User talk:Caulfield

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

350,000+This user has made over 350,000 contributions to Wikimedia projects.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Caulfield!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARMANDOFRANCIOLI..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

186.175.31.170 10:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non ho capito che problemi ha la foto di Armando Francioli di cui sono autore. 79.47.226.141 10:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Occhipinti Fenech Sanremo 1991.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted in the U.S. (after 28 February 1989)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Carnby.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 14:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Caulfield. Tu sei sicuro, neh? :-) Perché lo sai bene quanto sono fiscali, rigidi e talora pure poco ragionevoli quaggiù. Mi riferisco all'importazione di File:Cesare Gamba, ritratto.jpg. Noi sappiamo benissimo che è nel PD e non c'è dubbio alcuno:

  1. non solo perché ha più di ventanni
  2. ma perché è precedente all'URAA di decenni
  3. è evidente che siano trascorsi più di 70 anni dalla morte dell'autore
  4. e che si tratti di una semplice foto.

Però l'autore è a tutti gli effetti ignoto e l'opera non è strettamente una "semplice immagine di persone o di aspetti, elementi o fatti della vita naturale e sociale", ma è un ritratto. Ci ho provato in ogni modo, ma la data di morte dei fratelli dell'Avo (che hanno firmato questa foto in basso) non l'ho trovata, con ogni probabilità risale agli anni 30/40 massimo, quando hanno cessato l'attività (e fra l'altro erano i tipografi, non gli autori). Il fatto che i ritratti si possano considerare come una semplice opera rientrante nel pd-italy sappiamo bene che qui su Commons è da sempre contestato. In pratica, alla fine, l'unico tag incontestabilmente appropriato per questa foto sarebbe il PD-old-assumed, che però ci porta indietro all'ottocento. Se per te va bene che la foto stia qui - e non ho dubbio che sia anche formalmente appropriato - ok, ma stando all'interpretazione più rigida dovrebbe stare dove l'avevo caricata, e cioè su it.wiki. Giusto per essere precisini-precisini :-) --teatroge (dm) 11:34, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alla fine direi che il PD-anon-70-EU è più appropriato, visto il caso. Dall'Avo è la tipografia, l'autore è anonimo, sono trascorsi più di 70 anni dalla pubblicazione. Lascerei comunque anche il pd-italy, qualora qualcuno avesse l'idea di contestare l'altro come ogni qualche anno avviene. --teatroge (dm) 11:54, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In effetti qua su commons "si sta come d'autunno sugli alberi le foglie" :-) grazie alla prox. --teatroge (dm) 13:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aiuto[edit]

Category talk:Floriano Calvino. --95.234.15.148 09:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aspetto una tua risposta. --79.21.199.209 11:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ciao, ti rispondo qua avendo IP differenti. Ho creato la categoria per organizzare le immagini, altro interesse non ne ho. Mi spiace --Caulfield (talk) 15:24, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:CONSAGRABISSO03092021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ 🩺💉 03:14, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing person-categories[edit]

Hi, is there a rationale behind your removal of individualized/personal categories, as well as other categories? An example was this edit: Just because the personal category might be currently "red", doesn't mean that it is a false category. All the best, --Enyavar (talk) 08:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Re:Removing person-categories[edit]

Thanks for responding, the problem I see with your approach is when there are two or more images of the same politician. This happens occasionally, and when you then check the red category, you see that there are already images in that hypothetical category. And that is the point where starting that category for real begins to make sense. --Enyavar (talk) 17:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified writers[edit]

Ciao! Ho visto che qui hai inserito la categoria Category:Unidentified writers from Italy. Potresti spiegarmi in quali casi va inserita e quali sono le condizioni per rimuoverla? Horcrux (talk) 14:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie, ma continuo a non capire a cosa serva aggiungere in questa categoria (e simili) delle sottocategorie riguardanti delle persone specifiche. Tutte queste sottocategorie riguardano persone "idenfied", no? Quindi perché ce ne sono così tante? --Horcrux (talk) 10:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ciao, potresti rispondere per favore? Ad es., come spiegheresti questi tuoi inserimenti della categoria in questione? --Horcrux (talk) 18:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Se non hai nulla in contrario, io rimuoverei queste categorizzazioni. --Horcrux (talk) 13:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Horcrux: rimuovi senza problemi --Caulfield (talk) 16:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

-[edit]

File:Vignola VIII.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

1989 (talk) 14:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruthven: mi aiuti a spiegare la licenza libera presente nel sito del Senato e la licenza collegata? Grazie --Caulfield (talk) 10:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alessandro Azzi.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre cb (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Gaetano Salvemini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DonCalo (talk) 07:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]