User talk:Giggette

Archives Archivo1 Archivo2

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Giggette.

This is the user talk page of Giggette, where you can send messages and comments to Giggette.

• Be polite.
• Be friendly.
• Assume good faith.
• No personal attacks.

• Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
• Put new text under old text.
• New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
• Click here to start a new topic.

El imagen (la mapa) de Hispanoamerica

Hola, te escribo porque creo que la mapa de Hispanoamerica (tu obra) no es corecta. Me refiero de Canada. He mirada la fuente de Canada y me parece, que comprediste mal lo que se escribe allá. En página 4 hay "Más del 45% del total de la población hispana reside en la provincia de Ontario, otro 24% en la de Quebec y 13% en la Columbia Británica, lo que suma casi 83% del total de latinos concentrados solo en estas tres provincias." Pero estas procentajes coresponden al porcion de la poblacion latina, no la total. Es decir en Caanda hay 741 761 personas de origen latino. Eso responde a 2,4 % de poblacion total. De estos 741 mil viven 45% en Ontario (178 mil personas). Espero que hayas comprendido lo que estoy argumentando y que corrigirás el dibujo. Saludos --Unpocoloco (talk) 10:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Entiendo, pero en Ontario no viven 178 mil personas, en Québec si 178,625 mil hispanoparlantes, pero quizás te refieres a que en Ontario viven 337,650 mil hispanoparlantes, y la ecuación difiere al total de la población de Canadá y no con el total de la población de cada entidad canadiense.--Giggette (talk) 23:59, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Población hispana en Canadá por provincia 2006
Provincia	Población total	% de la población del país	Hispanos	% de la población de hispanos
Newfoundland y Labrador	500,610	1.60	1,955	0.26
Prince Edward Island	134,205	0.43	670	0.09
Nova Scotia	903,090	2.89	5,860	0.79
New Brunswick	719,650	2.30	3,385	0.46
Quebec	7,435,905	23.80	178,625	24.08
Ontario	12,028,895	38.50	337,650	45.52
Manitoba	1,133,515	3.63	34,450	4.64
Saskatchewan	953,850	3.05	7,160	0.97
Alberta	3,256,355	10.42	72,455	9.77
British Columbia	4,074,385	13.04	98,685	13.30
Yukon Territory	30,195	0.10	435	0.06
Northwest Territories	41,055	0.13	350	0.05
Nunavut	29,325	0.09	75	0.01
Totales	31,241,030	100%	741,760	100%

Tabla extraída. --Giggette (talk) 20:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Muchas gracias, me confundí Quebec con Ontario, lo siento, pero ahora todo está correcto. Hasta luego. --Unpocoloco (talk) 05:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Aztec map

I see you still resist starting a discussion on the talkpage. Instead, I'm starting it here. Looking at those maps, there's obviously far more difference than simply "dominance" between two areas. There's a different shape to the entire empire. What is the cause of the differences between the maps? Chipmunkdavis (talk) 18:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, well, first I did not still resist starting a discussion on the talkpage because this discussion started here weeks ago, and not only on the talkpage of this map, and it was finally closed there and on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, and yes the only differente of these maps is the dominance between two areas, that's all. Both maps have sources but some more reliable sources than others, only the Wikipedias should choose to use for the articles. And this map was firstly created than the other. --Giggette (talk) 01:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

I've shifted your response here, so I can follow the thread of conversation. A discussion on the file talkpage is different from the template talkpage. Looking at the maps, it's quite clear that the colouring in of territory between Teozapotlan and Xoconochco is not the only difference. The maps look very different. Why? Chipmunkdavis (talk) 18:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Supposedly it is the only difference, the map was created basing from the following sources.

1.- [1] by the Department of History by Ian Mladjov, University of Michigan.

2.- Aztec Warfare: Imperial Expansion and Political Control by Ross Hassig, University of Oklahoma Press, according a user with his map on COMMONS in use

3.- [2] Encyclopædia Britannica 1994

4.- As such more sources [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]

The template must have the two versions without distinction. --Giggette (talk) 19:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

No, it's wrong : Gengiskanhg, the author of the original map never quoted these sources. And Maunus said that there is no such map in Ross Hassig's Aztec Warfare. El Comandante (talk) 19:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Maunus said to be the author and his map was created by Ross hassig's Aztec Warfare here. --Giggette (talk) 19:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

No, it's wrong and you know it. Maunus said that he made an original research compiling various maps of journeys of Aztec armies from Ross Hassig's Aztec Warfare, which contains no map of the Aztec Empire. Also, Maunus said that he recommends the use of Yavidaxiu's map. El Comandante (talk) 19:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Look, this map File:Aztec Empire ME (orthographic projection).svg was created according by existing maps on COMMONS and in use as Maunus's map but I wanted to add references that's why I asked to the authors and Maunus accepted to be the author based by Ross Hassigs book Aztec Warfare. I'm not wrong and of course I'm not lying [12].--Giggette (talk) 19:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

And of course you know that when I saw that Maunus pretended that his map was based on Aztec Warfare, I asked him what was the exact page of the map that he used, and then he admitted there was no map of the Aztec Empire in Aztec Warfare and that he compiled various maps with absolutely no direct link with the Aztec Empire, just maps of different journeys of Aztec armies. And where an imperial army passes, it's not always considered as a territory depent on an Empire, if there is no treaty establishing such a relation of tributary or client state. That's why these territories are NOT included in the Aztec Empire by true specialists such as Michael E. Smith, Frances Berdan, Michael Coe, Leonardo López Luján and all the scholars peer-reviewing Arqueología Mexicana. El Comandante (talk) 19:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

You repeat the same over and over again, probably these territories are NOT included by "true" specialists but others editors YES include these territories, where an imperial army passes, that's why both maps must be in the template. Furthermore we can see these territories with others maps in use "File:Aztecempirelocation.png" or "File:Aztecexpansion.png". --Giggette (talk) 19:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Just a bunch of maps made by unknown authors or not mesoamericanists. You are NOT able to quote a single specialized source to support your map, while Sémhur's is supported by a lot of very famous specialists. What else? El Comandante (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

---

I can explain : the map that Giggette wants to impose everywhere is based on this Gengiskanhg map, itself based on no identifiable source, and more or less supported by another map by Maunus, which is an unreliable original research, as Maunus admitted it, compiling various maps of journeys of Aztec armies from Ross Hassig's Aztec Warfare. Instead, the map created by Sémhur is based on this map created by Yavidaxiu and based on a special issue of the very specialized and renowed mesoamericanist review Arqueología Mexicana published by mexican archaeological authorities, and also supported by recent and specialized sources such as the worldwide famous book The Aztecs by Michael E. Smith, which provides full explanations about the name and type of dependency of each tributary or client state (primary sources supporting this map originally created by Frances Berdan can be read in her book Aztec Imperial Strategies). It is VERY clear that Giggette's map, which is NOT supported by Ross Hassig's Aztec Warfare (as Maunus conceded it), and is therefore only supported by non specialized sources, is VERY LESS reliable than Sémhur's, as Maunus himself said. But she doesn't want to accept these facts, probably because she's a mexican nationalist wanting to glorify Aztec empire exagerating its power. El Comandante (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the summary El Comandante. I have however seen maps showing an extended contiguous Aztec Empire offline, in museums and such. Has the research developed recently? Chipmunkdavis (talk) 22:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

The first very detailed map I know is the famous one by Robert H. Barlow in 1949, revised by Frances Berdan in 1996, and then by Michael E. Smith in 2013. It's true that older maps relying upon a vague methodology like Giggette's are still commonly used by unskilled people ; maybe sometimes it is possible that some people supposed to be specialists of Mesoamerica ignore that subject or accept a too less scientific approach for popularization medias (see for example Eduardo Matos Moctezuma using an incorrect Commons file for a TV show, not including Cozumel in Mesoamerica)... El Comandante (talk) 23:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Disputes

So Giggette, you have no explanation for the other differences? For example, why is Teotitlan from Maunus' map included in the empire on your map? Chipmunkdavis (talk) 22:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes I already saw that Maunus' map doesn't include Teotitlan as part of the Empire but yes Encyclopædia Britannica's map. --Giggette (talk) 18:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

But what is the reason for the difference? Chipmunkdavis (talk) 20:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Well, Teotitlan as others areas are where the aztec imperial army passes and some authors not always considered these areas as territories depend of the Aztec Empire. I think these areas should be included in a single map of the Aztec Empire with light green, and not to discriminate authors who include them, that's my opinion. --Giggette (talk) 22:54, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Are you able to rework your map to show the areas that are light green then? Chipmunkdavis (talk) 23:03, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes sure I can changed it, but "my map" is not exactly my map because I reuploaded it when I noticed that it was replaced by El Comandante's request [13] from French Wikipedia, and now the original map or "my reuploaded map" is not longer in use as originally, only this replaced map without pior consensus before "update", that's my disagreement or dispute with El Comandante on COMMONS 1, 2, 3, 4 and finally [14] and he can't understand that he must have uploaded another file with its sources and have consensus on wikis to change it and don't commit edit war, although El Comandante was blocked by insult me many times (personal attacks) he stills as you can see, just tired of arguing. --Giggette (talk) 23:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Well if you change it, then we have two clear maps and everyone wins. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

File correction

Given the minor nature of this I figured I would simply discuss it here instead of on the file's discussion page. On the file Spanish speakers in the Americas (orthographic projection) the numbers are all given using a decimal "." point with the exception of Belize which uses a "," comma. I thought it would be a simple fix for the next time you update the file. Regards Coinmanj (talk) 08:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Viceroyalty of New Spain 1819 (without Philippines).png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Viceroyalty of New Spain 1819 (without Philippines).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 17:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Nahuatl in Mexico.svg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nahuatl in Mexico.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--El Comandante (talk) 16:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Official Spanish language in the World.svg

File:Official Spanish language in the World.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Permiso para usar contenido?

Hola, soy Nuevo, y por mas que leo, no me queda totalmente claro como debo pedirte permiso para usar varias de tus creaciones, que informacion debo proporcionarte, etc. Si me pudieras orientar te lo agradeceria. --Omar10594 (talk) 23:28, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Si, entiendo lo de saber ingles, cuando mire el autor de las imagines que queria usar, (que segun yo, eres tu, aunque el nombre es diferente, al darle click al nombre (Eddo) me manda a ti) habla español, pues mas facil (para mi) escribir en mi idioma. Lo de firmar, muy cierto, es casi lo primero que se ve al entrar a tu pagina, y se me olvido por completo, lo recordare. Ahora bien, respecto a las imagines que quiero usar, como lo comente antes, el autor aparece como Eddo, pero al darle click me manda a tu pagina, entonces tenia la duda de si eras tu el autor. Las imagines son: Tlaloc.svg y Mayahuel.svg, ambas tienen la misma licencia (Tambien planeamos usar Xochiquetzal V.png pero esta tiene una licencia de dominio publico asi que no creo que haya problema, aun asi se incluira el nombre de autor en las imagenes que se usaran), y basicamente dicen que debo hacer atribucion al autor, de la manera especificada por el, osea, que debo preguntar la manera "Especifica" al autor, por eso me vi en la tarea de buscarlo y preguntarle y por eso comente en tu pagina, pues creo que eres el autor. La imagen seria para unas cervezas artesanales, se quieren poner en las botellas (Una etiqueta con la imagen) para su venta, las imagenes no serian modificadas en lo mas minimo, simplemente se tiene un cierto espacio para ponerlas, por lo que no saldrian "completas", el tipo de atribucion que se piensa hacer, es el nombre que especifique el autor, en la misma botella, y en el sitio web, se pondria informacion mas completa (si es necesario), sobre el autor. No estoy seguro si esta es lo forma correcta de responder en tu pagina, pero mirando otros comentario, debo suponer que si, de antemano gracias, realmente esperaba que tardaras en responder por la fecha de tu ultimo comentario en tu pagina. Nose si sea el navegador o la pagina, pero algunas palabras me las "corrige", pero eso a lo major encuentras unas palabras "raras". Omar10594 (talk) 03:16, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

a ok, entonces si uso esas imagines fuera de Commons, no ocupo poner creditos, aun asi pondre una pequeña referencia. Gracias por todo, leere un poco mas de Wikimedia Commons para entenderle mejor, :D. Gracias por todo Omar10594 (talk) 06:40, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Joaquín Velázquez de León

Hi Giggette, I found one of your files (Joaquín Velázquez de León.jpg) but I don't understand your description of it. According to you, it's self-portrait by Joaquín Velázquez de León, but then you specify that the author is "Ramón P. Cantó". In addition, the dates seem to be wrong. Clearly, it was not made on 8 October 2010, and Joaquín Velázquez de León did not live from 1870 to 1907 (he lived from 1803 to 1882). I found the same lithograph in a book published in 1885, but it doesn't mention who is the author nor its date of creation, so I would like to know if you could verify the information you provided. Thank you! --José Gnudista (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Viceroyalty of the New Spain 1800 (without Philippines).png

File:Viceroyalty of the New Spain 1800 (without Philippines).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WCCasey (talk) 06:42, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Viceroyalty of the New Spain 1819 (without Philippines).png

File:Viceroyalty of the New Spain 1819 (without Philippines).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WCCasey (talk) 06:42, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Spanish Caribbean Islands in the American Viceroyalties 1600.png

File:Spanish Caribbean Islands in the American Viceroyalties 1600.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WCCasey (talk) 06:43, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Mexico Gay flag.svg

File:Mexico Gay flag.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Workadded (talk) 05:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Preguntas Sobre El Origen de Varios Diseños Tuyos

Lunes 28 de Marzo de 2016 Oaxaca de juarez

Hola Giggette estoy comenzando este hljo por que quisiera que me dieras cierta informacion sobre escudos que tu realizaste Antes que nada agradecerte por contribuir a wikipedia con recursos gráficos tan puntuales y necesarios bueno mi pregunta es la siguiente ¿en que documentos o imágenes te basaste cuando dibujaste los siguientes escudos?

- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5e/Coat_of_arms_of_Nueva_Extremadura.svg

- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/Coat_of_arms_of_Nuevo_Santander.svg

- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/00/Coat_of_arms_of_the_New_Kingdom_of_León.svg

Lo que pasa es que nunca los había visto y no los eh encontrado fuera de Wikipedia por ejemplo el Escudo del Nuevo Reyno de Leon lo eh visto en imágenes pero solo como un león morado y arriba de el una corona sin los adornos de los márgenes y los escudos de Nueva Santander y Nueva Extremadura nunca los eh visto. Te pregunto principalmente para saber en que época los usaron quien los concedio quien los diseño y en que los usaban ya que eh investigado y no eh encontrado nada sobre estos escudos

Soy muy entusiasta acerca de la historia heraldica de Nueva España y pues nada espero tu respuesta

Gracias de AntemanoAlonsoQuijano16 (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)AlonsoQuijano16

Subscribo lo susodicho. Por favor, es necesario aportar las fuentes de los escudos. Gracias. --Parair (talk) 11:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Manuel Ávila Camacho, portrait.jpg

File:Manuel Ávila Camacho, portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 23:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Aztec Territorial Organization map

Hi,

Can you provide some sources for your depiction of the borders and peoples in File:Territorial Organization of the Aztec Empire 1519.png? I'm especially interested in your referring to the Colima, Tonallan and Xalisco areas as "kingdoms".

You seem to have used the 'Secretary of Public Education of Mexico' as a source, but your only link seems to be broken, as it leads to the main page of Biblioteca.tv. I like your map, and especially the work you put into it, but I'd really like to know the sources you used to make it. Thanks! --TangoFett (talk) 01:52, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Prte Lázaro Cárdenas.jpg

File:Prte Lázaro Cárdenas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:20, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Slight inaccuracy in Viceroyalty of the New Spain 1800 (without Philippines).png

The map marks the borders of the then-current United States. However, it shows West Virginia as its own state in 1800. West Virginia did not split from Virginia until after the onset of the U.S. Civil War. The two states should be combined into one single state, as was still the situation in 1800. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BKITU (talk • contribs) 15:55, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Author of File:Xipetotec V.png

Hello,

Who is the author of this media / reproduction? Is it you?

Best,

--AntonierCH ^(d) 18:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Image of Xochiquetzal

Excellent work! File:Xochiquetzal_V.png Do you happen to have a SVG or higher resolution PNG you wouldn't mind uploading? Thanks for sharing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrownstoneKnockn (talk • contribs) 15:59, 15 September 2019 (UTC) BrownstoneKnockn (talk) 16:00, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of Nuevo Santander.svg

File:Coat of arms of Nuevo Santander.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HansenBCN (talk) 10:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of Nueva Extremadura.svg

File:Coat of arms of Nueva Extremadura.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HansenBCN (talk) 10:49, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of the New Kingdom of León.svg

File:Coat of arms of the New Kingdom of León.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HansenBCN (talk) 10:49, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Aztec Tributary Provinces on the Imperial Fronterier 1519

Hola. Quisiera conocer la bibliografía que consultaste para la elaboración de este mapa. Es muy detallado hacia el norte, pero no así hacia el sur. Por supuesto que sobrepasa el objetivo explícito del mapa, el cual, de acuerdo con el título sería de indicar las provincias tributarias de la Triple Alianza.

Saludos,

r — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 137.205.238.103 (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sun_symbol_yellow.svg

Hi gigette

My name is Lasse and I would be very grateful, if I could use your sun symbol image on the cover of my collection of poems. It's danish title is Solsange, which something like Songs of the sun. I would of course attribute it to you in the colophon in any way you like.

Would that be okay?

Best Regards Lasse Reinhardt

Ps you can see the cover here: hhttps://photos.google.com/search/_tra_/photo/AF1QipNkaQ8DkpEZTkI0DujqgAhwZEThui0ZQz9s7vJb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lassemr (talk • contribs) 11:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

New Guanajuato state flag (official)

There is a new official design for the flag since 20 December 2023.

The Spanish article has even changed https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandera_de_Guanajuato, but I can't modify this file File:Flag of Guanajuato.svg. Many articles are linked to this outdated file. Aleqc (talk) 21:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Mexico 1824.png Map

Hello - We'd like to use your Mexico 1824 (equirectangular projection).png graphic in a video we're creating about Latin American music. We will not be able to agree to the Creative Commons ShareAlike license, but we can provide an attribution. I'd be grateful if we could discuss permission for this. SHCullen (talk) 17:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

File tagging File:Tezcatlipoca V.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tezcatlipoca V.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tezcatlipoca V.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Yann (talk) 11:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Tezcatlipoca V.png

File:Tezcatlipoca V.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 12:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)