User talk:Digon3/Archive3

Panorama software

Hi Digon3, After I had tried some programs (including Hugin) one after the other and the results were not really fully satisfying, I got Panorama Studio into the hands. Its an easy to use tool but with powerful features. --Simonizer 07:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Arizona and Utah

Hi Jonathan, your gallery led me to my last phographic trip so I'd like to have your opinion about my work in some places you know well: Arizona and Utah. --LucaG 20:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

• I went down the Navajo Trail the day after a rainy day. Rangers were worried about possible flash floods so they closed the trail during my descent. My hike was short that day. --LucaG 21:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• I've just discovered your nomination. Thank you! --LucaG 21:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

A new version is available

Dear Digon3, Iam very disapointed about the polling-progress on this Image. So i uploaded a new improved version and would ask if you can drop an eye on it, that would be very kind. Regards Richie --Richard Bartz 20:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Damselfly September 2007 Osaka Japan.jpg

Hi!

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Damselfly September 2007 Osaka Japan.jpg

I see as you voted to the new version, please cut your vote to the more separeted new voting! Thanks --Beyond silence 07:01, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry for the template spamming, I was not patient enough to just drop a note because I was doing several things at the same time. Of course you had just forgotten to add the license ;). Regards, PatríciaR ^msg 14:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Commons problems

Hello, Jon. I wonder, if you aware about problems with the images uploaded to Commons. For example, I uploaded quite a few images for the last 3 days and none is showing up in my gallery. Have you tried to upload any image to Commonos lately? Maybe you could tell me whom I could contact about this problems? Thank you.--Mbz1 22:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Mbz1

Thank you for the response. The thing is that the lag is getting bigger and bigger. It was 3 days yesterday. Before it happened I was able to see all my images right away. As soon as I uploaded one it was shown in my gallery, but anyway, hopefully I would be able to see them soon.Thanks again for your time.--Mbz1 23:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Mbz1

iCommons

Yay, thanks for helping out :) pfctdayelise (说什么?) 12:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San Marcos Fort Panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San Marcos Fort Panorama 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:USA 10279 Monument Valley Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:USA 10279 Monument Valley Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 13:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San Marcos Fort Panorama 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:PanoMontBlancHDR edit 1.jpg

How did you get rid of that horrible black thing so well? What software did you use? Doo-dle-doo 14:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Doo-dle-doo 14:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Augustine Lighthouse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:PigeonMonceau.jpg nomination as FP

Just to say thank you for nominating my picture at FPC (I think it's the second one of me you nominate). It's always nice to see that other people like one's work :) Benh 20:40, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacksonville Skyline Panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacksonville Skyline Panorama 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Augustine Lighthouse 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San Marcos Fort Wall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Vue en montant à Vallonpierre.jpg nomination for FP

Hi Jon,

You voted for this picture on FPC and the author uploaded an edit. Maybe you would like to have a look.

thanks ! Benh 20:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Joergens.mi

My admin request seams to be succesfull, could you be so kind to change my state to admin. Thanks a lot --Joergens.mi 05:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Please help

Hello, Jon. I've noticed that one of my images disappeared. Is it anyway to find out what happened. Thank you--Mbz1 15:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

• • Thank you, Jon. I even do not recall down sampling this image. I just heppen to go to amber page and noticed a brocken link.--Mbz1 01:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Long-tailed Skipper Butterfly (Urbanus proteus) 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Barn wind turbines 0504.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Barn wind turbines 0504.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 23:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shark Tooth Macro 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Proposal concerning User PH-n templates

Hi Digon3, I've written a proposal concerning the {{User PH-0}},...,{{User PH-3}} templates, that you may be interested in. Best regards Slaunger 09:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi again Digon3, Quite some new points have been raised concerning this since you last commented on this. Unfortunately, I feel the discussion is dying out without having reached a consensus. If you have furher input feel free to join. Best wishes, -- Slaunger 07:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Bouncing ball FP candidate

There is a new extremely professional re-edit from my original RAW file by Richard Bartz, and I'd urge you to vote for this instead of my own imperfect Photoshop efforts. Thanks very much to Richard for the work he's put in. Please consider voting or amending your vote at: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bouncing ball - strobe.jpg. --MichaelMaggs 17:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crystal Formations Macro 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Image-Jacksonville Skyline Panorama 2.jpg

Shoot, I guess Wiki's email doesn't allow attachments. --JaGa 17:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Muchas gracias !

Thank you Digon for fixing it ! <3 --Richard Bartz 16:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacksonville Skyline Panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gulf Fritillary Butterfly on a Lantana 80.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Collapsability of boxes on Commons user pages

Per our previous discussion on the subject, please see this edit. Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 07:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

You finally got it

That took a very long time;-) Nice xmas gift. Hopefully we will see you back soon. Cheers, -- Slaunger 23:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silurian Orthoceras Fossil Macro 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

see

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Grey square optical illusion.PNG. Noy 18:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

decompose

I am not sure what your software calls this, but it seemed easier to mask both of your images with one of what my software calls a Red, Green or Blue decomposition -- a grayscale representation of the that color or other imagie concept (I have also the option for Hue, Saturation, Value, Luminosity gray scale reps as well). I think that I still had to manually block out the shadow. I could upload the masking layer if you are interested. Shadows (to me) are more fun to make manually and today, I attempted to put a shadow in the image that would have been from the flash -- but to make a good one would be to make a shadow that the object itself blocked out, so I didn't.

I did not mean any offense and I was surprised that it took you so long to revert the changes.

I have been much worse to other photographers here -- like one of them, I picked an image that did not have anyones name in the filename, pretended that what was in the filename was instructions and sent one of the bots here after it. That image never got reverted either.

I have no idea what to think about all of this. -- carol 15:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Reverting images

I just learned that if I revert your crystal image, it will appear as the image you uploaded but it will go into my gallery. I have a lot of images in my 'gallery' that I did not upload (I have been moving images from English Wikipedia without the help of a bot) -- but if that image is going to be in my gallery, if I had moved it from English Wikipedia, I would have made the same changes that I made to it for the QI collection.

I had an image nominated for QI and I opposed it. The reason that I opposed it is because it looked like there was an opposition party and all you had to do to attend the party was to oppose any image that I had touched -- I wanted to be a part of this party. Especially if the requirements were so easy (talent to attend so low). It was an "I can play this game too!!" vote and I would make that vote again. -- carol 11:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Template

Hi Digon,
No worries - I'm glad you (and others) like it! --Fir0002 www 04:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrolusite Mineral with Dendrite Macro Digon3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! False Limpet Shell Macro Digon3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Native Copper Macro Digon3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scoria Macro Digon3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horned Starfish Macro.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

A picture question

Hi, Digon3.
May I please ask you a question? It is probably a stupid question because I have this pine cone in my hands and I cannot say for sure what it is, but, if you have a time could you please take a look at the images and tell me what do you think. I found this cone at a beach. It seems to be a fossil and it is heavier than pine cones usually are, yet it seems not to be heavy enoug to be a fossil. The thing that attaches the cones to the trees (I do not know how to name it in English) is for sure still a wood and not a rock. You could see a close-up of it at the image. I'm asking you this question because I know you like fossils. Thank you for your time.--Mbz1 20:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

• Thank you.--Mbz1 16:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacksonville Skyline Night Panorama Digon3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

-- here is a banana sticker for you! -- carol 16:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image-Jacksonville Skyline Panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

French captions

Hi,
you are adding French captions to your picture and that is really, really excellent.
A fiew remarks though, to help you:
If you see Florida on a map, you'll say "Voici'la floride", but if you present a city of Florida, you'll say "Jackson, Floride", or, "Jackson est en Floride". St. in English can be short for "street" or for "saint". In French, street is "rue", and Saint is "Saint" or "Sainte". So St John River is "Le fleuve Saint John" and not "la rivière de rue john" (the creek of john street).
More important: NEVER stop adding multilingual captions because a frog whines at you, wine is the only thing we know about :-)) Hope it helps...--Berru 21:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

FPs and so on

Hi Digon, you asked me quite some time ago how many FPs I had. I didn't see your comment until now, excuse me. Currently I know about 4 own FPs and 3 edited ones. However it's hard to track everything that happens to my pics. --Ikiwaner 18:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

deprecated function in your monobook.js

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)