User talk:Cnyborg/2006-1

A r c h i v e		User talk:Cnyborg 2005 2006 January–August

This is an archive; if you wish to contact me, leave a message at my talk page.

velvet underground covers

hi cnyborg, you' ve set all my images of VU covers on speed deletion request/index...WHY? i think i'm able to photograph my own covers as much as i like. no 2D! i'm not very amused about it. —Hendrike 21:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Cover art is 2D, even though the album cover itself obviously exists in threedimensional space. Actually, even 3D-objects are protected, see Commons:Licensing#Derivative_Works. You can of course photograph them as much as you like, but you have no right to publish those photos under the GFDL licence. Cnyborg 22:58, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Copyright

Takk for hjelpen med å få in rett copyright på Rolf Nesch, Hhjelle

Jery Sandoval's Photos

Hello Cnyborg!

Thank you by take a look on Jery Sandoval's photos. She's Colombia's most beautiful actress (and we've got prettier).

All photos I've uploaded I got them from http://groups.msn.com/JeriSandoval a fan page what I belong.

Don't worry, no body will get angry of that.

Thanks for your time.

--S.V.B.E.E.V. 15:04, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Phranciscusmagnus

The website says "Todos los Derechos Reservados Jeri Sandoval 2006". Unless thay are released under a free license, they have to be deleted. Cnyborg 15:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Artichoke_pendent.jpg

Her er det noe jeg ikke forstår. Jeg lastet bildet opp fra engelsk Wikipedia hvor det er merket som GFDL [1]. Jeg legger inn på kilde og GFDL, allikevel merker du bildet for sletting pga. manglende kilde? Hmm... Jeg er sikkert en meget stor amatør her, men dette er vel GFDL innntil evt. rettighetshavere viser til at dette bildet faktisk ikke er lovlig? Hvordan skal jeg merke bildet for å få fjernet taggen dun satte på? Nsaa 15:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Du må gjengi designerens tillatelse til å publisere et bilde av lampen under GFDL-lisens. Mange lamper vil ikke ha original nok design på å være opphavsrettsbeskyttet, men når en lampe er spesiell nok til å ha en artikkel i Wikipedia er det ingen tvil om at den er beskyttet. Et foto av et beskyttet objekt er et derivativt verk, som er underlagt den opprinnelige opphavsmannens rettigheter. På en: er det ikke angitt noe, og hvis det betyr at designeren ikke har tillatt det er det en:s problem; de kan antagelig uansett hevde fair use hvis det blir problemer, men det går ikke på Commons. Cnyborg 21:38, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Bildet kan nok slettes alle steder. Ref. e-post produsent no:Diskusjon:PH_Kongle. Nsaa 11:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Sysop

Congratulations! You are administrator now. --EugeneZelenko 13:42, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of things. Cnyborg 15:26, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Frank Zane Teaching.jpg

Hola. Tengo permiso del autor, y la página web oficial www.frankzane.com, para compartir esta imagen en wikipedia, ya que les envíe un email pidiendo permiso que ha sido aceptado.

Hi. I have permission from www.frankzane.com for upload this image at wikipedia. If you want check it, you can writte a mail to zane0001@aol.com (www.frankzane.com), whose give me the license.

Why do you want delete it?

--JaviXu 14:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Answered at User talk:JaviXu. Cnyborg 17:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:KoreachildrenWPC.jpg

Considering the similarity in the name of the photographer and your username, it looks as if the license of this photo is fine, but could you please add a line to explain why you have the right to publish Captain Ray's photo under the PD-license? That could save you from the hassle of a deletion request later if someone doesn't make the connection. Cnyborg 00:21, 19 August 2006 (U

My father is now deceased, (Lt. Colonel Claxton Ray, US Army Corps of Engineers) I own all the negatives via inheritance and some of his War photography is excellent. What license should I use, I thought just having my photographic archive and collection information would let people know it is part of the collection which is copyrighted as well. I have more to scan and put up, what should I use? WayneRay 14:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)WayneRay

The PD-license is great, of course, and you clearly have the right to upload it under that license. If you want to make sure he is credited, you could license it under CC-BY-SA, or preferably under a dual GFDL/CC-BY-SA license. Cnyborg 18:03, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

What does that mean? 70.53.109.125 18:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)WayneRay

Take a look at Commons:Licensing for more information, but basically, by licensing something as PD, you give up all rights to the work. Anyone can do anything with it, without even having to crediting the author. If you, however, would like to ensure that your father is credited as the photographer, you can use the license CC-BY-SA and specify how they should be credited. As for the notice I asked for in the first place, I've added it to the image page since you've confirmed that the photographer was indeed your father. The photo is really good, and I hope to see more uloads from the collection. Cnyborg 20:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

I did that and it also shows up on the CC page, is that necessary, isnt that a duplicate thing? There are countless tons of images there , how would one use that section. Thakns for your help i have uploaded more and re written the article [ages with more relevent information WayneRay 23:14, 20 August 2006 (UTC)WayneRay

User:Eragon18

Taken care of. My rule of thumb as far as images like these go...It's been 100% true in the past:

Cartoon screenshot = copyright violation. You may want to go ahead and just risk putting the {{Copyvio}} tag on them. Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 21:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

If you think so. I've taken a bit of flak over that earlier, but I haven't actually been wrong so far, so... Thanks. Cnyborg 22:43, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Zoe_Lund_as_Thana_in_Ms._45.jpg

Hello Cnyborg

I found this image it here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Zoe_Lund_as_Thana_in_Ms._45.jpg From this : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoe_Tamerlis_Lund

Reply at User talk:Bleu. Cnyborg 13:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I don't understand. When you upload files, this screenshot copyright is not mentionned in the ones u can choose. And this came from english wikipedia. What the problem ? Can't YOU change the copyright and make it good once uploaded. That's my first one, I don't know how to do. I need a help. Tx for helping.User talk:Bleu

Fair use-images are not permitted on Commons. Please read Commons:Licensing, which should give you an overview of license matters. Cnyborg 16:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

you mean Fair use-images is permitted for english wikipedia and only for them ? Where do they store their image ? isn't it on wikimedia commons ? User talk:Bleu

Man, what a pity is all this, for a miserable picture already used in english wikipedia. User talk:Bleu

Fair use is dependent on other content; it's acceptable when illustrating an article. Commons has no articles, so fair use is simply not possible here. Some other Wikimedia projects accept fair use, but not all. Cnyborg 18:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)