User talk:Eusebius/Archives/Promotions/July 2010

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuilles de pistachier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Eusebius (talk) 12:08, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biarritz - Sainte Eugénie HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Eusebius (talk) 12:09, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canon EF 75-300mm lens.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The background is too dark, but nonetheless it's the best image because of perspective and detail. -- H005 21:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with H005 -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Canon EF 75-300 f-4-5.6 III.jpg: +2 <--
2. Canon EOS 450D with Canon EF 75-300mm F4-5.6 III lens-flickr - by - AaronE™.jpg: 0
3. Canon EF 75-300mm F4-5.6 II-flickr - by - MiNe (sfmine79).jpg: 0 
=>
File:Canon EF 75-300 f-4-5.6 III.jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Canon EOS 450D with Canon EF 75-300mm F4-5.6 III lens-flickr - by - AaronE™.jpg: Declined.
File:Canon EF 75-300mm F4-5.6 II-flickr - by - MiNe (sfmine79).jpg: Declined.

--Ikar.us (talk) 15:48, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

--Ikar.us (talk) 15:48, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Versailles - Roi Soleil à contre-jour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 19:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Versailles - vasque et façade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice contrast between the round vase and the diagonal line of the castle --Haneburger 11:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florence - Duomo sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 12:52, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tours - Saint-Julien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some will say it's a example of two dimensional building ;-) for m it's ok. --Berthold Werner 15:07, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Julien de Tours.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:24, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Best available, but does the straight frontal view depict the building well? --Ikar.us (talk) 22:41, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment The church has only a short article in fr:, but a very long one in ru:.Unfortunately,I don't understand enough yet. --Ikar.us (talk) 23:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 22:19, 30 July 2010 (UTC)