User talk:Benoît Prieur/Archives 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archives

Archive
Archive



Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Auditorium Maurice Ravel, Lyon, Rhône, France..JPG[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai vu que cette photo devait être détruite , je n'en comprends pas bien la raison. Il me semble que ce monument est considéré comme œuvre d'art et qu'il faille attendre 80 ans près le déces de ses architectes ? Je pensait pourtant que en France il était possible de photographier et d'utiliser les photos l'extérieur de tout les batiments sans aucune autorisation.

Merci de m'éclairer

--188.73.39.81 11:57, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Tout d'abord c'est juste une proposition de suppression. Je ne suis pas absolument certain de la pertinence de cette proposition qui peut déboucher sur une conservation. En France, au contraire d'autres pays, il n'y a pas liberté de panorama. Une photographie d'un monument est alors acceptable ici, 70 ans (en général) après la mort de l’architecte.
N'hésitez pas à apporter un éclairage et à donner votre avis ici [1].
Cordialement, --Aga (d) 12:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios[edit]

Bonjour,

Quand tu ajoutes des notices de violation de droits d'auteur, il faut informer celui qui a déposé l'image sur Commons. Et dans ce cas, il faut indiquer pourquoi c'est une violation. Tu devrais utiliser le gadget qui permet de faire cela automatiquement. Merci pour ton aide. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salut,
Tu utilises le gadget QuickDelete pour les copyvios ? (je viens de l'installer). Auquel cas, c'est l'option Pas de permission ?
Merci de ta réponse et de ton message.
Cordialement, --Aga (d) 14:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
En fait c'est Signaler une contravention au droit d’auteur (amené par AjaxQuickDelete ?).
Encore merci. --Aga (d) 15:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator[edit]

Hi, have you ever considered becoming an administrator at this project? Jcb (talk) 14:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jcb,
Actually not really. I should read first Commons:Administrators that I probably never read File:Blush.png.
I'm going to think about that possibility.
Regards, --Aga (d) 14:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:OSM-Man in Glasgow, Scotland seriously injured after being hit by car.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for tidying this, I was in a bit of a hurry. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You 're welcome. Done according [2]. --Aga (d) 15:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About files I have uploaded[edit]

I have noticed that you have tagged some of the files I have uploads as copyright violation. But you can see CC-BY icon on the right below of the page. --Leedkmn (talk) 18:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Similar case can be seen in other files like File:IU at K-collection in Seoul, 11 March 2012 01.jpg which is also distribued like the ones I have uploaded. --Leedkmn (talk) 18:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Leedkmn,
I'm not sure this mention is sufficient. I suggest you follow this procedure Commons:OTRS (only one or two emails to send) in the goal to confirm that you are the author of these pictures.
Regards, --Aga (d) 18:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not the author of those files. I just found that those files are distributed CC-BY 2.0 KR (Tistory's default CC version is 2.0 KR), so I have uploaded them. If the files I have uploaded should be deleted, I doubt why those files uploaded from http://wasabcon.tistory.com/621 still remains intact(ex. File:Lee Yeon-Hee in 2013.jpg and much more. distributed in the same way). I have tagged files I have uploaded LicenseReview, So I hope someone with experience in confirming Tistory's files can review those files. --Leedkmn (talk) 18:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'll revert your copyvio tagging. Thanks. --Leedkmn (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, what we need is only {{LicenseReview}}, not OTRS. — Revicomplaint? 23:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And a side  Info that I have passed all of his uploads. — Revicomplaint? 14:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Portraits de papes avignonais[edit]

bonjour,

Ses peintures sont des reproduction, à l'identiques, en espace publiques, de peintures du milieu du XIXème siècle exposées au Palais des papes d'Avignon. Il s'agit donc de copies d'oeuvre dans le domaine public. Comment l'indiquer ? JPS68 (talk) 08:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
C'est un cas particulier en effet.
Je vais commencer par en aviser l'admin qui "gère" les photos en question. Après, il me semble que préciser un peu plus tout cela en description pourrait suffire.
Cordialement, --Aga (d) 09:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Salut JPS68,
On me suggère que tu ajoutes cette explication sur chaque discussion relative à la possible suppression (tu peux faire un copier/coller de cet éclairage et le rédiger en français).
Cordialement, --Aga (d) 14:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Léotine Drapier-Cadec[edit]

Bonjour,

Vous avez supprimé une fresque représentant Léontine Drapier-Cadec. Je vous signale qu'une image analogue est présente sur le site de WIKI-Brest : http://www.wiki-brest.net/index.php/Fichier:Ecole_Quatre_Moulins13.jpg avec la licence Creative Commons BY-SA

Merci de rétablir cette image.

Bien cordialement,

Ggal (talk) 20:17, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Le fait que l'image soit présente sur un autre site avec la licence adéquate n'indique toutefois pas que l'auteur est d'accord avec cette diffusion.
Si l'auteur indique qu'il est ok avec cela (via OTRS par exemple), pas de problème.
En attendant, je ne peux pas faire grand chose (je précise d'ailleurs que j'ai juste signalé un possible copyvio. Je n'ai pas supprimé l'image, je n'en ai pas le pouvoir).
Cordialement, --Aga (d) 07:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais Idéal - mai 2014 - 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 15:10, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais Idéal - mai 2014 - 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to take part in the categorization of QI[edit]

Dear Agamitsudo! Your images were reviewed and have been promoted to Quality Image status. Congratulations! I invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. All new images with this status are automatically placed to the page Commons:Quality_images/Recently_promoted. They have to be manually tagged with relevant categories using the QI categorization tool (see link at the top of the page, the author of this tool is User:Dschwen). Very few users do this job now, so a large number of uncategorizated photos accumulates on this page time to time… --Bff (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guédelon - mai 2014 - 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:45, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Château dans un paysage ou Demoiselle rejoignant son chevalier.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Château dans un paysage ou Demoiselle rejoignant son chevalier.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 04:33, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Château et donjon de Chaumont.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Château et donjon de Chaumont.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 04:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Comminges et Adélaïde au couvent de La Trappe.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Comminges et Adélaïde au couvent de La Trappe.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 04:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Intérieur de la cathédrale Saint-Jean-des-Rois de Tolède.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Intérieur de la cathédrale Saint-Jean-des-Rois de Tolède.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 04:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perte de nomination dans VI[edit]

Bonjour, tes deux renommage dans VI ont détruit tes nominations. Refait les avec le nouveau nom. La bonne idée c'est de ne pas renommer pendant :) ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oups désolé :( --Aga (d) 16:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 1 - Jean-Christophe Péraud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:26, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grégoire Tarride in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antoine Lavieu in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean-Christophe Péraud in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jérôme Baugnies in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Benjamin Giraud in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Viktor Okishev in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected: 

-- Tuválkin ✉ 01:24, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cédric Pineau in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Julien Jurdie in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romain Bardet in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jonathan Paredes in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 4 - Julien Jurdie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 17:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 1 - Rémy Di Grégorio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de l'Ain 2014 - Stage 1 - Grégoire Tarride.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pieter Serry in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jordi Simón in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lachlan Morton in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olivier Rouyer in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of église Saint-Florent de Thil (Ain) south-west view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarah Bouhaddi in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thomas Degand in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Francis De Greef in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jérôme Gilbert in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zhandos Bizhigitov in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flèche motocycliste Beynost - 2014 - (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

VI[edit]

Pense à laisser un peu d'espace autour des sujet car les correction de perspective vont t'en manger. Je vais fermer et promouvoir tes deux images qui sèchent en haut de la liste. Tu aurais dù suivre mon conseil de refaire la nommination avec le nouveau nom. Je le ferait dans la jouréne car il faut que je me rappelle comment on fait... Bonne journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salut,
Pour le conseil, je me suis déjà dit : "mais pourquoi n'ai-pas pris de marge à droite et à gauche" => c'est en forgeant photographiant qu'on devient photographe (mais je partais de loin ;-)).
Pour la nomination, je ne me souvenais plus de ce cas là. Je regarde tout de suite.
Merci pour tout, --Aga (d) 05:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
En fait, je ne sais pas trop quoi faire pour que le bot agisse : peut-être remettre le nom d'origine (la redirection actuelle).
OK ça a marché! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frederik Backaert in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marco Minnaard in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Si tu peux faire quelque chose...[edit]

Salut,

À la suite d'une mauvaise manip' avec Cropbot, ces deux photos ([3] et [4] ont un historique. Est-il possible d'effacer les 2 derniers historiques pour avoir quelque chose de plus propre. Petro [pronto?] 13:01, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salut,
Là, je n'en sais rien du tout. Il faudrait poser la question sur Commons:Bistro : je suppose qu'un admin Commons a la possibilité de masquer certaines images de l'historique. --Aga (d) 13:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. J'ai demandé au Bistro. Petro [pronto?] 14:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Église de l'Assomption de Courlaoux west views.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thibaut Pinot in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jérémy Leveau in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

wiki-day bordeaux 2014[edit]

Bonjour Agamitsudo. Y'aurai pas un souci entre "Category:Wiki-Day Bordeaux 2014" et "Category:Wikiday Bordeaux 2014" ? A+ --Franck (talk) 17:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salut,
Je n'avais pas vu qu'il y avait déjà quelque chose. Je corrige de suite.
Et te répond rapidement sur Wp.
--Aga (d) 17:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bonjour mtr j'aime ces ata ma maman ces mariama manga à ziguinchor elle et de PDS ensient militente elle lée morte[edit]

j'aimerer vous rancontrait je suis en france je vous aime baucou ma maman elle me parlle tous jour de vous ma maman elle étai votre repréjentente en baje casamence

Bonjour,
Je crois qu'il y a méprise. Même si je connais un peu le Sénégal, je n'ai jamais mis les pieds à Ziguinchor ni même en Casamance.
Bien cordialement, --Aga (d) 09:02, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carré Frais.JPG[edit]

File:Carré Frais.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hangsna (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eugène Bénet[edit]

Bonjour, Vous avez créé sur wikimedia la page du sculpteur Eugène Bénet, l'orthographe de Bénet avec un accent a été modifié sur wikipedia au vu de sa nomination dans l'ordre de la Légion d'honneur ou Bénet est bien mentionné avec un accent (ainsi que sa signature Eug. Bénet). Cordialement. --Pierre-Dominique 07:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Salut,
✓ Done => Category:Eugène Bénet.
--Aga (d) 08:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean-Christophe Devaux.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

File:Bruxelles, novembre 2014 (1).JPG[edit]

File:Bruxelles, novembre 2014 (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

67.87.46.39 22:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fudge Ripple.jpg[edit]

File:Fudge Ripple.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Josve05a (talk) 13:31, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diran Kelekian.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Diran Kelekian.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Benoît_Prieur/Archives_2014&oldid=844467754"