User talk:Eusebius/Archives/Promotions/March 2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crèche - bergers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Question why flash? --Ralf Roletschek 13:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 Comment During this session I took pictures both with and without flash (on tripod). The lighting looks much better with flash (the lighting of the room is not good IMO). I think that the flash is reasonably balanced here, and that reflections, which are limited, are not an issue. If I were to criticize this picture I would focus on the hand of the foreground character, which somewhat gets into the composition. However, I nominated the picture because I think it passes the QI criteria. --Eusebius 14:47, 3 March 2011 (UTC) thank you, with this words: QI --Ralf Roletschek 15:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 13:16, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lichaa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Archaeodontosaurus 08:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 12:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lichaa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:33, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 12:30, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maaloula pano 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There's a stitching problem at the top near the right. Mattbuck 12:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 Info File updated, thanks. --Eusebius 13:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Then consider it promoted. Mattbuck 12:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 13:47, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dinan - Saint-Sauveur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Carschten 10:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rennes - Parlement de Bretagne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well made picture. Grand-Duc 20:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 12:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilique Saint-Sauveur de Dinan (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--Eusebius (talk) 14:18, 31 March 2011 (UTC)