User talk:Brosen~commonswiki
Logos[edit]
Logotypes are usually not published under a free license. Please do not upload company logos and claim that they are computer programs. Logos should be tagged with {{logo}}. Thuresson 10:08, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Twice25[edit]
Hi, Sebastian ! :)
Sorry, but I don't speak English, so I tell you in Italian ... ^^
Ti ho rubato (stolen) l'idea del template:Brosen (vedi User:Twice25/Crediti)
Good Luck ! :) --「Twice29.0 · contributi · talk」 10:29, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Automatic Babelfish it's ok ;-) Btw, I don't speak English, but I can undertand it a little few ... :) --「Twice29.0 · contributi · talk」 14:36, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Coats of arms[edit]
Hi, can U change coat of arms of the city of Gabrovo, Bulgaria with this one gerb Gabrovo.svg
dzękuję / merci[edit]
Pour ce superbe schéma : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Brosen_shipsmovemensonthewave.svg . Very nice on http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bateau#Hydrodynamique Alvaro 15:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Błędy[edit]
Z całym szacunkiem ale Twój wykres "Wykres_żelazo-węgiel" jest tak troszke ten tego do bani ;) Zauwazyłem kilka błędów... najistotniejszy to chyba taki ze A - perlite (eutectiod) B - ledeburite (eutectic) przetłumaczyłes jako: A - eutektyka perlitu B - eutektyka ledeburytu
Układ żelazo-węgiel nie ma 2 eutektyk! Jest przemiana eutektyczna ledeburytu i przemiana EUTEKTOIDALNA perlitu. Juz nie wspominając ze z oznaczeń nic się nie można dowiedzieć. Ten wykres chyba bardziej wprowadza ludzi w błąd...
[edit]
Hello Sebastian! I have a small practical question: The coat of arms of Sofia is very well made and I would like to import it in to Wikivoyage, a travel wiki, but I am not sure if the licenses are compatible, as we in Wikivoyage work with CC Attribution-ShareAlike 1.0 and you licensed your picture under CC version 2.5 and GNU. Thank you for letting me know what you know/think about the compatibility of the two license versions. You can either answer me here on your talk page or on mine at the Wikivoyage shared: (same as Commons for Wikimedia). Thanks a lot in advance for your help. --Mulleflupp 14:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Iledefrance03.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Iledefrance03.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Arcimboldo 07:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Polish flag[edit]
Stworzyłeś bardzo fajną flagę marynarki wojennej. Mam prośbę, czy mógłbyś - używając tej samej czerwieni - poprawić banderę wojenną i flagę prezydenta RP? Dzięki z góry belissarius 22:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello Brosen,
May you change your file license to {{PD-self}} ? That would be better (more convenient) ! Your file is widely used in maps, since used in File:Maps_template-fr.svg & File:Maps_template-en.svg. 90% of this 2 set of icons are PD license, it would be better to have ALL in PD license.
So, can you change your file license to {{PD-self}} ? Yug (talk) 06:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 08:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Brosen calystegia sepium2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Brosen durres beach.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Brosen betula2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Brosen albanian village2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Brosen swan group.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Brosen rosa rugosa1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Brosen calystegia sepium1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Brosen swan young.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Chocolate angel[edit]
Hi Sebastian
Many thanks for the angel in Bielsk Podlaski
It has been made into chocolate specially for the Christmas season :-)
I hope you enjoy the song:
Rupert the Chocolate Angel
Kind regards
David
Dwsolo (talk) 10:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license[edit]
Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Image Usage (2)[edit]
Hey Brosen! I was planning on using some of your coats of arms in the greek wiki (namely Sofia's), but I'm rather new here and have no idea how to attribute images to other users. Do you require a link to the wikimedia commons on bottom of the article? Maybe another link to your user page? Some wiki-code table stating you as the creator of the image(s)?
You can contact me in my talk page.
Thanks in advance for your time!
GutsHead (aka Alex!)
File:Brosen_ironcarbon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wizard191 (talk) 17:54, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 08:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
National Geographic Editor would like to use your image.[edit]
Hi Brosen,
I'm a photo editor for National Geographic and I'm interested in using one of your images-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brosen_icon_constantine_helena.jpg
If you could please contact me at acoakley@ngs.org to discuss this possibility.
Many thanks, Adrian Coakley
Cześć Brosen,
Jestem redaktorem zdjęcia dla National Geographic i jestem zainteresowany wykorzystaniem jednego z obrazów-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brosen_icon_constantine_helena.jpg
Jeśli można proszę o kontakt na acoakley@ngs.org do omówienia tego możliwość.
Wielkie dzięki, Adrian Coakley
Hi Brosen,
Would really appreciate hearing from you. I just need to get your real name for attribution and credit of the photograph. Please respond!
Your account will be renamed[edit]
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Brosen. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Brosen~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
20:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed[edit]
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
02:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Brosen tirana square.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.
|
Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 10:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Brosen tirana square.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 20:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Silesia 1 by jakub bogucki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 13:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Old town panorama3.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Old town panorama3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Old town panorama3.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Motlawa marina.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Motlawa marina.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Motlawa marina.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 10:28, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jelitkowo bouleward.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jelitkowo bouleward.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jelitkowo bouleward.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 14:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Orthodox churches has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |