User talk:EgorovaSvetlana

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, EgorovaSvetlana!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Patriarch Alexy I.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Patriarch Alexy I.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Patriarch Alexy I.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 22:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67
Hi, I have updated to PD-exempt license, if that appropriate?
Pin collection is my own family collection, as well as my Alma mater University's non official logos created while we were students, also from my own family archive.
Значок Thälmann Pioneers.jpg aslo from my family archive, but I am not sure which license should I use for it?
Regarding NCEI DEM of Newton terrain.jpg and File:Drift supercontinents and ancient oceans from 600 Ma to present at nowadays Newton Massachusetts location.webm I have also created it myself based on website data with link provided, what kind of license should I use? EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 23:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Гагарин Юрий значок.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67
Hi, I have updated to PD-exempt license, if that appropriate?
Pin collection is my own family collection, I saw similar soviet badge in an electronic catalog
EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 00:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ras67
Hi, I have updated to PD-exempt license, if that appropriate?
Pin collection is my own family collection, as well as similar is listed https://www.sovietznak.ru/badge/24333
EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 01:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 23:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67, all of aforementioned are mine original grayscale photo of my family archive and I did colorized it with My Heritage, which I have mentioned in tag. If needed I can upload original grayscale images as well. EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 23:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Пржевальск 100 значок.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Красный wanna talk? 11:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Пржевальску 100 лет значок.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Красный wanna talk? 11:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:ICA Boston 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for FoP notion, as ICA does allow "Noncommercial photography and video recording is permitted for most works on view; exceptions will be indicated with a no photography icon." For this particular work I can not recall if it had such indication, though on ICA site there is no any picture exists for this Chiho Aoshima's past exhibition and also The Sandra and Gerald Fineberg Art Wall displays murals commissioned annually only temporary, so that is also it is already more as historical photo. EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 14:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Незнайка значок.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Незнайка значок.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Alex Spade (talk) 19:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте @Alex Spade
это значок советского времени, Незнайка изображен в широкополой шляпе, по идее Лаптева Алексея Михайловича, очень похож на стиль его иллюстраций к книге, в добавок "блондин", в отличие от Незнайки в стиле Генриха Валька "брюнета", на значке ничего не указано, ни авторство, ни производитель, возможно это серия Веселых человечков, поскольку в похожей технике в интернете нашлись значки с другими сюжетами с Незнайкой, не уверена, если можно поставить PD-RU-exempt & PD-UA-exempt, как приемников СССР, книжка выпущена была Детгиз, 1954 году EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 20:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Это заведомо не гос.символ. Работы Лаптева будут охраняться АП до 1 янв 2040 года. Персонажи Носова - до 1 янв 2051. Alex Spade (talk) 20:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
значок сам по себе - не точная книжная авторская иллюстрация, как я понимаю, а сувенирный продукт, эдакий по следам, полюбившихся книжных человечков, советского производства, у Лаптева, человечки окрашенные, цветные, тут черно-белая графика, стилизованная, кто был технологом и какое предприятие выпускало значок в СССР, мне не известно, но значок из детской семейной домашней коллекции EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 20:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex Spade нашла похожий в интернете Незнайка значок то бишь производство было массовым EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Даже, чтобы попытаться подтянуть значок хотя бы до анонимного произведения, нужны источники, прямо на это указывающие, и год выпуска. А в целом персонаж охраняется АП до 2051 года. Alex Spade (talk) 21:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex Spade понятно, спасибо за объяснение EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 22:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex Spade рассмотрев самые ранние книжки, задумалась, что вполне возможно рисунок для значка самого Лаптева, оказывается в книжках иллюстрации не только акварельные, но и графические выполненные пером, тушью, либо это идеально стилизованный рисунок, практически зеркальный вариант Незнайки из иллюстрации в книге EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 03:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Doll The Edward Gorey House 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Doomhope (talk) 03:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boston Gas Port of Cinderella Nick Edmonds.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster "Grannies" Play Svetlana Zemlyakova Stage Director Theater Praktika Moscow Russia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry photographs[edit]

Hey, Egorova. Avoid uploading blurry photographs like these: [1], [2], [3], etc. They usually are not useful and will likely be deleted if anyone nominates them to deletion. I won't, but someone may find them someday. Thanks, RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RodRabelo7 thx for your note, think they are still valuable as documentary pics about past events EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 02:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]