User talk:Beata May

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Eluveitie!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Beata May!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Qantas.png was uncategorized on 26 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Emirates aircraft.png was uncategorized on 26 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Virgin atl.png was uncategorized on 26 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Aircraft.png was uncategorized on 26 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Airbus A330-223 - Kingfisher Airlines (VT-VJP).jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Aircraft.gif was uncategorized on 26 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Serwus

Widzę, że większość Twoich obrazów zrobiona została na HTW, ciekaw jestem ile przepraw z ochroną na Heathrow miałaś/eś, kilka razy się tam zamierzyłem z aparatem i zawsze kończyło się to rozmową z panami w jaskrawym zielonym :) Pozdrawiam. Chalger (talk) 22:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

JAL123 image

• 

Hi! Please change "survivors' sittings" to "seat locations of survivors" since the latter is a form that would be used by native English speakers Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 03:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

• It was fixed. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Please look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spoiny English.svg - I watched a Mayday episode and noticed something WhisperToMe (talk) 18:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

w:List of public art in Westminster

Please keep the great pictures coming! Ham (talk) 20:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

After Googling Emergence by David Breuer-Weil, which you added to the page today, I found out that the work is a temporary installation (see here). This has meant that I've sadly had to take it off the list, as it would be untenably big if all the temporary installations of recent years were included on it. I hope I've made amends by adding it to the page w:Hanover Square, London, and that you're not discouraged from adding further pictures by my actions! Thanks, Ham (talk) 18:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ob 08 sculpture, St Giles High Street, London.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI IMO (maybe a small perspective correction?).--ArildV 09:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC) I hope now is better --Eluveitie 10:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC) Good now.--ArildV 10:40, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing 777-337ER - Air India (VT-ALK).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 09:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paternoster Square, London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Decent quality. --Tomer T 08:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nymph statue, Berkeley Square.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 11:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dover Town Centre and Dover Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dover Lifeboat City of London II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Florstein 12:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suffragette Memorial, Christchurch Gardens, London .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is tilted and could need also a perspective correction Poco a poco 11:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC) I changed name of file, I mean I've requested it (I don't really know how it works) and I corrected perspective. --Cédric Amey 11:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC) I didn't request a new name, but rather a tilt, because the monument is not straight Poco a poco 12:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC) Right, sorry. Done! --Eluveitie 04:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC) Good enough Poco a poco 14:38, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! General Charles George Gordon statue, Embankment, London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! I Goat Sculpture, Spitalfields, London.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality seems good (margins on blue sky are to be expected), and FOP in UK is no problem. Perspective of background is not an issue imo. -- Aisano 22:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing 777-236ER - British Airways (G-VIIV).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me--Jebulon 09:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Admiral Horatio Nelson, Nelson's Column, Trafalgar Square, London.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. JLPC 21:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herring Gull (Larus argentatus), Brighton, England.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 19:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC) Done. --Eluveitie 20:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

RAF Bomber Command Memorial

Thank you for your photographs of the Bomber Command Memorial. They've really brightened up the article. Harrison49 (talk) 17:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Emergence sculpture, Hanover Square, London.JPG

Yours sincerely, ghouston (talk) 10:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Boeing 767-341ER - Star Alliance (LOT - Polish Airlines) (SP-LPE).JPG

Hiya, in relation to File:Boeing 767-341ER - Star Alliance (LOT - Polish Airlines) (SP-LPE).JPG can you tell me what airport this was at. Cheers, russavia (talk) 06:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Rename request

Please kindly rename this account to Beata May, as per my request. Thank you --Eluveitie (talk) 10:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

aircrafts

your photo are beautiful --Rippitippi (talk) 07:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gullfoss, South Iceland (2012).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Þingvellir National Park, Iceland (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough. A little noisy though. I wonder if lower ISO could have been used. --Ximonic 07:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing 757-23N(WL) Air Astana P4-KCU.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Too bad that this photo has only badge size. --Cccefalon 07:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embraer ERJ-190STD (ERJ-190-100) KLM Cityhopper PH-EZM AMS-LHR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Below 2MP requirement. --Cccefalon 15:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)  Comment Uploaded over 2MP version --Beata May 08:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC) Good quality. Thank your for the higher resolution. --Cccefalon 07:49, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

CCW

Hi (sorry, poor English) CCW = to the left (CounterClockWise). CW = ClockWise (to the right).

It is used to indicate inclination towards that side of the picture. Thanks for your pictures--Lmbuga (talk) 20:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

See Commons talk:Quality images candidates#For Newbies ...--Lmbuga (talk) 22:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dyna fyr (Dyna Lighthouse), Oslo, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Blue is oversaturated. Also, seeing the histo, I recommend to push the histo a little bit to the bright side. --Cccefalon 08:11, 5 April 2015 (UTC) *  Comment  Done Uploaded another version --Beata May 06:53, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Yes, it's better now. Can pass as QI imo. --Cccefalon 08:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oslo Opera house (2015)(2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mýrdalsjökull glacier, Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Palace, Oslo (2015).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me now! --Hubertl 13:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hallgrimskirkja pipe organ in Reykjavik.JPG

And also:

• File:Hallgrímskirkja church inside, Reykjavik.jpg

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 19:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hallgrímskirkja church, Reykjavik, Iceland.jpg

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 19:39, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Beata May, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! European robin (Erithacus rubecula), Bristol, UK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC)