User talk:Eusebius/Archives/Promotions/October 2011

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baalbek - swastika relief.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:58, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baalbek - temple of Jupiter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Classic shot. --Albertus teolog 07:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florence - tower of the Palazzo Vecchio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beylerbeyi Palace - wide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 02:36, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beiteddine - sanglier et ours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 18:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damas - détail du dôme du trésor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 18:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Temple of Jupiter in Baalbek.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:54, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Vecchio, Florence (clock tower).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in (rich) scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iridescent cloud.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:39, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Beylerbeyi Palace, Istanbul.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best for the scope. Yann (talk) 15:22, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:54, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius 10:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambord - monogramme d'Henri II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Eusebius 18:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moshe Vardi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Textbook-quality portrait here. -- Rama 15:08, 4 November 2011 (UTC)