User talk:Deror avi/Archive2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


דן חמיצר[edit]

wow this is really beautiful. I'm adding some content to en:Dani Karavan right now - how does it look? I may try to translate he:דן חמיצר afterwards after seeing that picture, unless someone else does first ;-) DVD R W 17:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the uploading of the pictures from He wiki is exhasting. It is taking me over a week to do it. Deror avi 23:05, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you deserve an award :-)[edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
I, DVD R W award Deror avi the Photographer's Barnstar for taking many beautiful photos and uploading them to ויקישיתוף.
:) Deror avi 13:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:PP105.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Unfortunately, there's no freedom of panorama in France. --Davepape 02:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Harhab mini.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.44.28 16:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The no source tag means that you must specify who is the author of this picture and who, therefore, must be given attribution. I presume it is you, but you must mention it explicitly. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your prompt reaction. If I may, you should provide your full name or username instead of just "I". Other people will not know who "I" is, and they will not always check the article/file history. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic images[edit]

Hi Deror avi, I've been looking around on your gallery and there are a few other images which appear to infinge on artist's copyrights. I'm talking about these images: Image:PG142.jpg Image:PG147.jpg Image:POTC.jpg Image:PA190095.jpg Image:PA190096.jpg Image:PA190099.jpg Image:Hatmadto Shel Zicaron.jpg Image:Trygve Lie PA210118.JPG Image:PA210125.JPG Image:U Thant PA210120.JPG Image:Kurt_Waldheim_PA210121.JPG Image:Javier Pérez de Cuéllar PA210122.JPG Image:Boutros Boutros Ghali PA210123.JPG Image:Kofi Annan PA210124.JPG Image:Dag Hammarskjöld PA210119.JPG. It is clear that some artist holds the copyright to these works of art. None of them seems to be in the public domain. Note that the owner is usually not the copyright holder! Even if some government administration buys a painting, the copyright is likely to remain with the painter.

If you agree, I'll delete these images. I don't mean to pick a fight with you - these are the rules on Commons which should be enforced by every community member. The rulese are laid down here: Commons:Derivative works). Note that Commons is not a private photo album, but an open image database which has to be free of third party copyrights and fair use images. --Fb78 12:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

all these images are of objects which are hung in public places. All the UN pictures are official UN pictures which were turned into carpets (thus the picture is of the carpet and not the original image)and it, in itself, is hung in a public area - the enterance to the UN building. Deror avi 09:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Believe me: Inside a building is not a pulic place. Roads, streets, plazas are, but buildings are not. --Fb78 14:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
U are incorrect. the definition of a public place varies from country to country. In many countries all public buildings are deemed as public places (see for example - all US federal builidings). Deror avi 22:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The US doesn't have freedom of panorama. And carpets are hardly "permanently installed". --Fb78 15:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
a. US does have freedom of panorama - see article here - though not relevant to this argument as the freedom of panorama in the US applies to "architectural works, not to other works of visual art, such as statues or sculptures" - as to the Shagal picture - it is an architectural aspect of the building done by an americal artist - does he is protected by US law which allowes freedom of panorama.
b. the carpets are in the UN and not in the US Deror avi 10:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've placed a speedy deletion request on all of them. --Fb78 17:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You requested the deletion of this picture, which is apparently yours, without giving any reason. May I know why? This is just a routine check. Thanks in advance, Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for checking. It is the same as Image:156.jpg - which is the name used by wiki articles - so there is no need for a double. Deror avi 21:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:PA190094.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Peregrine Fisher 08:25, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome pics congrats! I one to be in touch with you!

Renaming pictures[edit]

Hi, FYI - if you have uploaded a picture twice because it had the wrong name the first time, you can use the template {{badname|name of other file.ext}} to nominate the wrong one for deletion. This is much faster than the usual "delete" template. I have fixed this for a number of your uploads already. Kind regards, Deadstar 09:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. Deror avi 19:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello there, I am trying to specify the categories for images. Could you please tell me where exactly in which court of Topkapi this image was taken at? sincerely Gryffindor 04:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it's been a while. If I remember correctly, after you enter the main gate, it will be on your right, near the plates museum. Deror avi 23:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

פיקניק[edit]

הי דרור, אשמח אם תסנן את את תמונת השיפוד שלי. כמו שאמרתי לך - תמונות באמצע הביס אף פעם לא נראות טוב. התמונה השניה פצצות :) תודה מראש ST 13:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Weizman_KD.JPG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Weizman_KD.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 19:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Weizman_KD.JPG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Weizman_KD.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 19:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Weizman_KD.JPG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Weizman_KD.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 19:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KD_Lobby_1930's.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. PxMa 22:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures are hung at an exhibition at the King David Hotel. PD according to Israeli Law.Deror avi 18:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kd_State_Dinner_1950.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. PxMa 22:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

where did you get all this crazy shit? i haven't seen a nigger better at drawing the city of Worms then you you crazy hombre 66.66.144.28 00:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC) -PxMa 15:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:P4160108.JPG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:P4160108.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 23:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:P4160111.JPG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:P4160111.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 23:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KD_DIning_room_1950.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 00:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KD_British_departing.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 00:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:KD_1946.JPG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KD_1946.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 00:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:KD_1940s.JPG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KD_1940s.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 00:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


האם זה נחשב יצירה נגזרת? Hidro 22:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

זה תרשים - אני לא חושב שזה יכול להיות מוגן בזכויות יוצרים. Deror avi 11:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
תודה רבה. התוכל להסתכל בCategory:PD Israel? הקטגוריה מלאה בתמונות מ"לע"מ" ואני לא מבין איך זה מתאפשר כאן ולא אצלינו. והאם תוכל להסתכל בUser:סוצאנג? יש שם סמלי יחידות ותמונות של מוצרים. Hidro 17:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jaffa[edit]

Hi Deror avi,
after I've seen that you uploaded an image of Tel Aviv, may I ask your help for identifying what can be seen in front of this Image:Jaffa 0087.jpg Tel Aviv/Jaffa image? Thanks. --Túrelio 14:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

seems like Jaffa's port (the rocks south of Andromeda's Rock). Do you meen the mosque? Deror avi 14:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a mosque? I wasn't sure because I took this image about 13 years ago. And can you recognize the old-looking building to the left? Thanks. --Túrelio 14:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The area has changed a lot. The minerate belongs to a mosque, the building on the left - may even not exist today (the mosque is still there). Deror avi 14:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Did you mean by Andromeda's Rock the same as mentioned in here Image:Andromeda Hill.JPG? Out of your infos I've added something to the description and a few categories to the image. Feel free to correct it. I would also be glad if you could add a description in hebrew. Thanks for your help. --Túrelio 14:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The rocks in the watter image:Paul Gustave Dore Andromeda.jpg, the building is named after them. Deror avi 15:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

just saying hi[edit]

This is User:Zobango, just wanting to say hi. I hate to bother you, with your law duties and stuff, just wanted to know how youre doing P.S I know I ask you this all the time, but any news pn the translations

hi - not yet - there is a delay in this month hebrew wiki newsletter (due to vacation of most of the writers, olimpics viewing and the likes...). Deror avi (talk) 09:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

photos[edit]

i really like those lunar eclipse photos. thus is zobango just wanting to say hi

new transaltion added today. I was thinking of doing "w" but decided on "Cashew" instead. Maybe i'll do "W" next time. Deror avi (talk) 20:11, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you[edit]

i just wanted to say thank you and sorry for all the annoying comments i have been posting on your wall. Thanks for responding to them in a polite way. Dearest: User:Zobango P.S Is W a given for next month?

not yet - because the Hebrew Wiki newspaper was not published this month (September), therefore no one has seen the last translation - and it will be shown only next month. For November I will translate "tractor beam". Deror avi (talk) 12:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Van Leer Institute Jerusalem[edit]

Hello Deror avi, I regularly see images from sculptures in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem made by Talmoyair. To day I saw for the first time the image you took from that intriguing sculpture outside The Van Leer Institute. Can you please tell me who the sculptor is and perhaps a date? Greetings--Gerardus (talk) 11:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I need to check that.

דרור, אוהב אותך![edit]

כל הכבוד על העבודה עם תמונות מיזמי אלף המילים.

תוכל לשלוח לי שאר תמונות מעניינות (של המשתתפים בטיול כמובן) במייל?

תודה, הגמל התימני (talk) 20:15, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

גם אני אוהב אותך - כבר העלתי אותן. Deror avi (talk) 20:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
התכוונתי לתמונות אחרות, מעבר לשלוש - כבר ראיתי אותן. הגמל התימני (talk) 20:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
יש עוד תמונה אחת סתם ברחוב אבל לא ממש הצטלמנו. חבל שלא באת. Deror avi (talk) 20:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
אמא שלי לא הרשיתה לי... (ואני צרוד). הגמל התימני (talk) 20:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
תרגיש טוב. Deror avi (talk) 20:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
לא ארגיש טוב כל עוד אדלר לא חסום. הגמל התימני (talk) 13:38, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi from zobango[edit]

hello, my friend. How is it going. We havent chatted for a while and I was just urious about your progress and what your next idea will be. Thanks! Zobango

Retrieved from "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Deror_avi"

hi from zobango[edit]

hello, my friend. How is it going. We havent chatted for a while and I was just urious about your progress and what your next idea will be. Thanks! Zobango

no idea - I will let you know soon. Deror avi (talk) 10:18, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent help on Israeli stamps![edit]

Hi Dror! i was adding DOZENS of Israeli Stamps to Commons in the recent months as well as transfering some from the Hebew WP, i placed all with the template

Public domain
This file is in the public domain because Stamps are in free usage in Israel

This template must not be used to dedicate an uploader's own work to the public domain; CC0 should be used instead.

This work must carry justifications for free usability in both the United States and its country of origin.

or someting similar.

Suddenly 2 nights ago ALL of them were removed by an admin saying Israeli stamps are NOT PD (as Israel does not appear on the Commons:Stamps/Public domain. I was not aware of the existance of that page before, but i am amazed that someone just deletes a whole bunch of items without sending a question or warning to the uploader??? I was not informed about any change/discussion on this matter. My questions: 1. how can all the stamps be restored? 2. According to this w:he:ויקיפדיה:זכויות יוצרים#מותר ללא הגבלה Israeli stamps are PD, is there a need for further clarification on this issue? I would like to create an appropriate PD template for Israeli stamps. I appreciate your quick help and advice. Regards --kippi70 (talk) 15:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello[edit]

how are you doing my friend! any progress/ideas for next time? Zobango (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All is well. Just came back from Paris (Soon to upload photos). Still waiting for the next edition of the Hebrew Wiki newspaper - once the editor tells me she intends to publish an issue - I'll do the translation. Deror avi (talk) 09:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for the response. i take it W is next in line after Fall Out Boy?
probably. Deror avi (talk) 09:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Deror,
this image surely needs an "update" of its description, as it doesn't show a church, but the back of a woman.--Túrelio (talk) 09:26, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ideas after w?[edit]

hello again Zobango (talk) 19:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. not yet. the last too trnaslations were only published yesterday so there is at least a month until the next one is needed. Deror avi (talk) 04:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For potential ideas, after W, which im guessing you're going to next, you could do the one on Andy Kaufmann (Tony Clifton), a Jewish-American comedian, or modify cursive so that it is in hebrew cursive. that would be an interesting twist

74.105.222.89 15:06, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Abba_Yavniel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:40, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

permenantly hung in a public location. and by permision of the copyright holder. Deror avi (talk) 09:51, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Whitney_Museum_PC230112.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wish me luck[edit]

im starting finals next week .zobango try to come up with a definitive idea for the wikiworld after W for me? 74.105.222.89 23:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

נראה לי שכדאי להפריד בין הפיקיוויקי והקומונז[edit]

ראיתי שעדיין יש הרבה עבודה, ובכל פעם צריך לעבור על התמונה בקומונז ולשנות כמעט את כל הכתוב. העליתי לפיקיוויקי תמונה של תל נפוליאון, ולפי השאלות שנשאלתי, התיאור לא ממש ממצה לא לגבי הפיקיוויקי ובטח שלא לגבי הקומונז.

בהתחשב בכך שבשלב הזה צריך לעקוב אחרי כל תמונה ולשכתב למעשה את הטקסט, שלא לדבר על כך שחלק מהאדמינים בקומונז טענו שישנן תמונות אשר אין להן ממש ערך עבור הקומונז (בבחינת commons is not flickr), עלה בדעתי שאולי כבר היה עדיף לפתוח חשבון בPicasa ואליו לשלוח את התמונות, והמשתמשים יבחרו משם את התמונות המתאימות אותן יעלו ידנית לקומונז. אמנם בפליקר יש כבר סקריפטים מותאמים, אבל בכדי לשים יותר מ-200 תמונות צריך לשלם אחת לשנה...

בקיצור - לא עדיף באמת שהפיקיוויקי יהיה אתר עצמאי שבו יאוכסנו התמונות, וממנו תהיה אפשרות להעביר את התמונות המתאימות לקומונז?

Yuval Y § Chat § 17:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

בעיקרון לא. הסקופ של שני הפרוייקטים זהה (כך שאין תמונות שמקומן בפיקי ויקי ולא כאן ולהפך, מה שמקומו לא כאן, מקומו גם לא בפיקי ויקי) וכל מטרת הפרוייקט היא להעלות תמונות לכאן. שלחתי דואלDeror avi (talk) 07:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dror, please see my comment here here and tell me if I'm right about it. Thanks, ST (talk) 13:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

לדעתי כן, Deror avi (talk) 16:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Errrrr... ha? ST (talk) 12:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
תראי, לא ראיתי את התמונה, ושאלה אם היא אינסידנטלית או לא. אם כן - דעתי אין בעיה, אבל אני לא מתכוון להתחיל לריב פה. Deror avi (talk) 18:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
טוב נו, שיהיה ככה. מעצבנים אלה :) ST (talk) 11:39, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mw pikiwiki logo.jpg[edit]

You should confirm permission with OTRS. Multichill (talk) 18:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I sent. Deror avi (talk) 21:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For your information[edit]

Eddau (talk) 22:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

תיקנתי. Hidro (talk) 14:12, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Deror avi,

I have posted a message at Commons:Village pump#Unreferenced statement in Commons:Freedom of Panorama so that fresh new people who have not yet taken part in the talk may possibly add fresh new ideas.

Teofilo (talk) 07:12, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the discussion is quite over - every person who speaks or read Hebrew understand the Law the same way. I think this insistance is a waste of time and harmfull. Deror avi (talk) 07:28, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deror,
if I remember right from earlier discussions you are an Israeli lawyer. If that is true and if you can spare the time, couldn't you draft a sort of "guide" (similar as Commons:Image casebook, but less large) about what kind of things are o.k. to upload as being covered by the FOP law of Israel, eventually also with a little bit of elaboration of time periods if there were practically relevant changes in law over time. These constant conflicts such as here again really are intolerable. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 10:57, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HaMakhtesh_HaGadol_IMG_5985.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:03, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Atzeret_Dana_MVI_5780.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:EAC_IMG_6549.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:20, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Catecombes_de_Paris_IMG_2179.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Sahlechet P7160078.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:37, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Beit Hect has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--El-Bardo (talk) 11:26, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Neue Wache P7120015.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:TOL PA170001.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Powers (talk) 00:28, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

how are you[edit]

This is Zobango I havent talked to you in a while Your next Hebrew Wikiworld translation will be... Try Tony Clifton due to Andy Kaufmann's Jewish heritage+ David Letterman scandal User:Zobango good job on last one User:Zobango

just finished one yesterday (raining animals) so it will be a while till the next one is needed. Deror avi (talk) 14:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

any ideas? User:Zobango


File:PA190094.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hi Deror,
are you sure that this nice cat File:Cathedralat Peter Paul IMG 7484.JPG has anything to do the S. Peter and Paul Cathedral? --Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It was inside. Deror avi (talk) 12:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Israel dispute[edit]

Hi Deror avi,

I'm aware that there is a long-running dispute regarding Israeli copyright in which you appear to be involved. The dispute appears to be scattered over dozens of pages and as a result an uninvolved user cannot readily follow it. I personally consider myself uninvolved in this, and would like to help all people involved in this reach a resolution. I have no desire to act as an arbitrator or mediator, but I am attempting to help the broader community understand the dispute.

I have created a page in my user space in an attempt to list any discussions relevant to the dispute. I'd appreciate it if you would help by adding discussions that you consider relevant to that page. I'd also be grateful if you could notify other people involved if I have not done so already. Thanks.--Nilfanion (talk) 14:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deror, I've got a question. Do you still have access to Dr Presenti's book? If so would you be able to email me pages 934-5 of it? (Ideally as a typed document?) I'm intrigued by that passage, it certainly appears to support you but I need to know what else she talks about in its vicinity. The Email function on here, en or he.wp would work. Thanks.--Nilfanion (talk) 12:18, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

in Hebrew? or my translation to English? Deror avi (talk) 13:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well both would be good. I'd certainly find an English-language version easier to read, but the Hebrew is the original if I find something I consider important I'd like to be able to post the original. If I had to pick one - the Hebrew.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sent you the entire page. let me know if you got it. Deror avi (talk) 13:09, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Got it, thanks.--Nilfanion (talk) 11:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For your info, added a table to that page to try and show how the 2 viewpoints differ on specific images. Help there would be appreciated.--Nilfanion (talk) 12:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Making A video[edit]

Just to let you know, I decided to follow a lead similar to yours and am working a video based on the "Kilroy Was Here" WikiWorld comic. (No Hebrew translation) I'll do you the honor of sending it to you when im done so you can see it first P.S. Any news with the latest Wikiworld translation. Im guessing it's either "W" or "Cursive" Zobango (talk) 13:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi Deror, could you please email me? Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't have your email. send me an email and I will reply. Deror avi (talk) 11:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I do not have your email. It is not set up on Commons. Please go here, and click email me. It is my email. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:11, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sent you. Deror avi (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I responded from my other email address. Please do not surprised. It is still me :) --Mbz1 (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finished with new video![edit]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePkNPxfFIkM I finished my first video based on a wikiworld comic, how do you like it? Considering its the new year, I think you should try the 2000's comic for your next choice. Save the others for later, you have got to do one on that, and I might even make a video based on it Nice talking to you: Zobango (talk) 23:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Featured pictures on Hebrew Wikipedia[edit]

Please see Template talk:Assessments#Featured Picture on Hebrew Wikipedia. MathKnight 17:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:02, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Your claim regarding freedom of panorama in Germany[edit]

Hi Deror avi, you claim there was no German court rulling that a museum is not a "public place". Please be refered to this decision by the BGH which makes clear that § 59 Abs. 1 UrhG applies to the Straßenbild (view from public streets) only. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 12:27, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On page 10 paragraphy 3 it is said that any area that can be viewed from a public street or place can be photographed according to Section 59. I think a museums is a "public place" (I am using google to translate, so it may be inaccurate, pleae correct me if I am wrong). Deror avi (talk) 12:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Deror avi, now you see how misleading Google translate is — this time from the other side ;) Even if the English place and German Platz seem to be related, they have a different meaning. While it is more general in English, it is usually far more concrete in Germany as a reference to a square. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 12:56, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think machine translation should never be used. It always leads to confusion. Thanks for the explenation. I don't pretend to understand the German Law. While I am well versed in the Israeli one. Deror avi (talk) 13:01, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To this I whole-heartily agree :) --AFBorchert (talk) 13:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The google translation (that Deror avi had already quoted in his undeletion request) actually says "located permanently in public ways, streets or squares." Surprisingly accurate. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:16, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recordings restored[edit]

Hi Deror avi, as you can see at COM:UDEL, I've restored the four recordings. Given that the four recordings are derived works which are excempt from copyright restrictions as they are considered incidental, it might be perhaps helpful to create a template comparable to {{FoP-Israel}} which refers to COM:DM#Israel. It would be perhaps also helpful to extend this section to understand better what incidental means in this context. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 18:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will prepare the help page. Deror avi (talk) 13:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I hate to bother you but[edit]

I just wanted to say hi, ask how you were doing, and to ask what translation you are working on. I hope you are doing well and congratulations on your barnstar Zobango (talk) 22:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. Hope a new toon will be translated soon. Deror avi (talk) 08:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good Job!

Zobango (talk) 16:03, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
File:Acco IMG 0294.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
File:Acco IMG 0191.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:26, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Deror avi. Could I ask that you consider moving this page into your userspace. Since it is mainly your understanding of the law and hasn't really been discussed it is probably better as a subpage like Pieter's views. Adambro (talk) 13:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

unlike pieters personal unsuported views - this page is just quotations of the Laws and books. no opinion of my own. And left to be interpreted by the readers. Deror avi (talk) 16:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh yes, I suppose it can't really be compared to Pieter's page where he presents his own analysis. Although I would note that at least some of the translations are your own. Perhaps it would be more helpful if we used the (semi) official translation of the 2008 law from http://www.wipo.int/clea/en/text_pdf.jsp?lang=EN&id=5016. I note that, in particular, that translation refers to "applied art" rather than "useful art". Adambro (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The semi official translations are nutoreously bad. In all laws (not just that one). I would even dream of sending you to the semi official version of the Insurance Contract Law. Deror avi (talk) 16:29, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Whilst I say semi official, that translation is as official as we are going to get. It was submitted by Israel to the WTO. Although it is not official in the sense that it is legally enforceable, I would think we should be able to use it with some confidence. Using this published semi official translation rather than translating it directly ourselves also reduces the risk of suggestions that the translation is inaccurate.
Regarding another issue, I note that this page refers to "The 2008 Law". Would it be better to change these references to 2007 since that is the title even though it didn't come into effect until 2008? Adambro (talk) 16:41, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I do think we should aim at professional translation and not copy inaccurate ones. As for the date - I don't mind such change. Deror avi (talk) 18:18, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can you assist me in trying to understand where this confusion regarding "applied" or "useful" comes from? I mean why would the "inaccurate" translation from the Israeli government use "applied art". Is it perhaps the case that the words are similar in Hebrew and it is easy to make a mistake? I do note that Presenti has referred to "applied art" in her emails in English so I would assume from that that "applied art" is an reasonable translation, even if "useful art" is also reasonable. Adambro (talk) 18:45, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've undeleted this files but it would be helpful if you added some more information to the descriptions to provide some context about how these maps are displayed to allow the permanence to be considered. Adambro (talk) 13:33, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Tourist maps of Acco have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

wrong labelling[edit]

Hey Deror avi,

This picture shows Vienna (=Wien) not Nuremberg. (the same picture /bigger and with headline and the story) It can't be Nuremberg, because from 1499 to 1850 it was not allowed there for Jewish people to become a citizen. I think, this was nearly as bad as the shown exile. But nevertheless the labelling of the picture and the usage in the context of Nuremberg are wrong. Perhaps it was printed in Nuremberg, but I found no proof for that. --Pirkheimer (talk) 01:29, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Tate_Modern_IMG_9302.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:44, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

גג כנסיית הקבר[edit]

how can we go on the roof of the holy sepulchre please? Where is the stairs?145.242.11.6 16:49, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

go into the courtyard of the greek patriarchate, on the right side of the patriarchate street Image:Christian Quarter IMG 9447.JPG when coming from Jaffa's gate (when inside the gate, turn left, right, left, right and left again, and go forward, the dome will be on your left). Deror avi (talk) 16:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
thank you very much, i'll try this next time 145.242.11.6 16:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good Luck[edit]

On Your Wikimania Bid! I hope you get selected P.S. How are things, do you have any news? Zobango (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your email regarding this. I'm sorry though that I'm not inclined to undelete this. I would hope by now that you would recognise that deletion discussions are never simply votes so the number of votes isn't the only deciding factor. Being permanently displayed in a public place was only one issue. The other relates to what art works are permitted under the exemption. The argument presented that paintings would be permitted by the exemption isn't convincing, particularly in light of Presenti comments, made after most of that deletion discussion, that "an artistic work created for artistc purpose is by no means applied art ( e.g. painting)". I'd suggest that COM:UNDEL should be your first port of call rather than contacting me or other users privately. Regards. Adambro (talk) 09:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from labelling other contributors "clueless". Adambro (talk) 19:47, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hi, I have a question for you, if you don't mind. I saw this picture from this website and I want to upload it here, but first of all I want to ask you about its copyright. I saw you have experience with this kind of matters, so I hope you can help me. Thank you so much for your attention. Regards, Kordas (sínome!) 18:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images taken in Israel are PD after 50 years (if taken before 2008) - therefore the image is "PD". Deror avi (talk) 22:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! I just uploaded that picture, you can find it here. Any correction is welcomed. Regards, Kordas (sínome!) 13:34, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Ghetto IMG 4126.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--User:G.dallorto (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ghetto IMG 4349.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--User:G.dallorto (talk) 23:01, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Naharia_IMG_1163.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:26, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Russian images in Israel required[edit]

Hi Deror avi, I see you are the contact for Pikiwiki. I am currently looking for photographers who can help me with some photos from Israel as listed at en:User:Russavia/Required_photos#.C2.A0Israel. Do you know any photographers on Pikiwiki who I can approach for help with these? Or perhaps you may be in a position to help? Any help/advice you can give would be appreciated. Cheers, --russavia (talk) 06:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have published your call for pictures in Hebrew Wiki. Deror avi (talk) 09:18, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign Language Wikiworld-New artist[edit]

Hi, I was browsing commons and I saw that someone had translated an excerpt from the "Five Second Rule" comic into Czech. I thought you might be interested in this sort of news considering you do the same thing. Are you working on one right now? And if so, which one is it? If you aren't, "Five-second rule" might be a good one, since it has a thorough Hebrew article. Other good ones include Calvin and Hobbes and Andy Kaufmann-Tony Clifton. I'm just making a suggestion Regards Zobango (talk) 14:01, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks - good idea. Deror avi (talk) 19:28, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reichstag Chocolate P7120043.JPG[edit]

Dear Deror avi, could you please edit the description of the above named picture (now: The Reichstag made of chocolate - at a Berlin shop)? The certain Berlin shop where this chocolate model was made is Fassbender&Rausch at the Gendarmenmarket. Could you mention this shop in your image despription? Thank you, --Vincent Strega (talk) 14:40, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure about the name of the shop. If your are sure - feel free to edit the discription. This is the beauty of the wiki system - collaberation of knowledge. Deror avi (talk) 20:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deror avi, somehow this message was mistakenly sent to me. IZAK (talk) 06:56, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How to edit images?[edit]

Hi. I was just wondering how you edit the Wikiworld comics? Which software should I download so that I can also edit to create my own different translations? I'm just wondering. Thank you Zobango (talk) 01:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

שינוי שם של קבצים[edit]

היי דרור אבי,

מבין הכלים בקומנס יש כלי שימושי שתוכל להעזר בו בקומנס והוא File Mover. תגיש בקשה וסביר שתאושר.

את הבקשה מגישים כאן: Commons:Requests for rights#Filemover (add request)

תלחץ על ה (add request) ותמלא את התבנית בדומה לאיך שאחרים מילאו.

בהצלחה Geagea (talk) 03:50, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Broken descriptions[edit]

Hi, I don't know if you've noticed, but most of your latest uploads have broken descriptions [1]. Can you check your upload forms before you upload more images, and fix the ones already on Commons? Thanks. –Tryphon 09:31, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Usuing the commonist - The discriptions need manual fixing anyways. Deror avi (talk) 13:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for taking care of it. –Tryphon 13:38, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:Andartat_Peter_IMG_7075.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fernrohr (talk) 05:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about your latest comic :([edit]

Hi, I just wanted to say that I feel bad that you had to re-edit your latest cartoon for somewhat unfounded copyright reasons. It's a shame, nd I hope you didn't feel upset because of it. Thanks for all the good work. Anyway, if you're still thinking about doing another translation, I think 5-second rule would make a good one, but that's just my opinion. You don't have to listen. Thanks again Zobango (talk) 23:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eilat_IMG_2101.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Disney's_California_Adventure_IMG_4041.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 20:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License feedback[edit]

Hi, I noticed in your recent edit that you:

  • Changes a cc-by license to a cc-by-sa license; this is generally considered revoking the original cc-by license and is frowned upon unless it was a simple mistake on your part. In the future please be careful to use the desired license immediately upon upload.
  • Added an {{Attribution}} template. This is confusing because the attribution template states not that attribution is required, but that only attribution is required; this contradicts the cc-by-sa template. I recommend leaving the "Permission" field blank and using only one license tag, to prevent confusion.

Hope this helps! Dcoetzee (talk) 09:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I upload using the communist which does not have the option of the licence. I broaden the license from CC-BY to CC-BY-SA which allows more options (of share allike) - thus is more free then the previous option. And as to attribution - it is always part of the CC-BY licence - the additional tag just clarifies it is needed. Deror avi (talk) 09:17, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That is not the purpose of the {{Attribution}} template. It is a license tag intended for works where only attribution is required, like I said, not for emphasis. And no, CC-BY-SA does not "allow more options" than CC-BY (in fact, the opposite is true - it adds more restrictions). Dcoetzee (talk) 10:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"attribution" in itself is not a valid license - it does not deal with many aspects required. and the "SA" is more free than without it - by forcing the image to remain free. Deror avi (talk) 08:57, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HaPoel HaMizrachi Centeral Synagogue images[edit]

Do not remove valid comments from a file description page. And as I already indicated at Category talk:HaPoel HaMizrachi Centeral Synagogue, the spelling is "Central"... AnonMoos (talk)

File:Yom_Kipur_War_Suez_Canal_IMG_0961.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nyttend (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:California_Windmills_IMG_4163.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GFreihalter (talk) 12:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please comment on this? Jcb (talk) 22:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation of your videos[edit]

Hello Deror avi, thank you for your nice videos! If possible, please also use at least one of the video categories Category:Videos by subject and/or Category:Videos by country. Doing so it will help me selecting the "Media of the day" files. Thanks again, --Pristurus (talk) 10:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't know about these categories. thanks. Will go over my contributions tommorow and do that. Deror avi (talk) 12:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:TPM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:10, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skullrock.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catedralat_Basil_IMG_6797.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Shakko (talk) 10:06, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catedralat_Basil_IMG_6798.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Shakko (talk) 10:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bellagio_Ceiling_IMG_3729.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 01:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bellagio_Ceiling_IMG_3730.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 01:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

israel and other pictures[edit]

i am also a lawyer and photographer..coming to israel to take pictures and search for a family "golden book" that is supposedly close to 1000 years old..and taken to isreal by my grandmother in the 70's ...would like to meet you while touring there ,,,could not figure out how to reach you, but would also like to talk about how to use your images and correctly attribute them etc

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Deror avi!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:01, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and a question[edit]

Hi Deror. Thanks for the barnstar :) I have a quick question for you; do you know what the difference is between Category:Gardens of the Shrine of the Báb and Category:Bahá'í Terraces? They seem to both contain the same kind of pictures. Thanks! guillom 12:39, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know if there is official distinction, but looking at most of the pictures - the first is the gardens of the terrace of the shrine itself (the middle terrace where the dome is), and the other is all the other 19 terraces. Deror avi (talk) 14:01, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pikiwiki documentation and reporting[edit]

Hi, is there a better documentation and reporting to the success/problems of a PikiWiki project, than available on Meta?--Juandev (talk) 18:13, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I havent especially get from the presentation, what amount of files is than uploaded to Commons? Is it 5%, or 5% are deleted from Commons, or 5% of files are leaft behind after the deletions?
And why are those deletion problems? You as a Commons user and skill Wikimedian, but on the other side Wikimedia PikiWiki organiser should know that.--Juandev (talk) 18:21, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Generally a proofreading about this project might be fine. But I am not sure that the Meta page reveals all the questions I would have regarding this project.--Juandev (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:KD 1946.JPG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:KD 1946.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 00:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Israeli_Air_Force_P5080104.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marokwitz (talk) 09:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deror, could you comment in this discussion, please. --Túrelio (talk) 10:59, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Judean_Desert_IMG_1900.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chesdovi (talk) 17:05, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Judean_Desert_IMG_1903.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chesdovi (talk) 17:20, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Judean_Desert_IMG_1904.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chesdovi (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Judean_Desert_IMG_1726.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chesdovi (talk) 17:25, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good images only please[edit]

Deror - why is this a useful image for commons: File:Mohammad Said Kalash P1070835.JPG? It's blurred, his hand obstructs his face. There are other similar and better images of this person. Why did you bother uploading this? Unless we need images to illusrtate slow camera exposure.... Chesdovi (talk) 18:20, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He is an artist, here captured speaking enthusiasticly about his work. I like the motion you see in the picture. I think it has merit and artistic value, and captures the spirit of the said artist. Deror avi (talk) 16:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hand_in_Hand_–_Bridge_over_the_Wadi_P1070780.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chesdovi (talk) 18:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

v

File:Wikipedians P1070730.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hi Deror avi, are the images added by Leonardopo valuable here? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 13:59, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think not - not because of lack of possible educational use. I am against usage of porn here. Deror avi (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Shall I nominate them or do you prefer to do it? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 15:16, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You can go ahead. Deror avi (talk) 08:29, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Har_Hazeitim_IMG_3373.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chesdovi (talk) 12:50, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohammad_Said_Kalash_P1070835.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chesdovi (talk) 16:04, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikipedians_P1070731.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chesdovi (talk) 16:28, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kafr_Qara_P1070788.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chesdovi (talk) 16:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

v

File:Wikipedians P1070767.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hanay (talk) 04:22, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

v

File:Wikipedians P1070798.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hanay (talk) 04:50, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yaacov_Agam_-_Music_Fountain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civa (talk) 15:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

U.S. Route 1, Key West has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 07:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Does this file really have the correct orientation? I would have thought that the correct version is the one from 19 December 2011. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The mosaic is inside the cave at the back of the cript. Deror avi (talk) 09:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
'באווירה הנוכחית', אני סומך עליך שתסדר כאן את העניינים<br\>בתודה,

Yuval Y § Chat § 18:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Videos about holy places in Jerusalem[edit]

Hello Deror

I have created several videos about the stations along the via Dolorosa in Jerusalem and I would like to upload them to Wikipedia's pages such as the Via Dolorosa and each station pages.

You can watch these videos at my YouTube channel www.youtube.com/jerusalemexperience

Or at a map that I have created with google maps:

http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msid=208768704296501720137.0004b5a0a49ad44b1f248&msa=0#bmb=1

Thanks in advance

Eran Frenkel Eranfrenkel@gmail.com 0544-243630

Video Uploading[edit]

How can I upload a video to a Wiki page? what is the best way to do it.

Eran Frenkel eranfrenkel@gmail.com

Your deletion requests[edit]

Please either file a complete deletion request (toolbox bottom left) or use a speedy deletion tag like {{speedy|reason + signature}} for uncontroversal deletions like unused own image, misnamed cats. --Denniss (talk) 17:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Byzantine_floor_mosaic_map_at_St._George_Church_Madaba_P1090114.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.187.110.44 22:12, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interested in using many of your images, possibly your legal services as well.[edit]

Hi Deror - we have a large, tagged and geotagged library of images from all over the world, and we are interested in utilizing some of your images in it. I'd rather not disclose the details of what we intend to do with these images here, but I would like to discuss with you at your earliest convenience. We're also currently looking for an expert in international copy-write law. You can reach me at jim.edelstein at gmail dot com. Thanks!

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Lophotrochozoa (talk) 13:06, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]