User talk:Daniel.Cardenas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

¿Español, no? Lo digo por el nombre. Así hablaré mejor.

No sé si ya ha recibido un aviso de esto, pero lo voy a decir por si acaso. Por favor, no vuelva a subir hojas de cálculo Excel. Microsoft Excel es un programa muy conocido, pero no es libre y no se admite en Commons, donde prácticamente lo más parecido a un copyright es la licencia de Creative Commons.

Para la próxima vez, súbalo en otro formato; en este caso, en forma de imagen SVG, PNG o de documento OpenOffice. Aquí puede encontrar una lista de los formatos que se usan.

Aún así, gracias en nombre de todos. No tengo instalado el Office, pero lo he podido abrir en OpenOffice y parece bueno. Lo único, grabarlo con OpenOffice. Se puede descargar aquí.

Dejaré el archivo por si necesita recuperarlo. Cuando acabe, póngale un aviso de borrado. Algo como {{razón}} o {{superseded|archivo|razón}}. Y también listarla en Commons:Deletion requests.

Y perdón por toda esta parrafada para decir eso. Tengo tendencia a enrollarme mucho :).

Nethac DIU, siempre dispuesto a hablar aquí
23:36, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Otra cosa: no tenga miedo a sobreescribir un archivo para versiones nuevas. Sólo tiene que subirlo como si fuera nuevo y ponerle el nombre del anterior. Si vemos que no funciona, ya se revertirá. O sea que se puede hacer el mismo procedimiento de borrado con Image:Sudoku template.xls

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 19:38, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 17:14, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


File:Sudoku_template.xls has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ilmari Karonen (talk) 18:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Sudoku_template_v3.xls has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ilmari Karonen (talk) 18:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Micro SIM image[edit]

Thanks for editing the Micro SIM image. But the large blue outlines are actually part of the SIM card the the Micro SIM comes in and is used for backwards compatibility with older devices. Justin Ormont (talk) 03:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Daniel.Cardenas!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Daniel.Cardenas, I have seen that you have created this nice and informative image. However a piece of Alaska and Neuguinea/New Zealand are missing on the map. Could you please correct this? Could you also upload the map in svg format? Then also other people could update it. Thanks --Furfur (talk) 14:28, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the original for the info you want. Mine is just a crop. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 07:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks, I noticed it. --Furfur (talk) 20:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In other languages (translate this)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  italiano  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  日本語  +/−

Please use SVG
Please use SVG
Thank you for uploading File:Wikimedia browser share pie chart.png! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

AzaToth 02:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What svg tool creates a 3d pie chart? I used excel 2007 for this and I don't believe it has svg as an output option. I'll double check next time I use it. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 17:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You can use Adobe Photoshop or GIMP to remove the white background (for transparency; save a PNG file) and use Inkscape to open the PNG file, and save it as an SVG image (don't worry, it's virus free, and free at no cost). Need help with Inkscape? If you do, click here. --JCRules (talk) 23:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info, but not interested in doing those extra steps. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 19:46, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I like your graph of usage share of web browsers. I think it might look even better if the legend did not overlap the Firefox line on the graph.

In your R code, may I suggest you try the line:

legend(list(x=2008.6,y=55),col=1:6,lwd=3,legend=browser.names)

instead of:

legend("left",inset=0.05,col=1:6,lwd=3,legend=browser.names)

This moves the legend up a little so that overlap is avoided.

Thanks again for making this graph.

BrettMontgomery (talk) 05:47, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Electric bus in Santa Barbara CA.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

McZusatz (talk) 15:29, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:See-through-white-2017-Chevrolet-BoltEV-024.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 17:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CropTool[edit]

In the future, I would appreciate it if you used CropTool to crop images. This tool allows users to crop images already on Commons without having to download the images. It also makes sure that, if necessary, the file has already passed license review. It also properly links the images to one another, in case an issue with them comes up later. Elisfkc (talk) 18:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, didn't know about crop tool. Perhaps when someone mentions crop in image description, the user can get a notice about CropTool. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 20:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]