User talk:Cayambe/Archive4

ARCHIVE 4 = ARCHIVE 2013

Tenerife

Hello Cayambe, it is a pity, but it looks like we have been at the same time in the same place without knowing it. I was in Tenerife from Dec 12th to Dec 17th (incl. La Gomera on the 14th). All the best for new year, Poco a poco (talk) 11:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

It was also my first visit to Tenerife and La Gomera and also first time in the Canary Islands. I had the same impression like you, lots of different landscapes and things to capture. It reminded me to Hawaii somehow but with only 3 hours flight :) Thanks for your offer. Yes, I´d like to go to Luxembourg, The Netherlands and Belgium somewhen, but probably not this year. I will let you know whenever I plan it. The same applies to you, please, let me know whenever you are in Spain, South of Germnany or Poland. Rome is even in my plans for this year. When are you there (roughly)?. Best regards, --Poco a poco (talk) 11:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

European Court of Justice

Dear Cayambe,

My (very beautiful ;-)) picture of the European Court of Justice has just been deleted because of FOP. I am told I must get the authorisation of the architect to post my picture. As your picture File:European Court of Justice 01.jpg is allowed to stay on Commons, I would like to know what you did and where and how you got the authorization of the architect of the building.

Many thanks in advance

--BiiJii (talk) 14:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

File:European Court of Justice 01.jpg

File:European Court of Justice 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia canariensis Tenerife 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clervaux Loretto Chapel Adrien Gérard de Lannoy tomb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clervaux Loretto Chapel Albert Eugène de Lannoy tomb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clervaux Pharmacie V Hugo plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting and good quality. --JLPC 18:26, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clervaux Plaque V Hugo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:29, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clervaux bâtiment administratif Grand-Rue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clervaux Loreto Chapel int.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- MJJR 16:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sidi Bou Said Roundabout Fountain 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:03, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:Church_Saeul

Category:Church_Saeul has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jwh (talk) 00:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Croeff Luxembourg City Febr 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison van der Vekene Luxembourg Grund entrée 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Grund rue Plaetis maison van der Vekene 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:08, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Grund rue S Weis maison van der Vekene 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City dovecot rue d'Anvers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 19:29, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Grund rue Plaetis 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:51, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecuador Andes Cayambe 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Stromatholite

Je te remercie de ton intervention pour cette image. Comme me l'a conseillé Jebulon, je l'ai versé dans le légende. J'ai toujours le tord de croire que le sujet de mes image est universellemet connu, alors que quelques explications sont souvent bien utiles. Bon dimanche --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Grund maison van der Vekene Neie Wee 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:09, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue des Sept-Arpents Juegdschlass signs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support could have been sharper, suggest downscaling a bit, all in all OK to me --A.Savin 10:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City ARBED building pediment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:14, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rollingergrund Château de Septfontaines pavilions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 13:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Luxemb Sandweiler SIAS Fauchage tardif.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Luxemb Sandweiler SIAS Fauchage tardif.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

Unfortunately COM:FOP#Luxembourg is pretty clear on the matter. Did you upload any other images like this that will need deleting?-mattbuck (Talk) 09:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC). No. --Cayambe (talk) 16:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville Rempart Conseil d'Etat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb City bus stop Badanstalt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:41, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Fro

Salut Cayambe,

Eng kuerz Fro. Firwat mëss Du all déng Qualitéitsbiller vu Lëtzebuerg (bei Dir sinn dat der jo relativ vill) net an d'Kategorie Quality images of Luxembourg? Gett et do e bestëmmte Grond? Eng ganz Rei vu Portaler (ënnert anerem d'Portal:Luxemburg an der de:wiki an dem ech schaffen) notzen dës Kategorie vir op d'Qualitéitsbiller vu Lëtzebuerg ze verweisen. Gréiss, --VT98Fan (talk) 18:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rollingergrund Septfontaines Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Air Guyane Saül 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:30, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 20 rue des Glacis from below.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 20 rue des Glacis from below detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It's good, but a bit soft. Slightly more sharpness will improve it. --Iifar 17:33, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 20 rue des Glacis front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 08:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue des Glacis plaque 1850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --VT98Fan 21:49, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 18 rue des Glacis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 09:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiltz Fatima monument entry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok --Lmbuga 19:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiltz Fatima ent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb City rue des Glacis plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb City rue des Glacis plaque detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Grund Plaetis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:57, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rollingergrund Septfontaines Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Air Guyane Saül 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:30, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 20 rue des Glacis from below.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 20 rue des Glacis from below detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It's good, but a bit soft. Slightly more sharpness will improve it. --Iifar 17:33, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 20 rue des Glacis front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 08:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 18 rue des Glacis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 09:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiltz Fatima monument entry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok --Lmbuga 19:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiltz Fatima ent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb City rue des Glacis plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb City rue des Glacis plaque detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Grund Plaetis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:57, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! French Guiana Saül street 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice. --Moonik 15:05, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue des Glacis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue des Glacis 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembour Rollingergrund presbytère frontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 19:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! French Guiana Saül house 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:14, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! French Guiana Saül centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 09:09, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Binsfeld siège Naturaarbechten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 7 rue du Fort Rheinsheim front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 08:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 7 rue du Fort Rheinsheim oblique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 08:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wincrange Leeresmuhle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! French Guiana Saül rue principale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 07:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saül église de face avec crucifix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saül église de face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 12:53, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clervaux World War II monument aux morts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage étang école nature.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 21:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage cimetière tombe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 09:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage church from SSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Appropriately Licensed

You participated at the earlier discussion on licence choice for Featured Pictures. A number of users felt that such restrictions should be made at policy level. Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL for images). In earlier discussions there were a number of comments that, while reasonable opinions, did not align with Wikimedia's mission for free content. Please read the FAQ before commenting. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 22:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage pierre de cron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:33, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Cloche d'Or A6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:50, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage église plaque patriotes et résistants.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trintange Mont-St-Étienne arbre et plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:01, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trintange plaque apiculteurs canton de Remich 1884-2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage church entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Have you tried a moderate horizontal correction to make the entry more centered? Nonetheless QI. --Tuxyso 20:30, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage presbytère 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage école.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 16:44, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage maison chemin de fer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 15:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage place de Saintignon fontaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage mine entrée 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Neutral Sky overexposed in background --Christian Ferrer 18:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC) I change, it's maybe QI --Christian Ferrer 19:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC) Another opinion ? --Christian Ferrer 16:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC) Often I disagree with sky overexposed, especially if a difficult motif is well exposed. Here this would mean visible structures in the tunnel entry. But I see nothing behind the fence. --Ikar.us 16:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)  Support After reflection, I promote it --Christian Ferrer 18:19, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage maison 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 10:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasauvage Power Press 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:05, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mamer café rue de l'école 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 00:03, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mamer Gare vers Capellen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Notodromadinae

Hello Cayambe,
You created Category:Notodromadinae and Category:Cyproidinae which are subfamilies totally unknown to google (I never saw such case).
What source did you follow ?
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 11:18, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello,

Thanks for your answer.

I just discovered a strange thing with google:

When I do search Notodromadinae and Cyproidinae I find nothing (try this link).

But I can click on a link that disables google cleverness I find a lot of pages (try that).

Sorry to have bothered you for a google issue.

Cheers 08:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bremen Vegesack Havenhaus 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:20, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bremen Gerhard-Rohlfs-Street 58 with plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bremen Vegesack Gerhard Rohlfs-Straße 58 Plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoffelt road junction 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:07, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Colpach-Bas jardin château 01.jpg

File:Colpach-Bas jardin château 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfaffenthal Viaduc Trois-Glands Kirchberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 11:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Hachiville Maison 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 21:32, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Pfaffenthal church L Menager plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Diekirch rue du Curé fontaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cape Verde Sal Strandspargel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please check, whether there is a dust spot in the upper right. --NorbertNagel 18:57, 30 September 2013 (UTC)  Info Dust spot removed, thank you. --Cayambe 19:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Chambre des députés Nov 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I was first confused about the right pillar which looks slightly distorted. But imho I comes from a non exactly centered camera position. All in all OK for QI, probably improveable by careful horizontal correction. --Tuxyso 21:21, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City route de Longwy 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:43, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Théâtre national du Luxembourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:59, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Diekirch rue du Curé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:00, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Couvent Ste Zithe entrée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City St Zita Convent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 10:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulschiff Deutschland Bremen-Vegesack 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --EdouardHue 11:12, 29 September 2013 (UTC) Commenttwo dust spots; see notice --P e z i 21:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC)  Info Dust spots removed, thank you. --Cayambe 09:16, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de la Haute-Sûre Schumannseck 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:12, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centre St Jean de la Croix Luxembourg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:24, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cape Verde Sal Santa Maria square M Leitao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Matisse ITC... that takes me back. --Mattbuck 17:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in the categorization of QI

Dear Cayambe! Your images were reviewed and have been promoted to Quality Image status. Congratulations! I invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. All new images with this status automatically placed to the page Commons:Quality_images/Recently_promoted. They have to be manually tagged with relevant categories using the QI categorization tool (see link at the top of the page, the author of this tool is User:Dschwen). Very few users do this job now, so a large number of uncategorizated photos time to time accumulates on this page... --Bff (talk) 07:37, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Groupe électrogène Deutz 1907 plaque GD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:30, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Groupe électrogène Deutz 1907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 16:20, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Schifflange Dumontshaff Alzette oct 2011 b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:33, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Findel antenna Centre de rétention.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saeul Maison rouge jardin sept 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:36, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Hotel rue d'Anvers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Centre E Hamilius from bvd Royal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support need a little sharpening IMO but ok --Christian Ferrer 18:33, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Centre E Hamilius from rue Aldringen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kockelscheuer Ponts et chaussées shelter b 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:29, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kockelscheuer Ponts et chaussées shelter 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Paul Eyschen Plaque pl Guillaume II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb Weiler-la-Tour, Greek Orthodox Church with flags.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:00, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Info panel Eglise orthodoxe grecque St-Nicolas Weiler-la-Tour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diekirch ancienne église St-Laurent donkey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Could be a bit brighter imo. Can you lighten it a little (easy to fix)--JLPC 16:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC).  Done Brightened, better now? --Cayambe 22:19, 4 October 2013 (UTC)  Support OK now. --JLPC 17:59, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Findel antenna Centre de rétention.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Hotel rue d'Anvers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Paul Eyschen Plaque pl Guillaume II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Centre E Hamilius from bvd Royal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support need a little sharpening IMO but ok --Christian Ferrer 18:33, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Centre E Hamilius from rue Aldringen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kockelscheuer Ponts et chaussées shelter b 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:29, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kockelscheuer Ponts et chaussées shelter 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb Weiler-la-Tour, Greek Orthodox Church with flags.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:00, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Info panel Eglise orthodoxe grecque St-Nicolas Weiler-la-Tour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diekirch ancienne église St-Laurent donkey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Could be a bit brighter imo. Can you lighten it a little (easy to fix)--JLPC 16:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC).  Done Brightened, better now? --Cayambe 22:19, 4 October 2013 (UTC)  Support OK now. --JLPC 17:59, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Hollerich cemetery World War II memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:34, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nerium oleander Tunisia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 19:55, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinfort route de Luxembourg World War II plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:42, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinfort 36 route de Luxembourg World War II plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 08:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City pl de Clairefontaine relief.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Grand Ducal Palace plaque N.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:16, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Robert Schuman birthouse plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:50, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Bonnevoie plaque Gabriel Lippmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:17, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Bonnevoie pl parc 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 05:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Nospelt 4 r d'Olm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:23, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Hôtel St Maximin plaque west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Hollerich gazomètre 30 sept 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, just. --Mattbuck 15:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue du fossé fouilles 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat low DOF resp. focus should have been more in the foreground, but ok for me. --Smial 09:30, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue du fossé fouilles b 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:30, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Clausen allée P-de-Mansfeld 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:39, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hachiville cour d'école tilleul 1989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:39, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hachiville plaque 1989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:47, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Removal of comment

Hi there,

I noticed that a comment I made earlier today had gone missing. I tracked it down to this edit you made:- [1].

Was this intentional or not, and if so, what was the reason? The edit summary

File:131013 Nakasatsunai Art Village Hokkaido Japan02bs.jpg: opp and qictotal

suggests something else, but the edit had nothing to do with that file. Yottanesia (talk) 19:08, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

(Comment copied from User_talk:Yottanesia): "I'm so sorry... my removal of your comment was completely unintentional. In fact, I never remove comments of others. When editing the reviews of your file, I believed that I was editing and QICtotalling another image. I've seen that you reverted my unintentional edit and I agree with that. Cheers, --Cayambe (talk) 22:34, 28 October 2013 (UTC)"

That's fine, no hard feelings! All the best, Yottanesia (talk) 19:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diekirch monument Alexis Heck 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue Louvigny house entrance 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 17 rue Louvigny 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome Trajan's Forum Basilica Ulpia columns 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Marché-aux-Herbes Conrotseck Pietà 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City bvd Roosevelt Serv électricité.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:55, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville Marché-aux-Herbes Beschassenen Eck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A slight barrel and perspective distorsion could be easily fixed imo. Otherwise QI.--JLPC 15:29, 5 November 2013 (UTC<br< Thanks for reviewing. I'll rework it. --Cayambe 10:22, 7 November 2013 (UTC)) New file uploaded, feel free to reverse.--JLPC 11:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC) Much better now, thank you so much. --Cayambe 14:13, 7 November 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:59, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ettelbruck Ferme Ditgesbaach 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:26, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ettelbruck Grand-Rue Stolperschwelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:46, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Itzig from Oeko-Center Hesperange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cayenne hôtel de ville 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --P e z i 22:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! French Guiana Cayenne Couleurs Amazone 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cayenne place des palmistes rue de Remire 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for QI --A.Savin 14:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

QIC rule: The summarizing tag has to be added earliest 48 hours after the last entry.

It's honorable that you help occupying for the CR maintenance. But please observe the following rule:

The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Thank you, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:45, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cayenne hôtel de ville side view 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Cccefalon 09:49, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

2014 !

	* * * 2014! * * *
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:58, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cayenne Fort Cépérou 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, then : good quality --JLPC 16:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Dear Cayambe, I wish and you and your family a Merry Christmas and lots of health and, of course, nice pictures for the coming year! Your Poco² 13:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cayenne Fort Cépérou sommet avec panneau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cayenne mont Cépérou réservoir d'eau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:55, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Improvement in the image quality: File:Brasilia Supreme Federal Court of Brazil 2009.jpg

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brasilia Supreme Federal Court of Brazil 2009.jpg

Hey. Can you improve the quality of this image? File:Brasilia Supreme Federal Court of Brazil 2009.jpg. I named as FPC and it looks a bit of low quality because it is a little blurry. Look. Thanks. ArionEstar (talk) 15:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Koordinaten

Salut Cayambe,

Kuerz Fro: Weess du zoufälleg nach, wou genau du dës Foto geschoss hues (Koordinate fehlen). Ech sinn nämlech op der Sich no dëser Bréck (och do keng Koordinaten) an - esou ewéi ech dat gesi - ass dat genau déi Bréck op denger Foto. Merci am Viraus. Léiw Gréiss, --VT98Fan (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Gudde Mëtteg,

Fir d'Éischt mol villmools Merci fir deng Aarbecht. Allerdings hunn ech d'Koordinaten 49/39/58.57 N, 5/45/30.23 E an de Google Earth aginn (hei e Link op Google Maps), an ech landen mëtten an engem Bësch an der Belsch bei Arel. Bass du dir secher mat deene Koordinate? Gréiss, --VT98Fan (talk) 15:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok, dat do misst stëmmen. Ech kucken, soubal d'Wieder ett erlaabt, dohin ze goen an e puer aktuell Fotoe matzebréngen. Villmools Merci nach. Wënschen Dir e schéint neit Joer. Bescht Gréiss, --VT98Fan (talk) 16:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cayenne Maison Franconie 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. The right end fo the building is a bit unsharp. --NorbertNagel 21:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cayenne vista from Mont Cépérou.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)