User talk:CactiStaccingCrane/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, CactiStaccingCrane!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 03:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:ULA Vulcan.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: It does not seem to be a work by US gov and is possibly copyrighted by the owner, unless the owner has released it under the free license.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Soumya-8974 (he) (talkcontribs) 08:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

What? CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 08:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
File:New Neutron rocket logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Huntster (t @ c) 19:30, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Super Heavy side sketch.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Side Starship sketch.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Starship refuel sketch.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

FP closing

Hi there! While it's commendable that you want to contribute, please be careful with removing and fixing FPs manually. There are too many things that can go wrong and the Bot will fix it in a jiffy. Please wait for the Bot to mark the nom as done and wait for someone else to close it for you. It is not forbidden to close your own featured nom, but it's considered bad etiquette. And always let the Bot take care of the final stages of the sorting. There is no hurry. :-) You can make a new nomination as soon as time is up for your nom. Best, --Cart (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

W.carter, Thanks for your advice! I never knew this, I just want to do it asap for another FP. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
It's a common mistake to be "hasty" when you are new at FPC. :-) You are allowed to make/have two nominations simultaneously, and as soon as one ends, you can start a new one and let the system take care of the previous. BTW, by doing this yourself, you also missed getting a nice congratulations message on your talk page. Be well, --Cart (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

FM Promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:Perseverance Rover's Descent and Touchdown on Mars Onboard Camera Views .webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Perseverance Rover's Descent and Touchdown on Mars Onboard Camera Views .webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FeaturedMediaBot (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

FM Promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:Starship SN8 launch render.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Starship SN8 launch render.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FeaturedMediaBot (talk) 21:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
SpaceX Starship spacecraft.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Overwriting files

Hi, please do not overwrite images as you did with File:Quaoar-weywot hst.jpg. Please read Commons:Overwriting existing files. Thank you. Nrco0e (talk) 22:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I will revert on what I've uplaoded now. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 22:46, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Starship SN8 launch render.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Wikipedia constellation program logo.png

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wikipedia constellation program logo.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 16:48, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh, done, 2 files are in the public domain, and 1 file is licensed over LGPL (which is very annoying to use for derivatives). Sorry for being a bit vague earlier. Cheers, CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 01:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Blue Origin Space (35303761424).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Overwriting files, again

Please stop overwriting files with crops and differing compositions. If you want an image to be framed differently for a particular use, upload that crop or composition under a new filename. This is not the first time you've been asked to not do this. Let's keep it simple: in the future, do not overwrite any file unless it is something you uploaded, and it follows COM:OVERWRITE. Huntster (t @ c) 19:16, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

I don't think cropping File:Mars - 2020 Opposition.jpg or replacing File:North America on April 16, 1972, cropped from AS16-118-18880.png's badly exposed image is against the rules here. However, you're right – it's usually better to upload a new file instead. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:53, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
In both those instances, it does actually fall afoul of OVERWRITE, because the crop is major in the first case and the entire composition of the image is changed in the second. That said, my point really is that it's the polite thing to do. We're not lacking on storage space here, so it's better to have more options for the end users rather than less. I will often edit my own uploads, but I learned long, long ago to not do more to others' uploads than to provide higher resolution overwrites of the exact same composition. Huntster (t @ c) 05:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your "true color" image of the Solar system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Solar_System_true_color.jpg It's really nice someone cares about this topic, but the image is not correct. From left to right, Uranus is too cyan (it's really just lighter version of Neptune's color - cyan comes from our atmospheric scattering), Saturn is done with additional wider EM spectrum and blues are highly saturated, Jupiter is Hubble's image edited to match palette of wrecked images made by "citizen scientists" using Junocam data, Europa is done in total false color (it has no reds, it really looks like scratched cue ball), Mars is way too red and the Sun should be white. You got Venus right, and that's rare. :) Lajoswinkler (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Lajoswinkler, thanks for your comments, I will try to incorporating them into the pic after finding more spectral data to confirm the colors. It's honestly really tricky to find true color of the moons and the planets (especially when NASA insists that this is Mars in true color, yuck!) CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
It's sadly a nearly impossible task, courtesy of sensationalism driving NASA's public relations office. Just look at this.
https://i.redd.it/eod520uqqra91.png
The planet is still the same, I looked at it last week. :) What has changed is the paradigm and that's dystopian. Lajoswinkler (talk) 13:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Lajoswinkler, I probably need to redo the collage at some point, partly due to generational loss as I have lost the original project file and partly because I got Saturn's inclination totally wrong (should be 5.3 degrees instead of 53). I will try to upload the new collage by the end of this week. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 14:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Lajoswinkler, just to let you know, I'm still trying... A bit late but hopefully I'd nail the colors right. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 06:38, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Please do not overwrite files

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Transit of Venus viewed in Wagga Wagga (2).jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

--Bidgee (talk) 22:23, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Solar System true color (captions).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Solar System true color (captions).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

File:IncelandStampF.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ubcule (talk) 11:21, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Solar System true color.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

94.245.128.80 21:33, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

The Sun is white

Hi! About your change on this file: 171879main LimbFlareJan12 lg.jpg. You changed this file to black and white, stating that 'the Sun is white'. It may very well be white, but that doesn't mean one colorization is better than or preferred over the other. You might as well change this whole gallery to black-and-white, because 'stars are white'. It is very common for astronomers to assign false colors to their telescope images. The reason is that the human eye can distinguish color hues more effectively than grey intensities. TheBartgry (talk) 17:50, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

I'll support this statement, and further say stop uploading colour changes over existing files. If you wish to make such colour changes, then upload them to a new filename. Give users a choice, rather than force your interpretations on them. I've reverted the change to this file, do not change it back again. Huntster (t @ c) 18:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Nice picture, but isn't Iapetus missing? Double sharp (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

I sadly trimmed it off as I want the distance of the moons to scale with the planet, but Iapetus is 3x further than Titan. It is extremely hard to fit it in without making planets extremely small. Tilting Saturn is not an option since I want the planet's axial tilt to be accurate too. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:50, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Well, I guess you could add it somewhere with a note saying that its distance is specifically not to scale. I admit that I didn't come to the conclusion that any distances were to scale, since the distances between the planets clearly aren't. BTW, Iapetus' orbit is quite inclined to Saturn's equator (by 15.47°), so you could probably even fit it in at the correct distance and avoid a collision by depicting it at the point in its orbit furthest above/below the plane of Saturn's equator. :) Double sharp (talk) 15:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Time to make a version 3 of the image then, always striving for accuracy :) CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Looking forward to it! Might want to keep in mind the quite large inclinations of Earth's Moon and Neptune's Triton as well. :) Double sharp (talk) 21:12, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Also, surely it's correct to tilt Saturn; its axial tilt is 26.73°. Double sharp (talk) 19:29, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Anyway, at least I'd like Iapetus called out explicitly (instead of just subsumed in "and more") at File:Solar System true color (captions).jpg. It's almost the size of Rhea, after all. There's also a typo: it's "Callisto", not "Calisto". :) Double sharp (talk) 02:37, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Just a small request: could you maybe make a version adding the Moon, Pallas, Vesta, Io, and Europa to scale? Just to get the "geophysical" terrestrial planets (rocky bodies) as well. (Oh, I suppose Pallas and Vesta are borderline, but Vesta has been included enough times in reliable sources.) Double sharp (talk) 02:31, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

File:1984first.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

czar 05:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

I saw in the edit summary of File:Solar System true color.jpg you changed the Cassini image of Saturn that I used for that file as it was too yellowy or something along the lines of that. Hubble's images seem pretty high quality so I wanted to ask you if Hubble's images of Saturn are better than that of Cassini's. Criticism my edits to that file would be nice too. Thanks. Now to fix Uranus's image. A westman (talk) 02:45, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

No, it's because you should not overwrite files of others. Please upload an entirely new image instead. Also, Uranus color is too saturated. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 12:24, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Right. I forgot you set overwriting to disallowed. A westman (talk) 23:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

An illustration of light sources from magnitude 1 to 3.5, in 0.5 increments File:Magnitude illustration.svg

Thanks for creating this graphic in the Magnitude (astronomy) article. However there is a problem with it. RGB values aren't relative brightness. They are a non-linear encoding of brightness because the human eye perceives brightness non-linearly. Actual brightness, light energy in the visual spectrum, is given by (RGB Value)^2.2, where the exponent 2.2 is called gamma. If you actually measure the brightness of a computer screen lit with RGB 26 with a photometer, and compare it to a screen lit with RGB 255, it will be (26/255)^2.2 = 0.0066 times as bright, not 0.100 times as bright as shown on your graphic. If magnitude 1 is 255 RGB units, then magnitude 3.5 would be 255*(2.512^(1-3.5))^(1/2.2) = 89 RGB units. It's a good graphic. Can you redo it with corrected RGB values for the stars? Brian Wowk (talk) 20:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Well, that's a great mistake from my part. Let me fix the graphic... CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 01:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)