User talk:Edgar Allan Poe
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Image scanned from textbook
You cannot release images into the Public domain only because you scanned them. The images are still copyrighted by the original copyright owner. For example Image:Miroslav Krleža.jpg might not be in the Public Domain, because it is unlikely that the author of the image died more that 70 years ago (see en:Miroslav Krleža, he lived until 1981). So I marked some of your pictures with "missing source or license information". To see which images are affected you can see here. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. --Matt314 09:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:348px-HimmlerOberfhr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Matt314 09:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Konstantin Ustinovič Černjenko (Константи́н Усти́нович Черне́нко).jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Kjetil_r 20:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Andropov.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Kjetil_r 20:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Himmler45.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Matt314 12:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Gustav_Krupp_von_Bohlen_und_Halbach.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Gustav_Krupp_von_Bohlen_und_Halbach.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Matt314 15:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Hitler calendar.jpg
Hi! It's me again... I just saw you uploaded this picture of Hitler. Why is it a work of an employee of a federal government agency? On the source page it says it comes from ushmm.org, this is a museum, not a federal office (even if it was build with funding of the US government). Furthermore it says: Credit: USHMM, courtesy of Geoffrey Giles, Copyright: USHMM in the image description. Could you please explain why you tagged it as PD-USgov? --Matt314 13:33, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- You said USSHM is a government page. I doubt this, it does not say anywhere that it is related to the federal government (although some are government officials mentioned on the page) especially when you see that it is also (co)funded by private donors. [1]. Actually I think the image cannot be kept at Commons at all, so I will nominate it for deletion. Only pictures that are clearly in the Public Domain can be at Commons. --Matt314 15:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- "all government pictures are PD" - wrong! Until today pictures by government employees in Germany are copyrighted (there is no "official picture" of Mrs. Merkel, German chancelor, on Commons!). The US in one of the very few countries in the world that has "PD because made by government". If you mean "PD-GermanGov": This template is not for photos, mainly for texts of laws and court decisions. --Matt314 15:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Meloni1.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
These images are copyright WireImage.com
Image:Meloni1.jpg Image:Christopher Meloni (Elliot Stabler).jpg.
They are not public domain.
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Ice-T.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
This image Image:Ice-T.jpg is copyright WireImage.com and is not public domain.
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Richard Belzer (John Munch).jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
This is a photo copyright WireImage.com. Please do not upload copyright images. This site is for free images only.
Paintings by Salvador Dalí
Hi! Given that Dalí died in 1989, isn't there a problem with copyright? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- But this is a derivative work from a copyrighted content. The original painting being copyrighted, you have no right to release your own reproductions freely. Or have you? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Quoting Commons:Derivative works:
- “If I take a picture of an object with my own camera, I hold the copyright to the picture. Can't I license it anyway I choose? Why do I have to take care of other copyright holders?
- By taking a picture, you create a new, copyrighted work (i.e. the photograph). At the same time, the rights of the original still exists and don't go away. By publishing the picture, you do something only the original copyright holder is allowed to do. That's why you won't be able to use your own photography of a copyrighted work (except as fair use) unless the creator of the original gave you permission to do so.”
- According to this, you cannot upload paintings by Dalí on Commons... Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Quoting Commons:Derivative works:
- An ancient pot is in the public domain, whereas Dalí's paintings are not. And this museum isn't a public space: it's privately owned, you have to pay to get in. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- The picture is yours, but not the rights pertaining to the depicted object. Therefore, you can use your picture for a private use, but not publish it: “the rights of the original still exists and don't go away. By publishing the picture, you do something only the original copyright holder is allowed to do. That's why you won't be able to use your own photography of a copyrighted work”. If you wish we can discuss it on Commons:Deletion requests. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- That is the whole point of Commons:Derivative works: you cannot modify nor reproduce a work of art which is not yours in the first place. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
The discussion should now stand at Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Soft_Construction_with_Boiled_Beans_(Premonition_of_Civil_War).jpg. Thanks, Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- The {{Delete}} tag means that a page is listed for deletion, it doesn't ask for immediate deletion. Thus you are not to remove it while the discussion is going on. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry they got you on copyrights...
Nice username though. 68.39.174.238 22:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- This IS my "real username". 68.39.174.238 22:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Hirohito.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Oden 22:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Leonid Iljich Brezhnjev (Леони́д Ильи́ч Бре́жнев).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
High on a tree 00:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Don't remove the deletion warning from the image description page before the end of the deletion debate and please stop uploading copyright violations. regards, High on a tree 07:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:689px-Blaskowitz, Rommel, Rundstedt2crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--High on a tree 09:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Copy of 689px-Blaskowitz, Rommel, Rundstedt2crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--High on a tree 09:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Copy of Copy of 689px-Blaskowitz, Rommel, Rundstedt2crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--High on a tree 09:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Jury Vladimirovich Andropov (Ю́рий Влади́мирович Андро́пов).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
High on a tree 13:34, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Please don't remove deletion request tags from images (which are definitely uploaded with incorrect licenses). If you'll continue to do so, you may be blocked. --EugeneZelenko 15:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Also, don't remove whole deletion debates from the log because you think they are "settled". The closing of a deletion debate is done by an admin (i.e. a neutral party) and closed debates remain linked on the log page for archival purposes. regards, High on a tree 05:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Miroslavkrleža.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Matt314 18:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:MSelimović.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Matt314 00:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:JurijVA.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
--EugeneZelenko 16:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:JuVlAnd.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
EugeneZelenko 17:00, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
If you'll continue to upload copyvio images, you'll be blocked. --EugeneZelenko 19:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Andropov13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
EugeneZelenko 16:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Andropov13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
EugeneZelenko 16:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:800px-Rommel in North Africa crop.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:800px-Rommel in North Africa crop.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.44.28 19:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Goring.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
88.134.44.28 00:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Konstantin Ustinovich Chernenko (Константи́н Усти́нович Черне́нко).jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
--EugeneZelenko 16:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Tycho1545.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Valentinian (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC) .
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Wilhelm_Bodewin_Johann_Gustav_Keitel.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
--EugeneZelenko 16:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Copyright violations
Hello Edgar Allan Poe,
You have uploaded several images that are copyright violations and you have done so despite our requests not to do so, and despite our instructions. If you do not stop uploading pictures that are not free, your account will be blocked. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on the Wikimedia Commons. Please do leave me a message if you have further questions. --EugeneZelenko 17:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a duration of 1 day
EugeneZelenko 18:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Ante Pavelic4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ante Pavelic4.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. High on a tree 13:24, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Goebbels.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Goebbels.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Valentinian (talk) 14:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Copyrighted images
Please stop uploaded copyrighted images (for example Image:Goebbels.jpg) or you will be blocked. Regards. --Dodo 06:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Please provide the five source images for Image:TheFive.JPG. This is considered Commons:derivative work, and thus the licensing of the source images must be checked. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Images from Nehru has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
-- Bryan (talk to me) 21:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Various mis-tagged Library of Congress photos
Image deletion warning | Various mis-tagged Library of Congress photos have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
The gift of New York World-Telegram & Sun photos to the public domain only applies to ones taken by staff photographers, which the Library of Congress identifies as such. The NYWTS used a number of photos from outside sources like AP, and these they could not donate to the public domain, since they didn't own the copyright to them. --Davepape 07:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Flag of Vichy France.gif has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Shizhao 04:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Alban Berg.jpg
The reason you gave for believing Image:Alban Berg.jpg to be in the public domain is invalid. —Angr 19:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Béla Bartók.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Davepape 06:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Franco1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
This is an automated message from BryanBot. 02:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Charles-André-Joseph-Marie de Gaulle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
This is an automated message from BryanBot. 02:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Category:Wassily Kandinsky has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Image deletion warning | Image:Jean Paul Sartre -1960 - Cuba.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Image deletion warning | Image:PGoebbelsCrownC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
About copyrights
Hello Edgar Allan Poe.
Thank you for contributing to Commons.
I want to advice you to PLEASE read Commons:Licensing! Many of your uploads are not public domain. Please ask for advice before you want to upload images from websites, if you are not sure if they are really OK. As you can see on your userpage, many of your uploads have been deleted. So PLEASE, save us all the work of checking your images, by asking first, on Commons:Help desk or Commons_talk:Licensing.
Thank you.
Fred J 16:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Sockpuppet
Checkuser evidence has confirmed that Poirot is a sockpuppet of yours. Since you have only created this account to upload copyright violations, I have indefinitely blocked that account.
Hereby your very last warning: In case you misuse this or any other account to upload images that are not allowed here, this account will also be blocked for a long period. In case you need advise on whether an image is allowed here, ask on Commons:Help desk before uploading! -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Image:Adolf Eichmann.jpg
The Adolf Eichmann trial in 1961 is not 50 years ago. The image you uploaded was instantly deleted. Thuresson 14:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
German Nazi images
Stop uploading German Nazi images. They're copyrighted in germany and in many other countries. These images from the USHMM or the NARA have special status in the U.S., but they're generally not in the public domain in other countries. The cCommons does not accept such images. Lupo 20:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Re:Deletion requests
Sure, I'll take a look when I get back later today. If they haven't been open long they probably won't get closed, but any older ones or ones with consensus or clear results I will take care of. Take care! -- Editor at Large • talk 13:08, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Ethiopia 1987-1991.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Ethiopia 1987-1991.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. __ ABF __ 13:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Hitler Goverment
It is a photo made anyway by unknown photographer in 1933. Anyway it is suited to {{Anonymous-EU}} ( 70 y from publishing) Best regards:
Andros64 07:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
That was wrong. --Polarlys 14:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- For what reason why ? Your private opinion is not a court decision.
Andros64 03:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Copying an image from the web without suitable information on the author doesn’t make a photo an „anonymous work“. You have to prove that the author never claimed authorship. For pictures by German Photographers: The image is in the public domain, 70 years after the author’s death. --Polarlys 11:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Croatia-Tomislav.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Polarlys 14:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
SFRY images
Just because the SFRY doesn't exist anymore, that doesn't mean the copyrights had vanished. In fact, the successor states (including Croatia) all started out with the SFRY copyright law, and then wrote their own laws. As far as I know, all successor states also deposited formal declarations of succession with the UNESCO (for the UCC) or the WIPO (for the Berne Convention). Lupo 21:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:MKrleza.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Polarlys 22:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:VNazor.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Polarlys 22:29, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
„en.wikipedia.org“ …
is no source for images. --Polarlys 10:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Mao Zedong frame.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
--EugeneZelenko 14:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Albright_Jong-il.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Albright_Jong-il.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. EugeneZelenko 14:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
copyright violation
Hello Edgar Allan Poe,
You have uploaded several images that are copyright violations and you have done so despite our requests not to do so, and despite our instructions. If you do not stop uploading pictures that are not free, your account will be blocked. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on the Wikimedia Commons. Please do leave me a message if you have further questions. --Polarlys 14:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Albright Jong-il.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Lupo 17:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Hafez-al-assad-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
— Jeff G. 15:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:StreicherDarkerSharpHLSL.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:StreicherDarkerSharpHLSL.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. EugeneZelenko 14:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Crossed the line: blocked
The reason for the block is available in the block log. The administrator listed there in the block log can give you further information.
See also the contributions of this user or the Upload log in order to find out why this user has been blocked.
Despite multiple warnings over a long period of time, you have continued to upload images without or with dubious source information. You have been blocked from editting and uploading for 1 month. This matter has been discussed on various talk pages and noticeboards, and the Commons administrators agree that a block is appropriate. You may return to Commons after you block has expired on the condition that you have read and understood Commons:Licensing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Edgar_Allan_Poe. Sorry, but enough is enough. You have not been blocked for one specific image, but in the last few weeks/months you have only uploaded images with dubious copyright claim. I will inform the other administrators that you find your block inappropriate. -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Look at your talk page and your upload log. A whole batch of recent uploaded images have been deleted or requested for deletion. You have just been putting up templates on images, even if those templates say please provide proof that... without actually providing this proof. We have long tolerated this, but we will not tolerate this any longer. -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Nasser_people.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nasser_people.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yuval Y § Chat § 16:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Pay attention - your link is broken. Besides, are you sure that the Flickr user don't have copyrights on an image he've uploaded? Yuval Y § Chat § 16:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Crossed the line again: blocked
The reason for the block is available in the block log. The administrator listed there in the block log can give you further information.
See also the contributions of this user or the Upload log in order to find out why this user has been blocked.
Shortly after your last block expired, you startet to upload many copyvios again. What do you think, are these flickr users copyright owners of these historical photographs from Honecker, Goebbels, Petain, Gorbachev? …? No, they are obviously not. Uploding a copyvio on flickr under a free license doesn’t make it a free work (Just as an addition: a lot of these copyvios weren’t even licensed under Commons compatible licenses, but CC-ND, CC-NC and so on.) Regarding Yugoslavia:
- “Just because the SFRY doesn't exist anymore, that doesn't mean the copyrights had vanished. In fact, the successor states (including Croatia) all started out with the SFRY copyright law, and then wrote their own laws. As far as I know, all successor states also deposited formal declarations of succession with the UNESCO (for the UCC) or the WIPO (for the Berne Convention).” – Lupo (several times)
--Polarlys 20:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Extended for 6 months for sockpuppetry of the same thing [2]. Please stop. giggy (:O) 01:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Himmler 1941.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Himmler 1941.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Aaron Kosminski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
(fixed request) --Deadstar 13:29, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Schartz1888.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Deadstar 10:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Death_of_Roland.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Death_of_Roland.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 13:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:05magdalenobatista.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Thialfi 13:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:F.G.Abberline.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-DrKiernan (talk) 11:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
File:In_Grey.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
sугсго 18:27, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
File:Andropov_Head_on_Lubyanka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Andropov_on_Lubyanka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 11:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Hrušćov1.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Flag of the Israel (bordered).PNG was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Tojo3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
File:PICT4134.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cezarika1 (talk) 08:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Flag_of_Serbia_(1882-1918).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Buttons (talk) 04:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
This map contains really many fatal errors. 1. In 1939 Karelia, Petsamo and another chunk of land were Finnish. Here you presented Finnish-Soviet boundary as it is today. 2. Bessarabia was Romanian in 1939 (here it is Russian) 3. Dobruja was Romanian in 1939, here it is Bulgarian 4. The boundary between Hungary and Slovakia was quite different in 1939. Here it is the present one 5. Poland's boundaries were TOTALLY different in 1939: you cut off the entire eastern part of Poland (Poland bordered both Latvia and Romania in 1939) and you cut off Poland of the Baltic coast there where it really touched it - west of what is marked.
Please, consult a detailed map of Europe in 1939 and correct the above errors.
Regards, 212.130.49.218 06:37, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Gorge_Improvisation.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
sугсго 07:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Edgar Allan Poe, a lot of the images on your userpage have been deleted. Are you aware of it? Btw, are you related to the Maryland attorney general ? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 08:54, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Moscow I..JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:34, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Alkoholijada.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, INeverCry 20:11, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
File:LocationThirdReich.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
SFfmL (talk) 21:18, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
File:LocationNaziGermany.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
DrKiernan (talk) 19:50, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Dmitri1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Liliana-60 (talk) 17:16, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Bazar u Tashkentu.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bobyrr (talk) 15:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely Fæ (talk) 18:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
File:1Notorious start.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 18:54, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:3Men Notorious.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 18:56, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Z The End Notorious.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 18:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Alfred Hitchcock cameo (1946) Notorious 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:02, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Alfred Hitchcock cameo (1946) Notorious 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Notorious Hitchcock cameo part 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Notorious Hitchcock cameo part 10.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:39, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Notorious Hitchcock cameo part 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:41, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Notorious Hitchcock cameo part 3.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Notorious Hitchcock cameo part 5.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Notorious Hitchcock cameo part 7.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Notorious Hitchcock cameo part 8.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Notorious Hitchcock cameo part 9.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Grant Bergman (Notorious).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Door Notorious.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Notorious Trailer.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WFinch (talk) 19:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello!
Thank you for uploading File:Provincial Boundaries in Cambodia.svg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992-1998) bordered.png
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992-1998) bordered.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992-1998) bordered.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
File:ABCDE.jpg was recently deleted
File:ABCDE.jpg was recently deleted by Túrelio for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: Copyright violation: Kopien von Imdb
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 17:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Flag of the Vatican City (bordered).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |