User talk:Felix Folio Secundus

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Felix Folio Secundus!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Churches in X cats

Hi, Notice you are doing some very useful work on sorting out the pics of churches - thanks. However, I'm not sure about some of the churches in <village> categories. For example Category:Churches in St. Just in Roseland only contains imagery of the parish church. The category for that church should be Category:Church of St Just, St Just in Roseland (or similar). The issue about if it should be St or St. isn't really important.

The two categories are very different: Its correct to say that that church is a Grade I listed, Anglican church. It is not necessarily correct to say that the "Churches in St Just in Roseland" are Grade I listed, Anglican churches, as that concept can (and does) include other buildings that are not necessarily Grade I or Anglican. If the village only contains the one church, it seems redundant to have a churches in village category - would be preferable to just have the correctly named church category.--Nilfanion (talk) 18:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your observations. I began by trying to follow the pattern which existed without editing too many of the files. Because of the settlement pattern of Cornwall it is not always obvious how to categorize churches, whether by civil parish, ecclesiastical parish or actual settlement (e.g. St Nectan's Church in the parish of St Winnow has been given the category of Churches in Lostwithiel). Many of the Methodist chapels are short of information so it is hard to be precise about the categories for them. I hope to be able to make the categorization more consistent later. I do not know whether it is possible to rename a category rather than move each of the files to another one.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 19:11, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

I agree that Cornwall is particularly difficult for this :) On the question of civil parish (CP), ecclesiastical parish (EP) or settlement, my opinion is if the settlement is large (it includes multiple churches), use that. Otherwise, use the CP. The EP is obviously relevant to this subject, but it only really applies to a sub-set (CofE, but not Catholic/Methodist/whatever). It makes sense to also note the EP on the Anglican churches, whereas the CP is relevant to all denominations and also better ties in with how secular buildings should be treated.

And it is not possible to rename a category unfortunately. Posting a move request to User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands, asking for admin assist (I am one) or making use of the Cat-a-Lot gadget are the most sensible ways to handle it.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi

You appear on my watchlist from time to time :) Thanks for the work. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: John Rylands Library

Hi, I assume you are referring to Category:The John Rylands Library and comparing it to w:John Rylands Library - and asking if there's any reason for the "The". There is no reason for the Commons category to include "The", and the conventions here are the same as on Wikipedia.

Given that I'd suggest that you move the content to category:John Rylands Library. Instructions are at Commons:Rename a category, basically if you swap the {{Category redirect}} to the other page you'll be done.--Nilfanion (talk) 19:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Category:Other_Nonconformist_churches_in_Devon

Category:Other_Nonconformist_churches_in_Devon has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Nilfanion (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Cathedrals_in_Saint_Helena

Cathedrals in Saint Helena has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

-- Tuválkin ✉ 09:10, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Ratirahasya

Ratirahasya has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

DGtal (talk) 16:28, 24 February 2015 (UTC)