User talk:Cacophony

Category:Vancouver

Since the English article has remained at en:Vancouver, and true to other languages, I am reverting this category back to before your June 14th changes. Kaveh 09:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I got ahead of myself. Cacophony 06:43, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Suricata suricatta

Hi Cacophony, please don't worry about my reverts. Normaly an image or media file is linked by an article, because sorting and moving between family cats is easier. Please have a look at Lepidoptera. Best regards, --Olei 20:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I was trying to have the images not be orphaned (i.e. not be contained in a category). I can't think of a better category to add them to. All of Commons is massively disorganized. Cacophony 23:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

After looking at Commons:Categories, I see that the guidelines are these: The category structure is the primary way to organize and find files on the Commons. It is essential that every file can be found by browsing the category structure. To allow this, each file must be put into a category directly, and/or put on a gallery page which is categorized. Each category should itself be in more general categories, forming a hierarchical structure. Maybe someday I'll have the energy to change everything back. Cacophony 23:53, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I wrote something at my dicussion page. And please listen to that people who have sorted a lot of files until now! Best regards, --Olei 20:10, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

GWB category

Hi. I think the most specific images of George W. Bush are on the George W. Bush, and the Category:George W. Bush is broader including related material. Thus the inclusion of Image:BushmobilePileBayouStJohn.jpg there, making image accessible should someone be researching protests, caricatures, commentary etc related to GWB. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 02:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Red eye request

Hi, I saw you did a good job with the Jodie Foster pic- could you have a go with these two? Image:Charlize.jpg, Image:Charlize Theron 2005.jpg. Thanks, Arniep 21:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Sure, all taken care of. Enjoy! Cacophony 06:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Excellent job- thanks! Arniep 04:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PortlandTramCar3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Tony Wills 06:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SpaceNeedleTopClose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Would like to use your photo of Hayward Field

Hi Cacophony,

 I would like to talk to you about using your photo of Hayward Field.  Please contact me at 503-222-0165.

Thank you! Beth

Ok, I didn't get the message until right now, but I'll give you a call tomorrow. Thanks, Cacophony 04:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PaintedHillsPano4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DeltoidBalsamroot1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HaywardFieldPano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Geocode for Image:SpaceNeedleQAClose.jpg

Hello Cacophony,
I have added the "location possible" template and category to your photo Image:SpaceNeedleQAClose.jpg. If you can, please add the location where you took the photo (that is, where the camera was) and use the "heading:" parameter in the geocoding template. You can find out more about geotagging at Commons:Geocoding. Regards, Florian Prischl 08:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Bot request

Greetings. I have requested to be approved to use a bot to add categories to images. The request for approval has turned into something of a debate. I wonder if you would like to comment? Commons:Bots/Requests for flags/Polbot Quadell (talk) 21:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! YaquinaBridgeSpan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:SeattleI5Skyline.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:SeattleI5Skyline.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 07:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SpaceNeedleQAClose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuzco-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andean Man.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HawthorneBridge-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LimaSignPainter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OregonCoastEcola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Andean Man.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Andean Man.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Benh 22:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:SeattleWaterfrontPano.jpg

Hallo can you upload the detail pictures. I expect that it is easier to help you. --Marku1988 12:28, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I think I can stitch the panoramic. But I miss image SeattlePanoHelp4. --Marku1988 06:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I load up an new version. Perhaps I will improve the image in future a bit. --Marku1988 08:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TheDallesBridgeNorth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Cuzco-Pano edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cuzco-Pano edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Congratulations! :-) --Richard Bartz 10:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes sir! Though, I'm afraid I won't be getting rich!

thanks again,

Oberwiki (talk) 16:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Photo use

HI Cacophony,

I am very interested in using a couple of your photos to make a rendering for a graphic design project. Wondered if this is ok with you. I am new to the details of the Creative Commons lisc. etc.

thanks,

Oberwiki

Oberwiki (talk) 14:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing, no worries. If you are going to become rich kick back a few bucks to Wikimedia. Cacophony (talk) 05:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

File:SeattleWaterfrontPano.jpg, etc.

Where exactly were these taken from? From Seacrest Park or from the water? I ask because I'm trying to categorize them correctly & (for the component photos) enhance descriptions. - Jmabel ! talk 00:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

From the Bremerton Ferry, about 5 minutes after leaving Seattle. Cacophony (talk) 01:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:LandscapeArchPano.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LandscapeArchPano.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Panoramas

Hi Cacophony, I see that you've made a lot of excellent panoramas, and was wondering, what program do you use to stitch the pictures together? I've been looking for one, and can't decide. Feel free to respond on my Wikipedia talkpage, or email me. Thanks, Little Mountain 5 (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

File:VeraKatzStatueEsplanade.jpg

File:VeraKatzStatueEsplanade.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Hey, I really respect the work you do, and I admit this is a somewhat obscure twist to copyright law, so I don't like jumping on this photo (or any other, really). Please don't take it personally. —Werewombat (talk) 18:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

File:PGEPark-NEentry.jpg

File:PGEPark-NEentry.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Wknight94 ^talk 16:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Portlandia.jpg

File:Portlandia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lewis&ClarkBridgeSP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 10:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lewis and Clark Bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

I think that it is the best so far in the scope.--MrPanyGoff 07:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:42, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lewis&ClarkBridgeSP.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lewis&ClarkBridgeSP.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Brasil.RioDeJaneiro.Corcovado.jpg

File:Brasil.RioDeJaneiro.Corcovado.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Varnav (talk) 02:26, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

File:PioneerSquareWeatherMachine.jpg

File:PioneerSquareWeatherMachine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– Quadell (talk) 20:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! I5inPortlandNight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --XRay 07:25, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Grimshaw-NightfallThames.jpg

File:Grimshaw-NightfallThames.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sven Manguard Wha? 19:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Permission for Mt Hood Photo.

Hi Jason,

I work for Vaya Creative here in Portland and we need your assistance. We have been producing a pictorial book that chronicles the 74 year history of two construction company careers for The Donald M.Drake Company. Andrea Hull is the owner of Vaya Creative, and this is her father's work being honored. The many stories behind the iconic Portland buildings make your particular image extremely compelling. We would like to use your image of Mt. Hood on the cover of this book. The book will not be for sale and is for private distribution within the family. I am happy to provide whatever information you may need and pay a fee for acquiring a high resolution (over 1200dpi) version if at all possible.

Please let me know who to contact, or what my next steps might be!

Thank you in advance.

Carrie Watson cwatson@vayacreative.com 503.233.4177 6336 SE Milwaukie Ave. Suite B. Portland, OR. 97202

Photo Usage for Hayward Field

Hello,

I would love to use one of your photos that would be printed and affixed on pewter magnets and ornaments to be sold at the UO Bookstore. I would like to know if I could get permission from you to use your photo in this way? If you could email me at @alexannelson1@gmail.com that would be great. Thank You!

Alexa Nelson

File:KenKeseyStatue1.jpg

File:KenKeseyStatue1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Ho (talk) 03:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Washington_Park

Washington Park has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Drbones1950 (talk) 17:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Cacophony,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Washington State Capitol

The title of the image at the link https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campidoglio_(Olympia)#/media/File:WACapitolLegislativeBldg.jpg is misspelled.

ICE77 (talk) 07:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the head's up. I fixed it! Cacophony (talk) 21:04, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing the issue. ICE77 (talk) 01:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Hanford site tank interior.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hanford site tank interior.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

XenonX3 (talk) 19:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Hanford site tank interior.jpg

File:Hanford site tank interior.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke4roh (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)