User talk:Drdoht/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Franz Oppenheim

Gib mir doch mal kurz eine Erklärung, warum Du den Oppenheim hier raus genommen hast (Gedenktafel Königstr 4B (Wanns) Villenkolonie Alsen.jpg, Gedenktafel Am Großen Wannsee 58 (Wanns) Wannsee-Institut.jpg, Gedenktafel Am Großen Wannsee 58 (Wanns) Villen am Wannsee.jpg)?

Gruß OTFW (talk) 14:46, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Franz Oppenheim starb 1929. Zu seinen Bildern ist ein Grabstein und die Villa zu seiner Zeit ok. z.B. Gedenktafel Am Großen Wannsee 58 (Wanns) Franz Oppenheim.jpg
- bei Gedenktafel Am Großen Wannsee 58 (Wanns) Friedhof Lindenstraße2.jpg ist schon fast zu viel fremde Information enthalten.
- nix mit Oppenheim zu tun hat Gedenktafel Am Großen Wannsee 58 (Wanns) Villen am Wannsee.jpg
- überhaupt nix für die "Nachnutzung" seiner Villa durch die Nazis kann der Oppenheim bei Gedenktafel Am Großen Wannsee 58 (Wanns) Wannsee-Institut.jpg
-- dito Gedenktafel Königstr 4B (Wanns) Villenkolonie Alsen.jpg
ganz allgemein, die Bilder von Dir enthalten "zu viel Information PLUS zu klein dargestellt" im Bild, das liegt aber am Grafiker der Folien. Kannst Du nicht mit Grafikprogramm filetieren? Es ist dort zu viel Text enthalten.
also wegen der Villa Oppenheim, da würde ich es so machen wie bei z.B. Villa Dykerhoff, Villa Kalle, Villa Bosch, Villa Albert (p.s. die kannten sich alle untereinander). Eigene Kategorie "Villa Oppenheim" nur mit den Villendateien füllen und diese Kategorie mit dem Eigentümer verknüpfen. Dann sähe der Ordner Franz Oppenheim wieder "menschlich" aus. mfg --Drdoht (talk) 14:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Your category creations

I'm tired of fixing your categories since you refuse to listen to the instructions that were provided to you. If you keep it up, I will propose a topic ban. Regards, - Bossanoven (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Are these Mercks part of Category:Merck family, or are they a separate family? - Bossanoven (talk) 15:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

I fixed the Merck family. I understand what you were trying to do, but unfortunately, we do not categorize families in that way. If you think this policy is a bad one, you can bring it up for discussion. You can talk about it in German as there are administrators on the Commons who speak German. - Bossanoven (talk) 16:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

It is difficult to understand today the connections between former important persons named Merck. The only origin was in Hammelburg or Schweinfurt (north of Würzburg), possibly Johann Merck (1573–1642). From there grew two lines: 1) the very important line at Darmstadt (south of Frankfurt a. M.) with pharmacists and chemists. - 2) small line at Hamburg (500 km north of Frankfurt) with politicians and businessmen. Two coats of arms are shown here at wikipedia [1] and [2]. 3) Little is known about a Munich line.
After world war I the "Darmstadt line" was divided into the American Merck and the German Merck. - since 1918 up to now there are two different and independent companies.
if you look at the english side "merck family" all seems to be unimportant and easy. But the german side shows the real problems of genealogy.
Since 2015 the german company "Merck Darmstadt" became a very very important global player. I am searching in old german chemical literature about Mercks (ca 1800-1950).
Up to now there had been many Merck persons with first name Georg, George, Louis, Willy, Carl, Karl ... The 13th generation of Merck is born >=2002. Simply sorting by first name is not helpfull if not confusing. Let's go two ways, one sorting by first name and additional by origin. --Drdoht (talk) 05:46, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

You're still forgetting some essential things with these, namely the Category:People by name and DEFAULTSORT. Please learn how to do this, or I will propose a topic ban. Just check my recent edits to your categories to see the difference. - Bossanoven (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

ok, propose a topic ban and it's your turn to sort pictures out off the crowd of unsorted pictures. First job for you: there are thousend pics at "Chemists from the United Staates". I have not the time to learn anything and not the time to check and write birth and death dates. By the way whats your profession? Chemist, physicist or controller? --Drdoht (talk) 04:07, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
I deal mostly with existing pictures at commons and sort them acc. to the field of science. Why are they until now not "sorted by name"????

Because you fail to put the DEFAULTSORT template in when you create your categories. You need to learn how to do this before you make any new categories. Just look at the code on the pages by pretending to edit one of them. - Bossanoven (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

By the way, please do not abbreviate senior as sen. in category titles. Sen. is a common English abbreviation for Senator. - Bossanoven (talk) 04:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Great stuff :)

Just a note to say that I really like what you did here with your notes :) . I'm doing much the same on some other group photos of scientists. -- Deadstar (msg) 11:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Österreich Volkstrauertag 12g 25071937-8.jpg

File:Österreich Volkstrauertag 12g 25071937-8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 14:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Bayer Tafel

Moin! Zur Info: Bitte keine edit wars mehr auf Commons! Trotziges hin- und her-verschieben hilft keinem weiter sondern schadet nur. Es gibt kein mein Bild auf Commons, die Lizenzen sind nicht widerrufbar. Einmal hochgeladen gehoert das Bild allen und jedem. Zwist bitte auf Euren Diskussionsseiten austragen oder einfach mal jemanden Fragen, der sich damit auskennt: Village pump. Weitere wilde reverts werden mit Urlaub vom editieren belohnt (Zugang wird gesperrt). Also bitte: zivil und sachlich ausdiskutieren. Besten dank und ein guts Nächtle! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Hans Finkelstein ca. 1922.jpg

File:Hans Finkelstein ca. 1922.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rollingcontributor (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Upcoming Wiki Science Competition

Hi, I am contacting all active commons users I can find more interested in the management of pictures related to scientific or technical topics. If you have time, could you take a look in Commons:Village_pump#Upcoming_Wiki_Science_Competition. Thank you. If were already informed, sorry to bother you.--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

File:66dscf0830-NORDKAPP2.jpg

Hello. I’m curious about this file. You uploaded it in 2012 as your own work but a Tineye search suggests it has been on the internet since 2008. Some those links are inaccessible but an example is flickr.com/photos/moonbath/3751202755/in/album-72157612189671455/, which was uploaded to Flickr in 2009. Is this really your own work? Cheers. Green Giant (talk) 10:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your advise. My version "10:24, 2. Aug. 2012" was taken with my camera at the "Nordkapp Museet" (shop for tourists). We had been there with a cruise line ship (AIDA MAR). Meanwhile my picture has been replaced by Jindory1618 in 2016.
version 2012 is my work, version 2016 isn't my work. --Drdoht (talk) 12:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation. Are you saying that you took a photo of a photo? Green Giant (talk) 12:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I took a photo from the picture at the wall (ca. 1,5 x 3 m). --Drdoht (talk) 12:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Ah, I’m afraid that is a small problem. The only person who can license that image is the person who took the original photo, unless the photo is in the public domain. I’m going to have to delete it because it violates our licensing policy. If there any other similar files, please let me know. Cheers. Green Giant (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Koordinatenänderung

Hallo, du hast bei meinem Bild Würzburg, Röntgen-Gedächtnisstätte, 19.jpeg die Koordinaten der Kameraposition ({{Location}} so geändert, dass sie innerhalb des Gebäudes liegen. Dort hätte ich die Aufnahme nicht machen können. Hast du einen bestimmten Grund, meine Koordinaten anzuzweifeln? (Wenn du mir antworten willst, gerne hier mit {{ReplyTo|Renardo la vulpo}}.) -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 12:39, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, dein Reply-Link funktioniert nicht. Die Koordinaten der Kameraposition sind (bei mir im Google earth-Bild) genau an der Hausecke und nicht im Gebäude. Deine Daten hatte ich natürlich nicht angezweifelt, sondern nur weiter präzisiert, auch im Maßstab. Sehr ähnliche Bilder in dieser Kategorie habe ich mit den gleichen Koordinaten versehen. mfg --Drdoht (talk) 13:57, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Danke für die rasche Antwort. Erst mal muss ich ein Missverständnis aufklären: Das ist kein „Reply-Link“, sondern wenn du den Text einschließlich der Klammern in deine Antwort kopiert hättest, wäre ich automatisch benachrichtigt worden. Sonst wird man ja nur bei Änderungen auf seiner eigenen Diskussionsseite benachrichtigt.
Dass die neuen Koordinaten an der Hausecke liegen, ist ja gut und schön, aber man sieht auf dem Bild, dass ich mindestens acht Meter entfernt gestanden habe, und wenn du die Koordinaten auf hundertmillionstel Grad (also ungefähr auf den Millimeter) genau angibst, macht das einen Unterschied. (Ich halte solche Genauigkeiten für praktisch unerreichbar und gebe daher nur Zehntelsekunden an.) {{Location}} ist nun mal die Kameraposition und nicht die Objektposition (dafür gibt es {{Object location}}). Daher kann man ja auch die Kamerarichtung angeben. die du allerdings gelöscht hast.
Wenn es dir nur um dieses eine Bild geht, soll es mir egal sein. Aber wenn du diese Grundsätze, die meiner Meinung nach bisher anders gehandhabt werden, auch auf andere Bilder anwenden willst, wäre es meiner Meinung nach gut, zuerst eine Diskussion darüber anzustoßen.
Grüße, -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 16:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Die Städtische Wessenberg-Galerie bereitet eine Ausstellung über August Deusser vor. In diesem Zusammenhang interessieren wir uns auch für seine Schwiegermutter Antonie Albert. Sie haben einen sehr kompetenten Wikipeadia-Eintrag über Antonie Albert verfasst. Gern wüssten wir, woher Sie insbesondere die Informationen zu ihrer Kunstsammlung haben. Über eine Kontaktaufnahme würden wir uns sehr freuen!

Städtische Wessenberg-Galerie Konstanz Dr. Barbara Stark -- Mos Brugger 11:01, 7 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mos Brugger (talk • contribs) 09:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:WP Adolf Eichmann 1942.jpg

File:WP Adolf Eichmann 1942.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Diannaa (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Omega-process2.png

File:Omega-process2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:18, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Omega-process.jpg

File:Omega-process.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Atelier_Hermann_Sell_ca.1890.jpg

moin @Drdoht: , die Beschriftung des Foto wirft Fragen auf. Geht man davon aus, dass das Datum stimmt (die Kleidung passt zu 1890), dann ist es unwahrscheinlich, dass es das Atelier Hermann Selle ist, denn das wurde zu dem Zeitpunkt vom Bruder Paul alleine geführt. Auf dem Foto stehen aber zwei Fotografen quasi gleichberechtigt nebeneinander. Es ist also wahrscheinlicher, dass das Foto das Atelier Selle & Kuntze zeigt, zumal das Alter der abgebildeten Fotografen auch zu Ihnen passt. Paul Selle war deutlich älter.
https://www.fotografenwiki.org/index.php/Gustav_Adolf_Selle
https://www.fotografenwiki.org/index.php/Paul_Selle
Es ist löblich, dass du das Foto "gesichert" hast, denn es ist jetzt schon nur noch in kleinem Format im Internet zu sehen. --Hofmarschall (talk) 23:16, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

moin moin Hr@Hofmarschall: , die Beschriftung entspricht dem unter Quelle angegebenen Link: "Paul Selle, Im Atelier des Hofphotographen Hermann Selle, um 1890 © Margitta Wierzoch". Es ist allgemein üblich, dass eingetragene Firmennamen wie "Atelier Hermann Selle" nach dem Tod des Inhabers unter gleichem Namen weitergeführt werden. Nach heutiger Rechtslage würde man es dann weiterführen unter dem Namen "Atelier Paul Selle vormals Hermann Selle". Auch "Atelier Hermann Selle Nachf." wäre zulässig gewesen [3].
Im Jahr ca. 1890 wäre Paul Selle 50 Jahre alt gewesen. Ob im Bild ein anderes Atelier Selle & Kuntze gezeigt ist entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis.
Nach Prüfung Ihrer Links kommt mir die Idee, es könnte sich im Bild um Ernst Eichgrün (1858–1925) neben Paul Selle (1841–1906) handeln; Eichgrün verließ 1899 das Atelier Hermann Selle. mfg --Drdoht (talk) 17:08, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Ich verstehe jetzt Ihre Frage! bei Fotografenwiki hat jemand das Bild "Atelier Hermann Selle" aus den Commons übernommen und mit einer eigenen Unterschrift versehen. Also soooo geht's nicht! mfg --Drdoht (talk) 00:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Obwohl ich damit angefangen habe, bringen Spekulationen nichts. Solange man keine anderen Informationen hat, muss man sich an die Beschriftung halten. Und selbst wenn die Beschriftung korrekt ist, weiß man immer noch nicht, wie Paul Selle aussieht. Das ist schade, weil es von Fotografen des 19. Jahrhunderts paradoxer Weise wenig Fotos gibt. --Hofmarschall (talk) 12:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Ludwig ferdinand wilhelmy.jpeg

File:Ludwig ferdinand wilhelmy.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mayyskiyysergeyy (talk) 22:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)-- renamed into "File:George Vernon Harcourt.jpg"

File:100Neuseeland-Dollar vorderseite 21585256953 02d6c65788 o.jpg

File:100Neuseeland-Dollar vorderseite 21585256953 02d6c65788 o.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-- Geagea (talk) 15:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Emptying Category:Female chemists by country

Why did you remove all entries from Category:Female chemists by country? --GRuban (talk) 13:31, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

I've not "removed all entries", but only the link to "Category: Chemists by country". Now I've restored it. --Drdoht (talk) 15:59, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
You have, actually. It's empty now, and it used to have a number of other subcategories. Here are your edits removing them:
also you recently created a couple of other categories that would probably fit well there:
among your other recent category creations. Agree? --GRuban (talk) 18:34, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Not meant to be a criticism, mind, but a genuine question. I was of two minds about the whole "Female X by country" tree, whether it improves or actually worsens sexism (since, after all, being female shouldn't usually affect the way people do chemistry), but then decided that more categorization is better than less. I can well see someone disagreeing, so I'm asking; do you actually object to these subcategories being placed in this category, or was this removal just a mistake? --GRuban (talk) 18:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
First of all my wife is a industrial chemist too. Second, I think, an additional cat FEM will be helpful. On the other hand, a tree "female ..." should be placed correctly and the structure must be uniform. Because there are some wrong subcategory definitions like
    • Female chemists from CH --> cat: Female chemists by country + cat: Female scientists from CH + cat: Chemists from CH
some removals will cause obvious mistakes. I'm sorry for this. I'll do my best next days. --Drdoht (talk) 02:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Restored, hopefully correctly. Regards to Madame Dr Doht, and Happy New Year! --GRuban (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drdoht/Archive_4&oldid=659197971"