User talk:BRPever

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, BRPever!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Voting on Windows

FYI, this edit of yours was apparently a mistake that duplicated an entry and collapsed the rest of the page. It was undone by another editor. If you meant to vote with that edit, you'll have to redo that particular vote. All the best, Jess Mann (talk) 00:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - November - Windows/Voting

Hi, you have voted incorrectly on this challenge. You can only vote once for each 3/2/1 point awarded (though you can add as many 0 points as you like). You voted 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1. Please can you amend your votes as soon as possible, otherwise I shall have to mark them all as invalid. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 18:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

@Colin I corrected the votes as you say.BRPever (talk) 02:55, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

License verification?

Greetings. Would you help me establish license right for this entry?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cenando_en_Joyudas,_Cabo_Rojo.jpg

It is within the (CC BY 2.0), which is compatible with Wikicommons. Thanks for your attention.

Cheers, --Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 09:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Caballero1967: sorry but the image is not under free license you may see at the button of the photo that All right are reserved by someone else commons only accepts free content see Commons:Licensing for more information.-BRP ^ever 10:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

I see what you are saying. Did not notice the fine, very fine print. But as you can also see, teh Flickr license is indeed: (CC BY 2.0). There seems to be a contradiction. The photo has a difference license than the one in Flickr. What could we do? Thanks. --Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 10:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

What do you mean "by someone else"? It is the same name: the one in the pic's copyright and the one at Flickr, which is the one I placed as the author/artist: Jose DeJesus. Thanks. --Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 10:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Furthermore, can you help me understand why the date of since 22 January 2016 when it was uploaded within the last 24 hours? Thanks. --Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 10:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Caballero1967: , sorry for the trouble It is good that you had given correct license I closed the nomination. There was a conflict so I went to flicker and found out the license was correct. sorry for all the trouble. Thanks and Cheers and don't forget to give license in time from next time.-BRP ^ever 16:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hello,please help me and delete the photo uploded by me (File:Bibek bhurtel.jpeg) which you can find in my uploads.Nepali keto62 (talk) 18:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

deleted-BRP ^ever 09:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Private help

Hello again! please help me with my signature. How can I make my signature like yours ? Please reply if you want to help me. <font size=3><span style="text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em white"><u>Nepali keto62</u> (talk) 15:28, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Jianhui67 ^T★C 17:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC) Jianhui67 ^T★C 17:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks --BRP ^ever 17:56, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your participation in SVG Translation Campaign 2019

	SVG Translator Barnstar
	Namaste! BRPever The results of SVG Translation Campaign 2019 in India are out and in total, 194 users from 19 Indic languages have uploaded 2,655 SVG files with native language labels. Thank you for translating and uploading 10+ SVG images for the campaign. Keep up the good work.- Jinoytommanjaly (talk) 15:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

SVG Translation Campaign 2019 in India: Feedback survey

Greetings,

Many thanks for participating in the SVG Translation Campaign 2019 in India. It had been quite a successful campaign—194 users from 19 Indic languages took part in the campaign for 38 days, and have created more than 2,500 SVG files, all of them having labels in native Indian languages. You may read the complete report of the campaign at https://w.wiki/3yn.

We would like to thank you again for translating SVG files as a part of this campaign, your contributions have given thousands of people the knowledge that they need the most. Now we would like to have your feedback about the overall campaign, how effective were the training sessions, the resources provided, the support etc.

Please fill the feedback survey at https://forms.gle/4TCicfYzjAGVvKTy6

Your responses are extremely valuable to us, and will be of immense help to understand further training needs or plan future activities in this area. Let us know if you have any questions.

Please note that 4 August 2019 is the last date to complete the survey. KCVelaga (talk · mail) 05:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! One-legged Silver gull.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White wild duck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Object lower left should be cropped out.--Peulle 08:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC) @Peulle: cropped out. Thanks--BRPever 08:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centenary monument at Glenelg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wild Iris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 08:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Useful work

Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Just trying to keep things within scope :) -BRP ^ever 15:45, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden Dahlia flower 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden Dahlia flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Parsa 2au 13:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mawson lakes railway station 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mawson lakes railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

"ADT summer offer" spam...

Seems to be a lot of it about! Thanks for the work. Best Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:02, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

@Herbythyme Happy to help. Also, there's this one yet to be blocked :) -BRP ^ever 12:08, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and done Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:13, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water fountain near South Australian Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 13:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bench at Rundle Mall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 19:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Pakhribas.jpg

File:Pakhribas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

By the way, Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/10/Category:Statue of Iman Xin Chemjong, Bhedetar, hopefully you can make times for inputing. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)