User talk:Crimson Cherry Blossom

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Crimson Cherry Blossom!


Hi Crimson Cherry Blossom,
as File:Gösta Sundqvist.jpg is used on several pages, can't you first upload the better version you announced in your speedy-request? --Túrelio (talk) 12:55, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a scanner, but my friend has. I'm not sure when I will visit at his house next time but cause the picture is so poor I hope it will be deleted before I upload better version. =) Crimson Cherry Blossom (talk) 04:38, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for not instantly deleting it, was that it is used on 2 pages of :fi. Of course, you could record these 2 uses and, after uploading the new version, restore them. --Túrelio (talk) 05:54, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
@Crimson Cherry Blossom: You mention photographing/scanning this image. Yet you also claim to have the right to release it under the public domain as "Crimson Cherry Blossom". Which makes me doubt that you are the author of the image, and what the copyright status is of it. Where does the image come from ? How old ? Who is the author of that ? –Krinkletalk 12:42, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have panted it. I finished it in August 30th. Crimson Cherry Blossom (talk) 17:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Liston_Sonny.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Liston_Sonny.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Liston_Sonny.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 15:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I'm the creator of that paint, I used template {{PD-self}}, like these: 1,

2, 3. What's the problem? Crimson Cherry Blossom (talk) 22:20, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I said it already on my talkpage. This work is not ENTIRELY created by yourself but a derivative work based on soemone else work. Without this person, the photgrapher, your work will be different, it will be zero, it would not have been able to create it. So you have to provide a source for the original work and its photographer and you have to make sure that the original authors copyright expired or that the copyright holder released the work under a free license. This is to demonstrate with source information that you have been requested to add. --Martin H. (talk) 22:30, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So you think that I didn't paint it all by myself? You claim that the painting baises on somebody else's work? Well, then I guess you're the one who have to prove that it's not entirely my work. I needed to erase background because of lots of lead and ink smutches. It's not clean at all. This is the truth. Besides I can't take anymore pictures on camera on few weeks cause it's my stepdad's and he is in his cabin, far from here. I spent very very much time and things to finish that picture. I can tell you it's my work. Why don't you delete all my paintings by the same token? P.S.: How should I know what you've been talked on your talk page? Including your unfounded allegation, you are very rude. No offense.. Crimson Cherry Blossom (talk) 06:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I dont have to "prove" anything. Well, it looks like cropped from a photo, you wrote yourself that you removed some background. If you say it is entirely your own work and not based on any other persons input or is a reqork of an old photo (or of a photo of a photo) you should simply write exactly this reasoning in the source field and remove the no source tag. For me it was quite obvious that it is a photograph, if it is not please forgive my curiousity and just write the hones information down. --Martin H. (talk) 06:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Like this? If you believe that the picture bases on some photo, then use Google.
You know, all this suspicion means that painting really looks like Liston! So I'm not really as bad painter as I've believed. =) Crimson Cherry Blossom (talk) 13:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Liston Sonny.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 22:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 08:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]