User talk:D.O.G.A.

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 21:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will do a licensing and a description too if that is required. /D.O.G.A. 08:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sankt Laurentii kyrkas torn.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 14:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Mingunbell-Burma.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

GeorgHH 11:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please give images good descriptions[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  occitan  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  العربية  +/−


I noticed you've uploaded one or more images and I thought I should turn your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing! Yuval Y § Chat § 21:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, now I understand why. Shall the description be in English by the way?/D.O.G.A. 22:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
English and your desired language, but do click on {EDIT} for editing the text... use {{En}} for english, and so on... Yuval Y § Chat § 01:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for the information. I will do it some day and further on. /D.O.G.A. 22:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Norrström in central Stockholm.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 15:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Please note that if you won't provide a valid license in 7 days your image will be deleted and if you upload a lot of images without licenses you may be blocked from editing wikimedia-commons. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AudiensTre Kronor.jpg[edit]

Hej, Nyfiken på om du vet något mer om den audiens som avbildas? Vilket årtal? Syfte? Vad säger källan? Allt gott, /Urbourbo (talk) 20:37, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hej! Jo, i bildtexten på sidan 29 i Slott & herresäten står det att detta rum låg i det nordvästra tornet mot Strömmen till i det gamla slottet Tre kronor. Detta rum var audiensrum som hade byggts på uppdrag av Johan III och låg längst in i hans nya kungsvåning i översta våningen i nordvästra längan (väster om Stora borggården mot Storkyrkan till). Eftersom det var audiensrum står det också att det var extra utsmyckat i stor prakt (i renässansstil). Det hade ursprungligen en väggbeklädnad med pilastrar och däremellan försilvrade kopparplattor och ett försilvrat och förgyllt kasetttak av koppar. På bilden finns ännu bevarat det ursprungliga golvet av mässings- och kopparplattor (detaljerna om väggar och tak står på s. 26 i Slott & herresäten, där det även står att bara golvets vikt var 3500 kg!).
Kopparen i detta rums väggar och i övriga rumsinredningar i Johan III:s kungsvåning användes antagligen för att betala för Älvsborgs lösen (s. 28). Istället hänger på bilden som det verkar olika gobelänger eller tygtapeter på väggarna, enligt bildtexten med framställningar ur den antika mytologin. Forskaren Martin Olsson uppges på s. 26 ha antagit att Johan III:s intresse för metallarbeten i rumsinredningar berodde på polsk inverkan (hans första drottning var polsk prinsessa). I övrigt försvann detta rum och dess inredning något år innan år 1619 då Johan III:s kungsvåning och dess rum delades in i mindre rum (s. 26), som t.ex. var lättare att värma upp på vintern.
Bilden är enligt bildtexten från 1615 eller 1616 och föreställer Gustav II Adolf när han tar emot en holländsk ambassad. Den är också enligt bildtexten och s. 28 ett kopparstick i en holländsk resejournal Journael der Legatie ghedaen inde Jahren 1615, ende 1616 av Antonis Goeteris, publicerad 1619 och den finns på Kungliga biblioteket i Stockholm.
Jag hade tänkt skriva mer om Slottet Tre kronor på sv.wiki, men mitt Worddokument med det blev lite rörigt och jag orkade inte riktigt hyfsa till det.
//--D.O.G.A. (talk) 14:27, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Intessant! Vore ju suveränt roligt om du ville uppdatera bildens commonssida, såväl som de artiklar där den används, så att allt blir rätt! Jag hjälper gärna till med Tre Kronor-artikeln, efter bästa förmåga. Allt gott, /Urbourbo (talk) 14:40, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Jag börjar med bilden och eventuella bildtexter - ska försöka också med Tre kronor-artikeln. För ett par år sen hittade jag en väldigt intressant uppsats på nätet om arkeologiska utgrävningar på området, bl.a. har vid den senaste utgrävningen hittats rester av en port (igenmurad) från den gamla Stora borggården i nuv. slottets norra längas borggårdsfasad under dagens borggårds nivå. Man vet också sedan förstärkningsarbeten på 60-talet att det ligger ett skepp under nordöstra Logårdsflygeln, strandlinjen gjorde efter landhöjningen på medeltiden ursprungligen en krök framför slottet från Skeppsbron in mot slottet, det kan ses också på ett kopparstick i Suecia Antiqua. //Tack! --D.O.G.A. (talk) 15:18, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jag kopierade dokumentet och grundsförstärkningarna av Logårdsflyglarna skedde 1921-23, då hittades en ekbåt under den sydöstra flygeln. Vi får se vad vi kan göra! //--D.O.G.A. (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roligt detta, jag tog till att börja med och laddade upp de återstående bilderna från Suecia antiqua et hodierna, se: Category:Tre Kronor in Suecia antiqua et hodierna. Allt gott, /Urbourbo (talk) 20:07, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bra det. Ska kolla //--D.O.G.A. (talk) 13:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Segerstads kyrka 28.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 12:38, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Segerstads kyrka 19.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 12:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder Skara.[edit]

Hej. Kul att se så många fina nya bilder från Skara! Jag ställer mig dock lite frågande till varför du väljer att ladda upp så många bilder av i princip samma motiv, exempelvis "Skoltorget domkapitelhuset" och "Skara domprostgård" där kameravinkel verkar vara den samma. Finns någon mening med detta? Jag anser det bättre att som fotograf välja ut den bästa bilden av samma motiv, och eventuellt lägga lite extra tid på att efterbehandla den genom beskärning eller ljus/färg justeringar. Det blir då lättare för andra att hitta de bra bilderna och kategorierna fylls inte av identiska motiv. --I99pema (talk) 10:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Karlstads stift - karta, utbredning.PNG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Karlstads stift - karta, utbredning.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Karlstads stift - karta, utbredning.PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Ljungs församling karta.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 12:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]