User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive21

Inaccurate Commons:Deletion requests

Please correct the four issues that you've incorrectly instigated here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bsouthwell

If books and their content are in public domain, you should put proper public domain license tag instead of Creative Commons license. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

This is how each work is licensed: Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. This is how it's marked in each file's metadata, and this is how I uploaded them to WikiMedia. Why does this have to be a problem? Please remove the deletion proposal from each. Bsouthwell (talk) 20:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

If I'm going to continuously have inexplicable and obstructive problems like this, I'll just stop all work on Wikipedia if that's what you want. Message received. Bsouthwell (talk) 22:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Book consists of other works. Most likely modern license doesn't fit historical photos. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

The Ddos article needs an extensive overhaul. Most methods described are obsolete, and perspective is missing. Please find someone to do it. I can't until my issues are cleared up. Bsouthwell (talk) 22:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, but how this article relate to books your uploaded? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm just letting you know Eugene that the Ddos article is obsolete and as a result is misleading, and badly needs overhaul. The reason I am letting you know here is that, although I could fix it, I must stop all work on Wikipedia as my past work is impugned. If my fact-based and legally-cleared work is reversed arbitrarily, there is no use and I am wasting my time. I cannot even note in the Ddos article that it needs an overhaul. Maybe you will do that, maybe not. Bsouthwell (talk) 18:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, if I hurt your feelings, but definitely it was not my intention. Uploads on Commons should comply with Commons:Licensing. If license part has mistakes it should be fixed. By the word, conflicting situations and misunderstandings are possible on other projects, including Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

No feelings hurt, and you're not sorry. Of course it's impossible to upload files to Wikimedia without tagging licensing, and yet you claimed that they were not licensed, inexplicably. And you ignored my fact- and rule-based defenses. Then you had your friend delete the documents.

Wikipedia shouldn't be about a 'ruling class' of editors, to whom everyone must bow down. Life's too short for those of us who can give depth and meaning to Wikipedia articles, and it is discouraging when arbitrary actions are taken by editors, apparently on a political basis and contrary to the rules clearly laid out. I am a scientist, not a manager. If this is actually about a given editor and his buddies piling on without regard to the rules, I'll understand and withdraw as it's unsafe for people like me. Bsouthwell (talk) 18:10, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I tried to explain what was wrong with licensing of your uploads. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ŠimekMT

Hello EugeneZelenko. I´m original member from the band MALIGNANT TUMOUR. I have all rights reserved for these band pictures. And I want to put this pictures to wikimedia commons.

Please conirm your copyrights ownership via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I wrote from my personal email to email info-cs@wikimedia.org this message: Hello OTRS. Robert Šimek here. I´m original member from the metal band MALIGNANT TUMOUR. Few days ago I uploaded some pictures from the band to wikimedia commons:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MALIGNANT_TUMOUR.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MT_1995.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MT_2000.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MT_2005.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MT_2010.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MT_2013.jpg

I have all rights reserved for these band pictures and I want to put to wikimedia commons to see and download everybody. Please cancel "nominate for deletion". Thank you. Best regards.

Hope to enough for cancel "nominate for deletion". What do you think EugeneZelenko?

Sorry, I don have OTRS access. Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. If letter was witten in Czech, you'll need help of Czech-speaking OTRS volunteer. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Images related to Mongolian long song

I just uploaded the images in order to send the URLs of uploaded images and get written permission from the author and singer Dorjdagva Myagmarsuren. The images i uploaded before, but as a new user i lacked knowledge. This time i again uploaded them, got the written permission from Dorjdagva and now the e-mails are already sent to the permission@wikimedia.org. The images with author's permission are: File: Mongolan Statehood Long Song inauguration.jpg File:'Mongolian Statehood Long Song' Triple-CD album for public release.png File:'Mongolian Statehood Long Song' of 9 long songs, each on 1 audio CD, encased in wooden box. Author Dorjdagva Myagmarsuren.jpg and there will be more from the official Facebook pafe as well as coming official website to be launched soon. Glad to cooperate with you. Degisma (I just inserted my response directly by editing. If it was wrong, apology)

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

File:DJ김기덕 5.jpg

I got your message about my photos. I am a new member of Wikimedia Commons so I'm not sure how to add the right tags. But these images are my scans of my own pictures. Which means I'm 김기덕(Gideok Kim). I think These images don' need evidence of permissions. If it's still wrong, please tell me how to add the right tags. Thanks

These photo seems to me like promo ones. You could confirm your authorship/ownership via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

.Svg images vs .png

Thanks for your mesg. I just wanted to tell you that the reason why I post the .png instead of .svg is that with my copy of CD, the .svg files come out looking really strange and disconfigured.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/60/Metolazone_synthesis.svg

I got a bunch of .svg files like this but here is one that looks really bad to give you an idea how the software misbehaves/plays-up.--Lukashenk0 (talk) 16:24, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

I think will be good idea to ask help on Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Ludisphère.jpg

Hi EugeneZelenko, Ludisphère has an official Public Facebook Page with this Logo, the company is closed since 2010. nice day. Thomas.orleano (talk) 16:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

This is definitely non-trivial logo. You could upload such non-free images on projects which allows them (like English Wikipedia). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Cover of Shaikhu Nayagam Souvenir.jpg and File:Ahmad Abdul Qadir.jpg

As advised, I've updated the information. Please review deletion request. Regards, --Idriskamal

Looks like these images are in not in public domain yet. --EugeneZelenko ([[User talk:EugeneZelenko#top|talk

It's quite simple really: File:Cover of Shaikhu Nayagam Souvenir.jpg is from a copyright-free souvenir magazine from 1967. File:Ahmad Abdul Qadir.jpg is from a private individual who has made clear that there are no rights to the portrait. What else do we need?

]]) 14:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyrights in general case happens because of fact of creation, so copyright-free is wrong justification. If File:Ahmad Abdul Qadir.jpg is work of unknown author, if should be treated as anonymous work (copyrights expiration counted after date of creation/publication). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Gaby Herbstein.jpg

Hello, the files you deleted are free content but I didn't tag them properly, my mistake. I believe it is important to illustrate the article with images so I will work on that on the following days, taking your suggestions into account. Yours sincerely, Wikibubble Photography

Please upload original images with EXIF to confirm your authorship. If you was hired to make photos, you need to ask copyright owner to send permission to Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Braniff International Airways Chairman Troy Vicotor Post April 1966.jpg

Hello, I am not sure what you are wanting with my two photos. These are mine and I own all copyrights to them. That is what I indicated when I posted the photo. The source is me and nothing more. Thank youMmb777e (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

These photos are historical, and I doubt that you made them. If they are in public domain, you should provide justification of this fact. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

File:RealEmis.jpg

Caro EugeneZelenko, La foto RealEmis.jpg anche se é di bassa risoluzione l'ho scattata io con la mia macchina fatografica e non l'ho presa dal web GalaxyM (talk) 08:15, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Italian :-( You could upload photo in original resolution (uncropped) with to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Узурпация учётной записи

Добрый день. В связи с тем, что в некоторых других вики-проектах я узурпировал никнейм Yurluk (wikipedia:ru:Участник:Yurluk, wikivoyage:ru:Участник:Yurluk), прошу так же о смене никнейма на "Yurluk" в данном проекте. --Юрас (talk) 11:53, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Проблемы с файлом Cover of Belarus 2003 Akhremchik Portrait of Larisa Alexandrovskaya

Евгений, добрый день. Хочу проконсультироваться с Вами по поводу файла с изображением конверта Беларуси 2003 года, где размещена репродукция портрета Ларисы Александровской кисти Ивана Ахремчика. Кто-то выставил этот файл на удаление, не могу понять, по какой причине. Как обычно, загружаю изображения с белорусской лицензией PD-BY-exempt. Taкже, существует категория:Живопись на конвертах. Так что же я нарушила? C уважением, Татьяна. Tatiana Matlina (talk) 06:50, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Если марки явно перечислены как не охраняемые авторским правом в новой редакции закона РБ об авторском праве, то про конверты там ничего не сказано. Кстати, конверты могут выпускаться и негосударственными организациями и компаниями. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Евгений, Вы не могли бы помочь мне спасти вот эти два файла от удаления: File:Pavel Gavrilenko 100 Anniversary Cover of Belarusan Post 2002.jpg и File:Cover of Belarus 2003 Akhremchik 100 Portrait of Alexandrovskaya.jpg ? Я просто не знаю, как объяснить по-английски господам, выставившим шаблон об удалении, то, что конверты не нарушают ничьих авторских прав. --Tatiana Matlina (talk) 08:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Я бы не утверждал, что конверты не нарушают авторских прав. Конверты не исключены из объектов авторского права. А изображения кто-то рисовал. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

В случае с портретом Александровской - там же репродукция, напечатанная на конверте. Художник конверта рисовал только марку и штемпель. И у выставившего конверт на удаление претензии именно к портрету Александровской. Получается, что все белорусские конверты с репродукциями произведений Щемелёва, Цвирко, Масленикова подлежат удалению? --Tatiana Matlina (talk) 14:57, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Конверт и марка на File:Cover of Belarus 2003 Akhremchik 100 Portrait of Alexandrovskaya.jpg — разные. По поводу репродукций — вопрос нетривиальный: передавались ли авторские права художником/наследниками издательству; если передавались, то что издательство разрешает с репродукциями делать? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Я что-то ничего не могу понять из Вашего ответа. Издательский центр "Марка" разрешает публиковать изображение конверта на сайте Белпочты. Если копируешь изображение оттуда, указывая ссылку на источник,это является нарушением авторских прав и файл подлежит удалению? --Tatiana Matlina (talk) 15:19, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Думаю, лучше всего будет, если Вы прочитаете закон Республики Беларусь об авторском праве и смежных правах самостоятельно. По умолчанию произведения разрешается цитировать с указанием источника и авторства. Это не подразумевает возможности неограниченных изменений и использования в любых целях (требования Commons). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Евгений, подскажите, пожалуйста, если картина художника находится в моей собственности, имею ли я право разместить её фото на Викискладе под свободной лицензией или нет? Tatiana Matlina (talk) 17:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Авторские права существуют независимо от прав на физическое воплощение произведения. Если произведение не перешло в общественное достояние, Вы можете попробовать попросить автора дать разрешение на свободную лицензию. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Church of Mary Magdalene-2.jpg

Please check whether this file meets FOP. --217.21.43.22 13:46, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

This church was built in 1847. Belarus term of copyrights protection is 50 years after author death. I doubt that architect lived till 1964. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Прекратите удалять информацию в соответствии со своими пристрастиями, которые не подтверждены соответствующими запросами правообладателей. --Chubukou

Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с Commons:Лицензирование и Commons:Снимки экрана. File:Третья конференция из цикла "Повестка-2015".ogv — снимок экрана телевизионной программы. Авторские права принадлежат скорее всего телекомпании. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Bot

Hi! Thanks for your input and I'll try to remember to make the summary a little easier to read. Thanks for your time! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 14:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Russian-speaking admin needed in DR

Hi Eugene. Could you please take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Anoubis if you have time? I've pinged some other Russian-speaking admins, but I want to make sure this gets attention, in case they're busy. Thanks for your time. INeverCry 17:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

I added note about OTRS since uploader claimed to received photos directly from photographers. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I thought he might need someone to explain the process in Russian, seeing that he says he's not very good with English. I hope he understands what you've told him. Can you watch that DR page and see if he asks for further help? INeverCry 16:04, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

I'll watch page, but will be good idea to involve Russian-speaking OTRS volunteer too. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Screenshot

Dear EugeneZelenko, thank you. In fact I was not sure if the image was or wasn't protected by copyright. You have done the right thing, however, eliminating it.

What about screenshots made by me? Can I upload them on Commons? Thank you, DetectiveMLML (msg)

Making screenshot of copyrighted work will not make you author of the work. See Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Screenshots. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

File:--정은지 팬연합-- 우상 2014-04-26 02-30.jpg

Hi Eugene just to say, this was a pic of 정은지 (Jung Eun-ji) and should have gone in Category:Jung Eunji, as a candid of a celebrity to my mind it was in scope, I've re-deleted it however because the lack of exif, size, uploader history etc more than suggests that its a copyvio that's been grabbed from the net.--KTo288 (talk) 04:54, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for explanations! It's really hard to know every star and starlet these days :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:38, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

AskNet-Screenshot.jpg

Евгений! Вы удалили файл AskNet-Screenshot.jpg Его надо восстановить. Как я уже ранее указывал Вам, я автор не только этого скриншота, но и автор сайта, с которого снят этот скриншот. Я владелец поисковой системы AskNet Search. Я указал, что мой скриншот предоставляется в общее пользование. Не вижу причин для удаления указанного файла.

А кто является автором фотографий, присутствующих на снимке экрана? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Назвы беларускіх раёнаў

Вітаю, Яўген. Толькі сціхла з беларускімі раёнамі і вось зноў такая праўка. Як мінімум, уніфікацыю парушае, не кажучы ўжо, што кансэнсусу на яе няма. Плюс улічыце, што чалавек рукамі пераносіў кожны складнік катэгорыі пад новую назву, г. зн. яўна не здолее астатнія назвы раёнаў прывесці да такога ж выгляду. Паколькі на яго і дамовы не стае, прапаную адкаціць праўку, вярнуць старую назву катэгорыі, а ўдзельніка яшчэ раз папярэдзіць, што так рабіць не трэба. Дзякуй за ўвагу.--Хомелка (talk) 06:15, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Здаецца, удзельнік зразумеў. Так, варта дамовіцца пра назвы. На мой погляд, ангельска-беларуская трасянка ня лепей за звычайную. Гэты тычыцца і назваў населеных пунктаў. Дый ВікіЗьвесткі калісьці прыйдуць сюды і дапамогуць вырашыць праблему перакладаў назваў катэгорый. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Думаю, што так, дзякуй за ўвагу :)--Хомелка (talk) 15:00, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

An important message about renaming users

Dear EugeneZelenko,

I am cross-posting this message to many places to make sure everyone who is a Wikimedia Foundation project bureaucrat receives a copy. If you are a bureaucrat on more than one wiki, you will receive this message on each wiki where you are a bureaucrat.

As you may have seen, work to perform the Wikimedia cluster-wide single-user login finalisation (SUL finalisation) is taking place. This may potentially effect your work as a local bureaucrat, so please read this message carefully.

Why is this happening? As currently stated at the global rename policy, a global account is a name linked to a single user across all Wikimedia wikis, with local accounts unified into a global collection. Previously, the only way to rename a unified user was to individually rename every local account. This was an extremely difficult and time-consuming task, both for stewards and for the users who had to initiate discussions with local bureaucrats (who perform local renames to date) on every wiki with available bureaucrats. The process took a very long time, since it's difficult to coordinate crosswiki renames among the projects and bureaucrats involved in individual projects.

The SUL finalisation will be taking place in stages, and one of the first stages will be to turn off Special:RenameUser locally. This needs to be done as soon as possible, on advice and input from Stewards and engineers for the project, so that no more accounts that are unified globally are broken by a local rename to usurp the global account name. Once this is done, the process of global name unification can begin. The date that has been chosen to turn off local renaming and shift over to entirely global renaming is 15 September 2014, or three weeks time from now. In place of local renames is a new tool, hosted on Meta, that allows for global renames on all wikis where the name is not registered will be deployed.

Your help is greatly needed during this process and going forward in the future if, as a bureaucrat, renaming users is something that you do or have an interest in participating in. The Wikimedia Stewards have set up, and are in charge of, a new community usergroup on Meta in order to share knowledge and work together on renaming accounts globally, called Global renamers. Stewards are in the process of creating documentation to help global renamers to get used to and learn more about global accounts and tools and Meta in general as well as the application format. As transparency is a valuable thing in our movement, the Stewards would like to have at least a brief public application period. If you are an experienced renamer as a local bureaucrat, the process of becoming a part of this group could take as little as 24 hours to complete. You, as a bureaucrat, should be able to apply for the global renamer right on Meta by the requests for global permissions page on 1 September, a week from now.

In the meantime please update your local page where users request renames to reflect this move to global renaming, and if there is a rename request and the user has edited more than one wiki with the name, please send them to the request page for a global rename.

Stewards greatly appreciate the trust local communities have in you and want to make this transition as easy as possible so that the two groups can start working together to ensure everyone has a unique login identity across Wikimedia projects. Completing this project will allow for long-desired universal tools like a global watchlist, global notifications and many, many more features to make work easier.

If you have any questions, comments or concerns about the SUL finalisation, read over the Help:Unified login page on Meta and leave a note on the talk page there, or on the talk page for global renamers. You can also contact me on my talk page on meta if you would like. I'm working as a bridge between Wikimedia Foundation Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Stewards, and you to assure that SUL finalisation goes as smoothly as possible; this is a community-driven process and I encourage you to work with the Stewards for our communities.

Thank you for your time. -- Keegan (WMF) talk 18:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

--This message was sent using MassMessage. Was there an error? Report it!

Дискуссия о официальных документах международных организаций в Template:PD-RU-exempt

Возможно вас заинтересует дискуссия Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Official documents of international organizations in Template:PD-RU-exempt. Alex Spade (talk) 17:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Думаю, что к ней надо серьёзно подготовится. Попробую, если будет время. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Charlotte Stone Crabs

I work for the Charlotte Stone Crabs baseball team and recently did a massive overhaul to our Wikipedia Page. I noticed every image I put up on the page has been deleted. While I can understand trepidation about the image used for the team hats, which was generated by MiLB and sent to us on a flash drive, my picture for the team mascot and jerseys are nothing more than photographs taken during games. The All-Star team photos were also just pictures, taken by our team photographers. I cited their names for each image, yet they were still pulled down. The files in question can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gnome8910#.7B.7BAutotranslate.7Cbase.3DIdw.2Fheading.7D.7D, but I would just like some rationale for the deletion of these. There needs to be images on our page to make it more appealing and I don't know how I am to proceed if everything I post is taken down. Please let me know what I can do. I'm totally stumped. - Thank you

Please ask copyrights holder(s) to send permission(s) to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). This applies to Commons:Derivative works from logo and mascot. Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Some Photos

Hi!

Thanks to eliminate several of the photos I uploaded. I want to tell you that the images belonging to the Government of the Dominican Republic (as you've recently deleted without warning and without consulting me) have no property. The images of Government of the Dominican Republic belong to the people of the Dominican Republic, ie its citizens.

It's the same happens with images of the Government of the United States, of Spain and the vast majority of countries. Please consider this and rehabilitates images. I did not violate any copyright for these images as well as Dominican, are mine.

Read a bit before making such arbitrary measures. It has happened several times with several images of the Dominican Government, I always keep quiet, but I'm tired of some "good users" harm my reputation without investigating or read anything.

--Soyescritor (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

I far as I could judge from Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-DRGov, it's not a case. You also uploaded non-trivial logos of political parties, which are not created by state. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Please do not deviate the topic. I'm talking about the last two logos that you deleted, both are state institutions. I never went up images of political parties ... EVER! I uploaded pictures of Presidents and Vice official photos of the Dominican state property. Never on political parties. --Soyescritor (talk) 00:25, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

If template for government works was deleted, it means that your position on government copyright are not founded firmly. Logos were not trivial. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

File:RamónJVelasquezCOPAF1991.jpg

The file RamónJVelasquezCOPAF1991.jpg was delivered by a former member of COPAF´staff

Please ask copyrights holder(s) to send permission(s) to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Cada una de las fotografías que EugeneZelenko propone para ser borradas posee su debida información. Sugiero que un supervisor confirme que las fotografías, una a una, cumple con las condiciones de derechos de autor. No entiendo las razones para evaluarlas en bloque. Algunas fotografías son propiedad del autor (Luis Ciudad Vaca), otras son de origen oficial. No pueden englobarse todas ellas bajo la categoría de "Collection of historical photos" ya que algunas son de los años noventa del siglo XX y otras de un año atrás... No se les puede dar el mismo tratamiento y cada una de ellas posee su respective derecho de autor...

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Please ask help of administrator who knows Spanish. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

=

A group of photographs contributed by me in recent years were massively deleted by INeverCry at the request of EugeneZelenko who falsely claimed that they were of a "Collection of historical photos, not own work" and claimed that it does not understand Spanish.

Some of these photos are my own work. Others are photographs of free use for official photos. Others are from family archives, supplied to the author. Unfortunately all the pictures gave him the same treatment, and deleted them.

File:José Humberto Ocariz.JPG photography is an own work and I request to be reinstated.

File:Ramon J Velasquez JUL11 photography.JPG is an own work and I request to be reinstated.

File:Edgar C. Otálvora NOV09.jpg photography is an own work and I request to be reinstated.

File:Ligia photography nov 2004.jpg betancourt's own work and I request is returned.

Photography File:RJVelasquezPMarquezOtalvora.JPG's own work and I request to be reinstated.

Photography File:RamonJVelasquez.jpg is a photograph of use public because it is a Venezuelan official material and request is returned.

Pedro Arnal.jpg photography File:Atlas School of Venezuela is the cover of a book whose copyright is already perished and I request to be reinstated.

Photos File:AlbertoGarrido1.jpg and File:ARNALPedro1.png come from files familiars supplied to the author and I request to be returned.

Thank you

Luis ciudad vaca (talk) 21:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

You could upload own work in better resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. Work in public domain should be properly described. I think best place for your to do so will be Commons:Undeletion requests. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Request

Hi, Please remove otrs flag from here. Thanks :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:49, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Files uploaded by CarlK90245

Hi, I noticed that you've nominated the uploads created by CarlK90245, whom I previously asked to upload his works. The photos, which are computerized illustrations (forensic facial reconstruction), will be used on the English Wikipedia . Those that are not at the moment will soon be added. Please reconsider the nomination and see the nomination page for more info. Thanks Gourami Watcher (talk) 16:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

I think arguments should be expressed on deletion request page. I expressed my opinion during nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

I have added an entry, I wanted to send you a message to make sure you'd be informed. Thanks Gourami Watcher (talk) 15:19, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Patricia Sloane painting.JPG

Got your message about the Patricia Slone jpg. Not sure how to proceed as I own the painting and the artist has passed away about 10 years ago with no estate handle it or communicate with. What is my position as to copyright?

Please ask painter heir(s) or copyrights holder (if different) to send permission(s) to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Foreskin Images Deletions Requests

I added these images (and no others) because I feel they show a foreskin that is longer than average. Because there aren't many images of a longer than average foreskin on Wikimedia (especially of it tapering), I feel the images contribute well to the overall set of images of the foreskin and uncircumcised penis. Anonymous 001100 (talk) 04:14, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

You should provide arguments on deletion request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

I have provided my arguments on the deletion request page and think the images serve a useful purpose that is not really being fulfilled on Wikimedia Commons and therefore should be kept. Thank you. Anonymous 001100 (talk) 23:28, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Deletion requests are usually opened for comments for ~ week. Then one of administrators will make decision. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Barnstar of Reliable Deletionism
		I've been closing your DRs for a few years now. How many images do you think we've deleted? 50,000? Probably pretty close. It's nice to work with someone who makes my job easy with DRs that're always done right and are easy to close. Here's to 50,000 more deletions! INeverCry 01:46, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Абсолютно согласен. Автор удаляет объекты авторского права в соответствии с собственным виденьем и без надлежащего согласования с белорусским законодательством при этом нарушает базовые принципы Википедии в плане свободного распространения открытой информации. У нас в материале автор удалил две фотографии экспертов из Министерства экономики, Министерства образования и участников проекта "Умные сети", с чьего согласия они были размещены в сети, в официальной группе сообщества. А теперь пытается удалить файл национального телевиденья, которое (так сказано на официальном сайте) допускает воспроизведение своих материалов без искажения на сторонних ресурсах при условии обозначения источника.

Global renamer

Hi EugeneZelenko. You were one of the most active crats here... Aren't you interested in applying for the global renamer right? Trijnstel_talk 14:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for suggestion! But I need to look onto process first. Other projects like English Wikipedia had much more complicated procedure then Commons. And probably Meta already has enough volunteers to perform this task :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Local procedures aren't relevant anymore. Only the global rename policy. And imho we can always use very experienced renamers. :) Trijnstel_talk 22:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Template

Please, review this

Thanks --Soyescritor (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Deleted it, we have no fair use here, therefore we cant have a template that referes to the fair use sections of a copyright law. --Martin H. (talk) 13:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

NOTHOST

Hi, user Anujshiv01 has uploaded some files which seem like NOTHOST. You may take appropriate action. --Anton^Talk 23:10, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for help! Actually you could use MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js to do mass nominations yourself. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. --Anton^Talk 23:51, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

CommonsHasher

Hi Eugene, confirmed with wikitech-l that the bot flag includes apihighlimits. See thread and Special:ListGroupRights for details. I'd amend our request at CommonsHasher but that page is now locked for edits. --Jonasoberg (talk) 08:25, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

TDKR images

Eugene, those images are my own work. They are my grandparents. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 00:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Could you upload original images with EXIF as proof? File:Alejandro Plazas.jpg is also very small resolution, so may be Commons has better images (in both quality and artistic value) to illustrate mainstream articles? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

School logos

ETTZ.png was created by myself, it occupies only one author, which is me, therefore I believe your reason to delete the logo was invalid. Also, the logo is awaiting official confirmation by the principal of the school.

GGŠT 10.png IS the official logo of Gradevinkso-Geodetic School. Not to talk about the same, I suggest you visit their website and find it out yourself. I recommend you do this procedure to every school I created. KŠCTZ 44.png , MDTZZ 12.png

These were non-trivial logos. Most likely copyrights belong to educational institutions. You could not upload such images on Commons without explicit permissions from copyrights owners. Alternatively you could upload non-free images to projects which allow them. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Attribution for image

Dear Sir,

I would like to use your images of the Western Yellowjacket wasp, available at "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AVespula_pensylvanica-Queen-1.jpg", in an extension-outreach publication related to pests in community environments. This publication is purely for educational purposes and has no commercial interests whatsoever.

However, the suggested attribution formats, "By Eugene Zelenko (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC-BY-SA-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons" is very different from the style I will be following for other pictures in my publication, which will most likely be much shorter and in the format:

"Photo by Abc Defghijk", or "Photo by Abc Defghijk, Lmnopqr.org".

Therefore for the sake of consistency, kindly let me know whether I may cite the images in the above formats, and if so, what name/affiliation should I use.

Thank you! Sincerely, Shaku

Shaku Nair, Ph.D. Assistant in Extension, Community IPM University of Arizona - Maricopa Ag. Center 37860 W. Smith-Enke Road Maricopa, AZ 85138-3010 Cell: (520) 840-9429 Office: (520) 374-6299 nairs@email.arizona.edu

Sure, you could use my photo with such credits. But may be you could specify license and source in credits section (not in image caption itself)? Sure, it'll be nice to see final publication :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your message about copyright status

I am user Seriykotik1970

In your reply to your message to me about copyright tags, I am new to Wikimedia Commons and am not sure how to add the right tags.

The images are my scans of 19th century magazines owned by me, published in France in the 1850s and 60s. I understand the correct tags would be:

	This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer. This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.

https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse i.e. European Union, copyright expired

This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason: This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer. You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Jamaica has 95 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Honduras has a general copyright term of 75 years, but it does implement the rule of the shorter term. Copyright may extend on works created by French who died for France in World War II (more information), Russians who served in the Eastern Front of World War II (known as the Great Patriotic War in Russia) and posthumously rehabilitated victims of Soviet repressions (more information). This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag. Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

i.e. Scan of a work that is in public domain

           i.e.  US, copyright expired   

I would be grateful if you could confirm this and direct me to a link that shows how to add the tags. These scans are quite high resolution and take some time to make and so I would be sorry to see them deleted.

Best regards

You should loon on Commons:Copyright rules by territory to select proper public domain tag with {{PD-scan}} for each image. Please also note that date of original creation/publication and author(s) should be specified too. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Special:ListFiles/Lacambalam

Hi, don't all of these have valid copyright tags?    FDMS  4    17:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

This is definitely not own work. Proper public domain tag should be used. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

These are drawings by an expert on Maya history. Some might be exact replications of ancient works, others drawings with more originality than that. I don't think all the drawing (action) should be considered below the TOO, or should get deleted because of the suspicion they might be below TOO. Even if all of them were in the public domains, they wouldn't be copyright violations.    FDMS  4    14:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

I think proper public domain tag will solve problem. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

По вопросу фотографий

На странице федерации гонолыжного спорта и сноуборда России выложны 4 фото которые у вас вызывают доверие вопросы. По вопросу Сидоровой? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Евгения_Сидорова.jpg эта фото публикуется в нашей книге, и эта фото передана в архив нашей федерации/ По вопросу Хорошилова на трассе. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Александр_Хорошилов_на_трассе_слалома_(ОИ_2014).jpg С этой компанией которая делает фото у федерации заключен договор и все фото передаются нам на наше использование. фото мы покупаем. и полностью ими распоряжаемся По вопросу фото с грузии 1992 года. Фотограф наш штатный. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Сборная_СССР._Этап_Кубка_Европы._Гудаури_(Грузия),_1989_год._Тренер_-_Леонид_Тягачев..jpg По фото Макеев и т/д/ фото одного из наших руководителей. Фотограф так же работа на федерацию. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:В.Макеев,_В.Цыганов,_А.Жиров,_В.Синетов,_Д.Гулиев,_С.Чаадаев.jpg Как мне можно подтвердить данные файлы. Официально контракт есть только с компанией которая сделала фото с хорошиловым, а что мне надо взять с Романа который делал две другие фото. И как поступить с Сидоровой. Спасибо большое заранее за ответ Руководитель департамента по связям с общественностью Федерации горнолыжного спорта и сноуборда России Евгения. --Evgeniia (fgssr) (talk) 19:49, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Evgeniia (fgssr)

Если на официальном сайте информации про лицензии нет, то Вы межете попросить юриста федерации (если были переданы авторские права) или фотографов послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Потом можно попросить помощи на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard с проверкой разрешения. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

My explanation

Dear EugeneZelenko,
I have just read Notification about possible deletion which is somehow related to many of my contributions. One of them – File:Mia_Elezović.jpg – is not at all my own work, as I have clearly specified in the Summary: this photo already has a confirmed permission and appropriate license, so I really don't understand where is the problem? I also don't understand why you doubt my authorship, because I have properly fulfilled all the requested facts about (all) my uploaded photos. Sincerely,--Maestro Ivanković (talk) 16:23, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't notice OTRS tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

SolesofPassionDuo.jpg

EugeneZelenko: I have requested that three files, including the one in the title above, be undeleted. I had already forwarded a statement from the copyright owner granting permission to use that file and two additional ones that you have deleted. It seems to me that absent any response that the statement granting permission to use the file is invalid, any editor should take the time to first check and see whether such a statement was submitted. I sent the email and I never received a reply:

I had submitted permission from the copyright owner to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. The texst below contains the forward that I sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org on September 25, 2014:

Please communicate with me so I can resolve this rather than run into any ambiguity with respect to what has happened with the file.

1987atomheartbrother

--

Dear Wikimedia Permissions Team,

Regarding...

(1) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SolesofPassionDuo.jpg (2) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SolesofPassionInsideCover.jpg and (3) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SolesofPassionLogo.jpg

... please see the email forward below.

1987atomheartbrother

Forwarded message: From: <info@solesofpassion.com> Date: Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:41 PM Subject: Soles Of Passion Autho, Info, & attachments To: 1987ahb@gmail.com

I hereby affirm that I represent Passion Music, LLC the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the attached photo, and graphic logo images.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Steven Wolfe/Managing Member Passion Music, LLC September 11, 2014

---

--1987atomheartbrother (talk) 20:23, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

You should ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Well, I did send something but I realize everyone at Wikipedia is a volunteer and evidently, there's a disconnection between what I have sent them and what they would need to do and what you do. So let me ask you: since you are keen on monitoring these items for copyright, why not volunteer to help reconcile these problems too? I see a number of notes on your discussion page that are similar - at least one other above this - where permission has been granted but the image was still deleted. I think being in an editorial capacity to do this sort of work (deleting things that are *presumably* not allowed to be used on Wikipedia) gives a single person a great deal of latitude - but it seems it would be in genuine good faith to help promote a system where the left arm speaks to the right arm and other editors with less "authority" feel that their work is respected so long as they follow the rules, which was the case in the Soles of Passion article. I've shown you what was sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, it just seems it'd be in good faith to consider that maybe the picture(s) was (were) deleted in error? I mean do some editors just focus on deleting this stuff but not helping editors and contributors reconcile any potential inconsistencies like this one first? For instance, I noticed this on your Discussion page: "Deletion requests are usually opened for comments for ~ week. Then one of administrators will make decision. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)" Is there a reason this didn't apply here? I also noticed that you got a "barnstar" for deleting images - where do you recommend we submit a suggestion that editors be awarded barnstars for helping other editors reconcile potential issues with their images rather than for ammassing deletions? I'm just trying to understand what could help improve the system to honor good faith in editors and contributors.--1987atomheartbrother (talk) 17:11, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I could not handle all possible roles on Commons myself. We have procedure of OTRS which is used for cases like yours and place where you could ask for help. You could award any person with barnstar, so it's completely up to you :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

EugeneZelenko, I appreciate your response, and I understand no single volunteer can do everything. But why wasn't the file given a week of discussion before deletion as suggested in a prior discussion ("Deletion requests are usually opened for comments for ~ week. Then one of administrators will make decision. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)"). Isn't this deletion inconsistent with that? My point with the barnstars is, we are asked to edit and contribute in good faith. It seems deleting files without urging a discussion FIRST seems more focused on playing a role in a specific capacity than in contributing to the ecosystem that is Wikipedia and the good faith it should operate under. Just some food for thought. Bottom line, I feel your deletion of these files was premature and I think there's a quality vs. quantity issue: it seems you focus on deleting files; Wikipedia seems to look for good faith and it seems a more comprehensive effort - one that includes giving the appropriate amount of time for discussion before deleting a file and even working with editors and contributors to see where there might be a communication gap is infinitely more commendable. But I realize people all feel reward for what they do here in their own individual ways.--1987atomheartbrother (talk) 18:58, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

I think week is long enough time to sort out issue with OTRS, if permission is already sent.

I'm focusing on patrolling problematic uploads and uploads by new users. Unfortunately not all of them are made in good faith. OTRS is good way to distinguish bad and good faith uploads.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Starosta96

Здравствуйте ,EugeneZelenko, удаленные файлы редактировались и загружены мной с личного согласия Мочалова, Алексея Александровича. Я автор официального сайта. File:Серебряный крест.jpg -личная работа. Поясните, пожалуйста, можно ли восстановить какие-либо из файлов и как правильно это сделать в таком случае.

Вам надо попросить автора послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Потом можно попросить помощи на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard с проверкой разрешения и восстановлением изображений.

Вы можете загрузbть собственные фотографии в исходном разрешении с EXIF для подтверждения авторства.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Musiclanka about image deleting

hi please let me know some basic steps to send all the necessary emails to prove the copy rights for these images,and i humbly requesting you to please restore them back, i have met this Musician in many ocassions in sri lanka ,he is a living artist still and i have leagally all the copy rights for these images from him and diferent media people who took these pictures, some pictures have taken by me from my personal camra and i admit i have done some wrong in uploading it to wikimedia,please forgive me and please give me how should i prove the copy rights, please explain,its hard to follow wikimedia guide lines,its hard.if u can give me the basic steps t o get the common licence or advance please instruct me,regards (User talk:Musiclanka)

You need to specify own images first. If they were uploaded in small resolution without EXIF, please re-upload them in original resolution with EXIF.

For other people work: please ask copyrights holders to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Моля за помощ!

Здравейте! Аз Ви пиша защото забравих паролата и елетронната поща на моята сметка "Hegibeltz" в Общомедия (Wikimedia Commons), при което сега глобалната сметка е непълна. Aко можете да ми помогнете ще съм Ви много благодарен. С уважение, Izkilanttoa (talk) 09:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, my Bulgarian is not enough to understand you request completely :-{ Do you want to rename account because you lost password and e-mail is not valid to reset it? Rename requests are performed on m:Steward requests/Username changes now.

If you know Russian better then English, I could explain on Russian.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Hegibeltz – имя моей новой глобальной учетной записи. Я хочу войти в Викискладе с этим именем но я давно забыл пароль а также адрес электронной почты (только в Викискладе). Большое спасибо! Izkilanttoa (talk) 19:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Проблема в том, что с недавнего времени учётные записи можно переименовать только на Meta. Вам надо создать запрос на m:Steward requests/Username changes. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Переименовать учетную запись мне не нужно а узурпировать (только в Викискладе!). Izkilanttoa (talk) 10:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Независимо от проекта переименования делаются теперь только на Meta. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Выражаю благодарность. Я понял. До свидания. Izkilanttoa (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

FASTER Book Cover.png and Book Cover of SOCIAL 50 Ways To Improve Your Professional Life by Ankit Fadia.jpg

Hi - You recently placed a deletion request for the above photographs to be deleted. They are book cover photographs that are available in the public domain. See this: http://www.amazon.in/gp/product/0143419714/ and http://www.amazon.in/Faster-Ways-Improve-Your-Digital/dp/0143419706/. Why have they been marked for deletion? Sorry I am new to this. I uploaded these book covers so that they can be used in the respective Wikipedia pages of the books. Is there something I can do to undelete the photos?

Images available on Internet are not necessarily in public domain. Author should explicitly state rejection of all copyright somewhere. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

About my files

I don't now really why are you deleting my images, only i need to now what was the mistake and leave my images in Wikimedia, please explain me that Cesaro2012 (talk) 20:45, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

You uploaded non-trivial logos which may be copyrighted. This is reason for deletion. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

That images were created by me, so them have not copyright, then you cant delete them. Cesaro2012 (talk) 19:56, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

If these logos are fictional, they don't fit Commons:Project scope, if they are replicas of logos created by other people, they are Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Migux.png

That file was a logo of a defunct brazilian web based video game, and is posted on their own site [1] with no kind of disallowance. That file has a free license and was used for many websited and magazines in articles about the game with the porpuse of ilustrate it, and Brancaleone the developer of the game never disallowed them.

Defunct company doesn't mead that image in public domain or released under free license. There should be explicit statement about copyrights status. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

The websites and magazines posted the logo of the game BEFORE that company be extinguished, and they never told about the copyright license about that image, and looks like they never bother about it since the images were posted for illustration only. In the official blog of the game [2] Has a colummn called "Migux Blogueiros" (Bloggers Migux) and has fan-blogs of confidence, added by the developers of the game, and all of that blogs use the "Migux" logo in banners. --Kurtsgravity (talk) 06:18, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyrights exist because of fact of work creation. Copyrights laws allow limited use of works for particular purposes like w:en:Fair use. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Well, i'm really newbie on Wikimedia Commons and i just added that permission on the file because i relied on the permission of another Brazilian company logo file, and i really doesn't had some sense about file permissions. But i know that company allows use of that file for archiving, illustration and scholarship. So i should change the permission to w:en:Fair use?

Commons doesn't accept fair use materials (see Commons:Licensing), but some projects like English Wikipedia do. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictures!

For what? Kim Taehyung V (talk) 22:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Licensing and Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Тыва Культура Төвү uploads

Добрый день! Мы можем написать письмо от директора Центра Тувинской Культуры о том, что все данные изображения взяты из их архива или же принадлежат их фото-фонду. Помогите, какую форму-письмо можем написать и куда выслать? Мы намерены постоянно выгружать фотографии из нашего фото-фонда. Спасибо за скорейший ответ. --Тыва Культура Төвү (talk) 10:17, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

А также, распишите конкретно нам (представителям Центра Тувинской Культуры) как следует выгружать изображения:

1. Фотография из фото-фонда ЦТК 70-летней давности (сделанная известным/неизвестным автором),
2. Фотография из фото-фонда ЦТК меньше 70 лет (сделанная известным/неизвестным автором),
3. Фотография из фото-фонда ЦТК различными авторами, работающими в ЦТК, - обязательно указывать имя фотографа или есть вариант общий? --Тыва Культура Төвү (talk) 10:22, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

В качестве авторства можно написать организацию? А в качестве источника можно указать "Фото-фонд Центра Тувинской Культуры (Тыва Культура Төвү)"? Нам все это очень интересно. --Тыва Культура Төвү (talk) 10:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Центр Тувинской Культуры может давать разрешения только на те файлы, на которые авторы передали авторские права или были сделаны самим Центром.

Изображения, сделанные анонимными авторами более 70 лет назад находятся в общественно достоянии ({{PD-old}}).

Для изображений, сделанных известными авторами менее 70 лет назад, если авторские права не передавались, надо просить разрешения у авторов/наследников.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Следующие файлы были сделаны Центром Тувинской Культуры (штатным сотрудником центра):

File:Кыргыс Сорукту Центр Тувинской Культуры.TIF
File:Аас-чогаал болгаш хөөмей бөлүү "Тыва".jpeg
File:Моңгуш, Лазо Довуевич.JPG
File:Аъттың дерии. Моңгуш В.К..ogg
File:Моңгуш Валерий Кечил-оглу.jpg
File:Достай Откун Монгушович 02.JPG
File:Достай Откун Монгушович 01.JPG
File:Достай Откун Монгушович 03.jpg
File:Тыва кызы 2014г (2).JPG
File:Тыва кызы 2014г.JPG
File:Сарыглар Евгений.jpg
File:Айлаңмаа Дамыраң Тыва Кызы.jpg
File:Аас-чогаал болгаш хөгжүм бөлүү "Тыва Кызы".JPG
File:Моңгуш Николай Кечил-оглу.JPG

Посоветуйте, как их лицензировать? Что требуется от Центра Тувинской Культуры, если эти фотографии сделаны центром (штатными сотрудниками центра).

А на старые файлы можем найти источники или их авторов/наследников. Как поступить в этом случае?

--Тыва Культура Төвү (talk) 11:51, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Стоило бы уточнить, предусматривал ли трудовой договор передачу авторских прав Центру. В любом случае надо послать разрешение (фотографу, если права не передавались, или юристу/директору центра, если права передавались) в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Потом можно попросить помощи на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard с проверкой разрешения и восстановлением файлов.

Тоже для старых файлов, соответственно разрешения должны быть от авторов/наследников.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rajeshbieee

Please do not delete File:Shankar at Padayottam location.pdf. I will upload a jpeg image or png image of the same photograph. The photographs can be detected only in facebook where the page is maintained by myself. Those are rare photographs of Malayalam actor Shankar where I own the collections personally. I need to upload more photos of the same actor from his films and personal life. Please guide me. I have uploaded A NEW photo in a different format. thumb|Actor Shankar at Padayottam location This will be fine, right? png files are accepted.right? Rajeshbieee (talk) 17:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Who is photographer? Owning physical copy doesn't mean that you own copyrights. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

DRs

Recently I nominated a file for deletion because it was uploaded three times. I nominated two of the duplicates, but you deleted all three without any sort of discussion on their status and deciding by yourself they are copyright violations which was not clear at all. I don't believe that was proper, it should have at least been discussed first. Unilateral decisions like that are not popular when a file is not under Speedy as a very obvious violation. Fry1989 ^eh? 16:51, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

These files were non-trivial university logos. Anyway, not uploader own work completely. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

USERː CAMBUSTON

EUGENE I KNOW THAT YOU DONT SPEAK SPANISH SO LET ME TRASLATE TO YOUː

Mr. Eugene let me tell you that several times you team have blocked me images of the eighteenth and nineteenth century, including public documents like birth records in mexico that are public, this problems make me think (several times) to withdraw from the wikipedia project, but I like the purpose of the project and have not, in spite of the abuses in the form of deleting the images,(added the possibility of expulsion) is annoying since none of us get paid for this, so i just whant to ask you to lookup and be more aware of what is been deleted, I have documents there that allready mentioning and logos of municipalities of Sonora, logos disappeared and former political organizations, so please before labeling my profile with a warning of expulsion, pay attention to the materials

let me ask you to undelate the following filesː

File:Curp leticia calderon.png (public document)

File:Tetabiate.jpg (XIX century)

File:Ignacio de la Torre y Mier.png (arly XX century -1904-)

File:Gaston de Raousset-Boulbon2.jpg (XIX century)

File:Invasores franceses en Guaymas.png (XIX century)

File:Cayetano Navarro.jpg (XIX century)

File:Jose Maria Yañez.jpg (XIX century) also in "archivo general de la nacion"

File:PlutarcoEliasCalleschacon.jpg (arly XX century -1920- )

en wikimedia esta la opcion de que si los encuentras en internet y no estas seguro puedes poner esa opcion, los escudos de los municipios son del dominio publico, y las imágenes de los partidos son de partidos que ya desaparecieronǃǃǃǃǃ, ademas al subirlas les puse ahi claramente que los encontre en internet que no estaba seguro, justo para evitar este tipo de problemasǃǃǃ, y ojo ya hay varios archivos que son de uso libre y me han bloqueado solo por no tener el placer de leer de donde vienen, como cuiando me bloquearon un CURPǃǃǃ como es posible que me bloquearan el curpǃǃǃ cuando cosa mas publica no puede haberǃǃǃǃ porfa ǃǃǃǃ o el mapa de 1858 o la publicacion del periodico de 1904

ojo el curp es DOCUMENTO PUBLICOOO ESTA EN UN ARCHIVO PUBLICO ES COMO QUE ME DIGAN QUE NO PUEDO SUBIR UN ACTA DE NACIMIENTOǃǃǃ QUE ESTA EN EL REGISTRO PUBLICOǃ

LAS IMAGENES QUE OBVIAMENTE SON DE 1800 DE CAYETANO NAVARRO?, LAS DE MIER? LA FOTOGRAFIA DE TETABIATE, LOS ESCUDOS DE LOS MUNICIPIOS POR FAVOR ES COMO SI ME DIJERAN QUE NO PUEDO SUBIR UNA IMAGEN DE LA BANDERA POR QUE ESTOY AFECTANDO DERECHOS DE AUTORǃǃǃǃ

WIKI QUE LES PASA, HABLEN CON UN ABOGADO POR FAVORǃǃǃǃǃ

HAY OTRAS QUE SI PERO YA DESDE ESE ENTONCES NO NO HE SUBIDO NI UNA QUE TENGA LA DUDA, SI LAS SUBO ES POR QUE SE QUE NO TIENEN LOS DERECHOS DE AUTOR COMPROMETIDOS, LAS POLITICAS DE WIKI ESTAN HECHAS PARA ESTADOS UNIDOS, PERO POR FAVOR LEEN MAS DE LO QUE ESTA ESCRITO, SI SON PUBLICAS AQUÍ SON PUBLICAS ALLA, POR QUE? POR QUE NADIE LAS PUEDE RECLAMARǃǃǃǃ

Commons acepta material que esté en el dominio público, es decir, documentos que no puedan ser objeto de derechos de autor o cuyos derechos de autor hayan expirado. Por norma general una obra está en el dominio público cuando su creador ha muerto hace más de 70 años (en EE.UU. 95). Si un autor no estadounidense murió antes de 1944, puede asumirse sin problemas que la obra está en el dominio público. Si la obra es anónima o colaborativa (por ejemplo, una enciclopedia), se considera de acuerdo con el convenio de Berna en el dominio público 70 años después de su fecha de publicación. En general, si algo fue creado y publicado por primera vez en un país, probablemente se apliquen las leyes de dicho país. Excepción: Las reproducciones fidedignas de obras de arte bidimensionales, como pinturas que estén en el dominio público, están exentas de esta regla. En julio de 2008, luego de la declaración de la posición de la política de la WMF (fundación Wikimedia) sobre el tema, se realizó una votación para permitir que fotografías de esas obras fueran aceptadas como parte del dominio público sin importar el país de origen, y además etiquetarlas con una advertencia. Véase Commons:Cuándo usar la etiqueta PD-Art para más detalles.

File:Gaston de Raousset-Boulbon2.jpg LITOGRAFIA DE 1890

File:Invasores franceses en Guaymas.png FOTOGRAFIA DE 1860 ALREDEDOR

File:Cayetano Navarro.jpg - LITOGRAFIA DE 1860 ALREDEDOR

File:Jose Maria Yañez.jpg - ARCHIVO HISTORICO DE LA NACION

Sorry, I don't have time to look on all your uploads, so I'll comment only on images which I found to be problematic.

Please learn how to apply proper license tags. If municipal coats of arms are in public domain, proper reason should be applied (for example, state copyrights law, age, etc). Creative Commons tags are definitely wrong in such situation.

File:Partido de la Sociedad Nacionalista.gif seemed modern not-trivial political party logo.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello

You are a fucking shit, you think that deleted photos of karl marx you will make better human being, you are scum

I am marxist revolutionary and love the communism

Please be specific about files in question. I also learned in school, that founders of Marxism-Leninism where examples of politeness. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

deleted files

I would know why did you delete those files

File:The Art Of War 2008.jpg File:Primo Victoria 2005.jpg File:Heroes 2014 limited edition artwork.jpg File:Metalizer 2007.jpg File:Heroes 2014 official artwork.jpg File:Coat of Arms 2010.jpg File:Carolus Rex 2012 - STD.jpg File:Carolus Rex 2012 - 2EDT.jpg File:Attero Dominatus 2006.jpg File:Sabaton Art2.jpg File:Sabaton Art.jpg

Pär Sundström, bassist and founder of Sabaton, sent me the files and asked me for publishing them in Sabaton Spanish Wikipedia.

Please ask copyrights holder(s) to send permission(s) to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Various historical photographs I have uploaded

Hello,

I am a technological cretin, so bear with me. I have uploaded a number of images which you have proposed for deletion because I have not provided the correct copyright information.

They are all photographs of long dead people taken by people who are also long dead. They are family members of whom I am the heir. The images have never been acquired by any collection or registered for copyright by anyone. They are mine to donate to the public domain.

How can I insert the above information formally into the system? I am sorry but the technology baffles me.

As to why I submitted these pictures, they are all interesting for one reason or another, either because they are of interesting people, or because the subjects are wearing interesting uniforms.

Most likely images you uploaded should be public domain. Please provide information about photographers (if known), date/country of creation to determine copyrights status. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Affair.JPG inquiry

Hi EugeneZelenko,

I have added some information to the photo I uploaded titled Affair. JPG. Could you have a look to see if it is fixed now? It is a photo I took myself. I am happy to add more info ration, if needed. New to wikicommons so still trying to figure out what to do. Thanks!--Xlc (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Looks like Freedom of panorama in the United Kingdom doesn't allow such photos unless you have permission from painter. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Об удалении файлов участника Solver55 (talk) 09:54, 24 October 2014 (UTC) из Wikimedia Commons

Уважаемый EugeneZelenko! Поясните причину удаления файлов и мои дальнейшие действия по их восстановлению. Все фотографии мои собственные, о чем я писал при их загрузке. Solver55 (talk) 09:54, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Фотографии современных произведений искусства нельзя лицензировать под свободными лицензиями без согласия автора (смотрите Commons:Freedom of panorama). Для подтверждения авторства других фотографий Вы можете загрузить их в оригинальном разрешении с EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Уважаемый EugeneZelenko! Для пробы я загрузил оригинал фотографии MironovMAG2797.jpg Миронова Б.Г. А что делать с удаленной Mironov-BG.jpg? Она сама восстановится или опять ее загрузить? А в дальнейшем? Каждый раз загружать по две (оригинал+ обработка)? Посоветуйте, пожалуйста.Solver55 (talk) 10:34, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Думаю, что лучше загрузить заново (портрет делался вблизи и разрешение может быть и больше). Для изменённых фотографий стоит сохранять EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Život spasioca (Baywatch kid Croatia).jpg

I made this photo (and others) absolutely and I own copyrights. But though it's in 'Theatrical poster form', in fact it's just a snapshot and it hasn't been officially placed anywhere under that type or given to any company that would own it more than me. tnx, Bartul

You could confirm via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates) that posters are exclusively your work and copyrights were not transferred. Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Files from Wikiversity

Dear Eugene,

regarding your deletion request for these files. They present the printed version of course pages of the German Wikiversity. Due to a migration process the german wikiversity has shuted down its own uploading, uploading is now via commons since beginning of October. Since six years I do my mathematical courses on Wikiversity and also produce a reader-friendly pdf-version, which is much better than produced by any pdf-button. Mgausmann is my secretary, who is uploading these files. I would be very delighted if this would not further make any problems. It is only fair that with this migration proces files which were until now uploaded locally find their place now somewhere in commons. Best ragrads.--Bocardodarapti (talk) 13:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

My concern was that it's better to generate PDF from recent version then keeping another copy which may require updates. I think will be good idea to as MediaWiki developers to improve PDF generation. Or may be there is better HTML-to-PDF converters around? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Dear Eugene, I have seen quite some pdf-button versions of mathematical wiki-files and they have by far not the quality which we produce via producing a latex-file. I am happy if MediaWiki developers could improve this, but my students do not want to wait for the next five years, they need the sheets every week. Just go to

Wikiversity:de:Kurs:Analysis_(Osnabrück_2014-2016)/Teil_I/Arbeitsblatt_1

and push the pdf-button there and compare te results. The pdf-files are produced at a late stage, when the content has been corrected and is fixed. Later corrections, which take place sometimes, require then updates, yes.--Bocardodarapti (talk) 15:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello I'm sorry, and it will not happen again.

Bruno Groening

Dear Eugene, Would you be so kind to review [3]. I suppose a possible rules violation [4] --KirillKoriakin

w::ru:Файл:Грёнинг Бруно.jpg is clearly marked as non-free. Such files should confirm to w::ru:Википедия:Критерии добросовестного использования. I'm not big specialist in it, but resolution is too high. However will be good idea to try to find out information about photographer/date of creation. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Photos uploaded FaridAlizade

I don't understand why you delete my photos. The photos and pics are belong to me! /FaridAlizade

One of image was TV screenshot. Do you have permission from TV company? Same goes for organization logos. Rest of images looks like promo photos for me. Do you own copyrights to them? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

I need to delete a file

Hello Eugene,

Could you completely delete this file File:Islam.png. Thanks. Islamic11111 (talk) 18:38, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done. Please note that w:en:Help:Table and some HTML formatting allow to create similar things. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Manmohan.jpg

Hello Sir, I have added this and other pictures. I have given myself as the author and source. What more should i do? --Satdeep gill (talk) 15:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Some of images you uploaded looks like historical photos. You could upload images in original resolution with EXIF to confirm your authorship for rest. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Big Pun poster

Hi Eugene, I see you deleted the image I uploaded to wikimedia. I marked the copyright information wrong, and should have cited the website the photos were from. The 3 photos (Big Pun, Twista, Police State) I uploaded can all be found at http://vladar.com/productions/generationiron/ and are movie posters from professional films. I should have cited them fair use, as almost every movie page I can find on wikipedia has posters sourced from production company websites. Please tell me if it is possible to get those pictures back up, or if I can re-upload them at some point. Like I said, most movie posters on Wikimedia Commons seem to cite the production company website and fair use, which is what I would like to do. Let me know what I can do.

Thanks Terencebogards (talk)

Commons doesn't allow fair use images (see Commons:Licensing). But you could upload such images to project which allow them (like English Wikipedia). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Commons_talk:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Willowbl00

Hello, wondering what your concerns are for the conceptual drawings I've uploaded are. Nearly all are expressions of talks and panels at conferences, a different way of representing the ideas (often to accompany typed notes or photographs). Many of these works appear alongside the conference talk page with the talk video and/or transcript. The images are used in blog posts by the likes of the MIT Media Lab, Berkman Center for Internet and Society, and countless conference-specific settings (including Wikimania!).

• One such appeared in a well-lauded security paper from Citizen Lab on malware injected through non-https-served videos (more widely read in the WaPo overview
• Drawings often appear on the Center for Civic Media blog
• Before I was uploading these to the commons, images often appeared via other embed functions, such as in this post by Jonathan Stray on Build Peace. I prefer Commons because I'm entirely smitten with 1) having the assumption be that of CC, as per Commons, and 2) versioning being visible to others.

I'm new to contributing to the Commons (and have far more contributions here than edits to Wikipedia), after an excellent person at Wikimania 2014 showed me how to add things, and advocated that I include my work here. I understand there are things that I don't yet understand - do these need better citations? Categorization? Etc. But I do think that these alternative expressions of knowledge are important and useful. I've written more fully about the topic here.

After these nuances are better understood, I'd like to start contributing the animated explanations of infosec and technology in disaster and humanitarian response I tend to also create, so others have an easier time of pulling and remixing than they currently do from YouTube and Vimeo.

Thanks! Willowbl00 (talk) 05:55, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I expressed my concerns on deletion request page. I may sound like old-fashioned folk, but educational images looks a little bit different then those you uploaded. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

File: Microneis a Games 2014

Eres un ignorante en la materia.

Con mucho cariño, Davidchk

Sorry, I don't speak Spanish :-( This was non-trivial logo. You could upload such non-free images on projects which allows them (like English Wikipedia). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Kamen Rider Ryuki All Logo

Don't TV is Logo

These images were non-trivial logos. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

File:PPCC Stacked Logo CMYK.png

Please undelete this file. I agree that it is not text-only; however, it was previously restored after OTRS confirmation of permission (#2014111210023549) under CC BY-SA 4.0 ({{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}). Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 21:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

I restored file, but I didn't see OTRS in file history. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Check the deletion log. Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 17:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

I think file description history is good enough. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Willowbl00

Hi,

Could you please give your opinions about Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:MediaWiki Vagrant Visualization.jpg .28And possibly other files uploaded by Willowbl00.29. Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Prerogative user from Indonesia

Hello, Mr. Eugene Zelenko. I am an official government officer to publish anything under Indonesian state jurisdiction. I am an English teacher who has Pegawai Negeri Sipil status. I have obligation and special prerogative actions to publish the files. The real about me is on here.

Regards. Relly Komaruzaman | Talk 16:38, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

As far as I understood these files were logos of educational institutions. You should point to official we pages were license for logo clearly specified or ask legal departments to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

why u mark my photo ?

Hello,

You market my photo for source, it's me the owner and I put Own work. How i will give you the source ??

--Vivaystn (talk) 17:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

This photo is Commons:Derivative work from poster. See also Commons:Freedom of panorama for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

File Wappen von Türkoğlu

Hi EugeneZelenko, thank you for working on my file. I used the same license as the file "Datei:Antalya buyuksehir logo.png". But why was my file deleted and this one isn't? The same happens to many Turkish coats of arms, like Adana, Ankara or Izmir. I'm the opinion, the file must not be deletet according to Adana or Antalya. Thank you for your answer; with kindly regards --Christian1311 (talk) 12:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

File didn't have license tag. Could you please clarify what this coat of art represents: settlement, education institution, etc? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi EugeneZelenko, sorry that I answered so late, business.... The coat of art represents Türkoğlu, a town in Turkey. It has the same license as Antalya buyuksehir logo.png. Please take my file back to wikimedia commons. Thank you very much. Kind regards --Christian1311 (talk) 11:32, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

I restored file, but you still need to specify proper license tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Rf patroller

Hi dear EugeneZelenko, can you please grant me the patrolller right? i am very familiar with Commons' policies and guidelines and i believe that that will especially be useful to me.I also have Autopatroller right on Meta (check) and fr.wp and i think i can help local patroller in their work.Sure i don't have any right here but i have a cross wiki experience.Best Regards ----Grind24talk ??Contribs 12:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

I think adding request on Commons:Requests for rights#Patroller is best way to proceed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

EugeneZelenko, Добрый день! мне пришло уведомление, что Вами удалены фотографии со страницы "Фрекинг, Блейк".

Эти фотографии предоставлены мне лично Блейком Фрекингом специально для размещении на этой странице Википедии. Это его личные фотографии, авторские права на эти фотографии никто, кроме него, не предъявляет. Что мне нужно сделать, чтобы фотографии в статье вернулись на свое место?

Уделение фотографий со страницы "Фрекинг, Блейк"

Уважаемый Евгений! Мне пришло уведомление, о том что Вами удалены фотографии со страницы, посвященной чемпиону гонок на собачьих упряжках Блейку Фрекингу. Эти фотографии из его личного архива, переданы мне специально для размещения на этой странице в Википедии. Авторские права на эти фотографии никто, кроме него, не предъявляет. Что нужно сделать, чтобы эти фотографии вернулись на страницу "Фрекинг, Блейк"

С уважением, Curious angler (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Если он нигде не размещал фотографии на условиях свободных лицензий, Вы можете попросить его послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Потом можно попросить помощи на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard с проверкой разрешения и восстановлением изображений. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Ambassador John Banks Elliott

Dear Eugene Zelenko,

Please note that this is the correct photograph and must not be deleted. The caption is correct and should read, Ambassador John Banks Elliott after presentation of his credentials to the Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet Mr. K.E. Voroshilov. Moscow, January 1960

Please note that there are TWO photographs of Ambassador Elliott presenting his credentials. The First photograph is to the (Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet Mr. K.E. Voroshilov. Moscow, January 1960) |description=

English: Ambassador John Banks Elliott after presentation of his credentials to the Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet Mr. K.E. Voroshilov. Moscow, July 1960

The Second photograph is to the (Chairman of the Presidium of Supreme Council Mr. Leonid Brezhnev. Moscow, July 1960) |description=

English: Ambassador John Banks Elliott after presentation of his credentials to the Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Council Mr. Leonid Brezhnev. Moscow, July 1960

The above caption was attached to the wrong photograph, that photograph has now been corrected and the correct caption entered. These photographs are my personal property given to me by my father Ambassador John Banks Elliott to be used on his ‘Wikipedia’ page which I am yet to complete as it is still a stub. All the other photographs in this series are part of this collection.

Thank you, Kind regards, Dorothy

Problem is not in captions but in copyrights status. Photos are not your work. You need to separate official from family ones. For family made your father need to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). For official ones copyrights law of country of origin should be applied. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Bookcover Alan Walker book by Keith Garner.jpg

Hi Eugene, Keith Garner (who wrote and produced the book) sent Permissions-co authorization (using the specimen form) for this photo. I quote: I hereby affirm that I, Keith V Garner, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the attached images. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Rev Dr Keith V. Garner CEO/Superintendent, Wesley Mission Sydney 20 November 2014 Is there anything more to do? Could you please email me directly as I get lost on Wikipedia/Commons and can't easily find things. As a new user I am finding things complicated so would greatly appreciate any help you can give me. Regards - Dinoo.

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Just a notice

Hi. You may be interested in User talk:Jianhui67#about the images used in the Arotxa page in Wikipedia. Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 12:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Fichiers .OGG "Paradoxe sur le Comédien" et "Louis de Bourbon, Prince de Condé"

Bonjour, Vous m'indiquez que la licence de ces fichiers n'est pas correcte ; pourtant ils sont librement téléchargeables sur le site Internet de la station de radio France-Culture, ainsi que sur un autre site, en accès libre. Que faut-il faire ? Cordialement --Hdetorcy (talk) 16:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know French :-( Files doesn't have license. On my understanding this is radio broadcast. Does copyrights holder licensed it under term of free license? Otherwise you need to wait until they become public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Very sorry : my english is too bad. J'ai interrogé aujourd'hui par mail la station de radio productrice des enregistrements, pour leur demander de m'indiquer les droits associés aux fichiers téléchargés. J'attends leur réponse.

Cordialement--Hdetorcy (talk) 10:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Am I the problem?

Hi,

I’m under the impression that I’m not very popular among some members of the community. For example, the images that were eliminated were cropped pictures, I cropped them but the 3 were uploade by a different user each, a user that is not me. You can see why I’m suspicious that the problem it's me and not the pictures themselves. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 11:12, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

At least 2 crops were uploaded by you. I think claiming self work in case of crop is incorrect. Please also use author/source field in image description. I restored 2 images, but you still need to fix license/description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Photos téléchargées

Monsieur, Je ne comprends rien aux lois américaines qui semblent régir l'importation de documents pour une page Wikipédia. J'ai réalisé ou fait réaliser des photos À MES FRAIS dans différentes bibliothèques patrimoniales, qui m'ont simplement demandé de signaler la provenance des documents. Comment faut-il que je fasse pour ne pas que vous supprimiez ces illustrations ? Je remarque, au demeurant, que parmi les clichés reproduits dans un certain nombre de pages Wikipédia, beaucoup d'indiquent aucune provenance, aucun droit de copie, aucun auteur. Je vous remercie de bien vouloir me répondre précisément et en française, qui est ma langue de travail et la seule que je lise parfaitement. Cordialement. FMR1950

Sorry, I don't know French :-( Images which you uploaded are two-dimensional reproduction of public domain art, not your own work. You need to use public domain tags and specify author/country/date of creation/publication information in description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

image deleted

hi,

National_footprint.jpg was deleted with the reason "There are no pages that link to this file". I am currently preparing the wiki page. Can you please reinstate the image.

Thanks

This image is advertisement of marketing material. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Deletion requests/Files uploaded by HAL-Guandu

After a longer pause I am kind of new to Wikimedia commons. Today i got a Notification about possible deletion. Also it says: Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. I think, giving a reason why the files should be deleted in the first place would help me a lot to start the discussion. --HAL-Guandu (talk) 00:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Files which you uploaded may be re-created using w:en:Help:Table. It's much better to do tables that way. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

إليك وساما!

	وسام الاجتهاد
	شكرا على هدا الاجتاد وشكرا بتوفيق انشاء الله Youness totiyamo (talk) 13:18, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Arabic or Farsi :-( File which you uploaded contains text and images. I think will be good idea to move text to relevant project (Wikipedia, Wikibooks, etc) and upload images separately. You need to provide author/country of origin/date of creation/publication for each image. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Photos familiales

La photo de Jean Foyer est issue d'un album familial. Je l'ai mise sur commons, et j'ai ainsi donné le droit de l'utiliser. La photo du général Dumoulin est issue d'un album familial. Je l'ai mise sur commons et j'ai ainsi donné le droit de l'utiliser. En ce qui concerne la photo de Syam, l'association ArcheoJuraSites m'a demandé de l'ajouter au texte et m'a donné le droit de l'utiliser.

Family records

File:Jean Foyer au TDC de Paris 1964 001.jpg. come from a family album, and i give the right to use it. It similar for général Dumoulin who is my ancestor. For Syam, it is with association ArcheoJurasite asking for it.

File:Jean Foyer au TDC de Paris 1964 001.jpg and File:JCR 001.jpg seems to be official photos. Do you know any details about them? Most likely File:G.R 001.jpg and File:Charles Dumoulin 001.jpg are in public domain, but more information is need: creator/country/date of creation/publication. Same for File:André Berthier 1986.JPG. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Answers me please

Because when I carry an images, my videos, what me alone I recorded with my cellular one, do you turn off the video or the image, saying that I violated, the rights authorships, if I am the author of the image, which right authorships you want me to put in the image?.

He/she was appreciated answer me briefer possible. thank you --Jonasse102 (talk) 16:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

--Jonasse102 (talk) 18:21, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Portuguese :-( Please read Commons:Licensing. Who is author(s) of all songs or video clips you uploaded? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Brasil 4 X 0 Panama - melhores momentos - Amistoso Internacional HD 2014 by Jona Paz.ogg which I deleted originated from TV. Most likely files deleted by other administrators have similar origins (Internet, TV). I highly recommend you to read Commons:Licensing before making new uploads. You could ask help of Portuguese-speaking administrator. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the clue, I will already ask for help --Jonasse102 (talk) 22:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

([[User talk:EugeneZelenko#top|

Pedido de não eliminação dos Arquivos, not delete

HI EugeneZelenko I´m not speak inglish speak português

Ola EugeneZelenko, eu não falo inglês só portugues eu te pesso para não eliminares os meu ficheiros da wikimédia porque eu preciso destes ficheiros porque eu tenho uma comunidade no facebook em que eu carrego estes ficheiros na wikimedia e publico o link no facebook cá vai o link ( https://0.facebook.com/manuelmediafile?v=timeline&filter=1&page=1&sectionLoadingID=m_timeline_loading_div_1420099199_0_36_1&timeend=1420099199&timestart=0&tm=AQDsCkJfnccHOUbB ) e as pessoas baixam.

porque cá em angola a internet é muito caro por isso a wikimedia é a unica maneira de postar ficheiros e eles baixarem. Terminando espero que me entendas e saibas considerar.

Muito obrigado pela atenção. (thanks for atention)

Sorry, I don't know Portuguese :-( Sorry for disappoint you, but Commons is not free hosting for materials of questionable copyrights status. Please read Commons:Project scope and Commons:Licensing. Feel free to find other hosting service for your community. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

World Aviation files

I received your notifications about file deletion of some images today. Please refer to the email Dr. Ahura Khaleghi Yazdi sent OTRS on December 1st. Please advise how to include reference to this permission immediately on future uploads. Thanks in advance. 6th Common Sense (talk) 16:08, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

You could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with adding permissions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer. I did so. 6th Common Sense (talk) 08:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

fotografías subidas por mi

Estimado Eugenio

Junto con saludarlo y como e visto hace pocos minutos , he recibido de usted aviso sobre discutir el Borrado de las fotografías subidas por mi a commons. Por lo anterior debo señalar que todas las fotografías pertenecen a mi familia la cual las tiene en su poder sobre 100 años atrás. Todas las fotografías fueron sus propietarios que ya fallecieron sobre 75 años atrás a 150 años atras. El objetivo de subirlas a commons es que formen parte del patrimonio cultural de Chile. Mi nombre es Juan José Guzmán y mi mail es juanjose1956@gmail.com.

Si usted requiere que yo envié un mail a alguien de su distinguida organización autorizando el uso público de estas fotografía puede harcermelo saber y procedo a la emisión de dicho mail. Certifico además que las originales están en mi poder y que he cedido todos los derechos a commons como indica la licencia por mi usada

El fotógrafo que hizo cada fotografía es desconocido , sobretodo que todas las fotografías superan los 75 años de antigüedad muchos otros casos los 100 años Lo saluda atte a usted --Juanjose1956 (talk) 19:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Most likely all images you uploaded are in public domain. Please check that all of them have author/date of creation or publication/country of publication information and specify relevant public domain tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio,

Acabo de terminar la tarea que usted me indico, espero que este bien y de acuerdo de su distigida institución. Espero que me contribución sea de toda su utilidad a tan importante encyclopedia.

Lo Saluda muy cordialmente --Juanjose1956 (talk) 02:00, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

I think will be good idea to remove references Creative Commons license in description. Howvere mentioning of physical copy ownership and who perform scanning is OK. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio

Acabo de terminar la tarea por usted señalada, lo cual debo de agredecer su gentileza y guia dada Espero que este trabajo sea de utilidad para esta distingida enciclopedia y su colobaración.

Ademas aprovecho esta oportunidad de darle un feliz Navidad, lo saluda una vez mas --Juanjose1956 (talk) 21:52, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas for you and your family!

There are still mentioning of Creative Commons in permission field. It contradict public domain statement in license section.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio

Deseándole una muy feliz Navidad a ti como a todos tu familia y amigos de esta enciclopedia .!

He corregido todos los permisos de acuerdo a su instrucción . Esperando que esta contribución sea de su total utilidad para esta enciclopedia, lo saluda nuevamente --Juanjose1956 (talk) 21:27, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Thank you for all you fixes! I'm sorry to be so punctual, but I always think that it's better to fix a problem on early stages, then after awhile :-)

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio

Muchas gracias por ser Tan Puntual , para mi no es ningún problema , debido que de esta manera puedo aprender como funciona esta distiguida enciclopedia que comienzo a participar solo en la parte fotografica, debido que la parte escrita no es de mi interes.
Como pongo en la discisión de borrado manifiesto que James l. Woodward comete a mi enteder un error en señalar que como plazo maximo de creación son 50 años, cuando la ley dice, expongo en ella, que como plazo máximo de creación son 50 años cuando el autor es desconocido y ahí empieza a regir los 70 años para su nueva protección.
Como la gran mayoria nunca fueron públicadas ya esta vencido el plazo de su creación protegida. Por lo anterior todas estas foogtafias excepto dos tienen su creación con esta publicación y algunas de ellas 5fueron publicadas hace 100 años como lo explico en cada una., solo 2 fotografia escapán a esto por que son de mi autoria como usted puede ver. Por lo anterior usted puede ver en cada fotografia que puse un glosa con su antiguedad.

Esperando que usted y su familia tenga un feliz año nuevo , lo Saluda una vez más --Juanjose1956 (talk) 23:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)--Juanjose1956 (talk) 23:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

If I'm not mistaken that main complain was about publication date. In case of family album, probably fact of publication is adding photo to album if album was shown to other people. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio

Por favor solicito a usted reconsiderar el borrado de las fotografías escaneada por mi persona . Por favor si seria amable en reponer la discusión de borrado con el propósito que yo pueda aportar la fecha que fue puesta cada fotografía en el álbum familiar. No le he realizado anteriormente por falta de tiempo que he tenido. Esperando tener de parte suya su colaboración con el propósito de no perder el trabajo realizado por mi , te saluda --Juanjose1956 (talk) 22:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Regular process to restore files are Commons:Undeletion requests. You could add request to undelete your files there and provide all additional information on this page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio Acabo de subir dos requerimiento de restauración . Me puede decir si están bien o falta algo? -Juanjose1956 (talk) 21:06, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't understand :-( I noticed your request, but it may take time for Spanish-speaking administrator to process them. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio
Espero que el administrador de commons que habla español vea mis requerimientos y si hay algo incorrecto me lo haga saber para corregirlo, Muchos saludos --Juanjose1956 (talk) 18:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Requests were closed with suggestion to send permission OTRS. Frankly I didn't understand that, but may be administrator wanted confirmation that you are heir and family album was used actively (not collected dust? :-) I think will be good idea to clarify this question with closing administrator. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio
Ayer procedí a enviar el mail solicitado de acuerdo a las instrucciones dada por Fastily Por favor indicarme si el mail que envíe esta correcto o si le faltara algo y cuanto tiempo tarda su respuesta. Te saluda una vez mas y gracias por tu amabilidad --Juanjose1956 (talk) 20:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio
Todas las fotografías son de origen familiar y yo las he heredado o me las han regalado muchos parientes míos . Es por esta razón que las tengo y nunca he comercializado ninguna y no pretendo hacerlo y este es el motivo que estén disponible en su enciclopedia para libre uso patrimonial de estas. Muchas gracias y lo saluda --Juanjose1956 (talk) 20:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Commons:OTRS is needed because of you real identity. This confirmation will be accessible only to limited number of volunteers. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio

Acabo de enviar el mail solicitado , Esperando que contesten dicho mail , lo saluda --Juanjose1956 (talk) 22:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with its review to move things faster :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio

Acabo de presenter lo que tu me indicaste, por favor verlo y si lo puedes arreglar o si le faltara algo me lo pudes decir. te saluda--Juanjose1956 (talk) 23:49, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

I saw your request on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard and I hope it'll be processed soon. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio

Gracias por todo --Juanjose1956 (talk) 22:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio

El administrador Anon me informo que instruyó restablecer las fotos subidas por mi. Por favor lo puedes ver . Con este proceso he aprendido mucho como funciona esta enciclopedia y espero ahora seguir contribuyendo . Muchas gracias por ser tan puntual y tú paciencia Gracias --Juanjose1956 (talk) 12:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio
Cuando Usted cree que podrian ser la reposición de las fotografías de acuerdo a lo informado por Anon? Y me podría indicar si tengo que arreglar o repararles algo?
Lo saluda nuevamente --Juanjose1956 (talk) 19:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

I restored images, but OTRS ticket should be added and deletion template removed by OTRS volunteer. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio
Muchas gracias por su tiempo y dedicación . Si usted requiere que cambie algo en cuanto a la licencias en las fotografías que restauro , por favor indíqueme . Y cuando termina este proceso? Muchas gracias y te saluda --Juanjose1956 (talk) 21:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Process should be finished by OTRS volunteer. I think will be good idea to bother Anon126 again :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio
Acabo de poner en la discución de Anon . Por favor lo puede ver para ver si esta correcto lo que le solicite o hay que agregar algo. Lo saluda --Juanjose1956 (talk) 23:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio

Acabo de poner antecedente en el Talk de Anon, por favor vealo, muchas gracias --Juanjose1956 (talk) 00:21, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Estimado Eugenio

Puse en la discusión de Anon, por favor la puede ver , muchas gracias--Juanjose1956 (talk) 15:10, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Analisedecontido6.png

La imagen está etiquetada con

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:

. No entiendo porqué me piden que identifique la autoría (soy yo). Saludos.

--Tfeliz (talk) 23:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't speak Spanish :-( You need to specify source of each image used in diagram.

By the word, please replace files like File:Analisedecontido4.png with w:es:Ayuda:Tablas and nominate files for deletion.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Tabelas-resultado-avaliacao-geral-disciplina-2014.pdf

Hi EugeneZelenko

Do not delete the file.

This file is part of the a Wikiversity Course offered by Opensocialsciences (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2014 (UTC) at the São Paulo Federal University.

The link to the course's page is: https://pt.wikiversity.org/wiki/Sociedade_e_Tecnologias_Digitais/2014

This file presents the results of a students' self-avaliation survey of the course program Opensocialsciences (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Please use file in Wikiversity. However I think that it'll be good idea to use wiki-text with SVG files for charts instead of PDF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Educationtemple

Hello there. The uploader at youtube has released the work under CC please check the license. Any admin can check this on this page. If it is still problematic, please go ahead and delete the files. Discussion closed at my end. Thanks and cheers!

I think will be good idea to clarify, if video creator also created photo and poetry or not. In last case more permissions are needed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Looks like that the photos are from public resources, published news paper etc however, poetry and words are written and narrated by Verma in his own voice (see last slide on video). Yes, I agree with you that more permissions may be required for photos, which I have no control upon; other than relying on the youtube license provided by uploader/creator who released in under CC license; the appropriate action can be taken on the file. Educationtemple (talk) 16:22, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year EugeneZelenko!

Happy New Year!

EugeneZelenko,
Have a great 2015, and thanks for your contributions to Commons! INeverCry 22:06, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your order Iron XXL (talk) 15:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

لذيذة SoumiXa16 (talk) 23:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Gokturk Alfabesi.pdf

File:Gokturk Alfabesi.pdf

Gokturk Alfabesi.pdf has permissions within. See page 3 and page 84 Creative Commons-BY-NC-ND. Creator has informed the Turkish Wikipedia about the license. Besides, they have a creative commons statement at http://www.tamgalar.com. It'll be a handbook for Turkish runic alphabet. What should we do for it? --Kafkasmurat (talk) 18:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Commons doesn't accept non-commercial/no-derivatives Creative Commons licenses. See Commons:Licensing. I don't know Turkish :-(, so I didn't see license statement on site. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

But it's entirely created by a Wikipedia user. He uploaded the file. What about files like: Administrative Law and Intelligence Supplement 2011.pdf ? A user created handbook. It's also a handbook to learn ancient alphabets. No use of trademarks or licensed material. Only educational purposes. Can you remove the speedy deletion mark?--Kafkasmurat (talk) 16:50, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

If user had created this file he could fix license in PDF on both source site and Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Uploaded images information

Hi, thank you EugeneZelenco for the notice, I will do the categorization and proper author, date, country information for the images uploaded.--Vmsa (talk) 00:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Not yet removed the request for deletion, need more data? --Vmsa (talk) 23:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

You need to specify country of origin, otherwise it's not clear why Argentinean law was applied. Please also remove self Creative Commons tags and own work from images descriptions.

Text in description field should be wrapped in language tag (I guess {{Es}} in your case).

Please reflect your actions on deletion request page.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Logo omela.jpg

Доброго времени суток. это новый логотип группы в статье о ней же. на каком основании файл помечен на удаление? правообладателем является ООО "Арт-Саунд", лейбл AILANO-studio.

Смотрите Commons:Лицензирование. Вы можете попросить правообладателя послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Иначе — загрузить в русскую Википедию как несвободный логотип. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Bia Krieger 2015.jpg.

Hello EugeneZelenko! You have sent me this warning: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Marilobo#.7B.7BAutotranslate.7C1.3DFile:Bia_Krieger_2015.jpg.7Cbase.3DImage_permission.2Fheading.7D.7D

The website where the authorisation is embedded is: http://www.biakrieger.com/#!biographie/c157z

So please consider this photo as authorized material. thank you!

I removed warning and added permission link. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

COM:BN

Hi, Can you please have a look at my request (about commons delinker)? Thanks --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:29, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Dschwen is on it. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

file:徐匯中學

I'm the student with this school. And the pictures are all takes by the book.徐匯中學五十年誌。 What's the matter? Didn't I writen the source? --Cjackh (talk) 14:26, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Licensing. It's necessary to have more information the "image form book" to determine its copyrights status. And "image from book" is not your own work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

: Nope. My English is very low. In fact, I didn't want to mean that's my own work. I said that, "That's is my photo from book."And the picture "校徽"is real i took my own. Why you really want to delete? "If you can, please take the all license to do it." I didn't want to mean that's my work. By the way, the picture upload use this way it's simple. Who can abide upload pictures with English this thing? Truly your.--Cjackh (talk) 16:48, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

You need to provide correct credits for each image taken form book: photographer/date/country of creation. Taking photo of photo doesn't make you an author. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

copyvio user

You left this final warning a few weeks ago for 12Danny123 (talk · contribs). Non-free files are continuing to be uploaded. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 10:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for help! User blocked for one week. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk Back

Hello, EugeneZelenko. You have new messages at Dinosaur Fan's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File: Pedro Romero Mendoza

La foto es de mi propiedad por ser Pedro Romero Mendoza mi padre y haber sido heredero directo de todas sus propiedades a su fallecimiento. La fecha puede ser de 1939 - 1940 --JUAN JOSÉ ROMERO MONTESINO-ESPARTERO (talk) 19:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

File: Eladia Montesino-Espartero Averly

La foto es de mi propiedad por ser Eladia Montesino-Espartero Averly, mii madre y haber sido heredero directo de todas sus propiedades a su fallecimiento. La fecha de la foto es 18 de Junio de 1919 --JUAN JOSÉ ROMERO MONTESINO-ESPARTERO (talk) 19:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

commons undeletion request for files uploaded by wikimikson

I understand that you have some issues regarding the files I uploaded about a certain Emir of Gumel and another.. well despite the fact that the file resolution is small, I am the author of those files. I assure you the files were taking from a trip to the emirs palace in nigeria. I'm kinda new to this whole Wikipedia thing.. but I really wanna be part of it and contribute in any way I can. Thanks!!..

You could upload uncropped files with EXIF to proof your authorship. Please don't start new conversations on archived pages. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 4 June 2015 (UTC)