User talk:Eric0892

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Eric0892!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Anna Di Carlo-Leader of the Marxist Leninist party of Canada.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Krdbot 12:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Hey man, thanks for updating the results map. I didn't want to wait for Paris all night and went to bed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talleyrand6 (talk • contribs) 11:37, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Talleyrand6. Thanks for creating the map! -- Eric0892 (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi Eric. The map you created for the 2022 Australian election uses the 2019 divisions which are now out of date. The division of Stirling (Western Aus) has been abolished and a new division, Hawke has been created. And I think various other divisions have been redrawn for the upcoming election. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tdsnowdon (talk • contribs) 21:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me -- I forgot to update the map! I am currently working on a new version featuring the new redistributed divisions. — Eric0892 (talk) 01:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Eric! I’m not sure what exactly happened but the borders of the Division of Franklin in Tasmania appear to have been redrawn in a way that is not accurate on the 2022 election map. It is going to be a pain to fix but I decided to give you a heads up before I forgot.
Aside from this though, I have an alternate color palette for the political parties I thought I could share with you in case you find it preferable, although you would presumably have to change the colors on older maps as well so that they match. I pulled all of them from each party’s official logo:
Liberal: #194f9a
Liberal National: #0078bf
National: #057c46
Labor: #e13840
The Greens: #0b9b3d
Centre Alliance: #fd6507
Katter’s Australian: #df0d10
United Australian: #feec01
One Nation: #f16b26
I would have changed them myself as I think it is more fitting to use the colors officially used by each party, but I realized I should be polite and simply suggest them to the map’s uploader instead. It’s up to you :) The2016 (talk) 15:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your suggestions, The2016! The party colours were copied over from the 2019 map, but I agree that it'd be better to use the official colours; I'll make the change soon. The older maps were not made by me, and I think it'd be all right for a bit of colour difference.
I've not modified any divisions in Tasmania, so it's odd that they appear weird. I'll try and fix it. Thanks again. — Eric0892 (talk) 00:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @The2016, thanks for your alternate colours. With school, I was quite busy lately, so it took me awhile; but I changed all of them based on your recommendations – except for Katter’s Australian, since I feel there isn't sufficient contrast between that and Labor's colour. I've also fixed the inaccuracies in Tasmania, though some people have pointed out inaccuracies in N.S.W. as well, so I'll have to look into that. :) — Eric0892 (talk) 05:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian map errors?[edit]

Hi, I'm not sure if this is intentional or not but a lot of the river detail on maps such as File:Canada Election 2021 Results Map.svg makes it seem like one constituency is actually two separate constituencies. Look at the Winnipeg inset for example. From a first glance I count 17 separate districts when in reality there are only 11. Kingofthedead (talk) 07:38, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Kingofthedead, you're right — the amount of rivers in the insets can be misleading. I am currently working on an improved version of the map; but since I am currently in school, it might take a while for me to make and publish the revised version. Thanks for your comments! — Eric0892 (talk) 23:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inset for Windsor[edit]

The inset for Windsor is incorrectly labelled as "Essex". This doesn't make sense because all of the other insets are labelled based on the name of the city. Essex is the name of the county though. Jc8025 (talk) 04:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. I'm not too familiar with the geography of the Windsor/Detroit area but my understanding is that my inset actually covers more than just the City of Windsor, but the entire county. Therefore I think it would make more sense to say "Essex". Thinking in retrospect, perhaps it would also be more appropriate to re-label "Vancouver" as "Metro Vancouver". I'll make the change soon! — Eric0892 (talk) 18:26, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But Windsor is not administratively part of Essex County. The other problem is that "Essex" is not a common name in Canada (few people outside of Southern Ontario know it). Everyone knows where Windsor is though because that's the main city. Renaming the inset "Windsor-Essex" would be sensible...that's also a common name that is used for the region. 99.242.43.183 20:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see, Windsor–Essex. Cool! Thanks for the insight. — Eric0892 (talk) 03:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]