gryllefjord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark, but quality is good. Also left crop is not excellent done --Michielverbeek 07:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trangstraumen bridge in Berg municipality on Senja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Muntashir.islam 08:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ersfjord and the mountain range on the north side with Okshornan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 19:43, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The beach in Ersfjorden and the mountain range on the north side with Okshornan at the edge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 19:43, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Preikstoltinden in Nordskaret seen from Johanvatnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 04:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korsviktinden seen from Tindelva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lenvik and Gisundet seen from Landøyveien near Gibostad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Ok imo. --ArildV 17:34, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Views from the mountaintop with border point Rr 240 A against most western parts of Lináisen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Muntashir.islam 18:18, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeistinden and Sjunkfjorden as seen from the Korsviktinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 08:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bjørnsvikfjellet and Sørfolda as seen from Korsviktinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sørfolda and Leirfjord fjords seen from Korsviktinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 14:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeistinden and Sjunkfjorden as seen from the Korsviktinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little bit dusty but good enough for QI --D-Kuru 14:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bjørnsvikfjellet and Sørfolda as seen from Korsviktinden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little bit dusty but good enough for QI --D-Kuru 14:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karitinden seen from Puttegga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:56, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Cape seen from Knivskjelvika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thats not bad. -- Liberaler Humanist 12:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image being used in article[edit]

Hi, I don't know if you're active here anymore, but nonetheless, I'm just letting you know that this picture is now being used in this article on enwiki. Well, just thought I'd let you know. Have a good day! Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 18:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dylan, sorry for delayed answer, but I have been busy writing articles about the history of the sami people. On your user page, I see you also have a certain interest in topics relatet to Northern Norway.

Nice that you have illustrated an articel with a picture I took some years ago. It was taken on the way up to this muntain (right):

Soon it is time for my summer vacation in the high north. Hopfuly I would take some new picturers to upload to WikiMedia. Kind regards Frankemann (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you / takk![edit]

Hello

I work at Europeana. I thought you might like to know that we used one of your Wikimedia uploads in a recent blog.

It was your photograph of Nyholmsundet and the blog (written in all 24 EU languages) is here:

https://www.europeana.eu/en/blog/european-capitals-of-culture-2024-bad-ischl-bodo-and-tartu

Many many thanks for uploading and sharing your photographs!

Best wishes,

Adrian Acediscovery (talk) 09:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adrian Acediscovery. Very funny that the photo I took many years ago is being used. Thanks for mentioning it. Kind regards Frankemann (talk) 20:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]