User talk:Cirt/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Taking a break for some MELLOW time[edit]

I'm taking a break from recent drama for some COM:MELLOW time.

I'll defer to the judgment of other admins with regards to admin actions.

Please feel free to change what you wish on prior admin actions — no worries, either way. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 05:31, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you![edit]

Enjoy the break. I hope you don't stay away for too long. Merry Xmas and Happy New Year! INeverCry 06:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the kind thoughts! -- Cirt (talk) 06:02, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question at deletion request[edit]

Hey, just in case you missed it, I responded to your comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hylda and Meow bikini censored.png and would appreciate a reply. --Conti|✉ 21:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. :) ✓ Done. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 03:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Mr. Hankey images[edit]

Cirt, I am surprised to discover that you have uploaded more images of Mr. Hankey following the previous discussion about this. Would you be good enough to ask for them to be deleted? I can certainly do it if you wish, but I think it would be much less troublesome if you did it yourself. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:47, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hrm, this must've been awhile ago. Which ones are you referring to specifically? -- Cirt (talk) 22:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I believe everything in Category:Mr. Hankey, the Christmas Poo needs to go. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. Why do you think so, Delicious carbuncle? -- Cirt (talk) 23:18, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps we could be more specific? Let's talk about them individually, and that way it'd be easier for me to understand your concerns? -- Cirt (talk) 23:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think we've already covered this in the previous discussion. The issues are the same. I don't see any need to belabour this - I thought I would give you the chance to delete these yourself, but if you don't wish to, I will take it up somewhere else. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I thought these that are currently in the category were less similar to the character in question, and more original work by their creators, you see? -- Cirt (talk) 00:51, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Hi Cirt. Glad to see you back around. Hope you had a good relaxing break.

INeverCry 23:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! -- Cirt (talk) 23:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vladimir Putin caricature - Putin Rearmament Plan - by FreedomHouse.jpg[edit]

File:Vladimir Putin caricature - Putin Rearmament Plan - by FreedomHouse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


File:Vladimir Putin caricature - Putin Rearmament Plan - by FreedomHouse.jpg[edit]

Cirt, I am confused by your closure of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vladimir Putin caricature - Putin Rearmament Plan - by FreedomHouse.jpg. You closed it with the statement "uploader requested deletion of an unused file". You were the uploader of the image, but there is no policy that allows uploaders to have unused images deleted. Also, I thought that DRs were typically left open for a week? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recently uploaded files may be deleted in this way - though that does not apply here of course. --Herby talk thyme 14:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Understood, Herby, thank you for this clarification. I will keep that in mind in the future. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 14:56, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cirt, would you mind reclosing the DR to show that you deleted the file because it was a copyright violation facilitated by Flickrwashing? And perhaps you could add the account(s) for that Flickr user to the blacklist? Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 15:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some more from the same Flickr account:

There may be more. Can you delete these as probable copyvios, or should I start another DR? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, hope that's satisfactory, -- Cirt (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I found a few more (File:List Tunisia Elections.jpg, File:Protests Tunisia Elections.jpg, & File:Voting Station Tunisia Elections.jpg). I think that's all from that particular account, but our search engine isn't always as useful as one might like. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And ✓ Done, hopefully this will be satisfactory for now, -- Cirt (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:What about the children.jpg[edit]

File:What about the children.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GrapedApe (talk) 03:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification. -- Cirt (talk) 17:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Update: The result was  Keep. -- Cirt (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am a complete and utter idiot. Sorry.[edit]

-mattbuck (Talk) 10:53, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Mohammed by Jeff Walenta.jpg[edit]

File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Mohammed by Jeff Walenta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Nikkimaria (talk) 02:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know[edit]

On a couple of occasions you've written on my talk page letting me know of some deletion requests or discussions of interest. I didn't always reply, and I wanted to let you know that this is not because I don't find such notifications useful nor am I ignoring you. On some days I'm just too busy to get into yet another e-argument so I let some issues slide. I have checked out what you are doing on this project and I must say that I am glad that you are around, people like yourself make this place an interesting community, keep up good work. Good luck and take care. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 08:44, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


BarkingFish[edit]

Hi Cirt. I've replied to DC's thread about me at COM:AN/UP - if you want to kick in and let me know what you need to do/decide upon, I'm open to it. Thanks. BarkingFish (talk) 23:50, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to hear what some other admins think about all this. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perversion-for-Profit-lesbian.jpg[edit]

File:Perversion-for-Profit-lesbian.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:17, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FUCK!!!!![edit]

Hi again, apologies in advance for the title =) Category:Fuck (film), is this type of categorizing kosher here on Commons? I know on WP it is not per WP:OCAT etc. Browsing the first two pages of Category:Films of the United States I could only find a single film category containing actors/staff. jonkerz ♠talk 04:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's fine, it's done for other things like Television show production staff, quite a bit, actually. -- Cirt (talk) 06:06, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See for example, Category:Star Trek: The Next Generation. -- Cirt (talk) 06:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, well then. It clutters both staff and film categories. I may challenge it at CFD if it hasn't been already, but it will have to wait.. maybe forever, like so many other things in life, heh. jonkerz ♠talk 20:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transferring images from another project[edit]

What's up with this transfer? File:Plympton BW.jpg. Among other things, you tagged it with the wrong license. Normally I would template a user with Template:How to transfer, but you are an admin with 57,000 edits? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:14, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Thank you for the helpful changes you've made to the image page. Thank you, also, for the polite way in which you've imparted this advice to me. I appreciate it, -- Cirt (talk) 02:32, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re Categories[edit]

It makes it harder to find relevant photos (actors' photos can be found easily by other means). But if readers find it useful, why not? Commons is not WP after all, and non-English speakers may find it helpful since they cannot find photos as easily by browsing ENWP. So.. no CFD =) What I initially objected to was the link from the Fuck article, because linking Commons should mean that there is content about the film to be found here, now readers will only find photos of staff/interviewees not directly related to the article, and these can all be found by browsing ENWP anyway. A Commons page with captioned portraits of the staff/interviewees would be very nice though, and as a bonus, editors like me couldn't complain about over categorization =) jonkerz ♠talk 05:48, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, very good suggestion, thank you! I've gone ahead and created such a page, at Fuck (film). -- Cirt (talk) 20:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great =) well done, jonkerz ♠talk 11:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
P.S., congratulations on the GA, jonkerz ♠talk 12:03, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 14:33, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

duplicata[edit]

can you delete that duplicates? [1] [2] --Principal adjoint (talk) 17:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, -- Cirt (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
can you delete [3], duplicate of [4]?

--Principal adjoint (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. -- Cirt (talk) 20:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

very very long time no speak[edit]

I am a bit intrigued as to where a retrograde spelling change for Adisucipto airport comes from? Do you speak Indonesian? Have you been there recently? I must say I am quite open to some quaint explanation, but really, I havent seen that spelling for that location since I first visited in 1985... sats (talk) 08:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I see the change actuyally involves User:Humboldt - I have left a message... sats (talk) 09:11, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Indonesian sign makers and name custodians are particularly frustrating - Humboldt has simply redirected because the local airport signs carry old spelling, but all international flight information is in new spelling. Dumb and inconsistent. Indonesian. bah. sats (talk) 09:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I think the redirect should be in the other direction - as the most likely search will be from an outsider and if you google it the sucipto spelling is the logical one, but as humboldt so bravely asserts from his pointing to the old spelling and usage, it is in my mind an inconsistency which should default to the modern spelling and outsiders usage, not local. Maybe to sort that out for all indonesian images/files on commons in that frame of mind, I would need another lifetime of editing... sats (talk) 04:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Bradley Manning[edit]

Category discussion warning

Bradley Manning has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--Dcoetzee (talk) 06:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Supported, thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 20:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya!![edit]

Hiya Cirt: I saw your comment about "astute analysis" on the Commons:Deletion_requests/2013/10/09. Is it ok to just agree with nominator?? It was suggested to me that I work on these deletion requests by an admin who said there are too few people doing this and they needed help. I decided until I understand all the fine points to limit myself to the easy ones: family and personal snaps, ugly penii, and so on. Should I be more verbose, or is it ok to just agree with the nominator and not add more comment? Thank you for your help! I hope to do better always in Wiki. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will be more verbose in the future, sorry but when Jim (woodward talk to him) asked me to start doing it, the samples he gave were most brief. I spent some time yesterday (see my user page) making up some standard messages to send to people whose images I propose for deletion, I guess I shall make some standard ones for the deletion pages too. I did add the tag for sexually related deletion request, but of course that doesn't show on the main deletions request page! Thanks for your suggestions to make longer statements. I wish there was some page of suggestions, truly... many rules & 'be bold' and it still seems like I can't do anything right! Thanks for the info! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Simple fix for recently broken links[edit]

Hi! I am the controller of Gabrielchihonglee-Bot, I am here to tell you that I have noticed of your task and I am doing with it already.--Gabrielchihonglee (talk) 11:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing it. But there is a problem. I need a bit of time.--Gabrielchihonglee (talk) 14:51, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) I think he's finding me to fix it. But I'm having trouble contacting him on IRC (not online when I am). Currently it should be running as I started it just now. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:04, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Wings retired Banners.jpg[edit]

Hallo,

the red template/note says: Please check the image description page on the English Wikipedia (or, if it has been deleted, ask an English Wikipedia administrator).

  • the image description on en.wp has been deleted --> please ask an English Wikipedia administrator, neither 32X ‎nor Siebrand are administrators at the English Wikipedia. [5]
  • aks English Wikipedia administrators refers to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard.

Thank you, --Anika (talk) 08:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this was fixed, thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 16:38, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:I'm with Coco hair.jpg[edit]

File:I'm with Coco hair.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

The Photographer (talk) 02:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification, -- Cirt (talk) 02:14, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for you review. You are welcome --The Photographer (talk) 02:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please unprotect File:2009 07 31 David Tennant smile 09 cropped.jpg[edit]

Hi Cirt

Could you please unprotect File:2009 07 31 David Tennant smile 09 cropped.jpg so that I can upload an improved version as I did here File:2009 07 31 David Tennant smile 09.jpg. Thank you. - MrX 16:20, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@MrX, ✓ Done, Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Thank you. - MrX 00:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're most welcome, -- Cirt (talk) 01:36, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sopranos-ontheset.jpg[edit]

File:Sopranos-ontheset.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

CennoxX (talk) 15:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much, -- Cirt (talk) 20:51, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
AACS encryption key controversy (en:AACS encryption key controversy)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Streisand effect.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Admin's Barnstar
Thanks for all your good work here, including the little things like making cats for Chongas! FeydHuxtable (talk) 20:59, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much, I really appreciate this! -- Cirt (talk) 22:34, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated image for Featured Picture[edit]

I've nominated an image for Featured Picture consideration, discussion is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Streisand Estate.jpg/2. -- Cirt (talk) 07:13, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ready[edit]

my attempt. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, -- Cirt (talk) 21:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 21:49, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a w:WP:Featured Picture across three (3) different language Wikipedia sites and is used on many other languages. -- Cirt (talk) 21:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Result was  Keep. -- Cirt (talk) 20:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Streisand Estate[edit]

Thank You for replay! What else can be done to adjust the image for Featured Picture quality? Nothing! You can shot this object from another point of view and in higher resolution to be realy good aerial image. In current state this image is just a "soapbox" shot. Sorry for criticism, but this is a real world. Only in movies You can upgrade any 10x10 pixel picture to HDR quality :) --Kikos (talk) 08:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, understood, thanks for the polite reply! -- Cirt (talk) 19:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Streisand effect[edit]

Why are you repeatedly trying to correct the indents? They are correct as the way intended. :) (Sometimes two replies for the same user above.) Jee 12:14, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I just thought it looks confusing that other way, no worries, -- Cirt (talk) 19:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays[edit]

Happy Holidays!
G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 01:31, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, Russavia, and to you and yours as well! Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 01:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007 Avenue D duet by thraxil 01.jpg[edit]

File:2007 Avenue D duet by thraxil 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:41, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self: The Houstonian[edit]

The Houstonian info, here. -- Cirt (talk) 19:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Streisand Estate.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Streisand Estate.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: A file cannot have a CC- and a Copyright-licence at the same time.

abbedabbdisk 12:32, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) It has valid OTRS, CC tag. It has sufficient evidence of free work. —레비Revi 12:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Hym411, your explanation is most appreciated, -- Cirt (talk) 09:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, :) —레비Revi 09:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Wikisource admin[edit]

Userboxes
This user is an administrator on the English Wikisource. (verify)

Hello.

You can use: Template:User Wikisource admin+en -> {{User Wikisource admin|en}}.

Regards. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 22:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, HombreDHojalata, but isn't that a dup to {{User admin Wikisource}} ? -- Cirt (talk) 23:50, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brendan Eich Mozilla Foundation official photo.jpg[edit]

It said right there on the source page "Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License v3.0 or any later version." The page appears to have been deleted as soon as Eich quit. Here's the archived version from two months ago. - David Gerard (talk) 16:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see, thank you for the archived version. No worries, -- Cirt (talk) 09:08, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Picture nomination[edit]

  1. File:The Impact of Wikipedia Adrianne Wadewitz.webm
  2. Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Impact of Wikipedia Adrianne Wadewitz.webm

I've nominated File:The Impact of Wikipedia Adrianne Wadewitz.webm for Featured Picture consideration.

Discussion page is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Impact of Wikipedia Adrianne Wadewitz.webm.

-- Cirt (talk) 19:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quick delete[edit]

Hey can you delete this? File:Baltic Union.png. It was moved to File:Balkan Union.png, and it became a redirect. I feel foolish for naming something in the Balkans "Baltic". The page has 0 links to it. (Except now this talk page). Since I created the page, can you delete it? Thanks.—SPESH531Other 01:31, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, already, by Túrelio. Thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cirt – admin conduct review[edit]

Mentioned you here. ~ DanielTom (talk) 21:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self, comments by others at that thread: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&oldid=prev&diff=129160794#User:Cirt_.E2.80.93_admin_conduct_review -- Cirt (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note to self: Added additional history link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FUser_problems&diff=129194580&oldid=129193856 -- Cirt (talk) 22:00, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikileaks logo.svg[edit]

File:Wikileaks logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

86.87.28.238 19:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self: The result was  Keep. -- Cirt (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leipzig Award 2003.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Leipzig Award 2003.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 10:38, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

cover[edit]

I suspect that cover [6] also is copyrightable. it usually takes something like the cover of the Beatles white album to be inelibible. however, i am not an expert, and one of my files was just deleted for being a copyvio (a company logo that was apparently too complex)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:51, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This one: [7] is the original file i was proposing deletion of. however, i didnt delete it, just proposed it. if i was in error, you (or i) can request a review.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jmabel, what do you think of this one? Can it be uploaded to Commons? -- Cirt (talk) 03:37, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I would think so, but it's beginning to push into slightly more questionable territory because it is not just a typographical font. I'd take that question to Commons:Village pump/Copyright if you really want someone with more expertise to weigh in. - Jmabel ! talk 04:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, nevermind about that particular one, thanks though. -- Cirt (talk) 11:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Video contest[edit]

Hi Cirt! I'm one of the organizers of the video contest Videos für Wikipedia-Artikel in the German Wikipedia which aims at including more videos into Wikipedia articles. The topic of our contest is "Digital Society". I discovered that your video „Message to Scientology“ is included in the German article called Anonymous (Kollektiv). Therefor I want to invite you to participate with this video in the contest. The procedure is very easy: You would just have to add the template {{Video für Wikipedia-Artikel 2014}}. Obviously, if you have other video material consistent with the topic "Digital Society", you are wellcome to participate with it as well. --NSm (VWA) (talk)

Okay I'll think about maybe a different video. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 13:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've added {{Video für Wikipedia-Artikel 2014}} to File:The Impact of Wikipedia Adrianne Wadewitz.webm. -- Cirt (talk) 16:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You Cirt! It's a good one, I think -- NSm (VWA) (talk)
Most welcome, -- Cirt (talk) 23:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use of profanity on Wikimedia Commons[edit]

Could a user get block for typing out profane words? 174.91.69.244 20:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is rarely done, even in bad cases. See Commons:Blocking policy. --Leyo 21:27, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category moves[edit]

Please don't copy-paste category wikitext to move a page, as you did when you moved Category:Michael Davis to Category:Michael E. Davis. If you're going to move categories/pages, then please request filemover rights so that you can move the category/file/page using the right tool rather than copy-paste. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:07, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, I've fixed it, thanks. -- Cirt (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The wording style choice above kinda feels like w:Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars. -- Cirt (talk) 22:03, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued image candidate nomination[edit]

I've nominated an image for Commons:Valued image candidates nomination consideration.

It's about a picture of lawyer Gloria Allred.

Discussion is at: Commons:Valued image candidates/2012 Gloria Allred.jpg. -- Cirt (talk) 03:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Valued image nomination[edit]

Picture of Bill Cosby:

Nominated Commons:Valued image candidates/2011 Bill Cosby.jpg. -- Cirt (talk) 13:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3rd Valued image nomination[edit]

Please see nomination for Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck at:

Commons:Valued image candidates/2014 Charlie Beck.jpg. -- Cirt (talk) 07:24, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cirt/Archive_4&oldid=148481280"