User talk:Carschten/Archive/2018
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Category:Chempark
Die Kategorie ist so nicht optimal. Die Bayer AG ist ein Teil des Chempark aber nicht nur. Im Chempark sind einige, ich weis nicht wieviel ... 1, 2 oder 3 dutzend von Firmen ansässig. --Atamari (talk) 15:29, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ich muss zugeben, ich hab mich nicht genauer über den Chempark informiert, sondern mich eher an den vorhandenen Kategorien der Bilder orientiert. Dann passen die Bayer-Kategorien in der Tat nicht in die Kategorie, sondern je nach Inhalt eher in die Bilder. Danke für den Hinweis --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 13:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Anfield Cemetery
You seriously want to see 5cm of a lightning conductor? You want me to wait for another sunny day in Liverpool? You want me to disrupt my very busy plans for Heritage Week and take an eight mile trip to take one shot to include a very minor detail? I'm disheartened. I may give it all up. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:30, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- You over-dramatise the whole situation. Look, you have two options while taking a photo for Commons/Wikipedia: 1. You take a relevant photo and don‘t observe every little detail. But then you have to live if there are issues that don‘t fit the criteria for a QI. And the composition is one of the both main factors. The composition doesn‘t have to be magic, but solid and without any disturbance. And it‘s necessary that all relevant parts are on the photo. That doesn‘t fulfit your photo, so it isn‘t a QI. If you nominate it nevertheless, you have to live with an oppose vote. 2. You know you want to take a QI so you check all relevant issues and something like this shouldn‘t happen.
- And it‘s not only about 5 cm. After straightening the verticals (which is necessary, too), there‘ll be some more cm cropped. You should plan some space over the pillar.
- If you‘re disheartened because one of your images isn‘t a QI, you really do something wrong. You have to be attentive if you want to take a QI; if it isn‘t possible for you because you‘re busy, you have to live with less QIs. And if you don‘t agree with my vote, you can change this status to „discuss“ and send it to the Consensual Review. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 22:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
|
File:Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Hallo Carschten, diese von Dir erstellte Kategorie ist seit längerer Zeit leer. Kommt da noch was an Inhalt oder wurde die Kategorie versehentlich erstellt und kann gelöscht werden oder was ist damit los? Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2018 (UTC)