User talk:Bgag/Archive 9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horses in Jeti-Ögüz Rocks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charyn Canyon, Kazakhstan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charyn Canyon, Kazakhstan 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charyn Canyon, Kazakhstan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green Market, Almaty.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chor-Bakr Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Like all your photos of this day, good composition, but just above the QI bar regarding the sharpness. --Sebring12Hrs 22:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tombs at Chor-Bakr Mausoleum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charyn Canyon, Kazakhstan 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zenkov Cathedral, Almaty.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great horned owl 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:57, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Seven Bulls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Colors are a bit strange but the composition is good. --Sebring12Hrs 08:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture, would be beneficial to have description of the object shown here. --Plozessor 07:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)✓ Done --Bgag 16:27, 1 January 2024

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosque in Yrdyk 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings in Astana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. A tad too much sky. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street sign in Astana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 Support Great use of the national ornamental pattern. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Issyk-Kul, Kyrgyzstan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great horned owl 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret of Dungan Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street sign in Karakol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street sign in Yrdyk, Kyrgyzstan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jayma Bazaar, Osh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Ak Orda Presidential Palace.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silk factory in Margilan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tian Shan in Kyrgyzstan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower, Kyrgyzstan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeongnyeongjeon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bukchon Hanok Village 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Injeongjeon Hall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jongmyo Shrine 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Injeongjeon Hall 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burana Tower site 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modari Khan Mausoleum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach in Kurskoe, Kirghizistan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosque in Jeti-Ögüz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Seems a bit overexposed / too bright. --Plozessor 05:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
✓ Done--Bgag 11:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)