User talk:Donald Trung/Archive 352

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-52

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

Sceau du Dê Thám
(OLD.).

Add it here.

Signature (Siggy) to prevent automated archiving. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:27, 26 December 2021 (UTC) .

List_of_analog_television_stations_in_Vietnam
(OLD.).

Note-to-self:

--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:54, 27 December 2021 (UTC) .

How we will see unregistered users

Copying here to keep an eye on further developments as I find it interesting.


Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

De beste wensen

Hallo Donald, bij deze stuur ik jou de beste wensen voor het nieuwe jaar, wanneer dat ook maar precies voor jou begint! ;-)

Groeten, Quistnix (talk) 20:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

@Quistnix: Bedankt, en een gelukkig nieuwjaar voor jou en je katten. 🐱 --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Reply draft

Due to activity on the other talk page I'll draft the reply here.

Below this text.

Regarding the removed content from this edit I'll note why both the content and its sources should be included in sections below.

Concerning the self-published sources.

In general old Chinese coinages is a niche subject outside of China (and to some extent Japan) and non-Chinese works covering it is usually done by a small number of experts.

Regarding otherwise untrustworthy sources, the inclusion of the China Ancient Coins Collection Blog (中國古錢集藏網誌) in the Jurchen Later Jin Dynasty is to source the inscriptions as the website contains images of cash coins, as you can see I added it a day before I had found a better (academic) source there. In other contexts where this source is used is also mostly because of the images on its website that illustrate these cash coins, not any facts related to the cash coins themselves. Later the website Numista is cited, while Numista's catalogue is user generated, its list of Chinese cash coins was made by an expert based on Chinese sources. You also removed a quote from the Baidu Library, but this quote was from a contemporary document uploaded by a user, this is no different than quoting the Wikisource library for an original source document, which is a good usage of UGC as someone else had already pointed out to you. Artron is also another auction website mostly used for the confirmation of inscriptions, note that auction websites are known to authenticate the items in their stock and can be used for the authentication of certain inscriptions.

Regarding the other sources, namely Primaltrek, Ulrich Theobald, and David Hartill, well I have pointed out before that Primaltrek has been noted as reliable by the British Museum, Gary Ashkenazy has previously been published by the University of Arizona, both Primaltrek and his blog have been used by The Numismatic Bibliomania Society (NBS), the Royal Numismatic Society, among others. Most of the blog translates from and / or reports on Chinese news articles and rarely includes original thoughts by the author himself and in cases he leaves commentary this isn't used to back up facts. In the few cases when Ashkenazy has been wrong I have backed these corrections up with other sources. Regarding Ulrich Theobald (田宇利), he is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Chinese Studies of the University of Tübingen, he is generally considered to be one of the leading experts of Chinese history outside of China. David Hartill is probably one of the more heavier used sources for Chinese dynastic numismatic articles and while over the years people have noted how he self-publishes he is an award-winning writer at the Royal Numismatic Society and while he previously published with them he opted to self-publish. According to him he self-publishes because most publishers say that Western / Anglophone audiences aren't interested in East Asian numismatic books, his catalogue numbers are the de facto standard for Anglophone publications (including academic articles) on cast Chinese coinages and his books are generally regarded to be the standard (reliable) works on pre-modern Chinese coinages.

None of the sources used were randomly selected.

Also, regarding Art-Hanoi, Sema is considered to be one of the leading American experts of modern Vietnamese currency and published together with Howard A. Daniel, III. Also, the Art-Hanoi website hosts articles by François Thierry and Eduardo Toda y Güell for pre-modern Vietnamese coinages and the Qianlong Tongbao issued for Vietnam is mentioned in Toda's account of this inscription. Again, like with Wikisource this is a (largely) reliable book hosted online.

Concerning the content and its layout.

Most of the removed content was first here before being used as the basis for other articles, this doesn't mean that the content has to be identical. Regarding the inscriptions you removed, well they were in the history section and were short summations of these periods, the Qianlong Tongbao inscription was used until the Xinhai Revolution and it was explained in the text way, the Kangxi Tongbao was also the moment when Manchu Qing Dynasty cash coins got their distinctive look due to an altered metallurgical composition, which was explained in the removed section. The Xianfeng and inflation section explains why Manchu Qing Dynasty coinage changed so radically after the 1860's, while it's used in another article in this article it shows the readers exactly how this change occurred. The list of Manchu Qing Dynasty cash coins is an overseeable list of inscriptions, the full list article is about every Chinese cash coin issued until 1912, but this list is specifically about the Qing, if lists could be transcluded it might be a better solution but a more detailed list could be used here, as I wanted to include more details here, but again didn't have the time for it yet.

The same with the other specialised sections, they are specific to the Qing. For example the vault protector coin article also talks about other periods in Chinese history while this one isolates the one issued by the Manchu government. The silver coinages that circulated during the Qing were also summed up here, this article is largely "an overview" containing short summations of periods and coinage types while more details are in other articles, most of the repeated content is just short content here. Regarding Tibet, a reader now has to go through the entire monetary history of Tibet before Communist annexation instead of finding Qing period coins in the Qing period coins article, this doesn't really make much sense to do.

Above this text.

List_of_analog_television_stations_in_Vietnam

Note-to-self:

Signature (Siggy) to prevent automated archiving. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #501

Japanese bride in America

  • https://youtu.be/NseJ9llGbBE

--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 01:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Sceau du Dê Thám
(OLD.).

Add it here.

Signature (Siggy) to prevent automated archiving. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC) .

Nguyễn Thị Thu Cúc
(OLD.).

Signature (Siggy) to prevent automated archiving. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Infoboxes and subtlety

I know that you have largely retired and I actually did find the reason as you discussed it. First of all I am sad to hear that an LTA behaved like this towards you and that such a thing could happen on a collaborative website where we are all supposed to be collegial with each other. Anyhow, I noticed something interesting in this infobox, namely that its currency is listed as "Quan" (貫, "String(s) of cash coins") rather than "tiền đồng" and "tiền kẽm". This shows me that the people / person who added it likely was thinking in a way like we see modern currencies, namely that the largest denomination is "the base unit" with the smaller ones being subordinate to it, but in case of the Nguyễn Dynasty coinage system the opposite is actually true. The Nguyễn Dynasty coinage revolved around the zinc cash coins (tiền kẽm) for the simple fact that the majority of its population lived in absolute poverty far below that of many comparable societies. Copper-alloy cash coins (tiền đồng) were used by the Nguyễn administration and were produced until the end of the dynasty but they were always calculated in how many zinc cash coins they were worth.

Which brings me to the usage of "Quan", these refer to strings of cash coins but in no Chinese cultural society was its usage ever consistent and was based on how many cash coins were included in a string, these could range from anywhere from 50 (fifty) to 1000 (one-thousand) and in 1945 this mostly included strings ranging from 350 (three-hundred-and-fifty) to 600 (six-hundred), although the smallest denomination (issued in 1933) required a thousand (1000) cash coins for a single Piastre. During the Tự Đức period the denominations "Mạch" (陌) and "Quan" (貫) actually appeared on copper-alloy cash coins with the former being 60 (sixty) zinc cash coins and the latter being 600 (six-hundred) zinc cash coins. The Nguyễn Dynasty government always refused to collect its taxes in zinc cash coins because of their brittle and breakable nature as well as their low value, they were literally worth less than their transportation costs to them. Gresham's Law never really applied to pre-1945 Việt-Nam and the "good money" never pushed out the "bad money".

Note: Just realised that she would probably not care about this. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: December 2021





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 10:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-01

MING SOLDIERS ARMOR AND GEARS 出警图

"Title" field.

The Return Herald (出警图) - Jiajing period (27 May 1521 – 23 January 1567) 01

Relevant weblinks.
Individual image source files.
Categorise as...

--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 15:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC) .

Wikidata weekly summary #502