User talk:Dino Castelbou

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dino Castelbou!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Dino Castelbou!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dino, Commons is a project to collect media files, not articles. So creating user subpages like this does not help to improve Wikimedia Commons and so the userpage is not justified even in the user namespace. But thats not the main problem: The article is copy&pasted from fr:Religions traditionnelles africaines and as a copy&paste without attributing the authors you violate the wikipedia users copyrigth! Wikipedia is free to reuse, but it is not public domain. Read fr:Wikipédia:Sites utilisant Wikipédia. --Martin H. (talk) 20:01, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you !

sorry... --Dino Castelbou (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:PANDORE_-_L'amour_guillotine,_la_nonne_catholislamique,_la_maladie_tranche,_le_tyran_démocrate_Sarkosy_et_ses_copains_pillent_-_les_français_abrutis_mangent_le_hot-dog.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 21:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:PANDORE_détail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:PYGMALION_AMOUREUX_OU_MOURANT_D'AMOUR.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Pictures of the "Singe" series have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Eusebius (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Eusebius (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Caricatures have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Eusebius (talk) 21:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons n'est pas un hébergeur gratuit

[edit]

Bonjour. Il semblerait que jusqu'à présent, vous ayiez principalement utilisé Commons pour promouvoir votre travail personnel, sans considération pour la vocation du projet, qui héberge uniquement des contenus multimédia ayant un contenu éducatif. Les sous-pages que vous avez créées, par exemple, sont complètement en-dehors des critères d'inclusion du projet. Si vous persistez à utiliser Commons comme un hébergeur pratique et gratuit pour vos textes et vos créations originales, vous serez bloqué. Ce message constitue votre avertissement. Je vous invite à lire attentivement cette page, ainsi que les autres règles de fonctionnement du projet, et de réfléchir à la manière dont vous souhaitez contribuer. Je me tiens à votre disposition si vous avez des questions. Cordialement, --Eusebius (talk) 22:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eh bien, c'est que ces photos ont une "valeur éducative", il me semble, et ce n'est pas parce que j'en suis le sujet qu'elles le sont moins, je l'espère : par exemple, les photos du "singe", c'est juste issue d'une tradition hindoue : or, je n'ai pas de photographies d'acteurs indiens sous la main : donc j'y suis, puisque je suis moi-même acteur traditionnel hindou. Ce sont des figures de style, mimiques sanctionnées par les traités dramatiques indiens sur le théâtre ; en ce sens, elles sont parfaitement éducatives, portant sur l' information. Bonne nouvelle année. --Dino Castelbou (talk) 19:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Certains de vos fichiers (notamment ceux-là) ont sans doute une "valeur éducative" raisonnable, mais dans ce cas au moins ça manque un peu (selon moi) de documentation sur les pages des images elles-mêmes (description, catégorisation). Merci d'avoir participé aux débats de suppression, c'est là-bas que vos éventuels arguments seront pris en compte. --Eusebius (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]