User talk:Claude Villetaneuse

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Problèmes liés aux photos[edit]

Bonsoir,

Alors là tu vas me haïr et te demander si celà ne frole pas la persécution.

J'ai jeté un oeil sur ta galerie de photos et malgé que j'en aime un certain nombre, je me permet quelques remarques :

  • Image:Bus CGO ligne H.JPG Je ne préfère pas aborder le problème des cartes anciennes qui fait débats sur fr: mais en plus, comme c'est un scan de carte, (si on fait fi de la date de mort de l'auteur inconnu à priori) la licence ne peut qu'être {{tl:PD-old}}. Tu n'as pas qualité d'auteur pour un simple scan et tu ne peux arguer d'un travail personnel. Cette remarque est valable pour tes autres scans (cartes, obligations, plans etc...).
  • A noter que les documents scannés ne peuvent à priori pas être recopiés d'un bouquin sous copyright.
  • Image:Venus de villetaneuse.jpg là, je n'ai rien à dire sur la photo elle même, mais malheureusement, elle ne peux rester sur Commons car si tu es bien l'auteur de la photo, la statue est elle, protégé au titre du droit d'auteur au bénéfice des ayants droits de Cesar. Si elle peut être photographiée sans problème, les clichés ne peuvent être diffusés sans autorisation des ayants droits.

Ne pense pas que je m'acharne contre toi, (d'autant que j'aime beaucoup les cartes anciennes) simplement comme je suis tombé sur tes photos, je vais jusqu'au bout.

Cordialement Oxam Hartog 23:30, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour, Comme tu le sais, je débute sur wikipédia, et encore plus sur commons. Je te remercie donc de tes conseils et suggestions pour m'aidre à mieux respecter les chartes.

Image:Bus CGO ligne H.JPG Je ne préfère pas aborder le problème des cartes anciennes qui fait débats sur fr: 
mais en plus, comme c'est un scan de carte, (si on fait fi de la date de mort de l'auteur inconnu à priori) 
la licence ne peut qu'être {{tl:PD-old}}. Tu n'as pas qualité d'auteur pour un simple scan 
et tu ne peux arguer d'un travail personnel. Cette remarque est valable pour tes autres scans 
(cartes, obligations, plans etc...).

Je corrige la licence.

Ok j'ai vu la correction. A mon avis, il faut aussi que tu enlèves œuvre personnelle ainsi que la date qui n'apporte rien au descriptif puisqu'il s'agit d'un scan. Oxam Hartog 13:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A noter que les documents scannés ne peuvent à priori pas être recopiés d'un bouquin sous copyright.

Je m'en doutais bien, c'est pourquoi je n'ai scanné que des horaires publiés dans le chaix de 1914. Les droits doivent être largement éteints, pour autant qu'il y ait des droits sur ces documents purement informatifs, qui ne me paraissent pas avoir beaucoups de relation avec la notion d'œuvre littéraire et artistique ...

De manière générale, qu'en est-il des livres qui reproduisent des documents anciens ? Peut-on scanner uniquement le document ancien, qui est en domaine public ?

Tu ne peux pas recopier d'un livre encore sous copyright. En principe, les documents sont dans le domaine public, pas leur mise en page ni le principe de base de données que cela entraine. cette protection cours sur une vingtaine d'années je crois. C'est un peu compliqué, il y a eu une discussion sur fr: à ce sujet. Ceci concerne les documents reproduits mécaniquement, si le document dans le domaine public est repris sur une photo qui le met en situation de 3d la photo est protégée dans le cadre légal.
Si le bouquin est dans le domaine public, pas de pb. si t'es sur de ton coup et que tu scan sans indiquer d'où cela vient ben là, c'est la bonne foi mais attention aujourd'hui en reprographie, il est possible de mettre un filigrane electronique qui permet de retrouver l'origine. Oxam Hartog 13:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Venus de villetaneuse.jpg là, je n'ai rien à dire sur la photo elle même, mais malheureusement, 
elle ne peux rester sur Commons car si tu es bien l'auteur de la photo, la statue est elle, 
protégé au titre du droit d'auteur au bénéfice des ayants droits de Cesar. 
Si elle peut être photographiée sans problème, les clichés ne peuvent être diffusés sans autorisation des ayants droits. 

Il n'est donc pas possible de reproduire une oeuvre d'art moderne dans wikipédia, sans être un ayant droit ou être autorisé par un ayant droit ? Peut-on au moins lier sur un document figurant sur internet ?

Effectivement en matière d'art moderne, c'est difficile. Tu peux eventuellement faire un plan large où la statue n'est qu'un élément non déterminant de la photo ou alors, mettre dans l'article en bas de page un lien vers un site où cette oeuvre sera visible, sans que ce lien puisse être assimilé à une pub. Attention aux liens non pérennes. Oxam Hartog 13:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Et, par ailleurs, comment fait-on pour SUPPRIMER un document que l'on a téléchargé sur commons, ou pour CHANGER SON NOM ? J'ai fais quelques fausses manœuvres que j'aimerais bien rectifier.

Pour Changer un nom, on importe à nouveau sous le nom choisi et on demande la suppression du premier cliché en éditant celui-ci et copiant la fonction suivante {{good file name}} (good file name) est le nom du nouveau fichier. le reste est automatique, au boud de quelques jours un admin efface le fichier (Vérifier avant que le fichier est inemployé)
Pour une suppression simple, ou c'est net et urgent et après édition du fichier on met {{reason}} ou c'est plus ambiguë et on met {{reason}} et on suit la procédure indiquée. Oxam Hartog 13:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Claude_Villetaneuse 08:57, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Venus de villetaneuse.jpg a été listé dans les demandes de suppression pour que la communauté puisse discuter afin d'établir si ce fichier peut être conservé ou non. Nous aimerions que vous participiez à cette discussion, qui se déroule dans le paragraphe consacré à cette question.

Si vous êtes la personne qui a créé ce fichier, prenez bien note que le fait qu'il soit soumis à cette procédure ne signifie pas nécessairement que nous n'accordons pas de valeur à votre travail. Cela veut simplement dire qu'une personne croit qu'un problème précis se pose au sujet de ce fichier, comme par exemple un problème de copyright. Si le fichier est listé ainsi en raison de la mise en ligne d'une meilleure version disponible, considérez que bien que le fichier puisse être supprimé, votre travail (que nous apprécions à sa juste valeur) continue d'exister au travers de la nouvelle version.

Dans tous les cas, ne prenez pas cette procédure comme une attaque personnelle. Merci !
Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Jastrow (Λέγετε) 20:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CFBS_locotracteur_352_Nird.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. MesserWoland COM PL 21:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 05:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 06:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Catégories[edit]

Bonjour Claude, je ne suis pas d'accord. Tout d'abord, il y a une grosse majorité de communes qui étaient en XX (Y) pour une poignée en XX, Y. Il y a donc une uniformisation à faire et suivre la majorité parait logique. Tu ne peux pas créer des catégories différentes de celles des autres contributeurs. Deuxièmement, même si les catégories ont des noms anglophones, je pense qu'il ne faut pas exagérer dans une mondialisation honteuse sinon il faudrait aller jusqu'au bout du raisonnement et intituler les photos en anglais. Les images d'un pays sont principalement fournies par ses habitants et il convient donc d'être le plus logique possible. Les catégories concernant le Connecticut doivent être en Hartford, CT, celles concernant la Cumbria en Preston, Cumbria et celles concernant le Val-d'Oise en Marines (Val-d'Oise). C'est d'ailleurs ce que j'avais fait. Voyant que c'était rouge, j'ai créé la catégorie avant de m'apercevoir qu'il y en avait une autre pré-existante. Toutes les communes homonymes du 95 suivent maintenant un même principe de catégorisation. C'est logique, nécessaire et bien plus simple. Gato76680 08:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 18:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 18:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 17:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 18:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 05:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 05:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 18:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:29, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 07:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 06:33, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aéroport du Bourget.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 86.164.94.143 08:14, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 10:19, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:47, 20 April 2008 (UTC) ✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 11:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Issy-les-Moulineaux - T2 - Machine à laver les rames.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 17:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 17:16, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 16:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 17:16, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 17:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 11:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 11:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 17:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 17:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 05:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 05:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

--Legoktm (Talk | Bot) 05:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 05:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by ABFbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (abf /talk to me/ (using a bot)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --abf /talk to me/ (using a bot) 12:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fichier importé par erreur en format pdf - Claude_Villetaneuse 05:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 16:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Claude_Villetaneuse 05:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Métro Rome Guimard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--Cecil (talk) 20:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:PARIS - Une Gare du Métropolitain (Bastille).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--Cecil (talk) 20:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:IVRY_-_Rue_Marat_-_Les_HBM_-_Vue_intérieure.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Teofilo (talk) 13:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File deletion warning File:Hotel_des_Voyageurs_-_NOYELLES_-_La_gare_économique.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

92.131.20.92 13:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Claude Villetaneuse!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Jules_Girardet_-_Louise_Michel_harangue_les_Communards.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

sугсго 14:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Licence timbre[edit]

J'ai vu que vous aviez eu pas mal de fil à retordre avec les licence d'images. J'ai un peu le même problème concernant des timbres récents que l'on menace d'effacer (File:Tampon-T-DA.jpg File:Tampon-Belem.jpg File:Timbre-Belem.jpg File:LaPoste2.jpg). Or je constate que vous-même avez publié certaines images de timbres récents. Par exemple : File:Timbre Jean Renaudie.jpg, sans encourir de pareille menace. Seriez-vous capable de m'expliquer la différence car moi, je n'en vois pas et j'aimerai bien comprendre la règle du jeux ? Cordialement --alain.darles (talk) 12:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oups ! Je crains d'avoir déclenché cela...
File:Timbre_Jean_Renaudie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peter17 (talk) 12:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Passions communes[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai un ami parisien très sympathique, Armand, fou passionné des transports en commun : trains, trams, bus, autocars. Un puits de science, photographe, dessinateur et collectionneur sur ce sujet. Serait-il possible de faire en sorte que vous vous rencontriez pour parler ensemble de ce que vous aimez tous les deux ?

--Basili (discuter) 15:31, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig δ 16:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pompage de tes photos et des miennes[edit]

Bonjour Claude ! J'ai découvert il y a une quinzaine de jours que plusieurs de mes photos mais aussi au moins une de toi ont été illégitimement copiées-collées sans mention de licence et sans noms d'auteurs par ce site http://lusile17.centerblog.net/169-Église-de-la-Somme-. Voir mon "alerte" sur le Bistro de ce jour ainsi que mon début de page spéciale, suite au conseil d'un autre contributeur ... User:Markus3/Photos réemployées - Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 18:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Et une autre ... voir http://lusile17.centerblog.net/200-Eglises-de-la-SOMME-- La personne en cause m'a répondu en gros qu'elle ne voit pas pourquoi je vais en faire tout un plat, puisqu'elle habite dans la Somme et que certaines de ses photos sont aussi "pompées" ... mais j'ai constaté qu'elle pompe des masses de photos de toutes origines, et pour ce qui est des édifices, par exemple une vue d'Auxi-le-Château (issue de Commons, justement aussi), qui ne se situe pas dans son département de résidence ! Voir précisément : http://lusile17.centerblog.net/167--Eglises-de-la-SOMME - Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 07:59, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Et ce site est particulièrement "aspirateur-pompeur" http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/breteuil_oise . As-tu suivi mon "combat" de Don Quichotte sur le Bistro de WP depuis 8 jours ? Examine aussi cette page : User:Markus3/Photos réemployées - Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 17:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
La liste pour toi va être aussi assez longue, je pense : http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/catheux ... J'opère mes "intrusions" pour rendre à César ce qui appartient à César. - Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 05:14, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Et quelques-un(e)s de plus (bien entendu, je ne relève pas les clichés que tu as mis en "Domaine Public") :
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/le-crocq
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/domeliers
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/esquennoy
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/fontaine-bonneleau
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/francastel
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/froissy
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/le-gallet
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/gaudechart
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/grandvilliers_oise
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/hardivillers
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/hetomesnil
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/lavacquerie
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/laverriere
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/marseille-en-beauvaisis
- Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 08:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Il y a ce blog aussi (d'un type que je connais plus ou moins comme contributeur à des forums de généalogie et que j'ai alerté à 2 reprises (et en vain) pour qu'il mentionne mon nom et le type de licence pour certaines de mes photos pompées) : http://ma-genealogie.over-blog.com/article-25832906.html - Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 07:57, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who or what is F. Fleury?[edit]

Dear Claude, I notice some of the postcards you've uploaded are by an entity or person named F. Fleury. Would you know anything about this name? What is th F. an abbreviation of? Thanks. --CommonsDara (talk) 18:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:LE_TOUQUET_PARIS_PLAGE_-_Phares_et_Panoramas.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 12:08, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:GARE RER B La Plaine - Stade de France.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Common Good (talk) 16:17, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely PierreSelim (talk) 12:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 13:51, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:59, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Amiens/Soissons ... tu as raison[edit]

Bonjour ! Regarde stp ceci ! Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 06:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Villetaneuse Hotel de ville.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Noyers-Saint-Denis Monument de Vladimir Surovtsev.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 23:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 16:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:ND Missions - Vierge à l'Enfant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 16:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Faloise - Monument aux cantonniers.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 21:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:FLEURY 1- PARIS - La Place Clichy.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 18:30, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Flickrworker (talk) 22:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Il y a une erreur dans le texte: "rame de banlieue à impariale". 198.217.118.103 17:13, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{Information |Description=Locomotive tender MF-33 du Chemin de fer à Vapeur des Trois Vallées, construite par Haine Saint Pierre en 1911 pour le chemin de fer industriel belge du charbonnage Monceau-F

Good morning, Are you sure about the locomotive being built in 1911 by Haine Saint Pierre? I rather think it is a rebuild of a ROD Baldwin Bt which after WW1 some were purchased by the EB to become Type 47, later Type 50. Clarification would be appreciated.

photographie de l’établissement thermal d'Uriage[edit]

Bonjour Je vous contacte à propos de la photographie de l’établissement thermal d'Uriage dans l’article concernant Vaulnaveys-le-Haut. Celle-ci serait plus pertinente pour illustrer un article concernant la commune de Saint-Martin-d'Uriage, commune sur laquelle il est situé que celui concernant Vaulnaveys-le-Haut. cordialement - --Aristogiton (talk) 13:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chateau_de_Langeais_-_Salle_du_banquet[edit]

Dear Claude Villetaneuse, I am a Prof. in Architectureand I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chateau_de_Langeais_-_Salle_du_banquet.JPG. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com --hippofish 11:57, 12 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 11:57, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 08:55, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vos cartes postales de tramway[edit]

Bonjour Claude,

Je voulais vous faire savoir que j'ai utilisé vos photos sur un blogpost sur le tramway parisien : https://fabricofparis.com/2020/11/18/tramways-ile-de-france-history-the-first-mass-transit-in-paris.html

Merci beaucoup !

BenjaminChadwick (talk) 16:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image : viaduc de Rocherolles[edit]

Bonjour, Dans les commentaires, tu dates la carte postale des années 1920. Pour moi, elle est postérieure à 1935 car on voit les supports de caténaire qui ont été placés en 1935. Belgavox (talk) 11:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belgavox: Tu as raison : caténaires --> postérieur à 1935 : je rectifie. Merci du signalement Claude villetaneuse (talk) 12:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]