User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Здравствуйте[edit]

Несколько месяцев назад я загрузил две картинки админ-деления Белорусской ССР на начало войны и после освобождения. Карты составил сам. Также хотел вам дать источник. 1944 и 1940. На коммонс думаю целиком эти листы выкладывать смысла нет, а вот с них составить векторное изображения идея нравиться, только увы я незнаю как это делать (а обычные png - пожалуста)

К сожалению, в графике я специалист невеликий, но думаю, что можно попросить User:Zscout370, User:WarX. Точно знаю, что они векторизорвали/рисовали SVG. --EugeneZelenko 16:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо обращусь к ним, а мой план по картографии, как вы думайте, есть смысл?
Хотя с другой стороны, исходные карты тоже не помешают, всё-таки исторический документы да и разрешение приличное. К сожалению, на soldat.ru из "украсили" логотипом, а на poehali.net в результате переезда на poehali.org карты где-то потерялись (попробую спросить брата, он как раз из этой компании :-). Лицензионная чистота векторных карт на poehali.org под вопросом - геодезическая информация явно не была сделана самостоятельно. --EugeneZelenko 16:10, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ну "украшения" на ч-б рисунки нетак сложно убрать, фотошопом пройтись один раз и готов. А вот с 40-м годом да... неожидал, правда он у меня на диске сохранен. Вот еще 1939 откопал, да и несколько месяцев назад ко мне в наследство перешло 50+ томов Большой Советской Энциклопедии 2-го издания а там карт очень много. Помимо того у деда где-то видел топографический Атлас СССР 49-го... но это уже детали.
Брат написал, что у них есть и польские карты до 1940. Не уверен, что PD. --EugeneZelenko 15:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Советский закон до 54-го...а насчет Польских незнаю...--Kuban kazak 19:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ладно теперь моя главная просьба. Минское Метро. Я на en очень много написал про станции метро б.СССР. Так вот за Минск хотел взяться но увы фотоархив не полный. А вам я думаю не надо говорить о том что у нас Метро это не просто станции а каждая станции требует своего внимания. Так что без фотографии статья просто не получаеться. Ладно хватет говорить намеками, прошу вас отоснять и дополнить фотоархив. (Я займусь его формулировкой). Также помню вы как-то сказали ...с удовольствием помогу сделать подпись на белорусском языке (вариант на Ваш выбор) с Мінском...:-)--Kuban kazak 19:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Формулировка окончена.--Kuban kazak 20:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Перевод сделаю. Со снимками сложнее: сам их сделать пока не могу, но попрошу родных и на форуме белорусской Википедии. --EugeneZelenko 16:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Большое спасибо, вот хороший сайт который пусть будет примером для ракурсов. Только если можно - по больше внимания уделить всем украшениям - например все мозайки на Московской... --Kuban kazak 15:49, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
К сожалению, из-за отсутствия свободы панорамы в РБ (как и в РФ), снимки мозаик крупным планом будут нарушать авторские права скульптора (статья 19 закона РБ об авторских правах). --EugeneZelenko 16:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Вот это новость, я думал что публичные изображения не считаються как работа автора (в отличия от оригинальных эксизов). Т.е. это обозначает что любое изображения "встроенно" в здания защищено копирайтом. Ну быть этого не может! Сколько фоток на интере публичных объектов и никто не жалуеться... Честно говоря мне кажеться вы что-то перепутали. --Kuban kazak 23:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
К сожалению может :-( Я тоже был неприятно удивлён. И абсолютно не против, чтобы кто-то лоббировал изменения законов в лучшую сторону в РФ и РБ...
Из закона РБ (в законе РФ - статья 21): воспроизведение или доведение до всеобщего сведения произведений архитектуры, изобразительного искусства, фотографий, которые постоянно расположены в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, за исключением случаев, когда изображение произведения является основным объектом такого воспроизведения или сообщения для всеобщего сведения или когда оно используется в коммерческих целях;. Т.е., если произведение не в PD, то надо просить разрешения автора, иначе - запрет на коммерческое использование. А это несовместимо с Commons:Licensing.
Подобное обсуждение в русской Википедии.
EugeneZelenko 15:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Мда грустно... Но все таки насколько я понял, если ракурс правильно составить то проблем небудет. Например. Как вы сами видети изображения лишь часть картинки...--Kuban kazak 19:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Да, скорее всего такой ракурс не должен вызывать претензий. --EugeneZelenko 15:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for voting![edit]

Thank you for your vote and your kind words on my RFA. It succeeded with 16 support and no oppose. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please verify the status of this template: {{Rost.ru}}. The template only speaks about redistribution and not derivative work etc. Thanks, -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.rost.ru/about_site.shtml says only about reproduction (могут быть воспроизведены). I think template and all images which used, must be deleted. I add this into deletion request. --EugeneZelenko 15:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please look what I write at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:RussiaUralTransparent.png - I explain that the description on the site allows derivative works. MaxiMaxiMax 03:53, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can I ask you a favour? Could please do a Flickr review of this image of actress Elisabeth Shue? Thuresson 13:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --EugeneZelenko 15:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome log active again[edit]

Hi, on User:Orgullobot/Welcome log you are listed as a helper. Orgullobot hasn't been active for a while and SieBot has taken over the welcoming a few days ago. There is fresh output again. I thought you might be interested in that info. I do hope on your continued participation in checking newbie edits. Cheers! Siebrand 09:16, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nuevo admin[edit]

Gracias por el mensaje!! Ahora estoy leyendo los enlaces que me dejaste para tener un panorama mas amplio de las funciones administrativas por aquí. Saludos Axxgreazz (talk) 01:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Max Mirnyi[edit]

No problem, of course :) Thanks for saving me some work by putting it in articles! --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 05:32, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Username change[edit]

Thank you for taking the time to change my username. Happy editing! Arria Belli 20:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Solid white bordered[edit]

"Please move the image "Solid white border.png" to "Solid white bordered.png" because the first is better than the second one.--Actarux 15:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Just upload image under new name, and put {{bad name}} on old one. --EugeneZelenko 16:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)"
How can I re-unload an image, because the system say I am too new? I reload with another name this image: "Solid white border.png" but it has to replace this one: "Solid white bordered.png"--Actarux 23:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: adminship[edit]

Many thanks, Eugene ! All the best, le Korrigan bla 16:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Baader image[edit]

Hello Eugene,

Í posted the Baader image directly from english wikipedia not from the net, is this a problem in using the image in wikipedia in spanish if belong to the english wiki?

TIA,

Janyn

Hallo! First of all I want to apologize for making some mistakes while uploding images. The reason is that I'm new here, at Wikimedia, so, as you understand, I lack experience.

The second point is that I still don't understand the problem. In the case of Image:Ogloblin.jpg I mentioned the source (The Historic Encyclopedia of Kyiv). To my point of view, if an image (e.g. a photo) is published in an Encyclopedia that has got millions of copies it automatically becomes a public domain (tell me, please, if I'm wrong). I also have no possibility to find out who is the author of the photo or when it was first published. So, as it's not a work of mine, I've tagged it with a GNU Free Documentation License.

Another example is Image:Belomorkanal4.jpg. As you can see, in this case I've also mentioned the source. But still, a warning was added.

So, could you, please, explain me once again: what's my problem and what are the ways to avoid such problems?

Many thanks, yours Martofliak 20:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the explanation! I'll try to do my best! :) Good luck! Martofliak 22:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because he said he was on Russian Wikipedia, I yielded to your judgment. Although we don't have a specific policy on Commons about this, I do not consider non-verbal characters valid for usernames...regardless of what the other wikipedias allow. You have my support in rejecting this. Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 17:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously.... he's commented. Since he's Russian... you can take it :) [1] Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 20:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Евгений, спасибо! --User:-) 03:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you should upload unknown plants to flickr for identification!! :P

I'll try it later, main problem - to find time for this :-) --EugeneZelenko 17:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this one is undoubtedly some type of Eucalyptus (gum tree). Very pretty one too! --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 16:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for help! --EugeneZelenko 17:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Admin[edit]

Thank you for the welcome message! Dantadd 15:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is weigela so I have added it to Category:Diervillaceae. Ksbrowntalk 17:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help! --EugeneZelenko 15:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eugene, this photo shows two specimen of the Yellow-bellied Toad, Bombina variegata in a very typical habitat. Nice picture! Greetings from Germany, Christian, Feb. 09, 2007.

Thank you for your help! --EugeneZelenko 16:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I appreciate your posting on my page (& for noticing!). I really am in two minds about this - I have thought carefully I assure you (I have even read the requirements page!). As an Admin (with checkuser rights) on Wikibooks I have a reasonable understanding of what is required but I feel that my knowledge of Commons procedures & policies is not good. However I am now looking at other areas such as uncategorised pages so I will learn more. I have prejudices - vandals & spam being the main ones but you should know that I am not a fan of policy either! I am not good at languages but I might get by in French. Looking at the admin list you are an experienced member of the community, if you feel that it would be in the interests of the community and acceptable I would accept nomination. I have no reservations about actually using the tools (although I do have a reputation for being hard on vandals). If you have any questions for me I will happily answer them - regards & thanks --Herby talk thyme 10:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to say thanks for the nomination, regards --Herby talk thyme 17:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Administrator[edit]

Thanks. Although I wouldn't normally go seeking out more responsibilities, it seems like a reasonable & productive suggestion. If you want to make the nomination, go ahead, or I can take a look at doing it myself in a bit. --Davepape 05:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Could you look at the vandalism noticeboard please - two blocks in order - thanks --Herby talk thyme 15:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My thanks - I caught the same one on Wikibooks at the same time! (they are banned for a very long time on Wikipedia so playing in other places I think) --Herby talk thyme 15:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Admins[edit]

Good finds, Eugene :) (I had Herby in mind, though ;)) --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 03:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just tired to delete pages nominated by these users :-) They definitely could do that themselves :-) --EugeneZelenko 15:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The cake![edit]

My thanks - for the nomination, the support and the message. I hope I can help & that my mistakes will be few - regards --Herby talk thyme 18:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Łękawica[edit]

Steifer, who is much better than me in heraldry said, that on east of Poland (and Lithuania) łękawica looks different - image:HołowniaII POL CoA.png. So please choose what kind of shape do you like as on Abdank, or as on Hołownia II.

--WarX 08:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, bastique told told me to ask you for help since I have a Russian user who doesn't speak English. The image involved is the above and the user is HalanTul and I'm pretty sure the picture wasn't taken by him, just that he owns a copy of it. I'm also not sure if it can be used on any wikimedia project but then again I don't speak Russian. He sent me an e-mail (probably using babelfish):

"Kind time!

Concerning file Image:Toburokov Petr.jpg. I do not know English, therefore I shall write in Russian and I shall take advantage of machine translation. Therefore in advance I apologize for possible mistakes in the letter.

I explain, that the photo of the national writer of Yakutia Toburokov is placed by me. Toburokov is my native uncle. When the photo and whom it is not known is made. It is scanned by me from a popular source. If I have broken rules Commons I ask to consult what to make further to use this photo for an illustration of clause.

Yours faithfully, Nikolay Pavlov aka HalanTul, Yakutsk"

I have his e-mail address which I can give you if you want. Thanks, Yonatanh 18:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Please link images[edit]

Thank you very much for your help (sincerely); I'll be sure to follow-up on adding categories in the future. However, when I uploaded the images last night the "category-finder tool" was down for maintenance, or so the error message said, so I just decided to pursue this at another time. 2112rush

Image:Kosovo_and_part_of_Serbia.png[edit]

Image:Kosovo_and_part_of_Serbia.png which I uploaded is from English Wikipedia and it's GNU GPL license. If you have a time, you can see that :) It has the same name as this, which I add to commons. Pozdrawiam [PL] --Przemyslawflak 19:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot/sysop[edit]

Try adding the bot flag first, then the sysop flag. If that doesn't work, let me know. (I will try and get a steward to remove the sysop flag now.) pfctdayelise (说什么?) 12:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They intentionally made it so that an admin couldn't have the bot flag. More about politics on English Wikipedia than anything else. :) --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 02:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo

Might you allow adding a category to this protected image. --Javierme 23:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFA[edit]

Hi Eugene! I would like to know if you would support my RFA? I'm I experienced enough? Please let me know what you think. Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington 12:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have anything against :-) However, I'm usually voting for candidates, who did maintenance work (categorization, finding copyvio/no license files, welcoming, etc.) --EugeneZelenko 15:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's part of what I'm doing. Most time I spend time working on categories and uploading climate charts. But every so often I'm searching through the recent changes and try to find copyvios and something like that. I already talk to Rüdiger Wölk about RFA and he thinks it's ok. The main reason is that I saw that we have a 100(+) day lag in the deletion-queue. That's plenty of work and I would like to help cleaning up the mess. 8-) But if you think I should do some more maintenance work, I'll gladly do. Thanks for your fast answer! --Hedwig in Washington 16:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Добрага часу! Дадаў крыніцу да гэтай выявы, на старонках Рускага музэя, дзе выкладзены выявы розных твораў мастацтва, няма значка капірайту. Ды і як наогул твор мастацтва 12 ст. можа падлягаць аўтарскім правам, нават калі яго хто і сфатаграфаваў?. Выява гэтага ж колта ляжыць таксама на украінскай вікі, але кепскай якасці. --MaximLitvin 17:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Вай забыўся, гэтую выяву я адрэдавагваў у фоташопе - разрэзаў два фота і склеіў так, каб на адной выяве было бачна абодва бакі колтаў. --MaximLitvin 17:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Т.б. загружаць у Камонз можна толькі тое, што пад ліцензіяй ПД? --MaximLitvin 10:53, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
А вось такі дазвол падыйдзе http://www.museum.ru/alb/image.asp?13065 ? --MaximLitvin 09:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

A piece of cake... which somehow turned into chocolate. And ignore the napkin, I don't know how that got there!

I'll be careful, I promise! I'll be quadruple-checking everything for the next week or so at least, when I may pare down to just triple-checking. Oh, and here's a piece of the cake as a thank-you ^_^ -- Editor at Largetalk 18:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

В самом деле? И чем же она отличается в этом смысле, например, от Image:Belarus-Minsk-Victory_Square-1.jpg? И какие фотографии имеются в виду под словом "другие"? Cmapm 20:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Да, спасибо, я посмотрел дискуссию выше и теперь начинаю понимать, что скорее всего, эти 4 барельефа придется удалить, займусь этим сегодня же. Из будущих, к сожалению, не удел остались мозаики внутри кинотеатра "Пионер"... А как Вы думаете, загрузить их на flickr без права на воспроизведение можно? Cmapm 20:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
:-) Понятно, спасибо. Там еще надо будет хорошо подумать. Cmapm 21:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:380th_Bomb_Group,_King_of_the_Heavies.gif+[edit]

I sent the permission to use this image to the email that is specified in the upload area. I thought that the image does have a source. The 380th Bomb Group Association gave me permission to upload the file. Since this is my first picture uploaded, can you or someone else help me get all the permissions right? Thanks. Glennfcowan 05:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Crossposted)
Please use CheckUsage (or User:CommonsDelinker for image replacement) before deleting replaced images. This one was used at least on Belarusian Wikipedia. Please also add name of replacement in deletion comment. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko 15:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think in that case the page was protected, thus I had no way to replace it, so I just skipped it. Normally I would! I am also under the impression that replacing images with .svg will be ignored by CommonsDelinker, so that wouldn't work either. Also, for some reason after I replaced the images, they still showed up in the "CheckUsage", despite me verifying that they were replaced and the "CheckUsage" saying the database was updated. I don't know what else anyone would want me to do, but if you have a better suggestion, I'm open to it! Ram-Man 15:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question about your comment[edit]

Hi, I was confused by your comment that referenced my archive page. Most of the images on there had some minor problems with the copyright, but I believe that moist were fixed. I have loaded a lot of images from the different wikis using Magnus' tool, and have tried to be good about the copyright. Were you referring to the discussions on copyright? Your statement was rather vague. In would appreciate it if you would explain further? --Evrik 17:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely don't like Image:Kirill_turovskiy.jpg (clear web thumbnail without source on original wiki). See also User talk:Evrik/Archive 1#Behaviour: warning, User talk:Evrik/Archive 1#Image of San Giuseppe Cafasso. --EugeneZelenko 15:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • EZ - I appreciate your comments, and this whole process has been enlightening. I believe those uploads are the exception to the many I have uploaded a lot of images from the different language wikis using CommonsHelper.

I have been active with

I may have made some mistakes, but I have tried my best to only load free images. As for my terseness with Ian ... well, we go back a ways. --Evrik 16:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My point is - you must always think critically before doing such things. Users may use incorrect comments/tags. Or wiki simply doesn't have people who monitors file uploads (I saw many of them). If administrators will not pay attention - who will? :-) --EugeneZelenko 16:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Zelenko на en:wiki[edit]

en:Alexander Zelenko - Александр Устинович Зеленко, 1871-1953, не родственник вам? NVO 17:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Нет. Вообще-то фамилия - не редкая :-) --EugeneZelenko 18:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't Speak English[edit]

Söylediklerinden bir şey anlamadım:I can't Speak English.Can you are speak Turkish? I AM FROM TURKEY.

Разрешение автора[edit]

Посоветуй пожалуйста. Как оформлять разрешение, если автор мой товарищ, с которым я не поддерживаю электронной переписки? Я ранее у него спрашивал усное разрешение на размещение этото и еще нескольких фото. Я конечно могу навестить его как-нибудь, попросить написать расписку и послать ее фотокопию по указанному адресу, но так ли это необходимо? --Yakudza 22:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Формально User:Yonatanh прав. Думаю, что стоит ему объяснит про наличие устного разрешения (и то что подписание формального разрешения может потребовать больше недели) и при возможности стоит подписать подобие Commons:Email templates и послать их на соответствующий адрес. --EugeneZelenko 14:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I somehow doubt that this includes a release to public domain, but then again, I don't read Russian. Please take a look. Thanks. Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 12:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --EugeneZelenko 15:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Out of town[edit]

I will be in St. Petersburg (Florida) for the next few days. I suggest we kill evrik's nomination tomorrow...the two week mark. Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 18:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll close it tomorrow. Unfortunately I'll not available after 16:15 UTC --EugeneZelenko 15:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Переименовать[edit]

Привет. Ничего что на ты? Можно ли меня переименовать в User:Vaya?--Vaya 13:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Да, конечно. Сделано. --EugeneZelenko 15:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо.--Vaya 02:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates[edit]

I thought it's not necessary for those files which are not used in any project or those which I replaced before. But for the future I'll put such information for all files. Pilecka 18:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

См. User talk:Samulili#Image:Palma-mercalova.jpg. Что-то админ удаливший изображение мне не отвечает. Может быть, ты восстановишь? --Butko 16:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship for Tintazul[edit]

Hi Eugene! I have proposed myself for adminship; please go to the nomination page and support me with your vote. Thank you! – Tintazul talk 11:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA[edit]

Thanks :) Herr Kriss 14:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene. I need the help of a Russian speaker. Does this page mention derivative works and commercial use? Is it a free license? Kjetil r 23:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at some recent discussion there. I believe there are some inactive admins who should now be de-sysopped, as well as quite a few coming up soon. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 04:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carpathian Sheepdog Photo[edit]

Hi.. I just wanted to let you i had this photo identified by someone who breeds Carpathian Sheepdogs and was told that this photo is actually looks like a Bucovina sheepdog,which is another Romanian Sheepdog breed, I know i suggested to you it may be Carpathian Sheepdog but i was wrong as Carpathian Sheepdogs are only Wolf Greyish in Color as i have learned and not White With Spots... So you may want to edit it as being a -possible- Bucovina Sheepdog.... My Appoligies..

Thanks so much --Ltshears 17:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Trish[reply]

It's OK :-) Thank you for letting me know. I'll change descriptions. --EugeneZelenko 18:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opus Dei Central HQ photo[edit]

Thanks for your note at my page. To answer your query, kindly look at the Image Description page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Opusdeihqrome.jpg) where it states: This photo is courtesy of JPSonnen who took the picture and gave permission for its use: "yes, you can use/have any of the photos for whatever you like. i took them all myself for the internet world." https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=28321606&postID=4902897809033017452

Thank you for your interest. Marax 01:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deleted picture and admin is non responsive[edit]

An administrator deleted the an image which was being used in the article english article W:racquetball.[2] It would be nice to see this image again. The admin lacks com kills and didn't really explain himself. Furthermore, he didn't even fix the broken links. Can you please guide me in getting a response from this administrator. Thank you for your cooperation. --CyclePat 04:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Беларуская Вікіпедыя[edit]

Вітаю! Яўген, што робіцца з be:, Вы хоць нешта ведаеце? Жудас нейкі. Зачыняюць, пераносяць ці што, што Вікімедыйная адміністрацыя кажа? --MaximLitvin 07:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Я толькі бачыў як адключылі існуючую базу зьвестак і перанесьлі зьмест інкубатара. Нас ніхто не папярэджваў... Штосьці можна пабачыць тут:http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2007-March/029143.html, але be-x-old - дагэтуль неактыўны. Я запытаўся падрабязнасьцяў у аўтара. --EugeneZelenko 13:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Admin[edit]

Thanks for welcoming me as a new Admin, and for the gift of a cake. What I'd like to know, though, is why the cake has already been half eaten?  ;) --MichaelMaggs 14:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, it's very suspicious :-) --EugeneZelenko 14:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Mice on commons? :-) --Obersachse 19:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Form of government.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 14:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was wondering whether you knew who the author of the picture was and whether he died before 1954. Thanks, Yonatan talk 04:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA[edit]

I'm now well past 200 edits; grateful if you could look again at my RfA now that this eligibility factor has been resolved. -- ChrisO 19:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

French may 1968[edit]

Hi Eugene, my english is not very good, but I hope that you could understand me. These images don’t have copyright and aren’t advertisings, works of art, or anything as it. These are posters and placards made by Parisian students in the protests of French May of 1968. If you have some doubt about it, you can search in some pages about this topic, and you will see that these images are posters and placards in fact.--Mellotron74 21:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

kgrr[edit]

Eugene, thanks for your help. Kgrr 23:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL/bg[edit]

Eugene- You appear to be the only admin claiming any knowledge of Bulgarian, so could you take a quick look at Template:GFDL/bg and let me know if it looks okay? The non-existent template has been vandalized a dozen times in the last month, so I copied text from the bg wikipedia's GFDL template, just to get something there. Thanks, --Davepape 18:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Information[edit]

I am concerned about the voting on your deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/Image:1788.jpg and the related one Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Smpl09. The voting seems to be co-ordinated - a posting here is also part of it. I have requested checkuser on gmaxwell's page. Regards --Herby talk thyme 07:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since I left you the message I have blocked the last two users who removed deletion tags just for one day. I hope this gives time for checkuser information and sends a message that we will not allow this behavior. I consider the photos to be out of project scope myself and will vote tomorrow that way on both. I will also say that the vote must not be closed until we have information from Gmaxwell - regards --Herby talk thyme 14:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Unknown flower-3.jpg[edit]

The name is Centraurea montana. epibase 19:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for help! --EugeneZelenko 14:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usurpation[edit]

Hi, you have been said to be the only active bureucrat in commons, so you are the only one able to help me. I´m es:User:FAR, an admin from es. Some time ago, a vandal created in commons an account with that name, User:FAR. As you can see, it was banned forever due to his vandalism and his impersonation of me. Afterwards, I created this one. Since I hardly ever work here, it didn´t annoyed me, but nowadays I´m going to start working, so I would rather recover my nick.

It is possible by usurpation: the vandal account is renamed to other name, and mine is renamed to FAR. But it is compulsory to be a burocraut to do such thing.--F-AR 18:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --EugeneZelenko 19:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Mr. only active bureaucrat in commons :) Cary Bass demandez 23:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I never pretended to such loud title :-) Fortunately it could be easily taken by other bureaucrat :-) --EugeneZelenko 14:49, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship[edit]

Please see my talk page, last comment. Please reopen the request and allow me to get the two more support votes I need. Thanks, Yonidebest Ω Talk 00:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

See Commons:Administrators/Requests_and_votes/Yonidebest-2-. As you can see, even the only two Commons admins who are also active in he.wiki had voted for me. Am I good to go? Yonidebest Ω Talk 14:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Nominations usually remain for seven days. See Commons:Administrators. I don't see any reason to create "express-line", especially if you take in account that this is not he.wiki and other people may express their opinions too. --EugeneZelenko 14:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nominations usually remain for seven days. Usually. Considering my previous nomination had no oppose votes and had finished only a few days ago, I think there is place to close this nomination early. There's your reason. Yonidebest Ω Talk 14:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't think so. Sorry. --EugeneZelenko 14:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you should delete the usually, as it could fool me. Yonidebest Ω Talk 14:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
As far as I remember these words mean minimum time on practice. There were only nominations which took longer time not shorter. --EugeneZelenko 14:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Then "at least" should be used. Yonidebest Ω Talk 17:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Feel free to discuss this issue on Commons talk:Administrators. --EugeneZelenko 14:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect for you, I suggest that you let one of the other bureaucrats close the request. As Yondiebest says he opened it at your suggestion it means you could be perceived as involved - best to let one of the others do it. Actually, how many active 'crats do we have currently? You seem to be the one doing all the work of late...--Nilfanion 11:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I looked at the logs in more detailed and realised we have 4 or so active ;)--Nilfanion 13:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree that will be good idea if request will be closed by somebody else. --EugeneZelenko 14:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't I give the Source of the image here, as for the author I had it written down somewhere let me find it. PatPeter 01:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No the picture is a logo of the Catholic church, and as you can see it is made of stone, I will not say my guess but I know where this was taken, I just can't put my finger on it. But I do want to know would it be better with current licensing or as logo licensing? PatPeter 23:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for renaming my account :) Bye --Jacopo 16:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Czy można prosić o zmianę uprawnień z podstawowej na sysop? Szczepan dyskusja Mail 21:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imeage:Logo_Geranios.JPG[edit]

marcada como violacao pq ? why marked as image violation ? dont' understand! can yo please explain ? is this something that 'believe' ?

igtoth 08:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


On my mind this image is logo of corporation or municipality. It's likely to be trademarked. --EugeneZelenko 14:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


JUST IN YOUR MIND !!! (Just Want to know ONE LITTLE THING.. WHY you people DONT you ask the person who did it 1st Before erase or send this messages .. BE CAREFUL YOU ARE VIOLATING SOMETHING ? you're all "ON YOUR MIND" !! Sorry .. thats what I think. igtoth 10:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

You don't have email????? :o --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 15:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, specifically, Special:Emailuser/EugeneZelenko is no good - you haven't confirmed your email yet? --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 16:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Witam[edit]

Czy odwiedzisz nas w Białowieży [3]?

[4] - nauczyciel języka białoruskiego prosi o kontakt. Mam nadzieję, że się dogadacie bez problemu :) . Beentree

re: Duplicates deletion[edit]

ok :) Szczepan talk 15:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename[edit]

Can you please rename my account to Zachary? I have already renamed on meta, wikinews, and wikipedia. Thanks in advance, Zachary talk 04:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko 14:23, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! :) Zachary talk 19:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Maya Bow.jpg[edit]

I took this photograph myself, and hereby assert that I am the creator of of this contribution. Please do not delete the photo. Thank you. Poodle Girl 22:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Я обновил интерфейс, но моё знание белорусского не позволяет грамотно доперевести то, что не переведно. Посмотри, пожалуйста. В правом столбике я пометил слова, которые не знаю как перевести, вопросами. Левый надо просто весь просмотреть. Ну и вступления разумеется. Шаблон с братскими проектами я потом обновлю. ~ putnik 07:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за помощь. Уже кто-то подправил до меня :-) --EugeneZelenko 13:41, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Да, какой-то анонимный доброжелатель. =)
И ещё вопрос, как перевести следущие фразы:
  • Play media file
  • Прайграць медыяфайл
  • Download
  • Не знаю точно, термин не очень стандартизирован. Встречал Запампаваць.
  • File info
  • Інфармацыя пра файл
  • Problems playing the file?
  • Праблемы з прайграваннем медыяфайла?
~ putnik 13:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ups, I forgot It[edit]

Thanks Indeed.--FAR 20:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice please[edit]

A couple of days ago I noticed a new RfA Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Chanueting which was withdrawn with no voting within 24 hours. I protected it as I understood that to be the process (but have not placed it in the archives yet). Yesterday this was placed on my talk page and I replied here. Would you just confirm my actions were correct - I will know for another time then. Thanks & regards --Herby talk thyme 12:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on User talk:Chanueting#RfA page. --EugeneZelenko 14:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - I appreciate it --Herby talk thyme 14:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can I edit the nomination page when I want to have nomination again? Chanueting 14:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just create new one (for example with -2 suffix). You could copy content of old page there. --EugeneZelenko 14:42, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see, thanks. Chanueting 14:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright questioned[edit]

You left a message on my talk page and deleted an image I uploaded. The owner of this photograph gave permission to use it here and I forwarded the email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. I may not have coded it correctly but it's not a copyright violation. If I coded this incorrectly please tell me what I did wrong and how to correct it. - Maria202 16:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will do - thank you. Maria202 16:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userp[edit]

Cheers for the userp, ...adam... (talken home ) 15:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gelsemium[edit]

Hello Eugene! Image:Unknown plant-33.jpg is Gelsemium sempervirens, an ornamental originating from South-Eastern USA. I saw that you uploaded some more plant photos from California to Category:Unidentified plants. Maybe, I will find time to identify some more of them. It would help to know, if you took them in a Botanical Garden, in gardens within the urban area, or in remnants of natural vegetation. Regards --Franz Xaver 12:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Californian plant photos - Notification[edit]

Would you mind translating the Russian? I assumed it was Russian :/ -- Cat chi? 20:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sorry for delay. --EugeneZelenko 15:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Password[edit]

Hi, you renamed me to User:Patricknoddy, what is my password? - 68.217.193.89 19:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, password is not changed during user renaming. So it should be old one. --EugeneZelenko 14:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is changed. I'll type in my old password and it says "Incorrect password". - 70.144.231.201 11:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure that you typing it correctly? I think will be good idea to speak with technical people who can (at least in theory) reset or restore password. --EugeneZelenko 13:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In fact I'm just changing my username to Patricknoddy (avoiding the passord box) and it still says I have a incorrect password. - 72.150.88.223 00:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I can't do anything. Rename user only change user name, not password. Please ask developers for help. --EugeneZelenko 14:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, well. I just created a new account. - Presidentman 19:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Приглашаю. Подготовил новую версию и заготовку под 2008 год. Alex Spade 17:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Белорусские гербы[edit]

Я не проигнорировал твою просьбу, просто с наскока не получилось. Сервер не дает скачивать файлы напрямую без браузера, я постараюсь обойти в ближайшее время. --Panther 19:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо большое! --EugeneZelenko 14:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Я скачал, там полтора мега получилось. Как тебе их лучше передать? --Panther 14:55, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Лучше сюда: eugene точка zelenko собака gmail точка com. Хотя, не уверен, что смогу роботом закачать опять :-( Если сможешь, пожалуйста, подержи на всякий случай у себя тоже. Большое спасибо. --EugeneZelenko 14:59, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Отправил по почте, у себя тоже стирать не буду. --Panther 07:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Огромное спасибо! --EugeneZelenko 14:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename photo[edit]

Could you please tell me how to rename a photo?--Wasabo 06:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is impossible now. You should reupload it with a new name and set a special template to the old one - {{duplicate|New_name}}. --Panther 08:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Image:Uffe-nazi.jpg"[edit]

All material from Flashback Media Group is Copyleft and can therefore be reproduced/copied/illustrated. Do not remove it. Kristofer2 14:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image Tagging Image:LesnarAngle.gif[edit]

You might as well delete the image then.

Image_talk:NoEstoniaBigBoard.jpg[edit]

Could you please take a look here: Image talk:NoEstoniaBigBoard.jpg? Thank you! Dantadd 12:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrote my opinion there. Usual fair use. This image must be deleted. --EugeneZelenko 14:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) guillom 16:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up on user rename[edit]

Thanks for moving my user pages. I prefer even more privacy. Can you please delete the redirect pages made because of the move to User:Petter73 and User:Bananfisk as well? I prefer to not link the redirect pages directly here. Finally I would prefer deletion of both these user pages: User:Petter73 and User:Bananfisk. Thanks for understanding. Petter73 17:48, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --EugeneZelenko 14:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for all help. It's all as I prefer it now. Petter73 21:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Переименование участника[edit]

Год назад кто-то зарегистрировал имя User:The Wrong Man, чтобы насолить одноимённому участнику ру-вики. Весь вклад состоял из заливки провокационной картинки. Я картинку тогда удалил, а пользователя заблокировал. Сейчас настоящий The Wrong Man попросил меня посодействовать в получении этого логина - возможно ли переименовать эту учётную запись, чтобы он мог зарегистрироваться здесь под своим именем (или, чтобы никто не перехватил по ходу дела, сделать двойное переименование участников)? --Panther 16:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Code & source on Image:Renan_ernest.jpg[edit]

Thanks a lot for the information. I have tagged this with source (an internet site) and author (unknown painter).
It's all ok, now?
Goodbye, --Arcomanno 07:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fine now. --EugeneZelenko 13:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You hit me by default? (about Image:Guy Moquet.jpg)[edit]

Excuse me, but this site has a cc 2.5 licence. I tagged the file with source, author & licence. (Yes, It's true, I don't know the name of the author, but this photo is hosted by a site that have a cc 2.5) What else could I do?

Thanks in advance. This is my 2nd image post in common, and I got 2 warning... There is something that go wrong...

--Arcomanno 15:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Ok, you're right. I investigate and I found that the image was taken by a parisian photographer died in 1945. The property of this photographer was now acquired by the Paris City Council. I think the photo was copyrighted but I'm not sure of that. I found another photo of this guy on a museum site and I have asked to the person in charge of this museum if the photo is copyrighted and if we could obtain a GNU FDL release of this photo.

Thanks, --Arcomanno 16:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Logo Irish Universities[edit]

Hello,

You deleted the logo from University College Cork and several other Irish universities. I understand those logos are borderline, but they are accepted on the EN version of wikipedia under the fair use agreement. Other French Universities also have their logos on Wikimedia Commons : Paris3-Sorbonne for exemple. They are under the "article L-713-3 du Code de la propriété intellectuelle", according to the French Law. They should be allowed. Adding the licence box as on those page may help ?

Thanks for your help,

MaDelle 09:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Bryan comments on your talk page and Commons:Licensing for details. fr:Image:Paris3.Sorbonne.Nouvelle_logo.jpg is uploaded to French Wikipedia, not Commons. --EugeneZelenko 14:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About the woody allen's image[edit]

I'm the author of this file. The photograph is taken with my camera in Oviedo, Spain. There are any problem perhaps? thank you. --ÁWá 21:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edgar Allan Poe[edit]

Could you maybe comment at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Edgar Allan Poe/User:Poirot? Lupo 10:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answered there. --EugeneZelenko 14:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request[edit]

Image:Gimn.png, requested by uploader with comment "(знайдені помилки)". Babelfish fails me... thanks :) --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 04:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I trust you with all cyrillic characters! ;) thanks. --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 13:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

продолжение[edit]

Привет! По-видимому ты был прав тут. В связи с этим как ты считаешь, в собственно википедию это фото можно загрузить? И если да, то как это надо будет обосновать? Alaexis 10:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Пасиба. Насчёт геокода - к новым буду добавлять, а к старым - когда будет время. Alaexis 14:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, is there a point in adding location data if I know only the town where the picture is taken? Unfortunately high-res google maps are not available for many Russian cities. Alaexis 18:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
С белорусскими городами та же история :-( Хотя иногда можно что-найти :-) Конечно же имеет смысл указывать только координаты объекта, а не города. С другой стороны, если есть возможность использовать GPS, то задача значительно облегчается :-) Кстати на тему GPS - http://openstreetmap.org. --EugeneZelenko 14:18, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Нда... тогда пока добавлю геокод к казанским и самаркандским фото. Alaexis 15:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geocoding project[edit]

Eugene,

OK, I agree to take part in the project in so far as the procedure is not too long or complicated.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 17:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Please block[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Italian_Soldiers_on_Parade.png&action=history

Hey EugeneZelenko! Please block the page mentioned above for all users. I can’t stand it, if someone removes my request for deletion, before someone else stated his point of view. As I am involved, I won’t block this page myself. Thank you. --Polarlys 16:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --EugeneZelenko 16:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. --Polarlys 16:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Commons Geocoding[edit]

I just posted a note in our village pump, thanks Eugene. Cheers. Anna 18:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]