User talk:Daniel VILLAFRUELA/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey
Dear Daniel VILLAFRUELA,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.
Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Calvisson-Maison Ortuno VMB-20210227.jpg
Copyright status: File:Calvisson-Maison Ortuno VMB-20210227.jpg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Calvisson-Maison Ortuno VMB-20210227.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 |
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.
We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.
|
MiguelAlanCS (talk) 11:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Saint Clément-Donateurs-20210605.jpg
Copyright status: File:Saint Clément-Donateurs-20210605.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Saint Clément-Donateurs-20210605.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Lotus corniculatus-Lotier corniculé-Feuilles-20210611.jpg
Copyright status: File:Lotus corniculatus-Lotier corniculé-Feuilles-20210611.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Lotus corniculatus-Lotier corniculé-Feuilles-20210611.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Convolvulus arvensis-Liseron des champs-FE-20210705.jpg
Copyright status: File:Convolvulus arvensis-Liseron des champs-FE-20210705.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Convolvulus arvensis-Liseron des champs-FE-20210705.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
We need your feedback!
Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!
I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.
We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.
Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.
Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.
Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !
Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Pont Saint-Ambroix
Bonsoir. Simplement, parmi vos fichiers sur ce pont deux ne comportaient pas le bon I.D. (comme vous pourrez le vérifier dans leur historique). Et malheureusement je n'ai moi-même pas corrigé avec la bonne référence ce dont je vous prie de bien vouloir m'excuser. Très cordialement. J'en profite pour vous signaler, lorsque vous passerez à Arles, le grand intérêt de la visite du Museon Arlaten rénové mais il faut encore attendre un peu car il est provisoirement fermé à cause des dégâts occasionnés par les pluies violentes du dimanche 26 septembre.Finoskov (talk) 23:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Merci, A force de copier coller... je ne pense pas toujours à tout vérifier. Daniel Villafruela (talk) 08:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Centaurea sphaerocephala-Centaurée à têtes rondes-20211021.jpg
Copyright status: File:Centaurea sphaerocephala-Centaurée à têtes rondes-20211021.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Centaurea sphaerocephala-Centaurée à têtes rondes-20211021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Briscous-Église Saint-Vincent-Diacre-Crucifiction -20211124.jpg
Copyright status: File:Briscous-Église Saint-Vincent-Diacre-Crucifiction -20211124.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Briscous-Église Saint-Vincent-Diacre-Crucifiction -20211124.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 12:20, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Calvisson-Église Saint Saturnin-20220206.jpg
Copyright status: File:Calvisson-Église Saint Saturnin-20220206.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Calvisson-Église Saint Saturnin-20220206.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:56, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 | Category:1950 in Bayonne is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Palosirkka (talk) 08:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
| Category:Apis mellifera on Vitex agnus-castus is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Palosirkka (talk) 09:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove warnings
{{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}} or {{subst:autoarchive resolved section/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and then old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details).
If you have received warnings for copyright issues, please familiarize yourself with our policy on licensing. You can also ask for help at the village pump or the help desk if you need assistance.— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
File:Aigues Mortes-Buste de St Louis.jpg have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. |
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected: File:Montpellier-Hôtel de Région-20130721.jpg
Semur_en_Auxois
I wanted to ask you for permission of publishing your photos stained glass windows of Semur en Auxois . We would like to use the publication on the medieval archaeological fabric of Prague . Thank you very much dawit.koho@seznam.cz
Agra_fort-Muthamman_Burj
Dear Daniel VILLAFRUELA I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your images from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Agra_fort-Muthamman_Burj-20131018.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ranakpur-Adinath_Temple-04-Torana-2013101.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 12:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 12:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Nativity, or Birth of Mary
58.20/27 is this Nativity, or Birth of Virgin Mary [1]. Look also here, with google arts id [2]--Nous (talk) 21:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Taken on
Bonjour Daniel. La syntaxe de {{Taken on}} est la suivante: {{Taken on|2023-09-07|location=France}}. Si vous utilisez Location= au lieu de location=, l'image ne sera pas correctement catégorisée. Cordialement. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Saint Bertrand de Comminges-Reliquaire de Saint Bertrand-1967.jpg
Copyright status: File:Saint Bertrand de Comminges-Reliquaire de Saint Bertrand-1967.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Saint Bertrand de Comminges-Reliquaire de Saint Bertrand-1967.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:La Couvertoirade-Église saint Christol-Vierge à l'Enfant-20130516.jpg
- File:Saint Jean d'Alcas-Écriture-20130516.jpg
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 04:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Udaipur-Lac Pichola-Jag Niwas-20131013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Nîmes-Monument à Ernest Denis-20150517.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violations
|
Hello Daniel VILLAFRUELA.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Innsbruck-Maître-autel de la Basilique Notre-Dame des Quatre-Colonnes-199208.jpg
Copyright status: File:Innsbruck-Maître-autel de la Basilique Notre-Dame des Quatre-Colonnes-199208.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Innsbruck-Maître-autel de la Basilique Notre-Dame des Quatre-Colonnes-199208.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Misidentified plant images
Hi Daniel VILLAFRUELA/Archive 3, the three images above show very likely Scandix pecten-veneris, certainly not Athamanta cretensis. The extremely long fruits are typical for Scandix, especially for Scandix pecten-veneris. Of course, the close-up image of the flowers cannot be really identified, but you mentioned that this is from the same plants by linking to the . Athamanta cretensis has got very different fruits and this species won't form dense mats. There are two other species from the genus in southern France, but Scandix australis appears to have much smaller needle-like fruits and Scandix hispanica should not have so many two- or three-lobed bracteoles, if I understand "Flora Gallica" and the bracteoles should be smaller. I changed the ID already. The images must still be renamed. With best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 18:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for correcting the descriptions of my photos. In my defence, I'm not a natural scientist and to my recollection I had difficulty identifying them. So thank you once again.
Daniel Villafruela (talk) 09:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)- I made the rename requests. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 12:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Daniel Villafruela (talk) 13:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I made the rename requests. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 12:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)