User talk:Cirt/Archive 5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


You are welcome ![edit]

No problem : you are welcome ! The VIC page is probably the most friendly on Commons and all the usual contributors on this page try to help others... when it is possible. Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 13:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Why did you delete this file? The license at Flickr is still CC-BY-2.0. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  1. The metadata for the image attributed it to photographer Scott McDermott.
  2. I contacted Scott McDermott from contact info at www.scottmcdermott.com.
  3. He asserted copyright and didn't want the image on Wikimedia Commons or Flickr.

Hope that explains it, -- Cirt (talk) 21:12, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Towelie has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Kigsz (talk) 14:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I didn't upload that file. I only modified it. It appears that User:MDCarchives uploaded it. Nightscream (talk) 19:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry about that, that was just the automated script notifying you. -- Cirt (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A question[edit]

En,Wiki has a rule against role accounts, but as far as I'm aware that's not a WikiMedia-wide rule. Does Commons have a similar proscription? Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking, Beyond My Ken, but I'm pretty sure it's not a good idea to have unconfirmed accounts with possibly multiple people accessing said accounts. -- Cirt (talk) 02:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's certainly how the en.wiki community sees it, I'm just wondering if the Commons community sees it the same way.Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure. -- Cirt (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images by User:MDCarchives[edit]

Hi Cirt, what exactly was the reason for tagging these images as "no permission"? The user uploaded them as own work, and as several of them are from the nineties, you cannot expect high resolution or proper exif data. I'm having nobel prize people on my watchlist, so stumbled about these batch deletions of images which I find worth investigating a bit more time. Thanks for your feedback! --Elya (talk) 17:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your question, Elya. There were multiple reasons, including no permission for photos of people taken indoors, and also unconfirmed account asserted to be from organization but with no confirmation as such. -- Cirt (talk) 21:30, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, zero information was given on who the photographers were, and no documentation was given confirming whether or not those unnamed photographers released copyright appropriately. -- Cirt (talk) 21:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. What about „permission for photos of people taken indoors“? Did I miss anything new here? Usually it's no problem to take images of prominent people during a public reading or such, indoors or outdoors. Apart from that I contacted the user by mail (via en.wp) in order to get OTRS permission, if possible. Thanks for your answer! Regards --Elya (talk) 07:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Elya, but like I said above, we'd need permission from the photographers as well. -- Cirt (talk) 11:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Cirt, unfortunately my message was bounced, apparently there was an old mail address in the system, too bad :-( –  So I don't see more chances to get permission from the copyright holders (not necessarily the photographer, if – e.g. an archive – has the necessary rights). --Elya (talk) 16:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, Elya, no worries, and thanks for the update. -- Cirt (talk) 19:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I just found this message at the website of the Miami Dade College: http://www.mdc.edu/main/collegeforum/archive/vol15-04/features/l0300_wolfson.aspx - it refers to an archive, that was donated to the college, along with decent funds to digitize it. How about a mail to the college about the conditions of those donations regarding copyright? --h-stt !? 18:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That looks like an archive owned by the college, and not necessarily the same one used by the purported organization role account. We still have the issue of the unknown photographers, as well. -- Cirt (talk) 19:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tribute to Leonard Nimoy by Adam Schiff.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Closed. Result was "Speedily Kept". -- Cirt (talk) 17:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Statement on the Death of Leonard S Nimoy.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Closed. Result was "Speedily Kept". -- Cirt (talk) 17:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you confirm a license?[edit]

Hi Cirt, This video's author on Vimeo seems to have changed the license at the source. Can you confirm that this was published under cc-by-sa 3.0?

Can you confirm that this is cc-by-sa 3.0?

Victorgrigas (talk) 02:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Victorgrigas, it was indeed published as CC-BY-SA-3.0. -- Cirt (talk) 02:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Creator:Edward Snowden has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this creator, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sanandros (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This was closed as  Keep. -- Cirt (talk) 15:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Rick Santorum, Jack of Hearts - frothy Cartoon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 19:49, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The result was closed as  Keep. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 17:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:2015 student Ahmed Mohamed.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Heyyouoverthere (talk) 20:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gloria Allred.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bill Cosby, 2011.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charlie Beck (L.A.P.D.), 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Deleted image was added again[edit]

File:2015-09-16T193153Z 1 LYNXNPEB8F164 RTROPTP 4 USA-TEXAS-STUDENT.jpg Cwobeel (talk) 19:06, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Deleted file. User blocked. -- Cirt (talk) 19:11, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Not much an issue here, but generally, I think you should not close DRs you open. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader himself requested deletion. Thus it qualified as a speedy delete under criteria, request by uploader. I explained as much, in the detailed closing rationale. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 19:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clock pic - just a nit[edit]

Your reasoning in "delete" that the creator was Ahmed is false. The copyright holder isn't Ahmed, it is the photographer. There are many photos taken in public of celebrities that are released to the public domain and the celebrity has little or no say (certainly not anything we generally recognize). Ahmed has no ability to release or not release that photo to the public domain. The ownership is the photographer and likely passed to the City through their employment. Whether works of the City of Irving are public domain, I do not know. --DHeyward (talk) 21:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. He is the creator of the work itself. It was not taken outdoors but inside. It is akin to a sculpture. -- Cirt (talk) 21:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self - Martin Luther King Jr NYWTS picture is public domain[edit]

Note to self:

Detailed explanation of why this file is public domain licensed, at DIFF. -- Cirt (talk) 01:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:NASA - We're supporters of STEM and inspiring kids like Ahmed to pursue their dreams.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 12:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

please refresh[edit]

http://copyright.gov/circs/circ40.pdf on page 2 describing "useful articles" (such as a clock)- "Copyright in a work that portrays a useful article extends only to the artistic expression of the author of the pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work." The author of the picture, not the clockmaker is the copyright holder. It doesn't convey any rights to make the clock to the photographer but there are no rights to the picture by the clockmaker. The examples given are a picture of a car or dress. Inside or outside, the photograph of a useful article is owned by the photographer. The copyright of the photo belongs to the photographer that arranged it. It is not a derivative work of the clock. --DHeyward (talk) 18:50, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's also Commons:Freedom of panorama. -- Cirt (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Specifically, Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States, only applies to permanent buildings, so nope, copyright is retained by the creator of the work itself. Other arguments are debatable, but could be discussed at a potential deletion discussion, where the community can weigh in, there, at some point, not now, but possibly in the future. And that discussion would take place at a central singular location, and, ideally, not at my user talk page. -- Cirt (talk) 19:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued image candidate nomination[edit]

I've nominated an image for Commons:Valued image candidates nomination consideration.

It's about a message to Ahmed Mohamed by US President Barack Obama.

Discussion is at: Commons:Valued image candidates/President Obama tweet to student Ahmed Mohamed.jpg.

-- Cirt (talk) 20:51, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self - interesting picture[edit]

Note to self - Coats of arms[edit]

There are plenty of coats of arms that got featured:

  1. File:Austria_Bundesadler.svg - featured on Commons
  2. File:Kaernten_CoA.svg - featured on Commons
  3. File:Coat_of_arms_of_Mexico.svg - featured on Commons
  4. en:File:Alabama state coat of arms (illustrated, 1876).jpg - featured on en.wikipedia
  5. en:File:England Expects Signal.svg - featured on en.wikipedia
  6. en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/State Arms of the Union (set) - featured on en.wikipedia

-- Cirt (talk) 22:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:The President Delivers a Statement on the Shooting in Oregon.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nyttend (talk) 13:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I goofed - are you able to help[edit]

I earlier posted this several hours ago at the Help Desk under the section: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/, but so far no one has responded. Posting here also, just in case.

My first time nominating a Featured picture set (or any Featured picture). In my haste, I saved my edit on what (I now realize) should be the Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/ template that comes up when you click on "Create new nomination". Then, of course, I compounded that by trying to delete it. So, now what you get when you try to create a Feature set is my deletion request instead. I bungled it badly, and unlike Wikipedia, I don't know how to fix this myself. So I thought I should mention it to someone besides the Help Desk.

On the positive side, I did eventually get the nomination set up and posted. Maile66 (talk) 22:08, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Maile66: I've deleted Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/, I hope that solves your problem? -- Cirt (talk) 22:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but...not quite. Unless it's taking time to process. If you go to the Featured Picture nominations page and click on Create a New Nomination for set, you still see my message. I'm pretty sure it used to be a template of instructions for creating a set. Just like the template for individual pictures when you Create a New Nomination for the individuals. I purged the page, but it didn't resolve it. Maile66 (talk) 22:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Maile66: Just try to refresh your browser and purge your cache? -- Cirt (talk) 22:20, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. I purged the page cache. Purged my browser cache. Shut down the browser and deleted all my temp files. And it's still there:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Template%3AFPCnomSetPreload&editintro=Template%3AFPCnomSetInstructions&summary=&nosummary=&prefix=&minor=&title=Commons%3AFeatured+picture+candidates%2FSet%2F&create=Create+new+nomination

It is that which has my deletion message on it instead of the instructions it's supposed to have. There is no history on this but my edits. How do we get the instructions loaded back on there? Maile66 (talk) 22:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, Maile66, perhaps you can try posting for help to a more centrally placed noticeboard, like Commons:Village pump and Commons:Administrators' noticeboard? I'm kind of confused as to why you just post individually only to my user talk page, and not those two places, in the first place? I think you're likely to get more expertise and better faster help at one of those places, maybe? What do you think about those ideas? -- Cirt (talk) 22:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I posted to your page, because I didn't know about the Commons VP and Commons noticeboard. I don't do normally do anything here that would need those. I'll post to them. Thanks. Maile66 (talk) 22:32, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, glad to help out and point you in the right direction. I wish you the best of luck! -- Cirt (talk) 22:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sandra Fluke.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Hi Cirt, I understand you are no longer an OTRS volunteer, but I just wanted to drop you a courtesy notice regarding File:Hazal Kaya.jpg, which you verified. A question has been raised regarding this ticket, and having taken a look at it, I believe it likely that you were lied to. Regards, Storkk (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will respectfully defer to the judgment of Storkk and/or other helpful OTRS Volunteers, thank you ! -- Cirt (talk) 20:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

request[edit]

Hi, I've a request, I want to retrieval my file from edit from this user to be as I uploaded it, please. Faris El-Gwely (talk) 04:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:His Highness Hollywood.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Yann (talk) 21:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File was originally uploaded by the filmmaker himself. -- Cirt (talk) 13:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self - interesting category[edit]

I have gone through this with people many times. These are my own images. Wikipedia has no guidelines or requirements for image resolutions. It is very easy (one click, actually) to search the web and see if the image was lifted from anywhere. If there's no suitable evidence to suggest that this is not my immage, please close this. I'm tired of having to keep explaining myself to baseless claims. MavsFan28 (talk) 04:37, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. If you feel this image was lifted, like I said, feel free to provide any evidence. As I said, if it had been posted anywhere on the internet prior to my upload, you could easily find it. If you can't, please do not make up your own guidelines for images to be deleted. Thank you, MavsFan28 (talk) 02:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Valued image candidates/Merrick Garland.jpg[edit]

I've nominated File:Merrick Garland.jpg as a candidate for Valued Image.

Discussion is at:

-- Cirt (talk) 02:07, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meet Merrick Garland, President Obama's Supreme Court Nominee.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

czar 02:45, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For VI[edit]

It is good to invest you in VI, I congratulate you. I see that you are full of enthousiamse. If you vote you must complete the fields: Status. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Archaeodontosaurus: Thank you for the kind words ! Ah, okay, I had thought that was for the next person to fill out after the first comment. I'll do that in the future. Thanks again, -- Cirt (talk) 17:47, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you taking an interest in VI. Remember you have to change 'nominated' to 'supported'. Also, the quality - resolution, clarity, contrast etc. is less important here. You first have to be sure that the scope proposed by the nominator is appropriate: there are good guidelines you can read. The key criterion is then whether the image proposed is the best within the chosen scope on Commons - usually verified by checking the category gallery and similar galleries as sometimes the nomination links to a very limited gallery. Charles (talk) 08:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp: Already mentioned to me, above, but thank you ! -- Cirt (talk) 10:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some bacon for you[edit]

The Thanks For Your Kind Service Award
I appreciate the help, Cirt. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 03:02, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Merrick Garland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Pay attention to copyright
File:2015 03 10 Hillary Clinton by Voice of America.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Also affected:

Kumkum (talk) 20:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vycl1994 (talk) 03:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Admin's Barnstar
I'm sad you resigned Cirt. Thank you for your service while you're an administrator. Poké95 03:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Martine Rothblatt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Skybiome (talk) 15:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:2010 Vicki Sexual Freedom Award recipients.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Skybiome (talk) 15:18, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Rahul Bott (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, czar 09:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martine Rothblatt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bit7ocker (talk) 14:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:2010 Vicki Sexual Freedom Award recipients.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bit7ocker (talk) 14:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

my uploads[edit]

Mind checking out my pictures and telling me what you think? Chick1555 (talk) 08:24, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Series of Tubes - Senator Ted Stevens.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 13:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011 Matt Smith eyes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Gage (talk) 01:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:Ogv videos of sexuality has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 05:43, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:GIF videos of male masturbation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 05:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Ogv videos of male masturbation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 05:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:Videos of ejaculation by format has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 06:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:2010s ejaculation (animated) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 07:43, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:2010s videos of ejaculation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 07:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:2000s ejaculation (animated) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 07:46, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:2000s videos of ejaculation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 07:48, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:GIF videos of ejaculation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 07:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:2010s male masturbation (animated) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 17:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:2010s videos of male masturbation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 17:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:GIF videos of sexuality has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 18:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:1920s videos of male masturbation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 18:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:2000s male masturbation (animated) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 18:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:2000s videos of male masturbation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 18:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:Videos of ejaculation by decade has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 20:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:Videos of male masturbation by decade has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 20:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:Videos of sexuality by decade has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 21:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:Ogv videos of ejaculation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 00:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Videos of sexuality by format has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 00:25, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:Videos of male masturbation by format has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 00:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:1930s videos of ejaculation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 00:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:1920s videos of ejaculation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 07:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANU[edit]

Hello, I just notify you that. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:I ate Mr Hankey by Kenny Lex.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mr. Guye (talk) 02:54, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janice Dickinson on the Lloyd Klein runway.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:21, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janice Dickinson on the Lloyd Klein runway (cropped to Janice Dickinson).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:21, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz 21:37, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:12, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Draw Muhammad Day video by AwesomeSauceUK audio removed.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

«««« 23:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zohir.sekkaui (talk • contribs) 23:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 10:08, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:I wonder if Ahmed would share the plans for his clock, so we can make one for our office wall.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 18:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 22:01, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 19:44, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 19:57, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 17:30, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 19:53, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reps Honda, Ellison and Carson Lead Letter to the Department of Justice Calling for Investigation into the Arrest of Ahmed Mohamed.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 20:22, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also nominate the following for the same reason, the linked WikiSource transcription can be seen under the file usage of each file:

--BevinKacon (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 14:24, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Beloved Mensagers.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Missvain (talk) 03:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

History of Muhammad has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 20:27, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Ahmed and the Clock, after Izzy Galvez (21478828885).jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ahmed and the Clock, after Izzy Galvez (21478828885).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 11:33, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celebrating a new America -lovewins 58241 (18586335674) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 03:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Think of the children pink background.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 11:16, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 14:50, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jon Pertwee (cropped to eyes).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ubcule (talk) 10:56, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 22:20, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Template:Idw/layout Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, QTHCCAN (talk) 19:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Katelive2009 cropped.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

Sourced to file since deleted as copyvio or missing Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 13:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Message to Scientology.ogv was nominated for MOTD[edit]

Your file has been nominated for a Media of the Day.

Your contribution to this project has been noticed. A file Message to Scientology.ogv, which was uploaded by you, has been nominated to be displayed on the Main Page of this project as a Media of the Day. You can view this and other nominations at Commons talk:Media of the day. It is always a good idea to let other contributors know when you think your file would look good as a featured media file, provide descriptions in different languages, and perhaps spread the joy by nominating media of other uploaders, that you believe deserve that. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 15:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MOTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ubcule ([[User talk:Ubcule|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Geo Swan ([[User talk:Geo Swan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:05, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate  Mysterymanblue  07:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Dronebogus ([[User talk:Dronebogus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Dronebogus ([[User talk:Dronebogus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lord Belbury ([[User talk:Lord Belbury|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Arlo James Barnes 04:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AutotranslateRhain 04:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]